No buy, low buy, slow buy: How many consumers are preparing for an economic hit
A whopping 83% of consumers said that if their financial situation worsens in the coming months, they will strongly consider cutting back on their non-essential spending, according to a new study by Intuit Credit Karma, which polled more than 2,000 U.S. adults in April.
On TikTok, money saving hacks, with hashtags such as no buy, slow buy, low buy and underconsumption, have skyrocketed in popularity, especially among young adults. All are aimed at making the most of what you already have and resisting the temptation to buy more stuff, or even anything at all.
How no buy, low buy and slow buy challenges work
'No buy 2025' encourages shoppers to cut out all non-essential purchases for the year, including clothing, books, electronics and entertainment. Alternatively, low buy and slow buy advocate for a more mindful approach to buying decisions, such as following ' the 48-hour rule ' before making any discretionary purchases and limiting purchases altogether. The goal is to break the habit of overspending — or ' doom spending ' — as fears of a recession rise.
Recent data from H&R Block's Spruce also found that 68% of Generation Z consumers reported being influenced by social media finance trends, with over one-third of them looking specifically to social media for financial knowledge. (America's young adults are also increasingly turning to social media to express their financial dissatisfaction, making a joke of so-called recession indicators.)
Why savings challenges are so popular
To be sure, Americans are feeling the pain of higher prices, with various reports showing many have exhausted their savings and have been leaning on credit cards to make ends meet.
With sweeping U.S. tariffs now going into effect, concern is heightened about the rising cost of goods and making ends meet, especially as the economy shows signs of contracting.
'Consumers are going to have to pay for the increase in prices these tariffs are going to cause and there is no way around it,' said Eugenio Aleman, chief economist at Raymond James. 'The alternative is to reduce consumption, especially in discretionary items.'
A survey by Gallup last month found that inflation, housing costs and lack of money are the most commonly cited financial challenges by U.S. adults.
According to the poll, which was conducted during a period of extreme market volatility after the Trump administration announced new tariffs on most U.S. trading partners, a record 53% of consumers said their financial situation was getting worse, while just 38% said it was getting better. Additionally, 57% worried about not being able to maintain their standard of living.
A separate report by Bankrate found that 43% of adults said money now negatively affects their mental health, at least occasionally, causing anxiety, stress, worrisome thoughts, loss of sleep and depression.
'Tariffs, inflation, higher interest rates and a recession are all forces that Americans can't prevent, no matter how much they want to,' Sarah Foster, Bankrate's economic analyst, said in an email. 'Taking proactive steps to manage your finances can provide a sense of stability and security.'
A better way to improve your finances
Financial experts say TikTok's latest microtrends can provide a short-term boost to help reach some savings goals, however, there is no substitute for practicing good long-term habits.
'Ignore what others are doing with their money,' said Daniel Milan, managing partner of Cornerstone Financial Services in Southfield, Michigan. 'That to me is a very foundational tenet for any household.'
Milan says financial planning starts with a budget. 'People don't like that word,' he said. But rather than jumping on the latest TikTok trend, 'sit down and pencil out what you actually are spending.'
Milan recommends flagging excess expenses that can be cut, considering which are 'wants' or 'needs.' Milan says he did this himself at the start of the year after getting married, and was able to cut out some recurring bills as well as subscription services that overlapped with his wife's — to the tune of $800 a month.
'That type of exercise can be extraordinarily powerful from a cash flow perspective,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Doge reportedly using AI tool to create ‘delete list' of federal regulations
The 'department of government efficiency' (Doge) is using artificial intelligence to create a 'delete list' of federal regulations, according to a report, proposing to use the tool to cut 50% of regulations by the first anniversary of Donald Trump's second inauguration. The 'Doge AI Deregulation Decision Tool' will analyze 200,000 government regulations, according to internal documents obtained by the Washington Post, and select those which it deems to be no longer required by law. Doge, which was run by Elon Musk until May, claims that 100,000 of those regulations can then be eliminated, following some staff feedback. A PowerPoint presentation made public by the Post claims that the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) used the AI tool to make 'decisions on 1,083 regulatory sections', while the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau used it to write '100% of deregulations'. The Post spoke to three HUD employees who told the newspaper AI had been 'recently used to review hundreds, if not more than 1,000, lines of regulations'. During his 2024 campaign, Donald Trump claimed that government regulations were 'driving up the cost of goods' and promised the 'most aggressive regulatory reduction' in history. He repeatedly criticized rules which aimed to tackle the climate crisis, and as president he ordered the heads of all government agencies to undertake a review of all regulations in coordination with Doge. Asked about the use of AI in deregulation by the Post, White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said 'all options are being explored' to achieve the president's deregulation promises. Fields said that 'no single plan has been approved or green-lit', and the work is 'in its early stages and is being conducted in a creative way in consultation with the White House'. Fields added: 'The Doge experts creating these plans are the best and brightest in the business and are embarking on a never-before-attempted transformation of government systems and operations to enhance efficiency and effectiveness.' Musk appointed a slew of inexperienced staffers to Doge, including Edward Coristine, a 19-year-old who was previously known by the online handle 'Big Balls'. Earlier this year, Reuters reported that Coristine was one of two Doge associates promoting the use of AI across the federal bureaucracy.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Donald Trump claims on R&A's Turnberry spending are ‘well wide of the mark'
