Australia's navy not ready for war? PM Anthony Albanese dismisses audit findings
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has strongly denied claims that Defence Minister Richard Marles was not properly briefed about the readiness of the country's warships.A government audit released last week revealed that the Royal Australian Navy (RAN) had failed to maintain two of its most important vessels, HMAS Canberra and HMAS Adelaide. It also stated that Marles did not receive official 'preparedness reports' from the Australian Defence Force (ADF) in 2023 and 2024, during the time the Defence Strategic Review was being developed.Instead, the audit said Marles was briefed through 'other means,' including informal conversations.On Tuesday(July 1), Prime Minister Albanese rejected the suggestion that his deputy had been left in the dark.'Well, that's just absurd, that's just absurd,' Albanese told Channel Nine's Today show.'That's just ridiculous, frankly. I haven't seen that report, but we sit in the National Security Committee with the Chief of the Defence Force. We meet regularly.'He added that the government's recent defence funding decisions, including a $57 billion expansion and an additional $1 billion brought forward in the March 2025 budget, were based on direct consultations with Defence officials. Preparedness reports are used to assess how quickly military assets can be deployed during emergencies like war or natural disasters. The lack of formal reporting raised concerns amid growing tensions in the Indo-Pacific region.Australia is also under increasing pressure from the United States to raise its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. Prime Minister Albanese has resisted those calls, saying Canberra will determine defence needs independently.'Our national security is a matter for Australia, not Washington,' he said earlier this year.Last week, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said US allies in the Asia-Pacific should follow Europe's lead in boosting military budgets. NATO members, except Spain, have recently agreed to increase their defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP.Japan, New Zealand, and South Korea have also committed to increasing their defence budgets in response to regional threats.The audit report and the government's response come as Australia works to reassure allies about its military readiness and reliability, especially under the AUKUS defence pact with the US and UK.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
3 hours ago
- First Post
India, Australia sign key defence pact to boost undersea surveillance
India and Australia have signed a defence agreement to form a three-year partnership to work on improving the detection and tracking of submarines and autonomous underwater vehicles. read more India and Australia have signed a defence agreement for undersea surveillance. It has been described as the first of its kind. In recent years, India and Australia have deepened defence relations, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region where they have a common interest in countering Chinese hegemonic designs. Both the countries are members of Quad, which also comprises the United States and Japan. In a statement, the Australian Department of Defence on Thursday said that India and Australia have signed their first science and technology project agreement between Australia's Defence Science and Technology Group's (DSTG) Information Sciences Division and India's Defence Research and Development Organisation's (DRDO) Naval Physical and Oceanographic Laboratory. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The agreement will form a three-year partnership to work on improving the detection and tracking of submarines and autonomous underwater vehicles. The project will include work on 'Towed Array Target Motion Analysis' to improve the reliability, efficiency, and interoperability of current surveillance capabilities of India and Australia, according to the statement. Australia has been working on its undersea capabilities in recent years in the wake of increasing Chinese maritime activities in the Indo-Pacific. In 2021, Australia joined the United States and United Kingdom to form the Aukus trilateral partnership to develop nuclear submarines. The future of the partnership is, however, uncertain as US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered a review of the partnership. What does this India-Australia defence pact mean? Explaining the science behind the project, Target Motion Analysis, Amanda Bessell of Australia's DSTG's Information Sciences Division said that it is a collective term for target tracking algorithms developed to estimate the state of a moving target. 'Target Motion Analysis is the crucial element in maintaining platform situational awareness, when a passive mode of operation is required,' Bessell was quoted as saying in the Australian statement. DSTG Senior Researcher Sanjeev Arulampalam further explained that a towed array consisted of a long linear array of hydrophones towed behind a submarine or surface ship on a flexible cable. 'We need to harness the best minds in innovation, science and technology to build new capabilities, to innovate at greater pace, and to strengthen our strategic partnerships. The hydrophones work together to listen to the undersea environment from various directions. The sound signal is passed through a signal processor, which analyses, filters and detects underwater acoustic signals emitted from maritime targets,' said Arulampalam. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The combination of the Target Motion Analysis with the towed array system is intended to manage noise corruption and explore possible performance improvements. The three-year India-Australia project will put novel algorithms to the test by using the strengths and shared knowledge of the two countries, the statement said. 'The project arrangement will involve the sharing of ideas, investigation trials, algorithm demonstrations and performance analysis,' said Arulampalam. Separately, Chief Information Sciences Division, Suneel Randhawa, said, 'The output of this research program has the potential to guide the development of future algorithmic directions for our undersea combat system surveillance technologies.'
