You won't know when a recession starts: 5 key facts about downturns
Show Caption
Hide Caption
What we know: How savings could protect your family in a recession
This is the strategy and amount of savings that protect your family in a recession. Here's what we know now.
The looming threat of recession has hung over American consumers for what seems like forever, an ongoing economic drama that stretches back to the early pandemic years.
The chances of a recession in 2025 currently stand at about 40%, according to a May 27 report from J.P. Morgan. A month ago, many forecasters put the odds higher than 50%.
If a recession comes, how will we know? When will it end? What will be the fallout on Wall Street?
Here are some answers, drawn from experts at Investopedia, Motley Fool, Fidelity, NerdWallet and other sources.
Recessions are shorter than they seem
Economic downturns might seem to last forever: Endless months of corporate layoffs, shaky stock prices and general financial malaise.
Yet, going back to the Civil War era, the average recession has lasted only about 17 months. Since World War II, the typical recession has lasted about 10 months.
'The reason they've been getting shorter is that policymakers and the Federal Reserve and the Treasury have been getting more creative about how to deal with them,' said Caleb Silver, editor in chief of Investopedia. 'That could mean flooring interest rates. That could mean stimulating the economy by giving stimulus payments to households.'
Recessions feel interminable because of their impact on the job market, stock market and household budgets. The actual downturn might end in 10 months, but it 'may take us longer to bounce back,' said Niv Persaud, a certified financial planner in Atlanta.
Recessions are part of America's boom and bust cycle. And here's the good news: Boom times tend to be longer. In the post-WWII era, the average economic expansion has lasted for nearly five years.
You won't know when a recession starts
The National Bureau of Economic Research defines a recession as 'a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months.'
By that definition, a recession isn't a recession until the downturn has persisted for at least a few months. Theoretically, we could be in a recession right now.
'You don't usually find out that you're in a recession until six months after you've been in one,' said Denise Chisholm, director of quantitative market strategy at Fidelity.
The economic bureau decides when a recession has started, Fidelity reports, measuring signs of sustained decline in purchasing power, employment data, industrial production, retail sales and gross domestic product, among other factors.
Typically, those metrics must fall for several months before the economic bureau invokes the "R" word. But not always: The COVID-19 recession of 2020 lasted only two months.
In a recession, stocks don't always go down
How convenient it would be for wary investors, searching for clues to the market's direction, if stock prices began marching steadily down on the day the economists announced a recession.
But the market doesn't work that way.
'The stock market is a leading indicator,' said Robert Brokamp, a senior adviser at The Motley Fool. The market anticipates economic trends, including recessions, months before they arrive.
'It starts to go down, generally speaking, six months before a recession,' Brokamp said. 'And it starts to recover six months before the recession is over, very broadly speaking.'
When you consider that we don't know a recession is happening until months after it starts, you begin to understand how hard it can be to make investment decisions in a recession.
'Stocks usually bottom out about halfway through,' said Chisholm of Fidelity. 'So, by the time you have learned you are in a recession, stocks, more often than not, have bottomed.'
The stock market and economy don't move in lockstep. Sometimes they seem to move in opposite directions.
'If we go into a recession,' said Silver of Investopedia, 'you might notice that the stock market didn't dip that much at all.'
The big danger in a recession is losing your job
However much investors might fret about the stock market in a downturn, history suggests the market will eventually recover. The S&P 500 took back all of its losses in the Great Recession of 2008, although not until 2013.
If you're retired and spending down your savings, then a recession can bring fiscal disaster. For just about anyone else, there's time to rebound.
The bigger danger, said Brokamp of Motley Fool, is losing your job.
Unemployment hit 10% in the Great Recession, the jobless rate peaking after the actual recession was over. Unemployment reached 14.7% in the brief COVID-19 downturn.
People lose jobs in recessions because companies are making fewer goods and selling fewer services, and thus, they need fewer employees.
'If you're still working, and you're not close to retirement, the big issue is job security,' Brokamp said.
A recession is a great time to buy stocks
To buy low and sell high is a mantra of investing. But timing those transactions can be tricky.
When to sell stocks is a particularly tough call, for the simple reason that stock prices tend to rise. You could sell your stocks on a day when the S&P 500 hits a record high, only to wake up the next day and watch the market climb higher.
Cashing out of the stock market in a recession is generally a mistake, experts say, because of the market's notorious volatility. It's hard to predict when stock prices will slide, how low they will go, or when they will recover.
'Selling stocks to try to protect your portfolio from a recession is going to be an almost impossible enterprise,' said Sam Taube, a lead investing writer at NerdWallet.
But buying stocks in a recession, experts say, can be a comparatively safe move.
The 'buy low' directive instructs that investors should purchase stocks when the market is down. In a downturn, stock indexes can fall 10% or 20% (or more) below their historic highs. Buying stocks at those times is a relatively easy call.
