Over 32,000 South Lanarkshire kids and families get slice of £2.4m for heating bills
Social Security Scotland helped them to enjoy warmer homes.
Last winter over 32,140 children and families across South Lanarkshire enjoyed warmer homes after receiving a total of £2,445,500 towards their heating bills from Social Security Scotland.
Winter Heating Payment is paid automatically to people who get certain low-income benefits, including households with young children, disabled people or older people. It has replaced the Department for Work and Pensions' (DWP) Cold Weather Payment in Scotland.
It is a guaranteed payment that everyone who is eligible receives, no matter what the weather. Cold Weather Payment is only paid if the average temperature falls or is forecast to fall - to freezing or below for a full week.
Child Winter Heating Payment was introduced by the Scottish Government in November 2020 and is only available in Scotland. It is paid once a year to children and young people if they are under 19 years old and get certain benefits.
A total of 29,250 Winter Heating Payments, worth £1,718,500 were made for 2024/2025, along with 2890 Child Winter Heating Payments, worth £727,000.
The figures, taken from statistics released on April 29, also show that 95 per cent of Winter Heating Payments were made by December 2024 and 93 per cent of Child Winter Heating Payments were made by October 2024.
Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said: 'We have issued over 505,100 payments to families on low incomes, and those supporting children or young people with a disability, to help with the cost of heating their homes.
'Many people are struggling with the cost-of-living crisis and higher energy bills. The importance of these payments was brought home to everyone this month with the Energy Price Cap rising by 6.4 per cent. Ofgem estimates that this will add £9.25 a month to the typical household's energy bill.
'This year we will also be providing extra support to pensioners. While the DWP's Winter Fuel Payment will only be available to some pensioners, Pension Age Winter Heating Payment will provide money to every pensioner household in the country. The Scottish Government will continue to protect pensioners and people on low incomes in Scotland.'
Winter Heating Payment is paid automatically to people who were getting any of these benefits during the qualifying week: Universal Credit, Pension Credit, Income Support, Income-based Jobseekers Allowance and Support for Mortgage Interest.
Some restrictions apply for some of these benefits. For example, for those qualifying through Income Support may also have to have a child under five, a disability premium or a pensioner premium.
Children and young people in Scotland can get Child Winter Heating Payment if they are under 19 years old and get one of the following qualifying benefits:
Highest rate of the care component of Child Disability Payment, highest rate of the care component of Disability Living Allowance for children, enhanced rate of the daily living component of Personal Independence Payment and enhanced rate of the daily living component of Adult Disability Payment.
They must be getting this on at least one day in the week starting with the third Monday of September (called the 'qualifying week'). In 2024, this was Monday to Sunday, September 16 to 22.
The qualifying week for Winter Heating Payment was Monday to Sunday, November 4 to 10.
A universal Pension Age Winter Heating Payment will be introduced in winter 2025/2026 for all pensioner households in Scotland. This universal payment will provide much-needed support not available anywhere else in the UK and will support older people across Scotland.
