Estate where 'some kids have never been on a train'
A railway station planned for an estate where some children have "never been on a train" could make a huge difference to young people's lives, local people have said. The Woodchurch estate on Wirral is to be linked up to the rail network as part of a £1.6bn investment scheme. Staff at Fender Primary School said that despite the estate being only four miles from the seaside, some children have never been there.Discussions around building a station to directly serve the estate have been going on for more than a decade.
The exact location of a station is still to be confirmed, and it is expected to take until about 2030 for planning permission to be given. Once built, it would link the estate to Liverpool and Wrexham.
'Open up opportunities'
Emma Simms, a staff member at Fender school, said: "A lot of the children do not have the opportunities to leave the estate whether that is for days out or holidays."We have conversations with children who have never been on the trains."Staff at the school said a new station would cut down on travel time, open up school, university and job opportunities, and give children more life experiences. Sue Lee, who has lived in the area for 20 years, feels the new station would bring more value and investment to Woodchurch as well as open up opportunities.She said: "Just trying to get off the Wirral at all is a tricky one."You can but then you have to go to Birkenhead to get the train somewhere. This just enhances all your options."She said her daughter was an athlete and in the past, sometimes they had to get taxis to competitions because there were just no other options."A lot of children do not get off the estate," she said. "If there is something right there it makes it a lot easier to go to places they might not necessarily go to."
'Degree of isolation'
However, there's still some scepticism after years of promises. Maureen Cain said: "It's a good place to live, it really is and I think it will be really uplifted.However, she said: "Until it happens, no one will be jumping for joy. I think people get fed up and think that until it happens, we aren't going to be happy about it."Wirral councillor Jerry Williams, who grew up on the estate, said connectivity was one of the most important issues on the estate.The Labour councillor for Upton said there was "a degree of isolation on a lot of the estate" and "to have a station there is really going to transform things".When the funding was announced, it was welcomed by top politicians in Wirral. Matthew Patrick, Wirral West's MP and former councillor for the area, said: "People here deserve good jobs, better transport links, stronger schools and great leisure services."
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
'Disrespectful culture' at school rated inadequate
A school in which the use of misogynistic language was found to be "commonplace" has been rated "inadequate".Ofsted inspectors who visited The Oldershaw School in Wallasey, Wirral, said the offensive, derogatory and misogynistic language that was often heard "typified the disrespectful culture" at the MP Dame Angela Eagle said she was deeply concerned about Ofsted's "alarming" findings at the co-educational academy, which was rated "good" following a previous inspection in Oldershaw School said it had a "no tolerance approach to any form of disrespectful language between students" and was determined to make improvements. Labelling the school as "inadequate" in four of five areas, Ofsted said "profanities, offensive and derogatory language linked to misogyny are regularly heard".Labour MP Eagle said: "Young people only get one chance at their education, and they deserve far better than what is currently being delivered."She said the offensive language comments revealed a "toxic culture" within the school. The Ofsted report said pupils' behaviour in school corridors was "often boisterous and chaotic" and that "many pupils struggle to conduct themselves in an appropriate and respectful manner".Inspectors said poor behaviour often went unchallenged by their behaviour was questioned, pupils were often described as "confrontational, defiant and, at times, rude".The report said many pupils were not happy at the students were said to be wandering around the school instead of attending school was criticised for having low expectations for pupils and poor academic outcomes. 'Persistent absences' The report said the academy trust and the school itself were "too accepting of the barriers that hinder school improvement" and have been "too slow to drive forward the change that is needed to ensure that pupils receive an acceptable standard of education".It said both absence and persistent absence rates remained "unacceptably high", particularly for disadvantaged pupils, including those with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND).It said nearly half of the school's 836 pupils were persistently school was also criticised for its lack of focus on said "A very high proportion of pupils struggle to read and a significant minority are in the early stages of reading."The school's sixth-form provision is due to close this academic year, with it currently only having students in Year said she "condemned the failings of the school's leadership, academy trust, and governing body in the strongest possible terms".She said she hoped they would work constructively with the Department for Education to implement the necessary changes "to ensure that the children of Wallasey receive the high-quality education they are entitled to". 'Confronting attitudes' The Oldershaw School said more than 60% of its students qualified for free school meals and more than a third received SEND said improvements were being made following the inspection."Many of the issues highlighted in the report are long standing, particularly those around published outcomes," the school said in a statement."Over recent years the school has appointed a high number of well qualified, hard working and passionate staff who are focussed on improving the provision for all of our students."It should be mentioned that improvements in student personal development were noted in the report."This school, like all schools nationally, has to confront attitudes that exist in the wider community." Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
