Judge rules AI company Anthropic didn't break copyright law but must face trial over pirated books
In a test case for the artificial intelligence industry, a federal judge has ruled that AI company Anthropic didn't break the law by training its chatbot Claude on millions of copyrighted books.
But the company is still on the hook and could now go to trial over how it acquired those books by downloading them from online 'shadow libraries' of pirated copies.
U.S. District Judge William Alsup of San Francisco said in a ruling filed late Monday that the AI system's distilling from thousands of written works to be able to produce its own passages of text qualified as 'fair use' under U.S. copyright law because it was 'quintessentially transformative.'
'Like any reader aspiring to be a writer, Anthropic's (AI large language models) trained upon works not to race ahead and replicate or supplant them — but to turn a hard corner and create something different,' Alsup wrote.
But while dismissing the key copyright infringement claim made by the group of authors who sued the company last year, Alsup also said Anthropic must still go to trial over its alleged theft of their works.
'Anthropic had no entitlement to use pirated copies for its central library,' Alsup wrote.
A trio of writers — Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber and Kirk Wallace Johnson — alleged in their lawsuit last summer that Anthropic committed 'large-scale theft' by allegedly training its popular chatbot Claude on pirated copies of copyrighted books, and that the company 'seeks to profit from strip-mining the human expression and ingenuity behind each one of those works.'
As the case proceeded over the past year in San Francisco's federal court, documents disclosed in court showed Anthropic's internal concerns about the legality of their use of online repositories of pirated works. So the company later shifted its approach and attempted to purchase copies of digitized books.
'That Anthropic later bought a copy of a book it earlier stole off the internet will not absolve it of liability for the theft but it may affect the extent of statutory damages,' Alsup wrote.
The ruling could set a precedent for similar lawsuits that have piled up against Anthropic competitor OpenAI, maker of ChatGPT, as well as against Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram.
Anthropic — founded by ex-OpenAI leaders in 2021 — has marketed itself as the more responsible and safety-focused developer of generative AI models that can compose emails, summarize documents and interact with people in a natural way.
But the lawsuit filed last year alleged that Anthropic's actions 'have made a mockery of its lofty goals' by tapping into repositories of pirated writings to build its AI product.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
18 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Can Microsoft Join the $4 Trillion Club in 2025?
Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) had a market capitalization of $3.695 trillion as of Friday morning. That means its stock only needs to climb by another 8.3% for the company to become the founding member of the $4 trillion club, which I think is a very strong possibility by the end of 2025 (although Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) with its $3.835 trillion market cap could get there first). Artificial intelligence (AI) has been the primary driver of Microsoft's increasing value over the last couple of years. The company is approaching this lucrative opportunity from several different angles, and it has already become an industry leader in the software and cloud segments. Here's why AI could be Microsoft's ticket to a $4 trillion valuation this year. Microsoft has a diverse AI product portfolio Microsoft has invested around $14 billion in ChatGPT creator OpenAI since 2019, and it has combined the start-up's industry-leading AI models with its own to create the Copilot virtual assistant. Copilot is accessible for free in some of Microsoft's flagship software (like Windows, Edge, and Bing), but it's also available as a paid tool in several products, like the following: 365 (Word, Excel, PowerPoint): Enterprises can add Copilot for an additional monthly subscription fee to boost the productivity of their employees. In the fiscal 2025 third quarter (ended March 31), Microsoft said the number of organizations using Copilot for 365 tripled year over year to the hundreds of thousands. Copilot Studio: This platform allows enterprises to create custom AI agents and deploy them into the software applications they use each day to boost productivity, and it already has over 230,000 customers. Dragon Copilot: This is a solution for the healthcare industry, which can autonomously transcribe conversations between doctors and their patients, rapidly generate referral letters, and even summarize diagnosis evidence to help improve outcomes. But Copilot isn't the only revenue-generating AI product in Microsoft's portfolio because the company operates one of the world's largest cloud computing platforms called Azure, which now offers a suite of AI