3,400 offer letters against 135 seats: VNSGU issues penalty notice of Rs 3.62 lakh to society running MTB Arts College
ABVP members had a few days ago held the college principal — who was later removed from the post — hostage in his own office to mark their protest over the issue. The South Gujarat College Teachers Association had condemned the incident.
On July 10, a large number of students were in the pipeline for first-year undergraduate admissions in the Arts stream at MTB Arts College. However, on receiving call letters from the college, when these students learnt that there were only 135 seats left, they protested. Leaders and members of the ABVP's Surat unit subsequently reached the spot and joined the students in their protest. The ABVP also handed a memorandum to the college in-charge principal and VNSGU Vice-Chancellor Dr K N Chavda and urged him to take action against the college authorities for the 'mistake'.
After receiving notice from the VNSGU, Dr Rudresh Vyas, who was the in-charge principal of MTB Arts College, said that the 'technical mistake' was made by college clerk Sagar Rana, who had issued over 3,400 call letters to students while only 135 seats were available.
ABVP leaders in Surat held a protest on Sunday again and entered the office of then Principal Vyas on the college campus. Vyas was allegedly held hostage for eight hours and was not allowed to take his medicines. Vyas later submitted a written complaint at Umra police station against the ABVP members, after which the police launched a probe.
Umra Police Inspector J A Rathwa said, 'We have started a probe in the matter and are trying to identify those who had entered the principal's office with the help of a video of the incident that had gone viral.'
Chairman of the Sarvajanik Education Society, Bharat Shah, said: 'After the issue came into light, we issued a notice to the in-charge principal Dr Rudresh Vyas. He responded that the mistake was made by a clerk and distanced himself from all responsibilities. We have removed him from the post of in-charge principal of MTB Arts college, but he will still serve as professor with the grant-in-aid college, which is affiliated to VNSGU.'
He further said, 'We have written a letter to the VNSGU stating that the college is run by an education society, which cannot bear such a heavy penalty amount, and so it should be waived. We are running over 12 colleges, which have thousands of students. The act done by the ABVP is unpardonable, and it is unethical to hold an in-charge college principal hostage in his own office. We also want the police to take strict legal actions against the the ABVP members involved in the incident.'
South Gujarat College Teachers Association president Ajay Naik said, 'We condemn the incident, which saw Dr Rudresh Vyas being held hostage by ABVP members for eight hours and not being allowed to take his medicines of diabetes. Legal actions should be taken against those involved in such an act.'
When contacted, Vyas refused to comment on the issue.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
27 minutes ago
- NDTV
5 Arrested in Tamil Nadu For Selling Newborn Boy For Rs 1.5 Lakh
In a disturbing case of child trafficking, five people, including the father of a newborn, have been arrested in Tamil Nadu's Tiruvarur district for allegedly selling the infant for Rs 1.5 lakh. The male baby has been rescued and is currently under the care of a government-run children's home. The case came to light after a widow, Santoshkumari, alerted police that Dinesh, a local man with whom she had been in a relationship, along with his mother and others, forcibly took away her newborn baby on July 25 while she was returning home from the Thanjavur Government Medical College Hospital, where she had delivered the baby on July 13. Dinesh, who is married and has a child of his own, allegedly conspired with his mother Vasugi and a broker named Vinoth to sell the baby to a childless couple, Radhakrishnan, a Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited (TASMAC) employee, and his wife Vimala, from Adichapuram village in Mannargudi taluk. Following the complaint, police registered a case and arrested all five accused: Dinesh, his mother Vasugi, broker Vinoth, and the couple who bought the baby. The infant was successfully traced and rescued by authorities. "We do not want to endanger the newborn by returning him to the mother immediately," a senior police officer told NDTV. "He will be handed over only after proper counselling and evaluation." Tamil Nadu has had a Cradle Baby Scheme since the 1990s, an initiative that allows parents to safely and anonymously surrender unwanted newborns at designated government hospitals and child welfare centers. The scheme was introduced to combat female infanticide and ensure the safety of abandoned children.
