logo
Dover woman takes part in innovative homelessness trial

Dover woman takes part in innovative homelessness trial

BBC News17-07-2025
A Kent woman who took part in a trial where people supported by homeless charities are given a substantial sum of money to spend as they wish said the funds helped her reconnect with her children.The Centre for Homelessness Impact is leading the research into the effect of granting participants a personalised budget, on top of existing homelessness support.Sarah, from Dover, was among those to take part in the trial funded by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG).Supported by Canterbury-based homeless charity Porchlight, she said it was the reason she now sees her children and grandchildren more.
Sarah, who suffered with addiction issues, said: "I lost my kids a long time ago...Porchlight helped me get a place of my own and when I was awarded this money, I was able to kit it out. "I could choose what I wanted, I could make it feel like home. Getting the money has allowed me to do the final bits to my new home that mean I get to see them [my kids] and my grandkids more."This trial compared outcomes between people who have received typical homelessness support alongside financial assistance and those only given the standard assistance.Guillermo Rodríguez-Guzmán, director of evidence at the Centre for Homelessness Impact, said it was "really important" to have the evidence from the trial as he said the approach had been "controversial".It is the first time a series of trials on this scale has ever been carried out, with interim findings expected in the autumn and full results likely to be published in late 2026.
Porchlight's chief executive Tom Neumark said the trial could be significant for the future of homelessness support."Each person's journey into homelessness is different, so it makes sense to give them the means to rebuild their life in a way that works for them," he said."This trial allowed people to do that, and from what we can see it worked."This trial is part of a larger three-year programme commissioned by the MHCLG, which has allocated £15m to testing eight novel interventions for homelessness and rough sleeping.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour isn't working: Sick leave in Whitehall surges under Starmer as civil servant absences jump by over a quarter in major government departments
Labour isn't working: Sick leave in Whitehall surges under Starmer as civil servant absences jump by over a quarter in major government departments

Daily Mail​

time38 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Labour isn't working: Sick leave in Whitehall surges under Starmer as civil servant absences jump by over a quarter in major government departments

Sick leave in the Whitehall blob is surging under Labour, analysis suggests. Absence rates jumped by up to 26 per cent in major government departments last year. Civil servants taking prolonged periods off over mental health issues was fuelling the rise, sources claimed, with tens of thousands of working days lost. And it showed Labour ministers were 'turning a blind eye' and had gone soft on trying to boost productivity in the public sector, critics said last night. The analysis comes amid wider concerns about Britain's sick-note epidemic, with 11 million 'fit notes' – which assess an individual's ability to work – doled out in England last year. Public sector workers are 60 per cent more likely to be off due to illness than those in the private sector. Foreign Secretary David Lammy's department saw one of the biggest increases, with 35,452 working days lost last year, the study found. This soared from 28,122 in 2023 and concerned 2,904 staff, up from 2,437. Alex Burghart, the Tories' Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, said: 'This is shocking analysis. Too many days are lost to sick leave in the Civil Service. It's unfair on taxpayers and on the staff left to carry the load. 'Ministers are turning a blind eye and the Government has gone soft on productivity. This is the last thing Britain needs when it is already struggling under Labour.' Most of the increase was due to 'long-term' absences, suggesting civil servants are calling in sick for extensive periods. Working days lost as a result of these longer periods off surged from 16,165 to 20,770, compared to a jump from 11,957 to 14,682 because of 'short-term' sickness. Staff with no such time off stood at 67 per cent, down from 72 per cent. Mental health issues fuelled a surge in absence rates, the Department for Transport said. Its annual report and accounts claimed overall 'Average Working Days Lost' per staff member last year jumped from 8.6 to 9.2 for officials at the department and linked agencies. Again, the majority (5.7) were for 'long-term' sickness, with 'mental ill health' remaining the 'largest long-term absence type'. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's office recorded a jump of 12 per cent in the sickness leave rate. As of March 31 this year, the average working days lost to sickness per official was 7.4 days, up from 6.6 in 2024. And the Department for Education's rate surged from 5.3 to six. Angela Rayner's housing department also saw a 12 per cent jump in average working days lost due to sickness, from a rate of five in 2023 to 5.6 last year. Only 58 per cent registered 'no sickness absence', down from 63 per cent the year before. But rates at agencies linked to the department were much worse, with the days-lost rate at 8.8 – up from 5.9. Just 41 per cent suffered no sickness, down from 56 per cent. Of eight departments to have published their accounts for 2024/25, just two saw sickness rates fall or stay the same. These were the Treasury, where the rate dropped from 3.3 to 2.8 days lost on average per worker last year, and the Department for Work and Pensions (6.9 to 6.8). It comes despite Sir Keir Starmer saying in December that 'too many' civil servants 'are comfortable in the tepid bath of managed decline'. A government spokesman said: 'The civil service provides a range of tools and policies to ensure employees remain in work and are supported to return to work as quickly as possible.'

