Trans Mountain could take on more pipeline projects if private sector can't: CEO
Trade tumult in recent months with the United States — Canada's biggest customer for its crude oil — has intensified calls for Canada to build infrastructure that would allow its resources to flow to other global buyers.
When the expanded Trans Mountain pipeline began shipping Alberta crude to the B.C. Lower Mainland just over a year ago, oilsands producers were finally able to meaningfully access lucrative Asian markets.
Trans Mountain CEO Mark Maki said in an interview Friday there's an appetite for more pipeline egress to the Pacific coast and elsewhere.
'The U.S. is a great customer. It will always be a great customer, but diversification of markets for the country is important,' he said.
He said Trans Mountain's owner — the Government of Canada — would prefer the private sector lead the way.
'If that can't happen, and it's in the national interest, Trans Mountain is here,' Maki said.
His remarks came after Trans Mountain reported its operational and financial results for the first three months of 2025.
Since oil started flowing through the expansion in May of last year, 266 crude vessels have been loaded, and third-party information suggests the destinations have been split between the U.S. West Coast and Asia.
The expanded pipeline shipped an average of about 757,000 barrels per day during the quarter — below its capacity of 890,000 barrels per day.
Maki said if the pipeline were running full, western Canadian heavy crude would see a steeper price discount against the easier-to-refine light crude sold on the global market. That would eat into the margins of Alberta producers.
'You really don't want us 100 per cent full … What's important really is to keep a little bit of slack in the system,' he said.
As of now, the supply of crude hasn't caught up with takeaway capacity.
'But when that happens, the crude differential blows out. And so having a little bit of wiggle room is important.'
Trans Mountain said there are economical ways to boost the pipeline's capacity if needed, such as adding chemical agents to reduce friction, which would enable more crude to flow through the line. Other options could include adding pumping horsepower or pipe segments. Those projects could together add up to 300,000 barrels per day of capacity.
Trans Mountain said quarterly net income was $148 million, down from $158 million a year earlier.
Its earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization — a measure it says reflects the performance of its underlying business — were $568 million, compared to the $36 million it brought in a year earlier, before the pipeline expansion had started up.
During the quarter, $311 million was paid to its parent Canada TMP Finance Ltd., which is itself owned by the Canada Development Investment Corp. That consisted of $148 million in interest payments and $163 million in cash dividends.
The original Trans Mountain pipeline has been operating since the 1950s.
In 2013, U.S. energy company Kinder Morgan filed a proposal to expand it at a cost of $5.4 billion, touching off a contentious regulatory review process marked by protests and legal challenges.
Kinder Morgan suspended work in 2018 and shortly thereafter sold the pipeline to the federal government for $4.5 billion.
By the time the expansion project was completed, its cost had ballooned to $34 billion.
Maki said there's no hurry to bring Trans Mountain back into private hands.
He said the expanded pipeline should get a little more operating history under its belt so a potential buyer can ascribe the proper value to it. A dispute over the tolls customers pay to use the line, currently before the Canada Energy Regulator, also needs to be sorted out, he said.
There is also interest in potential Indigenous equity ownership in the line — when the time is right.
Trans Mountain is in a 'transitional' year where it is starting to pay dividends and is continuing some of the cleanup work from the pipeline construction.
Next year will be a 'much more normal' one, Maki said.
'And so really probably at that point and out would make sense to start thinking about that.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 30, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
What Triggered the Wild 120% Rally in Regencell Bioscience Stock (RGC)?
Regencell Bioscience (RGC) stunned the market with a jaw-dropping 120% surge in a single trading session on Thursday, despite no major news. The company has a history of wild stock swings fueled by low float, insider control, and retail trading momentum. Don't Miss TipRanks' Half-Year Sale Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. What Does Regencell Bioscience Do? Regencell focuses on developing traditional Chinese herbal therapies aimed at treating conditions like ADHD and autism. The company has no approved products, no revenue, no patents, and no distribution channels—its herbal treatments remain in the early stages of clinical testing. What's Happening with RGC Stock? RGC stock snapped a 10-day losing streak on Thursday with a 120% gain. The shares have skyrocketed by more than 17,000% year-to-date. On June 16, Regencell's stock surged around 300%, reaching an all-time high following a 38-for-1 stock split. The company said the split aimed to improve market liquidity and make its shares more affordable and accessible to investors. However, it has been trading down by over 70% from its peak in June. The company recently pointed out that short sellers are behind the recent rally and suggested a possible short squeeze. However, experts doubt this claim, pointing to data showing low short interest and modest trading volumes. For context, a short squeeze happens when a stock's price jumps quickly, and traders who had bet against it are forced to buy shares to limit their losses, driving the price up even more. Regencell's Financial Performance Regencell has posted net losses for six straight years. On June 30, 2025, the company shared its unaudited results for the six months ended December 31, 2024. It reported a net loss of $1.85 million, slightly better than the $2.19 million loss in the same period the year before. The update also showed lower operating costs and a small rise in total assets, suggesting a modest improvement in its financial position. Is RGC a Good Stock to Buy? RGC may be a risky bet, but its recent stock split makes it an appealing option for bold investors. The stock split lowered the share price, attracting more retail traders and driving strong buying interest, especially during price dips. With few shares available, any good news like success in a clinical trial could trigger another sharp price jump. While the stock may seem overvalued now, the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) market is expected to grow significantly in the coming years. If Regencell's therapies prove effective, they could potentially sell at premium prices. On the flip side, even in the best-case scenario, companies in this space face tough regulatory barriers in Western markets, where herbal treatments must meet strict approval standards. With limited clinical evidence to back its claims, Regencell could face a difficult path forward.
