logo
Popular sweets recalled in Belgium over cannabis in Dutch gummies

Popular sweets recalled in Belgium over cannabis in Dutch gummies

Euronews02-06-2025
Candy manufacturer Haribo has recalled its 1-kilogram bags of Happy Cola Fizz in Belgium after traces of cannabis were found in some bags in the Netherlands, the Belgian food agency FAVV-AFSCA confirmed on Monday.
In a joint press release with the agency, Haribo noted that consumption of these sweets can lead to health complaints such as dizziness.
The withdrawal concerns large bags of fizzy colas with production code L341-4002307906 — the same batch that was recalled earlier in the Netherlands.
"Haribo has carried out this recall in Belgium as a precautionary measure," Belgian food agency spokesperson Liesbeth Van de Voorde told Euronews.
She noted that, so far, no reports have been received in Belgium of people becoming unwell after eating the sweets. "We have set up a consumer hotline for this purpose, and we have not received any news of issues in Belgium."
People are strongly advised not to eat the recalled sweets. In case of consumption, it is recommended to contact a GP immediately.
The one-kilogram bags of sour candies were already withdrawn from sale in the Netherlands following reports that several people in the country, including adults and children, reported feeling unwell after eating these sweets.
A sample testing revealed that the product was laced with cannabis after police were notified of the issue. Dutch authorities are now investigating how the candy became contaminated with these drugs.
In the Netherlands, only three bags are involved so far. Still, Haribo is recalling the entire stock in the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg.
"The authorities' investigation concerns a limited number of reports and one specific product in the east of the Netherlands," Patrick Tax, marketing head for Haribo Netherlands and Belgium, told domestic media in Belgium.
The withdrawal only concerns Haribo's 1-kilogram bags of Happy Cola Fizz with an expiry date until January 2026 and production code L341-4002307906.
It is not clear which Belgian shops were selling these large packs. Van de Voorde added that this is the only product for which the agency has received information, meaning no other products are currently deemed a risk.
Instead of returning it to the store where they purchased it, consumers are asked to send the product to the Belgian head office. Affected consumers should provide their details and bank account number to receive a refund.
Ursula von der Leyen has endorsed a new bill rapidly making its way through the US Senate that would impose sweeping sanctions against Russia in a bid to force the Kremlin into serious negotiations for a lasting peace in Ukraine, despite the law having the potential to wreak economic havoc on several countries of the European Union.
The bill, jointly promoted by Lindsey Graham, a Republican from South Carolina, and Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat from Connecticut, has amassed more than 80 signatures in the 100-seat chamber, an impressive amount of bipartisan support that could help convince President Donald Trump to move forward with the plan.
Trump has so far refused to apply further pressure on Moscow, causing dismay among European allies, who have pledged to move forward with restrictions on their own.
After a "good" meeting with Senator Graham on Monday, von der Leyen suggested the draft law work in tandem with the next package of EU sanctions, meant to target Russia's financial sector, the "shadow fleet" and the Nord Stream pipelines.
Brussels also wants to lower the G7 price cap on Russian seaborne oil, which has remained untouched at $60 per barrel since its introduction in late 2022.
The president of the European Commission "made the objective clear: we need a real ceasefire, we need Russia at the negotiating table, and we need to end this war. Pressure works, as the Kremlin understands nothing else," her office said.
"This is why the President welcomed that Senator Graham committed to ramping up pressure on Russia and moving ahead with the bill in (the) Senate next week."
Under the draft law promoted by Graham and Blumenthal, the US would slap a wide range of primary sanctions and duties on Russia, such as broad prohibitions on financial transactions with entities owned or affiliated with the Kremlin.
Most notably, it would also introduce secondary tariffs of "not less" than 500% on any country that "knowingly sells, supplies, transfers, or purchases oil, uranium, natural gas, petroleum products, or petrochemical products that originated in the Russian Federation".
In theory, this provision would hit hard several member states that continue to rely on Moscow for their energy needs.
As of today, France, Spain, Belgium, the Netherlands and Portugal buy Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG); Italy, Greece, Hungary, Slovakia and Bulgaria buy Russian pipeline gas; and Hungary and Slovakia buy Russian pipeline oil.
Additionally, five countries – Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and Finland – operate Russian-made nuclear reactors that rely on specific Russian-made fuels.
The bill, however, features a clause that would allow the US president to spare specific countries, goods and services from the 500% tariff through a one-time waiver – as long as doing so is justified for "national security interests".
It was not immediately clear if von der Leyen discussed this exemption during her meeting with Graham. Her positive words following the encounter suggest the Commission chief is confident the bloc will manage to avoid the blowback.
Both Graham and Blumenthal have pointed the finger at China and India as the prime clients of Russian energy and, therefore, the prime targets of the 500% tariffs.
After a joint trip to Kyiv and Paris, the senators hailed new momentum to advance their bill, warning the window to prevent a renewed Russian offensive was closing fast.
"The world has a lot of cards to play against Putin," Graham told the Associated Press. "We're going to hit China and India for propping up his war machine."
Graham called the draft "the most draconian bill I've ever seen in my life in the Senate", while Blumenthal said the proposed sanctions would be "bone-crushing" and place Russia's economy "on a trade island".
Officials in Brussels believe the combination of 500% tariffs with a lower price cap would have a devastating impact on Moscow, as global clients would rush to flee Russian energy and precipitate a plunge in revenue for the federal budget.
Still, the White House has made no indication it is willing to amend the G7 price cap.
"These steps, taken together with US measures, would sharply increase the joint impact of our sanctions," von der Leyen said, according to the read-out. "Combined with actions targeting Russia's shadow fleet limiting Russia's ability to transport its oil, it's an effective measure to dry up the Kremlin's resources to wage the war."
The meeting between von der Leyen and Graham comes as delegations from Ukraine and Russia meet in Istanbul for a new round of face-to-face negotiations.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How do mineral and chemical sunscreens affect our health?
How do mineral and chemical sunscreens affect our health?

