Decent' Udit kissed by controversy
On Sunday, renowned Bollywood playback singer Udit Narayan found himself embroiled in a disturbing controversy following an incident during a live concert in Mumbai. A video surfaced online showing him interacting with a female fan who, while taking a selfie, leaned in and kissed him on the cheek. The singer reciprocated the gesture by turning towards her and kissing her on the lips.
The encounter happened during Udit's performance of the already sexually charged song Tip Tip Barsa Pani from 1994 film Mohra, at the specific verse before the chorus 'Mere bas mein nahi mera mann / Mein kya karoon' (I can't control my heart's desires / What can I do?). After the encounter went viral, he was recorded kissing other women attending the concert on the cheek, seemingly upon their request.
The incident garnered a spectrum of reactions online. There is a general consensus that both Udit and his fan had acted inappropriately. Given his status as an established, senior artist in the Bollywood industry, and the star-and-fan relationship of the two, netizens were stunned by this incident.
Internet reacts
Some users defended the 69 year-old singer, suggesting that the fan initiated the kiss and that his reciprocation was a natural response. One user commented, "First, the girl kisses Udit Narayan without his consent. Yet, leftists and feminists cry foul only when he kisses backbecause he's a man. The girl's actions? Conveniently ignored. Why?"
Conversely, many criticised Udit for his actions, emphasising the importance of maintaining professional boundaries, especially given his stature in the industry. Critics argued that regardless of the fan's initiation, it was incumbent upon the celebrity to uphold a standard of conduct that reflects his position and influence. One netizen commented, "With age, he has lost his character. Fans are always crazy, but he should respect each fan." Some Indian media platforms went so far as to speculate if Udit was intoxicated during the course of this concert to have acted in such a disgraceful manner.
As is natural for the internet, there was yet another faction of reactors who insisted that since both parties seemed satisfied with the encounter, the incident was not worth the debate. One such commenter addressed the rest of the fast-polarising comments section and remarked, "[The ] one who kissed is happy, [the] one who got kissed is happy. Why are some people upset about it?"
What Udit has to say
In response to the backlash, Udit addressed the controversy, stating that his actions were an expression of affection towards his fans and that there was no inappropriate intent behind them. He emphasised that he is a "decent" person and felt no regret or sorrow over the incident, viewing it as a natural interaction with an enthusiastic admirer. "Do you hear any regret or sorrow in my voice? I have been in the industry for decades and have always shared a close bond with my fans. This was an act of pure affection," the artist maintained.
Amid the ongoing debate, an old video from a 2021 episode of The Kapil Sharma Show (now called The Great Indian Kapil Show) resurfaced, further fuelling controversy. In this episode, Udit, along with fellow singers Kumar Sanu and Anuradha Paudwal, made remarks that were perceived as misogynistic. Udit's comments about Archana Puran Singh's laughter and weight, and similar comments about Alka Yagnik were deemed inappropriate by many viewers, leading to renewed criticism.
The internet was also quick to uncover older footage of Udit kissing Alka and Shreya Ghoshal at various events. In one clip, he kissed Alka on the cheek while she was performing on the Indian Idol stage, leaving her visibly startled. Social media users pointed out a similar moment in another clip, where Alka appeared to react uncomfortably to his gesture. Years later, at an award ceremony, Shreya received the Best Female Singer award from Udit and actor Malaika Arora. As she stepped onto the stage, Udit greeted her with a hug and a kiss on the cheek. Though she momentarily made a face, she quickly smiled before accepting the award.
In the midst of the controversy, fellow playback singer Abhijeet Bhattacharya has also come to his colleague's defence. Abhijeet dismissed the backlash as overblown and stressed the affectionate nature of fan-celebrity interactions. He stated, "Such incidents are being blown out of proportion. Udit ji has always been a gentleman and shares a warm relationship with his fans. This was nothing more than a gesture of affection."
The plot thickens
Public displays of affection are generally frowned upon in India and other parts of the region, with even Bollywood stars maintaining restraint in their interactions with partners in public. That the singer chose to break this unspoken cultural rule with a fan, rather than a spouse, made the act even more divisive. While some excused it as an impulsive reaction to fan enthusiasm, others pointed out that a seasoned artist like Udit, with decades in the industry, should have known better.
Dubbed as 'the kiss controversy', this incident also revived conversations about misogyny within Bollywood and the entertainment industry at large. Some social media users blamed the female fan herself, arguing that she should have known better than to initiate a kiss with a male celebrity, suggesting that she "invited" his response. This rhetoric mirrors broader societal attitudes where women are often held responsible for men's behaviour.