'History has shown us that the stock market recovers,' said Brokamp of Motley Fool. 'So, if you have the opportunity to buy stocks at a discount, you'll always be happy you did it.'
Remember, though, that months or years might pass before the stock market recovers completely from a recessionary swoon. Buying stocks in a downturn makes the most sense for investors who won't need the money for the holidays.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
23 minutes ago
- CNBC
27-year-old first-grade teacher lived paycheck to paycheck due to impulsive spending: ‘It became so stressful'
Maddie Baker, 27, will be the first to admit she was an impulsive spender when she started teaching kindergarteners six years ago. She bought coffee at least once a day, frequently shopped for new clothes and spent lavishly on vacations she says she "probably had no business going on." "Any day that I had a hard day at teaching, I would immediately go from my job to a store," the now first-grade teacher tells CNBC Make It. "The way I was coping with hard days was by spending money." Baker isn't alone. Almost half of American consumers say they make purchases to boost their mood, according to LendingTree survey data released in July. Emotional spending isn't always bad, either. It can provide temporary comfort or a needed mood boost. However, it can also lead to financial strain. Baker says her impulsive spending got so out of hand, she found herself in "horrible cycles" of living paycheck to paycheck to avoid going into credit card debt. Nationally, almost three-quarters of emotional shoppers admit they've spent more than they intended, and 44% say it's negatively impacted their financial well-being, LendingTree found. It took Baker three years to get her spending under control, she says. Today, she's very intentional with how she spends her money and has even developed new hobbies from habits she's built to save money. "I remember just waking up every single day, and the stress of finances was just really getting me down," says Baker, who was making around $50,000 a year at the time. "It became so stressful." Nearly Baker's entire paycheck would go directly toward paying off her credit card. Because she was paid once a month, that often left her with little to live on — forcing her to rely on the card for new expenses and trapping her in a constant cycle of borrowing from herself. She tried everything to earn extra cash. She tutored kids during her summer breaks, tried selling her clothes and donating her plasma, but none of it seemed to sustain her lifestyle, she says. Baker got her spending under control three years into teaching through a tax refund that allowed her to pay off her credit card bill without using her paycheck. Now, she keeps enough in her checking account to pay her credit card bill every month without having to rely on an incoming paycheck. "It took a total restart and being tired of the cycle I was in, in order to do something about it," she says. Young adults are particularly susceptible to overspending when they're online or bombarded with bad news, Ylva Baeckström, a senior lecturer in finance at King's Business School, said in 2024. Overwhelming feelings can lead to unhealthy spending habits as a way to cope or find relief, Baeckström said. To avoid overspending, "one of the biggest things you can do is take a beat," Keith Barron, a personal finance expert and former head of marketing at Jenius Bank, said in 2024. Rather than heading straight to checkout when shopping online, try adding the item to a wish list and waiting a day or two. This brief delay can help you decide whether you genuinely want or need the item, Barron said. Today, Baker is working toward building an emergency fund and saving for a house, and says she's way more intentional about what she decides to spend money on. On top of learning how to spend less impulsively, she says she's found alternatives to save money and a side hustle creating videos on TikTok to bring in more income. Her silver lining: Many of the activities that started as a way to save have become hobbies as well. She enjoys painting her own nails, making lattes at home and meal prepping to avoid eating out. On TikTok, she earns up to $2,000 a month from sharing videos about her life as a teacher. "All of these things happened because I had the mindset of, 'I need to save more money, and I need to spend less money,'" she says.