The Wire
27 minutes ago
- The Wire
ED Issues Look Out Notice Against Anil Ambani: Report
A SEBI report allegedly found that R‑Infra, a Reliance Group company, had moved around Rs. 10,000 crore to other group companies through an undisclosed private entity without declaring it as a related party. New Delhi: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has issued a lookout circular against businessman Anil Ambani, managing director of the Reliance Anil Dhirubhai Ambani (ADA) Group, according to a report by Hindustan Times. The agency is investigating allegations of loan fraud worth thousands of crores by his companies, sources told HT on August 1. The issuance of a lookout circular, or LOC, means that Ambani can no longer leave India without the permission of courts. As per the HT report, Ambani has also been summoned for questioning under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) on August 5. 'We have issued a LOC against Anil Ambani and issued summons to him on August 5 asking him to appear in Delhi for recording his statement under the PMLA in the loan fraud probe,' HT quoted an officer in the Enforcement Directorate (ED) as saying. The unnamed source also said that Ambani would likely be asked about various loans based on findings by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), a statutory body under the government of India that regulates securities and the commodity market in the country. The HT report said that the ED searched the premises of 50 companies and 25 people, including senior executives, associated with the Reliance Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group companies, last week. According to officials, the ED is looking into alleged financial irregularities and collective loan diversion amounting to more than Rs. 17,000 crore by multiple companies under the Group including Reliance Infrastructure (R Infra). According to The New Indian Express, a report by SEBI allegedly disclosed via ED sources accused R‑Infra of moving approximately Rs. 10,000 crore to group companies through an undisclosed private entity named CLE Pvt Ltd – without declaring it as a related party, possibly to avoid approvals from shareholders and audit panels – under the guise of inter‑corporate deposits, equity investments and corporate guarantees. According to the report, these transactions allegedly span across the financial years of 2013 to 2023, with total exposure to CLE reported at Rs. 8,302 crore by SEBI, and write‑offs reaching Rs 10,110 crore during the financial years (FY) 2017–21. Reliance ADA Group rejects allegations The Reliance ADA Group has, however, rejected these allegations, according to the TNIE report. A spokesperson of the Reliance Group said in a statement that the allegation regarding the diversion of ₹10,000 crore to an undisclosed party was a 10-year-old matter and that the company had stated in its financial statements that its exposure was only around Rs. 6,500 crore, the HT report said. As per the statement, R Infra had already publicly disclosed this matter on February 9 this year. 'Through mandatory mediation proceedings conducted by a retired Supreme Court judge and the mediation award filed before the Hon'ble Bombay High Court, Reliance Infrastructure arrived at a settlement to recover its 100 per cent exposure of ₹6,500 crore,' HT quoted the statement as saying. Per the report, the company also claimed that Anil Ambani had not been on the Board of Reliance Infrastructure for more than three years, since March 2022. The ED is also looking into allegations of illegal loan diversion of approximately Rs. 3,000 crore provided by Yes Bank to companies under the Reliance Group, Reliance Home Finance Limited and Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd, between 2017 and 2019. According to the HT report, ED officials had stated last week that Yes Bank promoters received money in their accounts just before the loan was granted to these companies. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
The Print
41 minutes ago
- The Print
Malegaon blast case: Abhinav Bharat not banned, govt yet to declare it terror outfit, says court
The judge held that the outfit has not been declared a terrorist organisation to date by the Central government, and 'even the Abhinav Bharat Trust or sanstha or sanghatana or foundation is not a banned organisation'. Special Judge A K Lahoti, in the over 1,000-page judgment, noted that the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) in its investigation claimed that the accused persons were all members of Abhinav Bharat, which was an organised crime syndicate. Mumbai, Aug 2 (PTI) A special court that acquitted seven persons in the 2008 Malegaon blast case debunked the prosecution's claims that right-wing extremist group Abhinav Bharat had carried out the blast, noting that the government has not banned the organisation as a terror outfit. The court noted that the term Abhinav Bharat was consistently used by the prosecuting agencies, from the stage of remand through the final hearing, as a common reference or in common parlance. 'It is necessary to mention that Abhinav Bharat is not a banned organisation. Till today, it is not a banned organisation under the provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act,' the judgment said. If the Central government is of the opinion that any association is or has become an unlawful association, it may be declared so by way of notification, it added. 'But nothing is brought on record till date to show that Abhinav Bharat Trust or Abhinav Bharat or Abhinav Bharat organisation is banned or declared unlawful by the Central government by way of any notification,' the court observed. It further noted that when the Abhinav Bharat Trust was constituted in 2007, it was registered with the Pune Charity Office, and on perusal, the trust deed did not mention anything wrong or illegal in its objectives. As per the trust deed, the objectives of the Abhinav Bharat Trust were to create patriotism and religious activities. 'The objectives mentioned in it (trust deed) are legal. Moreover, there is no evidence to show that the accused, Pragya Singh Thakur, Sameer Kulkarni and Sudhakar Chaturvedi were members of the Abhinav Bharat Trust,' the court said. The prosecution had claimed that Purohit had floated Abhinav Bharat in 2007 with the intention to propagate a separate Hindu Rashtra, with its own constitution, as the members of the outfit were dissatisfied with the Indian Constitution. It also alleged that the accused persons, who were all members of the group, had entered into a criminal conspiracy between January and September 2008 to carry out a blast in Malegaon to strike terror in the minds of people, cause communal rift and to overawe the government. The objective of the accused persons was to turn India into a Hindu Rashtra called 'Aryawrat', the prosecution had claimed. The court, in its judgment, however, noted that the prosecution had failed to prove that the Abhinav Bharat Trust was constituted for Hindu Rashtra and to change the Constitution of India. The prosecution also could not prove that funds amounting to Rs 21 lakh collected by Abhinav Bharat were used by the accused to purchase arms, ammunition and for other activities to carry out terrorist acts or illegal activities. PTI SP ARU This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