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
What if killing Canada's digital services tax is just the beginning for Donald Trump?
OTTAWA—Call it a prudent climbdown, a show of weakness, or an unavoidable concession. There are several ways to look at Prime Minister Mark Carney's 11th-hour decision to cancel the federal government's Digital Services Tax last weekend. But what if it's also a tangible example of exactly what Carney warned would happen? The Liberal leader won a minority government on April 28 with a pitch that no one was better placed than himself to protect Canada from Donald Trump. The U.S. president has mused about using 'economic force' to annex Canada. As if taunting or teasing this country, he questions why it exists, and keeps floating the prospect of it becoming the '51st state' of the U.S. Two days before the election, Carney spelled out how he understood all of this. 'The U.S. is trying to put economic pressure on us to gain major concessions, to the extreme of a level of integration of our countries that would impinge our sovereignty,' Carney said that day in King City, north of Toronto. Carney, in his final campaign conference, ruled out any prospect the U.S. would use military Flash forward to last week. There was Trump, posting on social media that Canada's incoming Digital Services Tax — a policy that would force American tech giants and other firms, including Canadian ones, to pay up — was nothing short of a 'blatant attack' on the United States. Trump declared he had cut off all negotiations to resolve the trade war that started earlier this year with his wave of tariffs on Canadian goods. In other words, Canada's most important commercial and military partner, the destination for 76 per cent of all exports last year , was willing to ditch talks and dictate terms that could jeopardize thousands of jobs and hundreds of billions of dollars in economic activity. All over a domestic policy the Americans didn't like. Barely 48 hours later, shortly before midnight on a Sunday, the government announced the tax was dead. Not only would Canada not implement the policy as planned, it would repeal the 2024 law that created it. Is this Trump using economic pressure to force Canada's hand? 'It is exactly that,' said Lawrence Herman, a veteran trade lawyer and special counsel with the firm, Cassidy Levy Kent. 'It's an example of, on a particular issue, how much pressure can be brought to bear to force Canada to abandon not only a policy, but a law that has been in force for 18 months.' In Herman's view, the decision looks like a 'significant retreat' by the government, which shows 'how dependent we are on a reasonable relationship' with Canada's largest trading partner. Other policies that Trump has complained about, such as the supply management system for dairy and poultry, could be next, he said. Pete Hoekstra, the U.S. ambassador to Canada, told the CBC this week that he has a 'strong belief' Canada could water down that system by changing a law designed to protect it if that becomes part of a new trade deal. 'It's not a particularly good start to this so-called new economic and security relationship,' Herman said. He was referring to Carney's stated goal of talks that are now continuing under an agreement struck at the Group of 7 summit in the Alberta Rockies last month to strive for a deal to redefine the relationship by July 21. Others have been harsher in their judgment. Lloyd Axworthy, a former Liberal foreign affairs minister, posted online that Carney was acquiescing to Trump in a way that contradicts his 'elbows up' mantra on the campaign trail. 'Forget any dreams of a more sovereign, self-directed Canada. We're doubling down on the corporate cosiness and U.S. dependency that's defined our last half-century,' he wrote on Substack. Axworthy did not respond to an interview request Thursday. For Jean Charest, a former Quebec premier who sits on the government's Canada-U.S. advisory council, the situation illustrates the 'chaos' of dealing with Trump, whose administration is grappling with trade talks and tariffs threats against most countries on the planet. This meant that Carney's government was operating 'in a world of very bad choices,' Charest said. Deciding to scrap the Digital Services Tax, in that context, was 'certainly a legitimate choice,' he said. 'We are not in an ordinary world of negotiations,' Charest added. 'It would be nice to think, 'You give, I give ... we compromise.' It doesn't work that way with Donald Trump, and we're making our way through this by trying to protect essentially what's the most important for us in the short term, and that's a negotiation that has some legs.' Charest noted that there was opposition inside Canada to the Digital Services Tax, which would have applied back to 2022 with a three per cent tax on Canadian revenues from digital services companies with more than $1.1 billion in global earnings and $20 million inside Canada. The U.S. also pushed back against the policy when Joe Biden was in power. David Pierce, vice-president of government relations with the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, said his business lobby group felt the Digital Services Tax should be paused. He also said it would have been wrong to proceed with it after the U.S. dropped a controversial provision from Trump's major budget bill last week: the so-called 'revenge tax' that would have hit the U.S. assets of foreign businesses and individuals. That decision came as the G7 agreed to exempt American firms from a co-ordinated effort to ensure corporations pay a minimum tax, which was 'absolutely a win' for the U.S. Even so, Pierce said Canada likely had no choice but to drop the policy, given Trump's exploitation of Canada's 'weakness' — its major economic reliance on trade with the U.S. 