Miami Herald
39 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Trump's Demand to Trading Partners: Pledge Money or Get Higher Tariffs
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump's tariff threats have turned into a play for cold, hard cash as he tries to leverage U.S. economic power to cajole other nations to make multibillion-dollar investments in order to maintain access to America's market. The president's second-term trade agenda has clear echoes of his 'Art of the Deal' approach, essentially demanding that trading partners show him the money in the form of investment pledges or else face astronomically high tariffs. The financial promises give Trump the opportunity to flex his negotiating prowess in relatable terms and show off the splashy sums he is pulling into America, adding to the reality show intrigue of his trade agenda. As the Trump administration races to reach trade deals with dozens of countries ahead of a Thursday deadline, he has embraced a strategy that goes beyond opening international markets and reducing the U.S. trade deficit. The tactic was on display last week as Trump and his team rolled out a blitz of new trade agreements before a self-imposed Aug. 1 deadline. 'South Korea is right now at a 25% Tariff, but they have an offer to buy down those Tariffs,' Trump wrote on social media Wednesday. 'I will be interested in hearing what that offer is.' The next day, Trump agreed to impose a tariff of 15% on imports from South Korea. The lower rate came after South Korea agreed to make $350 billion in investments in the United States and purchase $100 billion of liquefied natural gas. South Korea is not the only country to make such pledges. Japan said it would establish a $550 billion fund for investments in the United States. The European Union indicated that its companies were poised to invest at least $600 billion. To trade experts, the commitments raise the question of whether Trump is negotiating with trading partners or trade hostages. 'This is no doubt a global shakedown of sorts,' said Scott Lincicome, vice president of general economics at the right-leaning Cato Institute. 'The fact is that Trump is using U.S. tariff policy to effectively force these terms upon less-than-willing participants.' But the vague nature of these informal commitments suggests that other nations might also be looking for creative ways to escape Trump's tariffs. Although tariffs are relatively straightforward to enforce, investment and purchase commitments are not as easily policed. The European Union, for instance, does not have the authority to dictate the type of investments that it has promised, and much of Japan's pledged investments are coming in the form of loans. The investment announcements have also spurred confusion and lacked the usual detail that would accompany such pacts to avoid future disputes. A large majority of the $350 billion South Korean investment would take the form of loans and loan guarantees. South Korean officials expressed confusion over what U.S. officials meant when they said 90% of the profits from the investments would go to the American people. A fact sheet announcing the European Union's plans allowed for some wiggle room when it said that 'E.U. companies have expressed interest in investing at least $600 billion' in 'various sectors in the U.S.' 'I think there remain a lot of questions, including by the countries who have announced commitments, as to what those commitments actually really mean,' said Michael Froman, president of the Council on Foreign Relations, who served as the top trade negotiator in the Obama administration. 'Is it enforceable? If they don't deliver a certain amount of investment over a particular period of time, do tariffs go back into place?' During Trump's first term, the trade deal he struck with China included extensive commitments for Chinese purchases of American farm products that were never met. The agreement did have an enforcement mechanism, but it proved toothless. Some of the initial investment pledges appear to be too big to be true. New data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis showed that in 2024, foreign spending to acquire, start or expand U.S. businesses totaled $151 billion -- a small fraction of the new commitments being announced. The $600 billion EU investment commitment matches the total value of the goods that the United States imported from Europe last year. Although the United States has long been a magnet for foreign investment, the longer-term effects of making countries invest under duress are not clear. 'This is the kind of deal you'd more expect to see from an emerging market that can't attract capital on its merits,' said Aaron Bartnick, who worked in the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy during the Biden administration. 'And we may find over time that if the United States insists on acting like an emerging market, our trade partners may start treating us accordingly, with more onerous terms and less favorable rates that American companies and consumers are not accustomed to dealing with.' Regardless of the economic implications, Trump's tactics show no signs of abating, as he regularly claims more than $10 trillion -- and climbing -- in investments from foreign companies and countries. Daniel Ames, a professor at Columbia Business School who teaches negotiation strategy, said that Trump's approach to trade deals appears to be drawn directly from his days as a developer and businessperson. Trump became notorious for destabilizing his negotiating counterparts with severely low bids, dazzling sales pitches and an ability to capitalize on weakness to gain leverage. Ames noted, however, that the European Union and countries like Japan and South Korea might also be playing into Trump's sense of vanity when they unveil whopping investment promises that might ultimately be hollow. 'Donald Trump is a gifted storyteller, and I think when his counterparts recognize this, they can play to it,' Ames said. 'If you're negotiating with a narcissist, you look for ways to make them feel like they've won.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
AI could be the US's secret weapon in the race to mine more minerals — if it can prove itself
