Lawyers are not employees of Bar Council: HC refuses to direct for ICC under PoSH
A division bench of justice Ajey Gadkari and justice Rajesh Patil was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by the Women Legal Association seeking a permanent grievance redressal mechanism to address complaints of sexual harassment against lawyers.
The PoSH Act protects women from sexual harassment in the workplace and provides a mechanism for complaint redressal. It mandates the formation of ICCs in organizations with 10 or more employees to handle such complaints. Under the Act, the employer is responsible for creating a safe working environment, formulating a policy against sexual harassment and establishing an ICC. However, the court held that the provisions of the PoSH Act would not apply to the complaints of female lawyers of the Bar Council of India (BCI) and the BCMG as there was no 'employee-employer' relationship between the lawyers and the bar councils.
'The provisions of the Act of 2013 apply when there is an employee-employer relationship. But in the case of advocates and the BCI or the BCMG, there is no such relationship as neither the BCI nor the BCMG can be said to be employers of the advocates and, thus the provisions of the Act of 2013 will not apply to complaints filed by lady lawyers,' the court said while rejecting the relief.
'It is, however, made clear that the provisions will apply on complaints filed by any of the employees or the committee members of the BCI and BCMG,' the court observed. It added that Section 35 of the Advocates Act provides action against professional or other misconduct by the lawyers. 'This is a remedy available for lady lawyers, to file complaints against any kind of harassment which may amount to professional or other misconduct,' the bench added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
ICC seeks arrest of Taliban leaders over persecution of women
The International Criminal Court on Tuesday issued arrest warrants for two senior Taliban leaders, accusing them of crimes against humanity for persecuting women and girls. The ICC, based in The Hague, was set up to rule on the world's worst crimes, such as war crimes and crimes against humanity.(File/AP) Judges said there were "reasonable grounds" to suspect Taliban Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada and chief justice Abdul Hakim Haqqani of committing gender-based persecution. "While the Taliban have imposed certain rules and prohibitions on the population as a whole, they have specifically targeted girls and women by reason of their gender, depriving them of fundamental rights and freedoms," the court said in a statement. The Taliban had "severely deprived" girls and women of the rights to education, privacy and family life and the freedoms of movement, expression, thought, conscience and religion, ICC judges said. "In addition, other persons were targeted because certain expressions of sexuality and/or gender identity were regarded as inconsistent with the Taliban's policy on gender." The court said the alleged crimes had been committed between August 15, 2021, when the Taliban seized power, and continued until at least January 20, 2025. Taliban authorities rejected the warrants as "nonsense". The ICC warrants "won't affect the strong commitment and dedication to sharia (Islamic law)" of Taliban authorities, spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said in a statement. The ICC, based in The Hague, was set up to rule on the world's worst crimes, such as war crimes and crimes against humanity. It has no police force of its own and relies on member states to carry out its arrest warrants -- with mixed results. In theory, this means anyone subject to an ICC arrest warrant cannot travel to a member state for fear of being detained. 'Ongoing persecution' After sweeping back to power in August 2021, the Taliban authorities pledged a softer rule than their first stint from 1996 to 2001. But they quickly imposed restrictions on women and girls that the United Nations has labelled "gender apartheid". Edicts in line with their interpretation of Islamic law handed down by Akhundzada, who rules by decree from the movement's birthplace in southern Kandahar, have squeezed women and girls out of public life. The Taliban government barred girls from secondary school and women from university in the first 18 months after they ousted the US-backed government, making Afghanistan the only country in the world to impose such bans. Authorities imposed restrictions on women working for non-governmental groups and other employment, with thousands of women losing government jobs -- or being paid to stay at home. Beauty salons have been closed and women blocked from visiting public parks, gyms and baths as well as travelling long distances without a male chaperone. A "vice and virtue" law announced last year ordered women not to sing or recite poetry in public and for their voices and bodies to be "concealed" outside the home. The ICC prosecutor's office welcomed the warrants as "an important vindication and acknowledgement of the rights of Afghan women and girls." "Through the Taliban's deprivation of fundamental rights to education, privacy and family life... Afghan women and girls were increasingly erased from public life," said ICC prosecutors. "The decision of the judges of the ICC affirms that their rights are valuable, and that their plight and voices matter." When requesting the arrest warrants in January, chief prosecutor Karim Khan warned that he would seek warrants for other Taliban officials. Agnes Callamard, secretary general of Amnesty International, said the ICC warrants gave hope to women and girls inside and outside of Afghanistan. Liz Evenson, international justice director at Human Rights Watch, said the arrest warrants showed that 'when justice is supported, victims can have their day in court.'