The Guardian
4 days ago
- The Guardian
From Tate Modern to Grimsby docks: the team saving Britain's cherished buildings from the wrecking ball
It's hard to imagine London without the mighty riverside citadels of Tate Modern and Battersea power station, or bereft of the ornate Victorian market halls of Smithfield and Billingsgate. It is equally difficult to picture Yorkshire without its majestic sandstone mills, Grimsby without its fishing docks, or parts of Liverpool without their streets of terrace houses. Yet all these things could have victims of the wrecking ball, if it weren't for one small band of plucky activists. You may not have heard of Save Britain's Heritage, or Save as it likes to style itself. But the tiny charity, which celebrates its 50th birthday this month, has had more influence than any other group in campaigning for the imaginative reuse of buildings at risk, most of which had no legal protections whatsoever from being bulldozed. 'We felt that a much more punchy approach to endangered buildings was really needed,' says Marcus Binney, who founded Save in 1975, with an agile network of likeminded journalists, historians, architects and planners. 'There was too much, 'Oh, we'll write to the minister, and have a word with the chairman of the county council.' The usual channels were not working. We realised that the real battleground was the media.' They were spurred by the surprise success of a 1974 exhibition at the V&A, The Destruction of the Country House, co-curated by Binney, which conveyed the shocking scale of demolition across the country with graphic power. The 'Hall of Destruction', replete with toppling classical columns, displayed more than 1,000 country houses that had been lost in the preceding century, a number that rose to 1,600 by the time the exhibition closed. The scale of the issue struck a chord: more than 1.5m signatures of support were gathered to keep these buildings standing. What set Save apart from other heritage groups at the time was its proactive, propositional approach and energetic, youthful zeal. They had no qualms about calling out the villains, and would admonish greedy developers and lazy local authorities with ferocious glee. Their press releases and campaign pamphlets were a breath of fresh air, emblazoned with bold graphics, punchy headlines and evocative texts written with fierce authority – with a critical media-savviness brought by trustees including Simon Jenkins and Dan Cruickshank. Most crucially of all, theirs was not a call to keep the world in aspic, but to find creative alternative uses for buildings that their owners couldn't see. 'The argument for demolition was always that a building had 'reached the end of its useful life,'' says Binney. 'But the question is: 'Useful for whom?'' When the Central Electricity Generating Board planned to demolish its (then unlisted) Bankside power station in Southwark and replace it with offices, Save conjured a proposal in 1979, in a moment of wildly improbable blue-sky thinking, to turn it into an art gallery instead. A decade later, Tate announced that Sir Giles Gilbert Scott's great brick colossus would become the home of its modern art collection. It is now one of the most visited museums in the world. Twenty years on, when a developer wanted to scoop out the elegant innards of Smithfield market and replace them with a bloated office block and shops, Save commissioned an alternative vision, fought two crowdfunded public inquiries, and won. The London Museum is set to open there next year, breathing fresh new life into the atmospheric warren of cast-iron domes and brick vaults, that would otherwise be dust. It is hard to appreciate now, but Save's early activities fundamentally transformed the perception of heritage, and expanded the scope of what was deemed worth keeping. The conservation movement tended to focus on churches, country houses and town halls, but Save was the first to suggest that industrial buildings were equally worthy of attention. Its 1979 exhibition and publication, Satanic Mills, highlighted the threatened textile factories of the Pennines, and led to campaigns to protect places such as Salts Mill in Saltaire – now a Unesco world heritage site – and Lister Mills in Manningham. 'The building itself is an icon for Bradford,' says Mollie, who now lives in a flat in Lister Mills, once the largest silk mill in the world, which was transformed by architect David Morley for Urban Splash in 2006. 'When it was becoming derelict it gave the community a real down feeling – you felt everything was bad and going wrong. When it was done up it really raised people's hearts.' Save has long argued that communities' emotional attachment to buildings is just as powerful an argument for their retention as their place in the architectural canon. But that's not a factor that planners can consider. 