Euronews

time17 hours ago

  • Euronews

How do mineral and chemical sunscreens affect our health?

Mineral sunscreens have gained in popularity in recent years, fueled by claims that they're gentler or safer than their chemical counterparts. But the real differences between the two types of sun protection are more technical than many consumers realise, making it easy to misunderstand what scientists know about their health effects. The differences between these sunscreens mainly come down to their active ingredients and how they block ultraviolet (UV) rays. Chemical sunscreens absorb UV radiation, converting it into heat and releasing it from the skin. Mineral sunscreens, sometimes called physical sunscreens, create a thin barrier that primarily reflects or scatters UV rays away from the skin. Even the terms 'mineral' and 'chemical' can be misleading, though, given all sunscreens use chemicals. Many mineral-based formulas also use other substances, called 'boosters,' to help the active ingredients work better. More accurate descriptors could be 'soluble' sunscreen filters – those that could permeate the skin – and 'insoluble' filters that could not do so, said Christian Surber, a dermatopharmacologist (someone who studies how drugs affect the skin) at the University of Zurich and the University of Basel. 'It's just the mechanism of action [of the filters] that is different,' he told Euronews Health. 'It can be absorption, and it can be scattering'. Euronews Health has chosen to use the terms that consumers are most likely to see when they shop for sunscreens. Sunscreen and health Concerns around how sunscreens affect our health are nothing new, prompting the European Commission Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) to assess the safety of three non-mineral UV filters – oxybenzone, homosalate, and octocrylene – in 2021 over concerns that they may have endocrine-disrupting properties. The SCCS determined that homosalate and oxybenzone were not safe at the concentrations commonly used at the time, and that octocrylene was safe at a concentration up to 10 per cent – though it cautioned that the data was inconclusive. One analysis, for example, estimated that a person would have to apply sunscreen daily for 277 years to experience the same hormone-disrupting effects observed in rats that were fed oxybenzone in a lab. Even so, the European Commission issued new restrictions in 2022 to lower the amount of these filters allowed in sunscreens. 'We pretty much don't see them anymore on the market, because producers know that [they may] cause problems or will not be allowed anymore on the European market in a few years,' Laura Clays from Euroconsumers and the Belgian consumer protection group Test-Achats told Euronews Health. Beyond these potential risks, some people with sensitive skin prefer mineral sunscreens, which use ingredients like zinc oxide and titanium dioxide, because they are less likely to cause skin irritation, Clays said. However, when her group ran consumer tests, several mineral-only formulas offered weaker SPF protection than their labels claimed, meaning 'the ones that contain only mineral filters do not protect you enough,' she said. Because the sunscreen does not absorb into the skin, people should make sure they are fully covered. That could be another challenge, according to Clays' tests: people tended to reapply mineral sunscreens less often, partly because they disliked the thin layer of white residue it left on their skin. But when used correctly, both chemical and mineral sunscreens are widely considered safe and effective by dermatologists and health authorities. 'In principle, all sunscreen filters have a safety profile that has been regulatory-wise assessed and deemed safe,' Surber said. Ultimately, skin experts agree: the best sunscreen is the one you will actually use on a regular basis. 'There's really no big difference, health-wise, between the two,' Clays said.

