US mandates public social media for visa applicants, sparks privacy concerns
This diktat, effective immediately, has been met with outrage from data privacy experts and legal professionals in India, who argue it constitutes a severe violation of individual privacy and could infringe upon fundamental rights.
The directive, announced by the US Embassy in India on Monday, stipulates that all applicants for these visa categories must adjust their privacy settings on all personal social media accounts to "public." This move, according to the embassy, is intended to "facilitate vetting necessary to establish their identity and admissibility to the United States under US law" and "bolster national security."
Also read: Israel-Iran war: After explosions boom Bushehr, Iran's only nuclear plant; Rosatom downplays attack - 'site remains…'
US officials will scrutinize online activity across platforms like Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), LinkedIn, and TikTok, looking for any "hostile attitudes toward our citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles," or links to "extremist ideology" or "anti-American sentiment."
However, legal experts are quick to highlight the perilous implications of such a broad and intrusive measure. Senior advocate at the Supreme Court N.S. Nappinai noted that while US privacy laws, with the exception of California, may be weak, their fundamental rights, particularly concerning freedom of speech and expression, are absolute. "Any act which could result in restraint of speech and expression could be contested in the US on grounds of violation of this inalienable right," Nappinai stated, adding that "it remains to be seen however whether the requirement is likely to be contested."
From an Indian perspective, Nappinai suggested that government intervention might be mandated, as the move directly impacts Indian students. The issue, she emphasized, is not simply about privacy but also about national security, suggesting that the only recourse would be to invoke the US's strong rights of free speech and argue how the requirement could lead to a chilling effect on it.
Salman Waris, managing partner, TechLegis Advocates and Solicitors, echoed these concerns. "The US embassy's new rule requiring visa applicants to make their social media profiles public does raise privacy concerns under Indian and global privacy standards, since it forces disclosure of personal data beyond what's typical for such applications."
Waris highlighted that this policy "could conflict with privacy rights under India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act and the EU's GDPR, both of which stress data minimization and user consent." He called the new notification "forced consent" for sharing social media profiles and content.
Also read: US visa: Indians seeking F, M, J non-immigrant visas must 'adjust social media settings', says embassy — check new rules
For students, he warned, it means they will need to review and possibly clean up their online presence, knowing that even old posts or memes could jeopardise their chance of getting the US visa.
Aditi Verma Thakur, a senior partner at law firm Ediplis Counsels, said that while the US Department of State's requirement for social media handles has been in place for a few years, citing national security, the new mandate for public profiles raises questions about "free and informed consent under data privacy norms." She emphasized that while accessing public profiles may not be a direct breach of data privacy laws, there are "ethical concerns about how and why these profiles were made public in the first place."
Thakur suggested that applicants who are normally cautious about sharing personal information might feel "pressured to make their profiles public in order to not jeopardize their visa application," which she sees as a form of indirect coercion and an intrusion into individual privacy. She also highlighted that under India's new Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, 2023, the processing of personal data requires 'explicit consent,' a requirement that becomes diluted when users are forced to make their data public, even if "the underlying privacy concerns in such cases remain relevant and merit attention."
Thakur noted that foreign students "sensitive about sharing personal information online may not be comfortable making their profiles public," and this new requirement is "likely to make them more cautious about what they share and how much information they disclose on such platforms."
This latest development comes amidst a broader tightening of US visa policies under the president Donald Trump's administration, which has consistently emphasized a "quality workers" approach to immigration. Mint previously reported that the past six months have already seen student visa success rates for the US plummet from a historical 99% to around 70%. This decline is attributed to increased scrutiny and higher rejection numbers.
Also read: 'Don't go to India because…': American tourist's Instagram Reel goes viral; social media reacts, 'This is so true'
While the US remains a popular destination, particularly for Indian students pursuing science and technology courses, experts anticipate a shift in student sentiment. Mint earlier reported that while in-demand tech skills might still find acceptance, "lower order skills like coding, maintenance, etc., could be limited." Business management programs, too, are expected to see a "gradual plateau," with only Ivy League institutions likely to maintain strong demand.
The H-1B visa, often a post-study pathway for F1 visa holders, is also under the Trump administration's microscope. Any stricter H-1B policies or changes to post-study work permits would significantly impact Indian students' decisions to pursue education in the US.
Mint previously reported that parents and students are already casting a "wider net" for study-abroad options. The number of students choosing the US has "declined by half" over the past five years, with growing interest in European and some Southeast Asian universities. Concerns over rising political activism on American campuses are also contributing to this shift.
Adding to the uncertainty, Canada and Australia, traditionally alternative popular destinations, have also implemented their own clampdowns on international students. This could further push Indian students towards Europe, potentially making "America's loss Europe's gain."