NDTV
3 hours ago
- NDTV
Overtourism Sparks Protests In Europe, Is Australia Next?
Adelaide: A media frenzy erupted over the recent Jeff Bezos " wedding of the century" in Venice. Also notable were the public protests that showed tensions around tourism, especially mass tourism, are increasing. Leading the action was the activist collective No space for Bezos, which declared: [This wedding] is at the expense of those who live, work, and study in this city [and who are] already faced with countless difficulties after years of mass tourism. They complained Venice had been turned into a "private amusement park" for the rich. Locals were fighting for what they describe as a " living Venice", not a tourism playground. The backlash against overtourism is sparking protests across several countries. It has even prompted the US State Department to urge travellers to be cautious when heading to Europe this summer. Growth at all costs Local residents feel their communities are being reshaped to cater for visitors, and are pushing back against what they call the " touristification" of place. Touristification describes a situation where locals fear their home towns and cities are being developed, designed and managed to attract and accommodate tourists. This touristification process benefits commerce and industries that profit from catering to visitors. Everyone else misses out, or is literally pushed out by rising housing costs. At the heart of this polarising issue are some key questions. Are such places "tourism destinations" or do they belong to the local people who live there? Whose interests should prevail when tourism growth exacerbates tensions? These issues are being thoroughly investigated, including through a project I am involved in - Chronic Emergencies and Ecosocial Transformations in Touristified Coastal Spaces. Such research is focused on understanding the problems of tourism and co-designing solutions with communities. Continual growth in tourism is one of the guiding principles the industry promotes. It is this " growth fetish" that is catalysing overtourism and unsustainability. This is when tourism exceeds the local social and ecological carrying capacity of a place. It means there are simply too many tourists, and the impact is poorly managed. Aussie hotspots The dynamics of overtourism are emerging in some Australian locations. This includes popular coastal destinations such as Byron Bay and small towns along the scenic Great Ocean Road. Some places are overwhelmed by short-term overtourism. This may be the result of mega cruise ship visits or viral postings on social media, such as images of Western Australia's popular pink lakes. Byron Bay offers a telling example. It has evolved from a place attractive for alternative lifestyles, to a magnet for social media influencers and the location for the Netflix series Byron Baes. As a result, Byron Bay is the epitome of overtourism in Australia. Local housing, for instance, is being sacrificed for holiday rentals, facilitated by agencies such as Airbnb. Not surprisingly, there is growing local resistance to tourism overwhelming the sense of place. Is Australia in danger of touristification? If we aren't careful, popular opposition to mass tourism will continue to grow here in Australia. But whether we see the European phenomenon of touristification is harder to discern. It may already be evident when environmental and social regulations are overturned to make development processes more friendly to the tourism industry. Projects can be fast tracked if they are declared a high-priority "major development", which allows governments to override restrictive regulations. Anti-red-tape rhetoric is clear in Queensland's tourism strategy harnessing the growth power of the 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Another example of touristification may be when taxpayer-funded events are run for branding presence on a national or international stage rather, than for the benefit of the surrounding community. For example, the South Australian government found itself in hot water when its tourism commission held a marketing event featuring a Sam Smith concert at d'Arenberg winery. Social media influencers were invited to attend - many from interstate with all expenses paid - but locals weren't welcome. It also occurs when public commons are appropriated for tourism purposes, including national parks and protected areas, public spaces and beaches. Another example - again from South Australia - involves the decision to move the annual LIV Golf tournament to the Adelaide Parklands from 2028. The state government is being accused of a public land grab. The Adelaide community loves these heritage listed