France says it cannot save contraceptives US plans to destroy
France says it cannot save contraceptives US plans to destroy

LeMonde

time2 days ago

  • LeMonde

France says it cannot save contraceptives US plans to destroy

France said Friday, August 1, it could not seize women's contraception products estimated to be worth $9.7 million that the United States plans to destroy, after media reported the stockpile would be incinerated in the country. The contraceptives – intended for some of the world's poorest countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa – were purchased by the US foreign aid agency USAID under former president Joe Biden. But France's health ministry told Agence France-Presse Friday there was no legal way for it to intervene. The administration of Biden's successor Donald Trump, which has slashed USAID and pursued anti-abortion policies, confirmed last month it planned to destroy the contraceptives, which have been stored in a warehouse in the Belgian city of Geel. According to several media reports, the unexpired products were to be incinerated in France at the end of July by a company that specialises in destroying medical waste. France's government has come under pressure to save the contraceptives, with women's rights groups calling the US decision "insane." The health ministry told AFP that the government had "examined the courses of action available to us, but unfortunately there is no legal basis for intervention by a European health authority, let alone the French national drug safety authority, to recover these medical products. Since contraceptives are not drugs of major therapeutic interest, and in this case we are not facing a supply shortage, we have no means to requisition the stocks." The ministry also said it had no information on where the contraceptives would be destroyed. Leaving Belgian warehouse Sarah Durocher, head of the French women's rights group Family Planning, told AFP that some contraceptives had already left the Belgian warehouse. "We were informed 36 hours ago that the removal of these boxes of contraceptives had begun," Durocher said Thursday. "We do not know where these trucks are now – or whether they have arrived in France," she added. "We call on all incineration companies not to destroy the contraceptives and to oppose this insane decision." French company Veolia confirmed to AFP that it had a contract with the US firm Chemonics, USAID's logistics provider. But Veolia emphasized that the contract concerned "only the management of expired products, which is not the case for the stockpile" in Belgium. The products, mostly long-acting contraceptives such as IUDs and birth control implants, are reportedly up to five years away from expiring. Outrage over decision The US decision has provoked an outcry in France, where rights groups and left-wing politicians have called on their government to stop the plan. "France cannot allow itself to become the stage for such actions. A moratorium is necessary," wrote five NGOs in an op-ed in Le Monde, condemning the "absurdity" of the US decision. Among them was MSI Reproductive Choices, one of several organisations that have offered to purchase and repackage the contraceptives at no cost to the US government. All offers have been rejected. Last week, New Hampshire's Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen pointed to the Trump administration's stated goal of reducing government waste, saying the contraceptives plan "is the epitome of waste, fraud and abuse." A US State Department spokesperson told AFP earlier this week that the destruction of the products would cost $167,000 and "no HIV medications or condoms are being destroyed." The spokesperson pointed to a policy that prohibits providing aid to non-governmental organisations that perform or promote abortions. The Mexico City Policy, which critics call the "global gag rule," was first introduced by President Ronald Reagan in 1984. It has been reinstated under every Republican president since. Last month, the US also incinerated nearly 500 metric tons of high-nutrition biscuits that had been meant to keep malnourished children in Afghanistan and Pakistan alive.