From winter 2025/26, pensioners in Scotland in receipt of a relevant qualifying benefit, such as Pension Credit, and who will receive payments of £200 or £300 this winter, depending on their age, will continue to receive those payments automatically.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
King Charles is back, and Scotland doesn't want him. Here's why
As happens regularly now he'll face protesters in Edinburgh and perhaps elsewhere too, just as he has in Lancaster, Middlesbrough, Durham and at major royal events in London over the past few months. Support for the monarchy has dropped sharply over recent years. Across the UK, polls conducted by YouGov and Savanta have put the monarchy on or below 55% – on one occasion below 50% – while support for a republic has jumped to a third. In Scotland a republic is level pegging with the monarchy. There are lots of reasons for the collapse in support, one of them being irrelevance to ordinary people during a time when so many are struggling to make ends meet. For many people the Queen was the monarchy and they have little interest in Charles or the rest of them. Increasingly people are becoming aware of just how grubby and self-serving the institution is. The cost alone raises serious questions about the standards by which the royals live. When Charles visits Edinburgh the local council, Scottish Government, police and any other public body they come into contact with will likely incur significant costs. Local costs are just one part of the huge expense of the royals – estimated by Republic to be more than half a billion pounds a year. Yet that's not the figure the royals will be putting out this week, when they release their latest annual accounts. They'll ignore the revenues of the Duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall, continuing to lead the public to believe they are private estates. The Duchies are in fact Crown lands and the property of the state, their revenues should be going to the Treasury to be spent on public services and local communities. Instead they pay Charles and William personal incomes well in excess of £20m each. READ MORE: Tom Devine speaks after Neil Oliver binned from Glasgow tour buses The royals will also ignore the local costs, the bloated security costs and estimates of unpaid taxes and potential revenue lost from allowing them exclusive use of more than two dozen palatial homes. As always the royals will try to pull the wool over your eyes, tell you they're value for money or suggest the funding comes from the Crown Estate (it doesn't). They do this because dishonesty, obfuscation and secrecy are how they have operated for centuries, desperate to protect their own interests against the receding tide of deference. It is no wonder support for the royals is particularly low in Scotland. Because aside from a few visits during the so-called royal week, plus a handful more a short drive from Balmoral, this is an English institution. READ MORE: George Ezra hails Scottish folk group Kinnaris Q More to the point it is a London institution and a monarchy for the home counties. They represent the rich and powerful, they spend their days pursuing the hobbies and habits of their class while the bulk of their meagre list of engagements are in London and the south east. The monarchy's days are numbered, and their demise is likely to have a particularly strong Scottish flavour to it.
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
SNP Government insists renewable energy jobs boom on cards
The Government is seeking views on proposals which could see up to 40 gigawatts (GW) of new capacity added by 2040, which it reckons would be enough to power 45 million homes. The current ambition is between 8-11GW by 2030. 'We need to update our ambition for offshore wind to reflect and firmly underline our commitment to economic growth and investment offered by the sector,' said Ms Martin. She added: 'Scotland's offshore wind sector is already creating significant opportunities, delivering jobs and attracting major investment across the country.' Her comments look like a fresh attempt by SNP ministers to claim credit for a development that reflects the influence of geography and other factors beyond its control. READ MORE: Just transition furore reignited as SNP Government flounders As much of Scotland is surrounded by windy waters it has been an obvious focus of investor interest in offshore wind developments. The SNP Government's role in promoting growth has been minimal. It has control over planning but has faced criticism for delays in approval of the giant Berwick Bank development planned by SSE. The Scottish Government has held two offshore wind licensing rounds since taking control of the acreage concerned from the UK Crown Estate in 2017. It claims the ScotWind and INTOG rounds were big successes. However, successful applicants made clear that their interest reflected the availability of generous revenue support under schemes run by the UK Government such as the Contracts for Difference programme. The costs of this are added to the bills of households across the UK. Ms Martin did not refer to the subsidies but colleagues have underlined their importance. In a letter to then chancellor Jeremy Hunt in November 2023, finance secretary Shona Robison wrote: 'The Contracts for Difference programme has been very successful in supporting the deployment of renewables in Scotland.' She called on Mr Hunt to increase the amount of support provided to 'include allocating sufficient budget to develop Scottish projects at scale'. Ms Robison also said the UK Government should urgently accelerate the development of an appropriate market support mechanism to encourage firms to develop the huge energy storage facilities that will be needed to maximise the potential of