products and services under the Azure AI banner. Azure AI leases state-of-the-art data center infrastructure to businesses, which is fitted with the latest AI chips from suppliers like Nvidia. It also offers access to ready-made large language models (LLMs) from the likes of OpenAI, which developers can use to accelerate their AI software projects. AI is quickly becoming the driving force behind Azure Azure is often the fastest-growing part of Microsoft's entire organization, but it might have lost that title recently if not for Azure AI. A little less than two years ago, Azure AI accounted for just five percentage points of Azure's quarterly revenue growth. In the recent fiscal 2025 third quarter, it represented 16 percentage points, meaning it accounted for almost half of Azure's overall growth. The contribution from Azure AI is likely to increase further from here because Microsoft CFO Amy Hood says the segment has a staggering $315 billion order backlog from AI customers who are waiting for more data center capacity to come online. Microsoft is building more data centers as fast as it can, and it opened new ones in 10 different countries during the last quarter alone. In fact, the company is on track to have spent over $80 billion building AI infrastructure during fiscal 2025, which ends on June 30. Management's guidance suggests that the figure is likely to grow in fiscal 2026, which isn't a surprise, given the size of the opportunity ahead. Can Microsoft join the $4 trillion club in 2025? Based on Microsoft's trailing 12-month earnings per share (EPS), its stock is trading at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 38.2. That's 14% higher than its five-year average of 33.4, which suggests investors are willing to pay a premium for the stock at the moment: Data by YCharts. Microsoft's fiscal year 2026 begins on July 1, and Wall Street's consensus estimate (provided by Yahoo! Finance) suggests the company could deliver $15.14 in EPS, which would represent growth of over 13%. That places its stock at a forward P/E ratio of 32.6. That means Microsoft stock would have to climb by around 17% over the next 12 months in order to maintain its current P/E ratio of 38.2, which is a fair assumption given the strength of its AI business. If the company delivers strong earnings during the first two quarters of fiscal 2026 (which fall in calendar year 2025), then investors might start pricing in the full-year result early -- especially considering that the stock market is a forward-looking machine. In other words, it's possible Microsoft stock will deliver the majority of that 17% in potential upside in the next six months or so. Remember, it only needs a gain of 8.3% for the company's valuation to hit $4 trillion, so it could certainly achieve the milestone before 2025 is over. Should you invest $1,000 in Microsoft right now? Before you buy stock in Microsoft, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Microsoft wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $704,676!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $950,198!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to175%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025
Globe and Mail
2 days ago
- Globe and Mail
Lately: Meta, Anthropic win copyright lawsuits against authors, and a made-in-Canada social platform
Welcome back to Lately, The Globe's weekly tech newsletter. I'm Prajakta Dhopade from the digital team, covering for Samantha Edwards this week. If you have any newsletter feedback or just want to say hello to a real-life human, send me an e-mail. 📚 Artificial intelligence wins two lawsuits against authors over copyright 🍁 Tech leaders urge startups to dig in their heels and stay in Canada 🛡️ A defence spending boom may be coming to the tech industry 💬 A made-in-Canada social-media platform It was a big week for developments in that uneasy, grey area of copyright when it comes to training AI. In two separate cases of authors suing companies for using their books to train their artificial intelligence models, both judges ruled in favour of the tech companies - Anthropic and Meta. U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria said the authors had not provided enough evidence to suggest Meta's AI would dilute the market for their work. He said the ruling did not mean the tech giant's use of copyrighted materials was lawful, just that the authors' arguments were not the right ones to win the case. U.S. District Judge William Alsup, who ruled in favour of Anthropic, had a different take, saying that using the copyrighted materials to train chatbot Claude did not break the law. Claude's ability to distill the authors' work into its own passages counted as 'fair use' under U.S. copyright law because it was 'quintessentially transformative.' However, Anthropic must still go on trial over how it got a hold of the books; the company apparently downloaded pirated copies of the works. Ah, yes, why buy the books with your billions of dollars when you can just … not? And once Claude is trained up, why have an original thought when you can just ask the chatbot and … not? One more lawsuit was filed this week by another group of authors, this time against Microsoft. Maybe this time will be different. 