'We just hope that this now paves the way for a good renewed deal,' said Pierce. The ultimate goal of the federal government in that deal, at least publicly, has been to return to the terms of the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA), which Trump signed in 2018 during his first term, after disparaging North American free trade as unfair to his country. That would mean lifting the rounds of tariffs Trump has imposed since the winter, with import duties tied to concerns about drugs and migration over the border, and others that Trump slapped on Canadian autos, steel and aluminum in a bid to promote those sectors in the U.S. Canada has responded with countertariffs on its own that the government says hit more than $80 billion worth of American imports to Canada. Canada's lead trade negotiator with the Trump administration, Ambassador Kirsten Hillman, was not available for an interview this week, the embassy in Washington told the Star. Charest, however, said he believes it is possible that Canada could accept some level of tariffs in a July 21 deal, so long as they have no material effect. Such 'zero-effect' tariffs could only kick in at levels of trade that Canada doesn't or likely won't achieve, for example. Yet there's a question of how much any deal can be relied upon, so long as Trump is in the White House, unilaterally imposing tariffs that Canada views as 'illegal' violations of the 2018 trade deal. 'Trump is arguing about supply management and the (Digital Services Tax), but it's the U.S. that is in flagrant breach of its trade obligations. It's abandoned the CUSMA, virtually behaving as if it did not exist and the U.S. signature has no meaning,' Herman said. 'So we are in a world where rules and the rules-based system, and the stability that that treaty was supposed to provide, have gone by the board.' That means, at least for now, the Carney government is operating in a world where Canada's foremost ally, the colossus to the south, will use economic force to get what it wants.
Hamilton Spectator
6 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
‘Time is now' for hydro connection to Nunavut: Inuit association president
A proposed hydroelectric fibre link from Manitoba's power grid to five communities and two mines in Nunavut's Kivalliq region should be part of the national infrastructure strategy, according to an Inuit leader. But the federal government has been keeping the project on the back burner for at least four years, Kono Tattuinee, the president of the Kivalliq Inuit Association, told an audience at the Nunavut Arctic Security and Sovereignty Summit in Iqaluit on June 26. Tattuinee said that transitioning off 60-year-old diesel generators is a priority for the region. 'We've done our best to work with different departments. We tried to get our foot in the door of the finance minister's office, but we were half in and half out and never really made it,' Tattuinee told those gathered at the summit. An hydro-electric power connection to Nunavut would allow the territory to start building its own renewable energy facilities and sell electricity back to the rest of Canada's, according to a website pitching the project. The Nukik Corporation, an Inuit-owned company lobbying the federal government to build the 1,200-kilometre hydro fibre link, counts Tattuinee among its board of directors. Arviat, Baker Lake, Chesterfield Inlet, Rankin Inlet and Whale Cove, along with two gold mines and future resource projects in the Kivalliq Region, would benefit from the connectivity, according to the website. High-speed internet for residents, hospitals and businesses would also be a feature of the hydro-fibre link. Nukik Corporation's project has been mentioned three times in federal budgets since 2021, and it received $2.8 million to advance engineering and design work last year. The Department of Northern Affairs estimated construction would begin in 2028 at the time. But Tattuinee told the Nunavut Arctic Security and Sovereignty Summit that the federal government had been keeping proponents of the hydro-fibre link in the dark. 'We have it on a silver platter. It's all ready, shovel-ready — we were shovel-worthy a few years back, and now we're shovel-ready,' Tattuinee said. Despite the frustration with the pace of development, Tattuinee said he's hopeful about the future and believes the federal government will eventually make the project happen. 'We Inuit, we're resilient, we want to push this through. The time is now, and so we're very hopeful,' he said. The federal government passed Bill C-5 on June 26, giving itself far-reaching powers to fast-track 'nation-building' infrastructure projects, the same day as Tattuinee's comments to the summit. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