Despite the growing anxieties and the new social media requirement, some consultants remain cautiously optimistic, predicting only a "short-term blip" in US visa applications. They even foresee a surge in M1 vocational visas due to a demand for teachers in the US.
However, the immediate impact of the public social media profile mandate is undeniable. As Indian students weigh their options, balancing academic aspirations with concerns over privacy and the evolving visa landscape, the new US policy stands as a stark reminder of the increasing complexities in international education.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
32 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
How South Africa could harness Donald Trump's wrath
NO SAILOR LIKES a hurricane. But if the alternative is drifting in the doldrums without hope, even vicious gales have their uses. As South Africa is buffeted by criticism from President Donald Trump and other American conservatives—some of it unfair and pushed by bad-faith actors—centrist business and political leaders dream of riding that storm to hasten reforms. In February Mr Trump issued an executive order suspending American aid to South Africa, including funding for HIV medications that keep millions alive. His order accused South Africa's government of fuelling violence against the country's white minority and condemned a new law that, on paper, allows land to be taken without compensation. It said this was an attack on white South African farmers known as Afrikaners. These whites, of mostly Dutch, French and German descent, are invited to apply for asylum in America. For good measure the order called South Africa's foreign policies 'aggressive' towards America and its allies, notably Israel, which South Africa has accused of genocide before the International Court of Justice in The Hague. On May 21st South Africa's president, Cyril Ramaphosa, a glad-handing but paralysingly cautious stalwart of the ruling African National Congress (ANC), stepped into the tempest's eye. Invited to the White House with government ministers, a trade union boss and Mr Trump's golfing buddies, Mr Ramaphosa was ambushed in the Oval Office. He had hoped to lobby for his country to remain in AGOA, a trade pact that gives many African nations preferential access to American markets. After Mr Trump gave the word, video screens showed footage of a radical opposition leader chanting anti-white slogans. 'Officials' in South Africa are saying 'kill the farmer and take their land,' Mr Trump baselessly claimed. America's direct leverage is not what it was. After years of deepening ties with China and the rest of Africa, South Africa sent just 13% of its exports to America in 2023, of which about a quarter were covered by AGOA. Business groups estimate that between 200,000 and 300,000 jobs depend on AGOA, mostly in carmaking and farming. AGOA is formally in the gift of America's Congress, and long before Mr Trump's re-election Republicans and Democrats in Washington grumbled about South Africa's closeness to China, Iran and Russia, and its expressions of sympathy for Hamas, the Palestinian terror group. The port city of Cape Town faces 'quite concentrated AGOA risks' as a centre for exporting citrus fruit, wine and car engines, frets its mayor, Geordin Hill-Lewis. He is from the Democratic Alliance (DA), a business-friendly party and junior partner in Mr Ramaphosa's coalition government. Mr Hill-Lewis declares that South Africa has behaved 'appallingly' towards America for years. 'If there were a textbook for alienating friends, we have written it,' he says in his office overlooking the bustling docks. He suggests that big American firms have long chafed at post-apartheid laws that oblige many foreign firms to set up licensed local subsidiaries then sell 30% stakes in them to black business interests, under a system known as Black Economic Empowerment (BEE). Critics charge that BEE-related equity transfers enrich a few, well connected black executives. There have already been reforms in several sectors, allowing firms to invest in community projects and employ local suppliers, rather than hand over ownership stakes. In the words of an insider, previous governments hesitated to allow such workarounds in the digital-services industry, fearing a 'backlash' from ANC hardliners about the watering down of BEE. Now the government is asking regulators to allow Starlink, the satellite-internet firm owned by Elon Musk, a South African-born billionaire, to give free broadband services to 5,000 rural schools instead of sharing ownership rights. That responds to pressure from Mr Musk, who says BEE laws are racist. 'Hardball' American lobbying is unhelpful. But some pressure 'allows those who have pushed for reforms to say, you see, there are negative consequences' to rigid versions of BEE, says the DA leader, John Steenhuisen. Songezo Zibi leads Rise Mzansi, a small centrist party. He says fears about the expropriation law are exaggerated: it is a compromise that mirrors language in the constitution. Radicals wanted something harsher. In contrast, he worries that even old friends from the Democratic Party in Washington were confounded by South Africa's go-it-alone Gaza campaign. Mr Zibi would like his country to act in concert with China, Brazil and others. Shining a light on home-grown problems Weighing America's clout in South African public debate is not simple. For one thing, its former generosity was not always noticed. Sikelela Dibela serves tasty, home-roasted coffee in his café in Khayelitsha, a black township outside Cape Town. He only learned that American aid part-funded a local HIV clinic when doctors talked of job losses over coffee. Mr Dibela credits Mr Ramaphosa with keeping his cool in the Oval Office, so that: 'It was not an embarrassment like with Zelensky.' Still, he says that talk of a 'white genocide' is false and inspires widespread anger. Colin Mkosi, the founder of a bicycle-delivery service in Langa, a nearby township, defends BEE rules that hand equity to black executives. Without ownership, people 'can be sidelined', he says. He objects to foreign investors trying to 'dictate how we do things'. Importantly, external criticism is prompting self-reflection. Several South Africans welcomed Mr Ramaphosa's delegation acknowledging their country's appalling crime-rates in the Oval Office, as they tried to convince Mr Trump that white farmers are less likely to be murdered than poor blacks. American hostility will not make South Africa change course entirely. But if it puts wind in reformers' sails, this tempest might yet do some good.