'Don't do it.' That's Cohere CEO Aidan Gomez's message to tech companies thinking about following the siren call of U.S. capital and moving down south. Gomez made his case for a 'nationalistic stance to build for Canada' during a conversation with Shopify's Harley Finkelstein at a Toronto Tech Week event. Apparently, both companies refused that sweet American capital in their early days; a large, U.S.-based firm tried to acquire Cohere, while Shopify declined to take money from American investors in an early round. AI-for-enterprise Cohere and e-commerce giant Shopify may be the poster children for saying 'no' to a hunk of USD but it sounds like it's going to become more difficult to resist. Opportunities to accept U.S. funding may be on the rise, as more of Uncle Sam's venture capitalists turn their attention to Canadian startups, according to Ajay Agrawal, founder of an accelerator program and a professor at the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto. Canada's first-ever AI Minister, meanwhile says 'sovereignty does not mean solitude.' Evan Soloman says that the country needs to work with France, Germany, Britain, and yes, even the United States, to scale up the artificial intelligence industry. Canada's tech industry is gearing up for a big boost in defence spending. But after decades of underinvestment in defence, it'll be a tough job to ramp up expertise. Time is not a luxury the country has, industry experts said this week. 'There are governments around the world getting behind it, and Canada is in the early stages of waking up to that,' said Daniel Sax, founder and CEO at the Canadian Space Mining Corporation during a panel. Meanwhile, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced that Canada will spend more than $60-billion on defence for 2025-26. And just this week, at a NATO summit, he committed the country to boosting defence spending to 5 per cent of gross domestic product by 2035 – the biggest increase since the Second World War. And this cash infusion will mostly be spent on Canadian defence companies, the Prime Minister said, to reduce reliance on the U.S. for military goods. (Are you seeing a theme here?) The key is to focus on dual-use technologies, which can be used both commercially and for defence. Think robot-maid that can also disarm a bomb. Communications company founder Bogdan Frusina stressed that companies being tapped for these dual-use technologies need government support to do the job right. 'You're asking for somebody who's been selling to a bank, an infrastructure, to go out and sell that to an army person that's worried about getting their head shot off and making sure that stuff works. Completely different thing,' he said. Good point! 😬 What if instead of wading into the toxicity of X or Truth Social, you could instead have a civil discussion on a social-media platform made by a bunch of polite Canadians? Gander Social Inc. an app created by five Canadian co-founders, hopes to be that safe space. Like the social-media platform Bluesky, Gander is built on AT Protocol, which means it's part of an open, decentralized network and not controlled by a billionaire. And, users will have the option to toggle between having their posts appear on the larger, open network or the Canada-only network. Early access opened in April and the app will publicly launch in October. Will it be the utopia Canadian social-media users dream of? Or a bunch of goose crap? Hard to say. I'm also wondering if the terminology for posting will be 'honk,' how Twitter users would 'tweet.' Jeff Bezos is reportedly courting Trump after public spat with Musk (Tech Crunch) Google Earth adds old Street View captures to rewind time from the street level (The Verge) Danny Boyle says shooting on iPhones let him capture 'startling' violence in 28 Years Later (Wired) Narwal Freo Versatile Self Mop Clean Robot with DirtSense, $1,399.98 This two-in-one robot vacuum mop may be a high-tech - and admittedly pricey - solution for dirty floors. It not only cleans your hardwood or tile, but sanitizes its own mop heads and even dries them with heat so you don't have to worry about dirt-encrusted cleaning pads scouring your home. But at a whopping $1,400, it costs as much as a new iPhone in Canada. Though, famously, iPhones cannot clean your home. This TikTok trend is neither dangerous nor does it require you to spend loads of money. It's in fact, quite wholesome and cheap. People are turning their apartments into aesthetically pleasing little cafés, baking goods and inviting their friends to bring their own. It's not just any old potluck, though. The key is to print out signage or write little labels on butcher paper or even draft a logo for your fake café. With wars, political strife and general garbage-fire vibes in the world right now, a fun little party – a sweet-treat bonanza, if you will – is just what the doctor ordered. If you're looking to get in on this trend, here's a recipe for glazed doughnuts. Doughnuts and coffee – perfect!