Trump officials weigh fate of European contraceptive stockpile
Trump officials weigh fate of European contraceptive stockpile

Euronews

time3 days ago

  • Euronews

Trump officials weigh fate of European contraceptive stockpile

The Trump administration says it is weighing what to do with family planning supplies stockpiled in Europe that campaigners and two United States senators are fighting to save from destruction. Concerns that the Trump administration plans to incinerate the stockpile have angered family planning advocates on both sides of the Atlantic. Campaigners say the supplies stored in a US-funded warehouse in Geel, Belgium, include contraceptive pills, contraceptive implants, and IUDs that could spare women in war zones and elsewhere the hardship of unwanted pregnancies. US State Department deputy spokesman Tommy Pigott said Thursday in response to a question about the contraceptives that 'we're still in the process here in terms of determining the way forward'. "When we have an update, we'll provide it," he said. Belgium says it has been talking with US diplomats about trying to spare the supplies from destruction, including possibly moving them out of the warehouse. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Florinda Baleci told The Associated Press that she couldn't comment further 'to avoid influencing the outcome of the discussions'. The Trump administration's dismantling of the US Agency for International Development (USAID), which managed foreign aid programmes, left the supplies' fate uncertain. Pigott didn't detail the types of contraceptives that make up the stockpile. He said some of the supplies, bought by the previous administration, could 'potentially be' drugs designed to induce abortions. Pigott didn't detail how that might impact the Trump administration thinking about how to deal with the drugs or the entire stockpile. Costing more than $9 million (€7.9 million) and funded by US taxpayers, the family planning supplies were intended for women in war zones, refugee camps, and elsewhere, according to a bipartisan letter of protest to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio from US senators Jeanne Shaheen, a New Hampshire Democrat, and Alaska Republican Lisa Murkowski. They said destroying the stockpile 'would be a waste of US taxpayer dollars as well as an abdication of US global leadership in preventing unintended pregnancies, unsafe abortions and maternal deaths – key goals of US foreign assistance'. They urged Rubio to allow another country or partner to distribute the contraceptives. European lawmakers, aid groups voice concerns Concerns voiced by European campaigners and lawmakers that the supplies could be transported to France for incineration have led to mounting pressure on government officials to intervene and save them. The European Commission, through spokesman Guillaume Mercier, said Friday that 'we continue to monitor the situation closely to explore the most effective solutions'. The US branch of family planning aid group MSI Reproductive Choices said it offered to purchase, repackage, and distribute the stock at its own expense but 'these efforts were repeatedly rejected'. The group said the supplies included long-acting IUDs, contraceptive implants, and pills, and that they have long shelf-lives, extending as far as 2031. Aid group Doctors Without Borders said incineration would be 'an intentionally reckless and harmful act against women and girls everywhere'. Charles Dallara, the grandson of a French former lawmaker who was a contraception pioneer in France, urged President Emmanuel Macron to not let France 'become an accomplice to this scandal'. 'Do not allow France to take part in the destruction of essential health tools for millions of women,' Dallara wrote in an appeal to the French leader. 'We have a moral and historical responsibility'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store