Adding to this was singer Bhattacharya's defence of Udit, which many saw as reflective of the ingrained entitlement among male celebrities. Bhattacharya himself has faced accusations of sexual misconduct in the past, famously in 2018 when a former flight attendant named Yamini Khanna accused him of making unwanted sexual advances at her in a Kolkata nightclub in 1998. His questionable past has made his statements dismissing the backlash even more infuriating for critics. The entire fiasco reinforced the long-standing issue of male artists in the industry enjoying impunity, often indulging in sexist behavior without real consequences. Many pointed out that if a female celebrity had done the same, the outrage would have been far more severe, further highlighting the double standards within Bollywood and South Asian society as a whole.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
3 days ago
- Express Tribune
Booker Prize releases diverse longlist nominees
Featuring thirteen nominees from nine different nationalities – including Indian novelist Kiran Desai and Malaysian author Tash Aw – this year's Booker Prize longlist is the most global in a decade, reported the Guardian. At 667 pages, Desai's novel The Loneliness of Sonia and Sunny is the longest book on the list, and took her almost 20 years to write. The book marks Desai's first appearance on the longlist after her novel The Inheritance of Loss, which won the Booker Prize in 2006. Tash Aw, meanwhile, made it onto the list for the third time with his latest book, The South. If Aw takes wins, he will become the first Malaysian author to take home the Booker Prize. This year's judging panel includes Sex and the City star Sarah Jessica Parker, along with Nigerian writer Ayọ̀bámi Adébáyọ̀, American novelist Kiley Reid, critic Chris Power and chair of judges Roddy Doyle. "The chosen books are all alive with great characters and narrative surprises," said Doyle. "All, somehow, examine identity, individual or national, and all are gripping and excellent." Praising the quality of submissions this year, he added, "Whittling down the nominations at times was agony." A total of 153 books were submitted between October 2024 and September 2025, all written in English and published in the UK or Ireland. Independent publisher Fitzcarraldo Editions scored its first entry on the longlist with Jonathan Buckley's One Boat. Another independent publisher, Faber, has three titles nominated this year: Universality by Natasha Brown, The Rest of Our Lives by Ben Markovits, and Claire Adam's Love Forms. Publishing giant Penguin, meanwhile, saw the highest number of titles on the list with five books. Gaby Wood, chief executive of the Booker Prize Foundation, remarked that it is "striking that most of the longlisted writers have already had sustained careers." Out of the thirteen books, only two debut works featured on the list: Misinterpretation by Ledia Xhoga and Endling by Maria Reva. The remaining works comprised Love Forms by Claire Adam, Flashlight by Susan Choi, Audition by Katie Kitamura, The Land in Winter by Andrew Miller, Flesh by David Szalay, and Seascraper by Benjamin Wood. The longlist nominees for the Booker Prize, which is worth a whopping GBP50,000, will be whittled down to a shortlist to be announced on September 23, with the ultimate winner be revealed on November 10. Last year's Booker prize was won by Samantha Harvey for her novel Orbital.
Express Tribune
3 days ago
- Express Tribune
Booker Prize releases most diverse longlist nominees
Featuring thirteen nominees from nine different nationalities - including Indian novelist Kiran Desai and Malaysian author Tash Aw - this year's Booker Prize longlist is the most global in a decade, reported the Guardian. At 667 pages, Desai's novel The Loneliness of Sonia and Sunny is the longest book on the list, and took her almost 20 years to write. The book marks Desai's first appearance on the longlist after her novel The Inheritance of Loss, which won the Booker Prize in 2006. Tash Aw, meanwhile, made it onto the list for the third time with his latest book, The South. If Aw takes wins, he will become the first Malaysian author to take home the Booker Prize. This year's judging panel includes Sex and the City star Sarah Jessica Parker, along with Nigerian writer Ayọ̀bámi Adébáyọ̀, American novelist Kiley Reid, critic Chris Power and chair of judges Roddy Doyle. 'The chosen books are all alive with great characters and narrative surprises,' said Doyle. 'All, somehow, examine identity, individual or national, and all are gripping and excellent.' Praising the quality of submissions this year, he added, 'Whittling down the nominations at times was agony.' A total of 153 books were submitted between October 2024 and September 2025, all written in English and published in the UK or Ireland. Independent publisher Fitzcarraldo Editions scored its first entry on the longlist with Jonathan Buckley's One Boat. Another independent publisher, Faber, has three titles nominated this year: Universality by Natasha Brown, The Rest of Our Lives by Ben Markovits, and Claire Adam's Love Forms. Publishing giant Penguin, meanwhile, saw the highest number of titles on the list with five books. Gaby Wood, chief executive of the Booker Prize Foundation, remarked that it is 'striking that most of the longlisted writers have already had sustained careers.' Out of the thirteen books, only two debut works featured on the list: Misinterpretation by Ledia Xhoga and Endling by Maria Reva. The remaining works comprised Flashlight by Susan Choi, Audition by Katie Kitamura, The Land in Winter by Andrew Miller, Flesh by David Szalay, and Seascraper by Benjamin Wood. The longlist nominees for the Booker Prize, which is worth a whopping GBP50,000, will be whittled down to a shortlist to be announced on September 23, with the ultimate winner be revealed on November 10. Last year's Booker prize was won by Samantha Harvey for her novel Orbital. Have something to add to the story? Share it in the comments below.