windfarms. Households pay a fortune to compensate firms which operate Scottish windfarms that are switched off in times of low demand. Last year the Labour Government launched a revenue support scheme to encourage investment in large scale storage facilities but developers such as SSE have said it is not generous enough. READ MORE: Scottish hydropower boom hopes fade amid threats to major projects Ms Martin's statement did not include any evidence in support of her claim that Scotland's offshore wind sector is delivering jobs. The Scottish Government doesn't have the statistics required to support that claim. Boosters rely on estimates that renewables supported 42,000 jobs in Scotland in 2021 produced by academics at the University of Strathclyde - who warned they came with a moderately large margin of error and should not be over-interpreted. Industry leaders admit that job creation in Scotland has been disappointing. This is despite successive SNP Governments launching sector support schemes with big budgets culminating in the £500m offshore wind supply chain initiative announced by former first minister Humza Yousaf in October 2023. Ms Martin said the SNP Government would invest up to that amount over five years to 'support market certainty, create a highly productive, competitive offshore wind economy and support thousands of jobs, while embedding innovation and boosting skills'. But her announcement included further indications that the current SNP Government badly needs ideas about how to turn the grand vision into a reality. READ MORE: SNP Government green jobs failure seen in English city's success A section in the offshore wind consultation document entitled 'delivering ambitions' hailed the ScotWind and INTOG licensing rounds without explaining how they would translate into activity that would benefit the Scottish supply chain. The announcement asks: 'What additional actions do you believe should be taken by the Scottish Government, UK Government and agencies in order to realise the full potential of Scotland's offshore wind sector?' The consultation period is open until August 13. The launch of the consultation process came soon after the SNP Government was forced to admit that some of its climate ambitions were fanciful. In April last year then energy secretary Mairi McAllan scrapped the target to reduce emissions by 75% by 2030 after being forced to accept it was not credible. The Scottish Government adopted a system of five-year carbon budgets to replace emissions reductions targets. In a recent report on those budgets, the Climate Change Committee highlighted the extent to which advances made so far have been due to UK Government support. 'Progress to date has largely come from electricity decarbonisation, reflecting Scotland's abundant renewable resources,' said the expert body, which advises the UK and devolved governments. 'This is a reserved area of policy and Scotland has benefited from measures across Great Britain's electricity system.' While independence supporters pin the blame for everything on 'London', the Committee highlighted failings in areas where the Scottish Government is clearly in control. These include actions it could take to reduce demand for energy. The demand side of the equation seems to get forgotten amid the posturing of SNP ministers. READ MORE: North Sea jobs cull looms after blockbuster oil and gas deals The CCC appears to think the move to carbon budgets will be helpful at some point. However, interim chair Piers Forster, warned: 'We do need to see action now.' He noted: 'The Scottish Government has devolved powers to deliver the necessary emissions reductions in key sectors, particularly buildings, surface transport, agriculture, and land use. We encourage them to exercise these powers as quickly and fully as possible.' Underlining the scale of emissions from buildings, the Committee lamented the fact that plans to tackle these were left in limbo in April when the Scottish Government scrapped proposals for a scheme that would have cost householders a fortune. The Committee said: 'It is therefore disappointing that the proposals for regulations to upgrade properties at the point of sale have been abandoned, with, as yet, no specific alternative measures to deliver the target for heating to be zero emissions by 2045.' Ms McCallan assumed the housing brief after returning from maternity leave this month. The Committee also said the Scottish Government needs to do more to promote public transport and low carbon farming. 'Long-term certainty is needed on public funding for farming practices and technologies to reduce emissions from managing crops and livestock,' it said. The Committee recommended the Scottish Government support farmers in woodland creation, peatland restoration, agroforestry, and renewable energy. READ MORE: Israeli-owned firm takes control of UK's biggest gas field But the Scottish Government decided to reject the advice on farming, which could alienate supporters in SNP heartland areas such as North-East Scotland. Ms Martin said: 'While we welcome the UK CCC's advice … it is always for Scotland to decide whether those policies are right for us. She noted: 'To ensure we protect rural communities and have a thriving rural economy, we will not adopt all their recommendations on agriculture and peatland and will instead meet our targets in a way which works for rural Scotland, including supporting and protecting our iconic livestock industries.' But cosying up to farmers may only help the SNP Government recover some of the support it lost after abandoning the oil and gas industry as it courted the green vote under former FM Nicola Sturgeon. She led the 2014 independence campaign alongside Alex Salmond on the claim the North Sea's reserves would power an independent Scotland to prosperity.
