Ministry refutes ice price hike claim
Published on: Wed, Jul 02, 2025
By: Crystal E Hermenegildus Text Size: Armizan said Ops Kesan 4.0, which begins on July 1, 2025, will monitor such movements closely and action will be taken under the Price Control and Anti-Profiteering Act 2011 (Act 723) if there is evidence of unreasonable price hikes. Kota Kinabalu: Domestic Trade and Cost of Living Minister Datuk Armizan Mohd Ali (pic) has clarified that the recent claim saying there's a hike in the price of ice from RM3.70 to RM6 is inaccurate. The ice manufacturer in question has lodged a police report. He said the Ministry takes viral claims seriously, but urged the public to verify such information before spreading it. 'The ice manufacturer involved confirmed they did not issue the notice,' he said. While acknowledging that some producers may have made minor price adjustments, especially for block ice, Armizan said no formal notice of a price hike to RM6 had been submitted to the Ministry. KPDN summoned the ice company to provide a detailed explanation regarding any price changes, including whether the adjustments are related to increased electricity tariffs, raw material costs or the implementation of Sales and Service Tax (SST). 'If they claim the increase is due to SST, we will require a breakdown of which components led to the price adjustment. It's not just about the new price, but the profit margin or price range must also be justified,' he said. Armizan said Ops Kesan 4.0, which begins on July 1, 2025, will monitor such movements closely and action will be taken under the Price Control and Anti-Profiteering Act 2011 (Act 723) if there is evidence of unreasonable price hikes. 'The law allows us to issue a notice, and if we find profiteering, individuals can be fined up to RM100,000 or jailed for three years, while companies face fines of up to RM500,000,' he warned. He reminded all businesses, especially those dealing with essential items like ice, to act responsibly and ensure any price changes are transparent and based on actual cost increments. 'We understand that operational costs may change, but that doesn't mean prices can be increased arbitrarily. There must be accountability,' said Armizan. KPDN is also currently monitoring similar issues involving other consumer goods, including the recent price movement involving Ramly Burger products, which will also be reviewed. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Married couple arrested for prostitution and porn distribution in Shah Alam
SHAH ALAM: A married couple was arrested at a hotel here for allegedly operating a prostitution ring and distributing pornographic videos through social media. The Kuala Lumpur police contingent's D7 division apprehended the 34-year-old pair following an investigation into their illicit activities. Kuala Lumpur police chief Datuk Rusdi Mohd Isa stated that the husband managed the business, creating and selling explicit content featuring his wife and clients. The wife reportedly served as the primary performer in the videos while engaging in prostitution. 'They earned up to RM6,400 a week by selling videos priced between RM50 and RM150. 'Prostitution services were arranged via Telegram, with fees ranging from RM450 to RM800 per session,' Rusdi said. The couple was remanded for three days as authorities investigate violations under Sections 372(1), 372B, and 372A of the Penal Code, along with Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998.
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Married couple arrested for prostitution and distribution of pornographic videos
KUALA LUMPUR: A married couple was arrested at a hotel in Shah Alam on Tuesday (July 1) for alleged involvement in prostitution and the distribution of pornographic videos via social media. Kuala Lumpur police chief Datuk Rusdi Mohd Isa said the couple, aged 34, was detained at 8pm by a team from the D7 (Anti-Vice, Gambling and Secret Societies) division of the Kuala Lumpur police contingent headquarters. Preliminary investigations revealed that the husband acted as the content creator, promoting and selling pornographic videos featuring his wife and their clients, while also managing a prostitution ring to generate income. "His wife acted as the prostitute, playing the lead role in the videos. They earned up to RM6,400 a week," he said. "They targeted clients via the X platform to sell their pornographic videos, while prostitution activities were coordinated through Telegram," he said in a statement on Wednesday (July 2). Rusdi added that their fees ranged from RM450 to RM800 at a four-star hotel, while pornographic videos were priced at RM50 and RM150. "The couple has been remanded for three days until July 4. The case is being investigated under Sections 372(1), 372B and 372A of the Penal Code, as well as Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998," he said. - Bernama
Focus Malaysia
2 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Coherent SST reform requires zero exemptions for policymakers