Nutritional expert shares popular snacks parents think are healthy... but should actually not be fed to kids
Nutritional expert shares popular snacks parents think are healthy... but should actually not be fed to kids

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Nutritional expert shares popular snacks parents think are healthy... but should actually not be fed to kids

An expert nutritional therapist has revealed the popular snacks parents think are healthy – but shouldn't actually be fed to kids. With the summer holidays in full swing, families will be scrambling to find activities to occupy their little ones. And it's no secret that giving them something to eat can fill the gap for a while. But Amber Silverman is urging parents to be careful when choosing a healthy snack, as what might seem nutritious is actually doing children more harm than good. 'One of the most common things I hear from parents is: "I honestly thought that was healthy," and it's completely understandable,' the nutritional therapist, from London, told NeedToKnow recently. 'Supermarkets are full of products that look wholesome, often plastered with phrases like "no added sugar" or "made with real fruit,"' she warned. 'But once you take a closer look, the reality isn't always quite so rosy.' Here are the most common lunchbox and cupboard offenders. Fruit Snacks Amber, a mom-of-two, said that labeling on fruit snacks often states that 'real fruit' is involved, but it can be extremely misleading. She explained: They're usually little more than processed sugar, syrup, and flavorings. 'Even when fruit purée is listed as an ingredient, it's stripped of the fiber and nutrients you'd get from eating real fruit.' And the same goes for fruit pouches, which are better than ultra-processed snacks, but still aren't as good as the real deal. Smoothies and juices Amber, 54, said that while smoothies are a great way to get kids' five-a-day in, they're only beneficial if made from scratch. She warned that bottled versions often contain fruit concentrates, sweetened yogurt, or added sugars – and are surprisingly high in calories. And juice is no better. Amber added: 'Even the pure kind is still very high in natural sugars and lacks the fiber that slows down sugar absorption in whole fruit. 'It's easy to forget that one small carton of juice might contain the equivalent of sugar of several pieces of fruit. 'Better to stick with water most of the time and keep juice as an occasional treat – or just eat an orange.' Flavored Yogurts Amber said that yogurts in little tubes or pots are usually marketed towards children, and can be enjoyed as part of a healthy diet. But there's little benefit for your tot. She dished: 'Low-fat versions are particularly sneaky, as the fat is usually replaced with added sugar to keep them tasting good. 'A better option? Go for plain, full-fat yogurt and stir in some fresh fruit yourself.' Granola and Cereals Oats, nuts, and sometimes a bit of dried fruit may seem like a winner, but what's really hiding in the ingredients? Amber said: '[They're often] held together by glucose syrup or other sweeteners and can contain just as much sugar as a chocolate bar. 'Not ideal if you're after something genuinely nourishing that'll keep kids going through the day. '[And while] cereal is quick and convenient, even the ones labelled with 'whole grain' or 'fortified with vitamins' can be high in sugar and low in fibre. 'They may give a short burst of energy, but that's usually followed by a mid-morning crash – and a grumpy, hungry child asking for snacks.' Veggie Straws and Chips If the phrase 'veggie' is used, it must be healthy, right? Wrong. 'Sadly, not. They're often made with potato starch and oil, with just a dusting of powdered vegetables for color,' Amber explained. 'Nutritionally, they're not much better than ordinary crisps.' Whole Wheat or Multigrain Crackers Reaching for crackers might seem like a quick, tasty, and nutritional option to feed your tot when they're hungry. But, like most foods, the labels are misleading. Amber said: 'Just because something has 'whole wheat' or 'multigrain' on the label doesn't mean it's automatically a healthier option. 'Many of these snacks still contain refined flours, low-quality oils, and not much in the way of actual nutrients. 'If you're buying crackers, check the label and look for ones made with 100% wholegrain and minimal added ingredients.' Amber advised parents to opt for savory snacks over sweet – such as cheese, homemade hummus, edamame beans, and nuts and seeds. She said eating refined sugars can be 'detrimental' to kids. The mom continued: 'It creates unstable blood sugar levels, where the highs and lows can have an adverse effect on behaviors. 'Common symptoms of this would be irritability or anger, fatigue or lethargy, headaches, mood swings, and attention problems. 'This can impact their learning at school and at home – and how they interact with people around them. Refined sugars are also linked to inflammation in the body, which in turn is linked to a diseased state. 'In the medium to long-term, there may be impacts on immune function and other health concerns when refined sugars are consumed daily or very regularly.' She also noted that refined sugars impact teeth, weight, and digestive health – which can also damage developing brains. Since it has addictive qualities, these difficulties can last even into adulthood. While it can feel overwhelming trying to make the right choices, she says the best method is to stick to real, whole foods and recognizable ingredients. And don't be afraid to whip up simple meals from scratch. She concluded, 'Feeding your child isn't about being perfect. It's about balance, awareness, and building habits over time. 'One less fruit snack and one more real apple might not seem like a big deal today, but over months and years, it adds up.'

Atai Life Sciences schizophrenia drug fails to meet main goal in trial
Atai Life Sciences schizophrenia drug fails to meet main goal in trial

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

Atai Life Sciences schizophrenia drug fails to meet main goal in trial

July 25 (Reuters) - Atai Life Sciences ( opens new tab and its partner Recognify Life Sciences said on Friday their experimental drug did not meet the main goal in a mid-stage trial for patients with cognitive impairment linked to schizophrenia. U.S.-listed shares of atai fell about 14% in extended trading. Recognify said patients taking the drug, inidascamine, showed some improvement in cognitive tests compared with a placebo, but the results were not statistically significant. The trial enrolled 242 patients with cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia, which affects memory, attention and decision-making in people with the mental illness. Despite the drug missing the main goal, Recognify said patients on inidascamine showed consistent signs of improvement in areas such as processing speed and verbal learning, with positive trends on a test assessing real-world cognitive abilities.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store