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
"Biggest winner will be American people," says Donald Trump as Senate passes 'One Big Beautiful Bill'
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel As the US Senate passed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote, President Donald Trump called it a "major policy win", saying the American people would be the biggest beneficiaries of the described the bill as "everyone's bill" and highlighted its potential impact, lower taxes, higher wages, secure borders, and a stronger military, while asserting that the American people were the "biggest winner.""Almost all of our Great Republicans in the United States Senate have passed our 'ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL.' It is no longer a 'House Bill' or a 'Senate Bill'. It is everyone's Bill. There is so much to be proud of, and EVERYONE got a major Policy WIN -- But, the Biggest Winner of them all will be the American People, who will have Permanently Lower Taxes, Higher Wages and Take Home Pay, Secure Borders, and a Stronger and More Powerful Military. Additionally, Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security Benefits are not being cut, but are being STRENGTHENED and PROTECTED from the Radical and Destructive Democrats by eliminating Waste, Fraud, and Abuse from those Programs," Trump wrote on his social media platform, Truth the Bill is now set to be presented at the House of Representatives (lower chamber), Trump urged that the bill is presented to his desk before July 4 (Independence Day of the US)"We can have all of this right now, but only if the House GOP UNITES, ignores its occasional 'GRANDSTANDERS' (You know who you are!), and does the right thing, which is sending this Bill to my desk. We are on schedule -- Let's keep it going, and be done before you and your family go on a July 4th vacation. The American People need and deserve it. They sent us here to, GET IT DONE!" Trump also predicted a wave of economic expansion following the bill's enactment. "Our Country is going to explode with Massive Growth, even more than it already has since I was Re-Elected. Between the Growth, this Bill, our Tariffs, and more, 'THE ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL' sets the United States down a fiscal path by greatly reducing our Federal Deficit, and setting us on course for enormous Prosperity in the new and wonderful Golden Age of America," he bill cleared the Senate in a 51-50 vote after days of intense negotiations. Lawmakers worked through the weekend before launching a 27-hour marathon of amendment votes, during which Republican leaders worked to win over dissenting its Senate passage, the bill now faces a tougher path in the House, where at least six Republican lawmakers have publicly opposed it due to proposed deeper Medicaid cuts, changes to clean energy incentives, and modifications to the SALT (state and local tax) deduction provisions originally approved in the House version. Representative Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) has also indicated he may vote against the bill, citing concerns over its projected USD 3 trillion addition to the national Mike Johnson now faces the challenge of rallying the House Republican majority to pass what could become one of the most ambitious and defining legislative achievements of Donald Trump's political legacy.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
QUAD condemns Pahalgam attack, says perpetrators must be brought to justice
The QUAD countries (India, US, Japan, Australia) on Wednesday jointly condemned the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, which claimed the lives of 26 people, mostly tourists, in Jammu and Kashmir's Baisaran valley. The leaders made these remarks at the QUAD Foreign Ministers' meeting in Washington. The group also urged all the member states of the United Nations "to cooperate actively with all relevant authorities in this regard." A joint statement was shared by the US Department of State, which read, "The Quad unequivocally condemns all acts of terrorism and violent extremism in all its forms and manifestations, including cross-border terrorism, and renews our commitment to counterterrorism cooperation. We condemn in the strongest terms the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, on April 22, 2025, which claimed the lives of 25 Indian nationals and one Nepali citizen, while injuring several others. We express our deepest condolences to the families of the victims and extend our heartfelt wishes for a swift and full recovery to all those injured." "We call for the perpetrators, organisers, and financiers of this reprehensible act to be brought to justice without any delay and urge all UN Member States, in accordance with their obligations under international law and relevant UNSCRs, to cooperate actively with all relevant authorities in this regard."