Powys County Times
13 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Welfare U-turn will cost £2.5bn by 2030, Liz Kendall tells MPs
The Government's U-turn on welfare cuts will cost taxpayers around £2.5 billion by 2030, the Work and Pensions Secretary has told MPs as she laid out concessions to Labour rebels. Liz Kendall said the costs and savings of the Government's revised welfare package would be confirmed by the Office for Budget Responsibility at the budget in the autumn. But her statement to MPs on Monday suggested the measures would save less than half the £4.8 billion the Government had expected from its initial proposals. Ms Kendall's statement confirmed the concessions announced last week in an effort to head off a major rebellion by Labour backbenchers, including protecting people who claim personal independence payments from new eligibility criteria. Responding to claims this would create a 'two-tier' benefits system, Ms Kendall said: 'I would say to the House, including members opposite, that our benefits system often protects existing claimants from new rates or new rules, because lives have been built around that support, and it's often very hard for people to adjust.' Earlier, modelling from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) suggested the Government's proposals would push 150,000 more people into poverty by 2030. The figure is down from the 250,000 extra people estimated to have been facing relative poverty after housing costs under the original proposals. Modelling published by the DWP said the estimate does not include any 'potential positive impact' from extra funding and measures to support people with disabilities and long-term health conditions into work. Speaking in the Commons on Monday afternoon, Ms Kendall insisted that changes to her proposals on Pip and universal credit would 'ensure no existing claimants are put into poverty'. A Number 10 spokesman also said that the DWP's poverty modelling was 'subject to uncertainty' and did not 'reflect the full picture', including investment in the health service to help people get back to work. Ministers hope the concessions will be enough to avert defeat when MPs vote on the reforms on Tuesday, although Downing Street remains braced for a substantial revolt. A 'reasoned amendment' proposed by senior Labour backbencher Dame Meg Hillier had received support from 126 Labour MPs, enough to overturn Sir Keir Starmer's majority. On Friday, Dame Meg had described the concessions as a 'workable compromise'. But Labour MP Debbie Abrahams, who negotiated the concessions alongside Dame Meg, told ITV News on Monday that the Government had rowed back on what had been negotiated. Although she described the concessions as 'good', Ms Abrahams said the rebels were 'not quite there yet' on a deal with the Government. She added: 'The actual offer that was put to one of the negotiating team wasn't actually what we thought we had negotiated on Wednesday and Thursday. There are some issues around that.' In the Commons, both Dame Meg and Ms Abrahams raised concerns that a review of Pip, to be conducted by disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms, would report too late to have an effect on the changes scheduled for November 2026. Meanwhile, Conservative shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately accused the Government of making 'unfunded U-turns costing billions and welfare plans that are not worth the paper that they are written on'. She said: 'Their latest idea is a two-tier welfare system to trap people in a lifetime on benefits and deny them the dignity of work while leaving the taxpayer to pick up the ever-growing bill.' Tory leader Kemi Badenoch confirmed on Monday evening that her party would vote against the Government's proposals, saying they were 'not serious welfare reform'. Accusing Sir Keir of having 'watered down the small savings Labour were making', she added: 'We have a Government that is incapable of governing. For that reason, we will be voting against the welfare Bill tomorrow.' The U-turn will also cause problems for Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who will now have to find a way to cover the shortfall between the amount the Government had expected to save, and the new, lower figure. And that figure could be even higher, with economists at the Institute for Fiscal Studies and the Resolution Foundation suggesting last week the U-turn could cost in the region of £3 billion, raising the prospect of further tax rises.