'The planning system is heavily focused on historic fabric and architectural significance,' says Henrietta Billings, Save's current director. 'But what about emotional attachment and embodied memory? What about the feelings of loss when these buildings are ripped out of communities, and what about the unlisted buildings that people really care about?' The development industry may not speak the language of loss, but it certainly understands the 'value uplift' that a 'heritage asset' can bring. At Capital and Centric's recent development of a Manchester textile mill, Crusader Works, the sales team received four times as many inquiries for flats in the 19th-century mill buildings than in the new-build blocks. And they sold them for 10% more, inviting buyers into a fantasy of 'exposed beams and red brick dreams'. Another office developer says it favours renovating postwar blocks in order to attract the gen Z workforce, who prefer working in 'distinctive, characterful buildings' with low carbon credentials over generic 'grade A' glass boxes. Alongside financial value, Save is increasingly raising the environmental benefits of keeping buildings – something which can be more precisely measured than emotions, and fought over at public inquiries with the help of expert witnesses. The Oxford Street branch of Marks & Spencer recently became a lighting rod for this new frontier of the heritage debate, when the carbon emissions of demolishing the 1920s department store and replacing it with a 10-storey behemoth were raised as one of the key reasons for keeping it. The M&S plans, Save argued, with the help of carbon expert Simon Sturgis, would release 40,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere – the equivalent of almost 20,000 flights from London to Sydney. 'It was a watershed,' says Billings, 'aligning heritage and sustainability at the heart of a public inquiry for the first time. Although we lost the battle, we were able to show how, by avoiding demolition, you are not chucking out all the embodied carbon in the existing building, as well as not expending more carbon on producing all the steel, glass and concrete for a brand new building.' Save may have lost the case but the inquiry highlighted its next crucial battleground. The then secretary of state Michael Gove's decision to quash M&S's permission to demolish the building was ultimately overturned, because he had misinterpreted the national planning policy framework (NPPF). He suggested that there was a 'strong presumption in favour of reusing buildings' in the rules – which there is not. At present, the NPPF merely tries to 'encourage the reuse of existing resources, including the conversion of existing buildings'. There is a legal ocean of difference between a 'strong presumption' and a mere 'encouragement', as M&S's barrister successfully pointed out. The devil is in the semantic detail, and it is exactly that detail that Save is now campaigning to see changed. 'The current government's rhetoric is all about 'build, build, build' and 'bulldozing the planning system',' says Billings. 'But planning is not the obstacle. It just needs to be properly funded and tightened up. There are plenty of planning applications that we know local councillors and planners are uncomfortable with, but they are often forced to approve them because of the costs involved in defending refusals.' Entirely funded by donations, Save's team of six is currently juggling numerous campaigns, from trying to close legal loopholes in Scotland's heritage protection rules, to saving a Georgian seaside hotel on the edge of Snowdonia, to contesting several controversial plans to butcher Liverpool Street station. As it celebrates five decades of such David and Goliath battles, against a bleak backdrop of rapid global heating, missed emissions targets and a government intent on building at any cost, the work of this gutsy little group is more critical than ever.
BBC News
5 days ago
- BBC News
Surrey parents celebrate after axed bus services replaced
Campaigning parents whose children were told to use torches to walk across unlit heathland by Surrey County Council (SCC) are celebrating after it was announced that an axed school bus service would be this year, SCC said it was saving money and cancelling the free bus service between Molesey and Esher High School, advising children to walk through dark alleyways and across countryside parents started a petition to put on an extra 814 bus service to accommodate the children with part of the £12bn transport funding granted to SCC by the Kate Maxwell said: "I'm thrilled they've seen sense but it could have been handled so much differently. "This whole process has been so stressful on everyone involved, the parents, children, and schools, and for what?"In a letter to parents, Esher High School headteacher Andy King said the school was pleased to share that an additional 814 bus would be running as a trial from September, following "strong and sustained advocacy from our school and parent community".The council said the extra bus would run for the first half-term of the 2025/26 academic year, according to the Local Democracy Reporting that, demand will be analysed to see if the service continues, said Furniss, cabinet member for highways, transport and economic growth at SCC, said: "We're very aware of the challenges raised by parents and carers and have worked with Falcon to address these."As with all bus services, we need to ensure they are used to make them viable, so I encourage parents and carers to take up this new provision. "This additional bus is being provided by Falcon at no cost to Surrey County Council."