Express Tribune
26-07-2025
- Express Tribune
Hollywood vs censorville
A rude emoji was replaced with a politer one in F1: The Movie. Photo: File Film fans in India were outraged to learn that a 33-second kiss scene in Superman was shortened to just a few seconds by their country's censors. Despite the film's 13+ rating, India's Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) felt compelled to sanitise the embrace they described as "overly sensual." When it was created through the Cinematograph Act of 1952, the CBFC's official mandate was to certify films according to age categories, but it has since become notorious for its role as a censor. Recent examples of alterations in major Hollywood productions include replacing a middle-finger emoji appearing in F1: The Movie with a fist emoji. Swear words were muted in Marvel's Thunderbolts and Mission: Impossible — The Final Reckoning. In Christopher Nolan's Oppenheimer (2023), the Indian board had Florence Pugh's nudity covered up with a digitally inserted CGI dress. "If a scene is meant for mature audiences, it should simply be placed in the appropriate category," argued writer Disha Bijolia in Indian online magazine Homegrown. "Instead, the CBFC repeatedly interferes with a filmmaker's vision — cutting into plots, disrupting emotional arcs, and flattening the intent behind entire narratives." Satisfying demand Along with the widespread censorship method of simply banning films, releasing alternate versions of movies is also well established in many countries beyond India. Authoritarian states know that even if a film is banned, it can still circulate illegally, which motivates them to distribute their own "more appropriate" versions of the works. Way before AI-created imagery became widely available, Iran had already equipped the country's censors with new digital technology by 2010, allowing them to tweak dialogues and images that didn't conform to Islamic modesty. The approach is detailed in an 2012 article in The Atlantic, which also shows stills comparing how the original scenes were retouched in the Iranian versions: Women simply disappear from the frame, or their neckline is covered up with a clunky vase. Even Will Ferrell's crotch is hidden behind a wall in the motorsports comedy Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby (2006). Drugs not okay Even though many major Hollywood studios no longer distribute their films in Russia since it launched its full-scale war on Ukraine in 2022, there are still some Western films appearing in the country's cinemas or on streaming platforms. One recent example of a film that circulated in an altered version was the award-winning US film Anora (2024). Censors simply zoomed into various scenes to crop out the depictions of characters using drugs, as shown by independent Russian-language news site Meduza. Meanwhile, the film's nude scenes featuring the stripper played by Mikey Madison were left untouched. A film like Anora would never air on Turkish television. Under President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's conservative AKP government, around 95 per cent of the media landscape has been brought into line with their conservative guidelines. Broadcasters mainly avoid sex scenes and portrayals of LGBTQ+ characters. Historical topics seen as promoting "anti-Turkish rhetoric" can be particularly contentious. Cigarettes and alcohol are also blurred on TV, with some stations coming up with creative solutions to cover up the items. Meanwhile, some Hollywood studios have released their own self-censored versions to circumvent bans and blurs. Sony Pictures supplied an alternate version of Blade Runner 2049 to Turkey and other non-Western markets, removing or cropping scenes showing nudity, as film critic Burak Göral first noted. Turkey's Film Critics Association (S?YAD) issued an open letter condemning the censorship, noting that the cuts were "an insult to moviegoers in Turkey." Accessing China China is renowned for banning and shortening films, too. Official censorship guidelines prohibit, among other things, the "promotion of cults or superstition." The 2016 Ghostbusters reboot thus failed to be released in the country despite being retitled Super Power Dare Die Team. Surprisingly, Disney's Coco, which centers on the Mexican Day of the Dead, was authorised a year later. Major productions that have been altered by China's censors include the 2012 James Bond film, Skyfall. A scene in which a Chinese security guard is killed was completely cut out because it suggested that China is unable to protect its own territory from foreign agents. In other "controversial" scenes, the subtitles differed from what was actually been said on screen. In the famous portrait scene in James Cameron's Titanic 3D (2012), Kate Winslet was cropped up to her chin to hide her nudity. "Considering the vivid 3D effects, we fear that viewers may reach out their hands for a touch and thus interrupt other people's viewing," a Chinese official explained. In 2022, social media users widely mocked the censors' alternate ending for Minions: The Rise of Gru. In the original version, villains Gru and Wild Knuckles evade capture by authorities after the latter fakes his own death. But through a series of subtitled stills that were widely compared to a PowerPoint presentation for their poor quality, the Chinese version had Wild Knuckles arrested and imprisoned for 20 years; he starts a theater troupe in jail. Gru is portrayed as simply "returning to his family," with being a father becoming his "biggest accomplishment." Hollywood studios have also been releasing their own alternate versions of movies in China to avoid state censorship — and the PowerPoint slides. The country began allowing a limited number of Hollywood films per year into the country in 1994, and as major studios increasingly competed to gain access to the restricted and lucrative slots, they also started tailoring their stories to please a Chinese market of some 1.4 billion people. A 2020 report by nonprofit organisation PEN denounces the growing trend of producers willingly altering their films for Beijing's censors: Hollywood filmmakers "are making difficult and troubling compromises on free expression," it stated. Iron Man 3 (2013) is a prominent case highlighting this approach. While altered films typically lose runtime, four minutes of extra content were added to the Marvel blockbuster, with exclusive scenes featuring Chinese star Fan Bingbing and actor Wang Xueqi, as well as scenes promoting a local milk brand. In the Chinese version, the beverage helps Iron Man/Tony Stark recover from an injury.