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
5 hours ago
- First Post
ICC issues arrest warrants for Taliban leaders over gender persecution
Judges said there were 'reasonable grounds' to suspect Taliban Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada and chief justice Abdul Hakim Haqqani of committing gender-based persecution read more The International Criminal Court on Tuesday issued arrest warrants for two senior Taliban leaders, accusing them of crimes against humanity for persecuting women and girls. Judges said there were 'reasonable grounds' to suspect Taliban Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada and chief justice Abdul Hakim Haqqani of committing gender-based persecution. 'While the Taliban have imposed certain rules and prohibitions on the population as a whole, they have specifically targeted girls and women by reason of their gender, depriving them of fundamental rights and freedoms,' the court said in a statement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Taliban had 'severely deprived' girls and women of the rights to education, privacy and family life and the freedoms of movement, expression, thought, conscience and religion, ICC judges said. 'In addition, other persons were targeted because certain expressions of sexuality and/or gender identity were regarded as inconsistent with the Taliban's policy on gender.' The court said the alleged crimes had been committed between August 15, 2021, when the Taliban seized power, and continued until at least January 20, 2025. Taliban authorities rejected the warrants as 'nonsense'. The ICC warrants 'won't affect the strong commitment and dedication to sharia (Islamic law)' of Taliban authorities, spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said in a statement. The ICC, based in The Hague, was set up to rule on the world's worst crimes, such as war crimes and crimes against humanity. It has no police force of its own and relies on member states to carry out its arrest warrants – with mixed results. In theory, this means anyone subject to an ICC arrest warrant cannot travel to a member state for fear of being detained. 'Ongoing persecution' After sweeping back to power in August 2021, the Taliban authorities pledged a softer rule than their first stint from 1996 to 2001. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But they quickly imposed restrictions on women and girls that the United Nations has labelled 'gender apartheid'. Edicts in line with their interpretation of Islamic law handed down by Akhundzada, who rules by decree from the movement's birthplace in southern Kandahar, have squeezed women and girls out of public life. The Taliban government barred girls from secondary school and women from university in the first 18 months after they ousted the US-backed government, making Afghanistan the only country in the world to impose such bans. Authorities imposed restrictions on women working for non-governmental groups and other employment, with thousands of women losing government jobs – or being paid to stay at home. Beauty salons have been closed and women blocked from visiting public parks, gyms and baths as well as travelling long distances without a male chaperone. A 'vice and virtue' law announced last year ordered women not to sing or recite poetry in public and for their voices and bodies to be 'concealed' outside the home. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The ICC prosecutor's office welcomed the warrants as 'an important vindication and acknowledgement of the rights of Afghan women and girls.' 'Through the Taliban's deprivation of fundamental rights to education, privacy and family life… Afghan women and girls were increasingly erased from public life,' said ICC prosecutors. 'The decision of the judges of the ICC affirms that their rights are valuable, and that their plight and voices matter.' When requesting the arrest warrants in January, chief prosecutor Karim Khan warned that he would seek warrants for other Taliban officials. Agnes Callamard, secretary general of Amnesty International, said the ICC warrants gave hope to women and girls inside and outside of Afghanistan. Liz Evenson, international justice director at Human Rights Watch, said the arrest warrants showed that 'when justice is supported, victims can have their day in court.'
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
'Violations of fundamental rights': ICC cracks down on Taliban; Supreme Leader, Chief Justice named
The International Criminal Court On Tuesday issued arrest warrants for two senior Taliban leaders, accusing them of crimes against humanity for systematically persecuting women, girls, and others who defied the group's strict gender policies. The warrants named Haibatullah Akhundzada, the Taliban's Supreme Leader, and Abdul Hakim Haqqani, the regime's Chief Justice. According to a statement from the ICC's Pre-Trial Chamber II, there are 'reasonable grounds to believe' that both men were responsible for ordering, inducing, or soliciting crimes of persecution on gender and political grounds. These crimes are alleged to have taken place across Afghanistan from 15 August 2021—when the Taliban seized power through at least 20 January 2025. 'While the Taliban have imposed certain rules and prohibitions on the population as a whole, they have specifically targeted girls and women by reason of their gender, depriving them of fundamental rights and freedoms,' the Chamber said. The ICC detailed a broad and ongoing pattern of repression, stating that the Taliban had 'severely deprived, through decrees and edicts, girls and women of the rights to education, privacy and family life and the freedoms of movement, expression, thought, conscience and religion.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Invertir en Cervecería Nacional CFD podría proporcionarte un ingreso adicional Empieza a invertir hoy Registro Undo The court also highlighted abuses against those perceived to be 'allies of girls and women,' as well as individuals whose gender identity or sexual expression diverged from Taliban norms. The judges said that gender persecution under Article 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute includes not only direct violence but also 'systemic and institutionalised forms of harm,' such as the enforcement of discriminatory societal norms. These, they concluded, have resulted in 'serious and systemic violations of fundamental rights' in Afghanistan. Although the arrest warrants remain under seal to protect victims and witnesses, the Court said it was in the interests of justice to publicly confirm their existence. The judges noted that public awareness 'may contribute to the prevention of the further commission of these crimes.'