THE Malaysian government's recent changes to the Sales and Service Tax (SST) are true to an at least decade-old tradition of self-defeating consumption tax policies. Raising taxes is a thankless but necessary task that requires astute policy design and nuanced messaging to manage both economic and political narratives. Both the 1 July changes and the case for them have left policymakers open to justifiable but needless criticism. Malaysian policymakers have long recognised the need to significantly increase revenue collections but have struggled to convince Malaysians. Tax reforms repeatedly adopt a narrow, small-target strategy that—by lacking both vision and tangible economic sustainability and equity objectives—instead become lightning rods for critics. Malaysians worried about their household budgets naturally fear higher taxes and do not count fiscal sustainability among their chief concerns. Making the case for consumption tax reform needs and deserves better than pointing to unsustainable budget deficits and delivering patronising rebukes of SST critics. It requires a consistent, coherent and non-condescending narrative that garners public support for changes that will improve not threaten their livelihoods. Policymakers should be explaining the importance of taxing consumption, how it supports a tax strategy that balances fairness, competitiveness and sustainably, and how the money raised will be used to benefit Malaysians. Consumption taxes have advantages that are especially relevant to Malaysia's circumstances. Malaysia has a large visiting and undocumented population whose income cannot be taxed but whose consumption can be. It has a sizeable informal sector contributing around a quarter of gross domestic product, whose income likewise escapes direct taxes but whose inputs may be partially captured by consumption levies. Shaping consumption choices through price signals will be essential to making Malaysia's future economic development less carbon intensive and more sustainable. Consumption taxes progressed alone cannot address Malaysia's revenue needs or be implemented equitably. Consumption taxes are regressive as low-income households consume more of their disposable incomes and therefore experience a greater relative impact. Attempts to neutralise these impacts by exempting or setting to zero the rate for basic goods introduces complexity for businesses and consumers, exempts rich and non-Malaysian consumers at the same time, and opens policymakers to arguments of inconsistency or bias. Accompanying changes to income taxes, transfers or welfare for low-income households would be a superior approach. Malaysians would be more receptive to tax hikes if their purpose were more tangibly linked to spending for their benefit. Public wariness remains high in the shadow of 1MDB and other newsworthy examples of funds being misused, with the government's fiscal challenges explicitly associated with corruption. At the same time Malaysians want better schools and hospitals, greater access to safe and efficient transport and technology, more generous social welfare and more. Transparent and well communicated spending intentions are an essential enabler of tax reform. The SST reforms have thus far been mapped poorly in these regards. Far from presenting a coherent vision for equitably, efficiently and sustainably raising revenue to spend in the interests of Malaysians, the reforms adopt a piecemeal and discriminatory approach to taxation. Two particularly concerning elements that have attracted fair criticism are the inclusion of basic goods and differential rates for local and imported goods. Malaysia is a net importer of food including many staple products, with openness to trade a critical contributor to food security both at the household and national levels. SST increases that represent an implicit import tariff, especially on basic and healthy goods like fruit, send precisely the wrong signal at a time when Malaysia is trying to counter global economic policy uncertainty. Malaysia must reinforce its openness to trade and investment by avoiding discriminatory taxes on overseas goods. Bowing to public backlash to provide post-announcement tax exemptions for imported apples and oranges (among other changes) further illustrates the policy development and communication shortcomings. Policymakers were either unaware of or misread public sensitivity on the price and availability of basic food imports, and in the absence of a compelling defence for the proposed SST increase were forced to make concessions. Evident is both a need for wider consultation and that complex and subjective tax design leaves policymakers exposed. Making the case for tax reform in Malaysia should also stick to message not mechanism. Long-running arguments comparing the SST with a restored GST are of greater distraction than consequence to the current debate. Either mechanism can be tailored to achieve comparable coverage and revenue outcomes, and tax incidence (who ultimately pays: consumers or producers) is determined by markets not tax design. Differences in administrative efficiency and effectiveness are important considerations that are adaptable to a consumption tax with either (or any) name. What Malaysia needs from policymakers is greater tax policy reform coherence, communication and ambition. And the leadership to design and deliver tax strategies and mechanisms that benefit Malaysia and Malaysians. ‒ July 2, 2025 Dr Stewart Nixon is the deputy director of research at the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (IDEAS). The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: Bigstock