The US is scrambling to reduce its reliance on foreign sources of critical minerals. The raw materials are essential inputs for modern technology. Smartphones, 5G networks, and military weapons like fighter jets are built using these materials, and they continue to be used to spur innovation. Lithium powers electric vehicle batteries, copper keeps data centers running, and silicon forms the foundation of semiconductors. Demand is rising fast, with the global critical minerals market projected to reach nearly $500 billion by 2030, said Kings Research, a market research firm. Yet the US still relies heavily on imports. As of 2024, the country imported 100% of 12 out of 50 designated critical minerals, including graphite, manganese, and gallium, according to the United States Geological Survey, many of which come from China. Now, under the second Trump presidency, the US is pushing to reestablish its dominance in mineral production. The administration has made domestic manufacturing a national priority, issuing an executive order to boost mining on American soil and imposing 50% tariffs on imported metals like steel and aluminum. Rebuilding domestic mineral supply could strengthen the economy and improve national security. But it could also lead to supply gaps, potentially driving up the cost of materials that power innovation. To prevent bottlenecks, startups and legacy tech companies are turning to artificial intelligence. Their AI tools promise to speed up mineral discovery and reduce supply chain risks in a volatile geopolitical climate. But in a highly regulated industry where progress is slow, some experts question whether AI can deliver on its promises. Startups are racing to reshape mineral exploration Startups are betting on AI to discover new mineral deposits — and some are seeing early results. Earth AI uses predictive software and proprietary drilling hardware to find, verify, and sell multi-billion-dollar mineral projects. Its algorithms are trained on decades of historical data from Australia, including past successes and failures of mineral discovery, to pinpoint hydrothermal systems: heated, mineral-rich waters likely to hold valuable deposits. After identifying a promising site, the company drills using its own rigs and analyzes rock samples to confirm the presence of metal. Once proven, the site is sold to larger mining firms. Earth AI said it has a success rate of 75% — far above the industry average of less than 1%. Over the last 12 months, the company said it has already made three discoveries in Australia, one of which is indium, a rare metal used in touchscreens and semiconductors for AI hardware. It's also discovering untapped reserves rich with minerals. In late July, Earth AI's software identified a massive underground trove of nickel and palladium in the east coast of Australia the company will drill. By using AI, Earth AI told Business Insider it can cut mineral discovery timelines from years to months. "We think that we can create the most value by drilling into the ground, proving that 'Yes, there are chemical concentrations of metal there,'" said Monte Hackett, CFO of Earth AI. Terra AI is also betting that AI can speed up the industry's slow discovery process. "Despite decades of investment in sensors and data, we're doing worse every year," said John Mern, cofounder and CEO of Terra AI. "The amount of metal added to the global supply this year is 90% lower than it was in 1990." Terra's software uses AI to ingest layers of geological data — like magnetic field readings and seismic activity — used to generate thousands of underground maps to identify the most promising places to drill. Mern said its AI-first approach is already being piloted on rare earth projects in the US and by mining companies across the Americas, Africa, and Europe. He added that Terra's platform could cut the 17-year average mine development timeline in half. Investors see AI applications in mining as a major opportunity. Founders Factory, a UK-based venture firm, recently partnered with mining giant Rio Tinto to launch an accelerator backing 12 startups a year — including Terra AI. Jack Kennedy, an investor at Founders Factory, sees mining as a $2 trillion industry that's been "untouched" by tech innovation. He compares mining to a "waste management business," where tons of earth are moved to extract small amounts of metal. "AI is essentially a way to try and process tons of different data points to make efficiencies," Kennedy told BI. Doing so, he added, translates to reductions in waste, costs, and environmental impact. Legacy players use AI to secure the supply chain Legacy firms are also getting in on the action. Exiger, a supply chain management software provider, helps governments and Fortune 500 companies track and secure critical mineral supply chains. Its AI model breaks down products into digital twins — detailed virtual versions that map the materials inside — then traces the material composition of the products using a database of 10 billion transaction records. The database includes commercial datasets purchased from custom brokers and invoice processes, financial data, engineering specifications, build-to-print drawings, material declarations, and manufacturing process documents. Using AI to assess a company's supply chain gives clients visibility into the vulnerabilities within their mineral supply chains, like where they may be over-reliant on certain countries and geopolitical risks. In turn, clients can make informed decisions when adjusting their mineral supply chain strategy. In one case, Exiger identified how to extract germanium — a rare earth mineral used in fiber optics and chips — from coal ash and smelter waste in the US, potentially reducing foreign dependence. "When China restricted exports on rare earths, it exposed customers to price volatility and geopolitical uncertainty," Brandon Daniels, CEO of Exiger, told BI. "Our platform helps clients navigate that risk with a level of precision previously unattainable." The limitations of AI Still, AI isn't a magic solution. Rajive Ganguli, a mining engineering professor at the University of Utah with decades of experience applying AI in the field, said the technology is only as good as the data it's trained on. High-quality, hard data — like drill hole information and physical samples — is often scarce, expensive, and difficult to obtain. "AI on bad numbers does not result in good answers," Ganguli told BI. He also points out that many "AI discoveries" happen in areas already known to geologists. The technology, he said, doesn't work as well in unexplored, data-poor regions. Additionally, the startups that spoke to BI said that the mining industry remains skeptical about embracing new technologies, making the adoption of AI in the critical mineral discovery process an uphill battle. That said, Ganguli believes the biggest obstacles to scaling up mineral production aren't technological, but systemic. In the US, companies often wait 10 to 15 years to get permits approved. Even though the Trump administration is making moves to fast-track permitting, the process continues to remain bottlenecked in the near term. Despite early talks with US clients, Earth AI hasn't begun exploration in the country due to delays that can drag on for years. Experts agree that AI won't replace humans. Geologists and engineers are still essential for interpreting AI outputs and making final decisions about where to drill. "This isn't a lab problem," Ganguli said regarding mineral discovery, adding that "domain experts" are crucial to understanding how the machines operate, what the data means, and how the site actually works. Even so, companies believe AI can play a key role in strengthening the US mineral supply chain. But even with the best tools, the US is unlikely to do it alone. "The reality is, the majority of our supply chain is going to come from beyond our borders," Terra AI CEO Mern said. "We need responsible international partners to secure it."