Globe and Mail
2 days ago
- Globe and Mail
Are Quantum Computing Stocks Becoming the Next AI?
Investors flocked to artificial intelligence (AI) stocks last year, and they drove market gains, leading the S&P 500, the Nasdaq Composite, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average higher. Today, these players continue to advance, and they're joined by certain stocks in the high-potential field of quantum computing. In fact, quantum computing stocks might be following in the footsteps of AI stocks, becoming the next industry to lead market gains, and here's why. Why AI became so popular First, though, it's important to understand why AI grabbed the world's attention in recent years. This technology has the potential to revolutionize the way things are done -- from business to our daily lives -- by introducing more efficiency into processes. AI also can help companies develop new and better products -- from therapeutics to autonomous vehicles -- faster. So, AI can be a gamechanger, and experts have even likened the technology to the development of the steam engine, or in more recent days, the internet. Companies powering AI, such as AI chip leader Nvidia and networking giant Broadcom have seen their shares surge -- and so have companies offering AI infrastructure, like Amazon, or those developing AI platforms and applying them to their businesses. A good example of that is Meta Platforms, which trained AI model Llama, a tool that powers its popular AI assistant. Today, AI continues to be an interesting growth story, and there are plenty of chapters left in this exciting book. But quantum computing may be even earlier in its growth story -- and also promises to become a game changer. Investors generally like getting in on an investing theme early to fully benefit as it develops. So, what exactly is quantum computing? It's a type of computing that relies on the principles of quantum mechanics, or how subatomic particles interact. In quantum computing, the computing is done by qubits rather than the bits used in traditional computing. Their ability to process data as a zero, a 1, or both at the same time, and the combining of many of these qubits allows for the solving of problems that have been impossible for classical computers. D-Wave's record quarter Several pure play companies are publicly traded and are working toward making this process useful for real world problems. In fact, D-Wave Quantum (NYSE: QBTS) recently launched its Advantage2 quantum computer to be used in fields such as business optimization or AI. D-Wave, thanks to sales of its Advantage system and services, in the recent quarter said revenue soared 500% to a record $15 million -- the increase in revenue shows customers are interested in such technology, and the revenue level shows there still is plenty of room for gains as this technology develops. Though D-Wave and others such as Rigetti Computing and IonQ are generating revenue from certain systems and services, quantum computers haven't yet even come close to reaching their full potential. The good news here is that means, if research and development goes well, revenue could explode higher down the road -- making now an excellent time to get in on these players. The big difference between AI and quantum computing today is AI is more regularly and easily applied to real world problems, while quantum has significant challenges to conquer. For example, qubits are fragile and can only hold information for a short period of time. Other challenges are error rates and difficulty scaling quantum systems. All of this makes quantum computing stocks higher risk right now than AI stocks -- but, considering the promise of quantum computing, investing in these stocks could lead to enormous returns over time if the technology is successful. Should you invest in quantum computing stocks? What does this mean for you as an investor? If you're an aggressive investor looking for the next big thing in technology, you may consider buying shares of some of the leading pure play companies such as the players I've mentioned above. If you're cautious but still interested in the field, you could opt for well-established tech giants such as Alphabet or Microsoft that also have quantum computing programs. It's still too early to say how successful quantum computing will be over time, but companies have made progress recently, and potential is strong. That means quantum computing stocks could become the AI stocks of 2025 -- and help lead the overall market higher. Should you invest $1,000 in D-Wave Quantum right now? Before you buy stock in D-Wave Quantum, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and D-Wave Quantum wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $687,731!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $945,846!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is818% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to175%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Adria Cimino has positions in Amazon. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