parklands and has resisted attempts to co-opt their use for private interests for decades. Reclaimining a sense of place Ultimately, in places like Venice, Bali and even in Byron Bay, local communities do not feel heard or empowered by tourism models which are focused on growth. Their protest actions are designed to ensure their quality of life is not undermined in the process of catering to tourists. It is a struggle for reclaiming places as local people's homes, rather than as tourist destinations. While locations can be shared, tourism must be better managed so locals don't find their homes unrecognisable - or even worse, find themselves displaced. (Author: Freya Higgins-Desbiolles, Adjunct professor and adjunct senior lecturer in tourism management, University of South Australia) (Disclaimer Statement: Freya Higgins-Desbiolles is a collaborator on a project led by colleagues at the University of the Balearic Islands entitled 'Chronic Emergencies and Ecosocial Transformations in Touristified Coastal Spaces'. This article is part of the R+D+i PID2022-137648OB-C21 financed by MICIU/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 and by "ERDF, EU".) This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
How Dalai Lama's spiritual lineage makes him an icon for LGBTQ community: Queer Buddhist sociologist writes
The spiritual persona of the Dalai Lama can well be considered an icon for gender fluidity, a top researcher at an Australian university has theorised. Stephen Kerry underlines that the Dalai Lama, one of the top temporal heads in Buddhism, is considered the manifestation of Avalokitesvara, the godly being 'who hears the cries of the world'. The 14th and current Dalai Lama, seen here in Paris in 1989, is considered the manifestation of Avalokitesvara, the godly being 'who hears the cries of the world'.(AFP File) Known as Chenrezig in Tibet, Guanyin in China, and Kannon or Kanzeon in Japan, Avalokitesvara originated in India as a man, but can be depicted as either a man, woman, or non-binary being in religious iconography. This gender fluidity has led to them being revered as a trans icon in the West, writes Stephen Kerry, lecturer in sociology at Charles Darwin University. Conversation around the Dalai Lama tradition has grown busier since the latest and 14th incumbent, Tenzin Gyatso, turns 90 soon. And this has reigniting speculation over his eventual successor. In Buddhism, a bodhisattva (as is Avalokitesvara, represented through the Dalai Lama) is a person or representation who denies themselves enlightenment until all beings can achieve enlightenment. "Avalokitesvara appears to living beings in whatever form could best save them,' Kerry writes in The Conversation. 'I have spent the past five years investigating the lives of queer Buddhists in Australia. As part of this research, I have surveyed and interviewed 109 LGBTQIA Buddhist Australians. The words of these individuals, and my own experience as a genderqueer Buddhist person, reveal how the Dalai Lama emerges an an unlikely inspiration for individuals sharing a trans and Buddhist identity,' he adds. 'Effeminate and handsome' He also says that homosexual or non-binary Buddhist Australians are generally reluctant to disclose their gender identities to their communities, and may be told to remain silent about their identities. 'For some, Avalokitesvara's gender fluidity has been important for reaffirming both their queer and Buddhist selves. One Buddhist trans woman […] told me Guanyin (Avalokitesvara) had special significance for her. [She] spoke about Avalokitesvara travelling from India to China as a male, before 'transitioning' to the mainly female presentation of Guanyin over centuries.' Another individual from the queer community told Kerry about how he was fascinated by depictions of Avalokitesvara 'looking effeminate and handsome, with a cute moustache'. Not everyone agrees Some Buddhists deny Avalokitesvara's perceived queerness. Kerry recounts how a genderqueer Buddhist person told him about a teacher who called the theories 'just stories'. Kerry adds, though: 'Despite being a cisgender man who has been somewhat inconsistent in his support of queer people, the Dalai Lama, as the manifestation of the bodhisattva of compassion, is a possible spiritual link between today's queer Buddhists and centuries-long traditions of gender transition and fluidity.' Meanwhile, the controversy over how the next Dalai Lama will be chosen rages on. The 14th and current Dalai Lama has asserted that the temporal institution will continue after his death but his 'reincarnation' will 'not be chosen by China'. The Chinese government has said any successor will have to be approved by Beijing.