Donald Trump's claims that the R&A has invested 'millions of dollars' in updating Turnberry's broadcasting and communications facilities in preparations for The Open returning to his Ayrshire links are understood to be well wide of the mark. Sources insist that, in complete contrast to the US President's comments, the R&A has not done any such work on cabling since a small amount was laid in 2009. Trump made the assertion when landing in Scotland on Friday night for his five-day visit. 'The infrastructure of the course is good,' he told The Telegraph when asked about the R&A repeatedly stating that substantial amounts of work would need to be done on logistics before it would consider taking the major to Turnberry again. 'In fact, the Royal and Ancient [sic], I don't know you're aware of this ... they spent a lot of money, hundreds of thousands of dollars, probably into the millions of dollars. And they've laid all the wire for television and for electricity under the holes of Turnberry, so that when the Open gets there, they have it all done.' The R&A declined to comment on Saturday, but it is understood that a little cable was laid in and around the 18th and the [fans] village in 2009 and nothing has been done since then. What has been laid wouldn't even be usable now according to sources and did not come at significant cost. Trump has lobbied for the Open to return to the course after he dished out his own millions to improve the layout and the hotel that is on the property. Yet while the former R&A chief executive, Martin Slumbers, declared 'we will not be taking events there until we're comfortable that the whole dialogue will be about golf', his successor, Mark Darbon, has indicated that the main stumbling block is not Trump's character or his penchant for stealing the spotlight, but the remoteness of the resort he bought for $60m in 2014. 'We love the golf course but we've got some big logistical challenges there,' Darbon said at last week's Open. 'You see the scale of their set-up here [Royal Portrush] and we've got some work to do on the road, rail and accommodation infrastructure around Turnberry. We've explicitly not taken it out of our pool of venues but we'd need to address those logistical challenges should we return.' Darbon met earlier this year with Eric Trump, the President's son who runs the family's portfolio of upmarket golf clubs, and informed him of the scale of development needed and stressed that Government support would be necessary. Regardless of any Whitehall pressure, it is highly unlikely the R&A will budge on this thorny issue. It relies on the revenue from its major to govern and develop amateur and recreational golf in 146 countries internationally and while Portrush last week attracted a crowd of 280,000, only 123,000 showed up at Turnberry the last time it played host 16 years ago. That could lead to a draining shortfall and the feeling in the sport's corridors of power is that even if the green light was given for a new road and a new station – not to mention a few hotels – Turnberry still might have to wait at least another decade. And Trump's wildly inaccurate statements will hardly assist in whetting the R&A's appetite to return.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Coke bottles bitter US economic formula
NEW YORK, July 23 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Mexico is a frequent target of Donald Trump's ire, but he prefers the Coke sold there. After holding conversations with the president, Coca-Cola (KO.N), opens new tab unveiled plans to roll out a version of its signature soda using cane sugar, as it is sold south of the border, instead of corn syrup. Even setting aside the idea of the Oval Office occupant influencing one of the world's most successful recipes, it's a classic case of industrial policy gone awry. The $300 billion company has occasionally tinkered with the Coke formula over its 139-year lifespan, removing the cocaine, opens new tab that was originally included in 1903 and introducing a sweeter New Coke in 1985, which created a marketing disaster. After Coca-Cola and other carbonated beverage makers started using corn syrup for their U.S. products in the 1980s, the so-called Mexican Coke, bottled with purer sucrose, became a cultish find in supermarkets. Making it more widely available bubbles up a multitude of complications. Homegrown sugar – as Coca-Cola CEO James Quincey vowed to use – is pricey because the Department of Agriculture tightly controls production and limits imports. There have been levies on it since 1789, and the U.S. government started providing farmers with financing in 1981 to help underpin prices. It costs about 50% more today for domestic sugar than what's sold internationally, according to the Sweeteners Users Association trade group. There's also the matter of U.S. support for corn. It's the most subsidized crop in the country, with growers receiving some $3 billion of direct payments, insurance and loans from the government. The feed grain accounts for 30% of all U.S. agricultural assistance. Championing Coke with sugar muddles the various policy objectives while also inviting more imports from Mexico. Moreover, both ingredients contradict other White House positions. Although Trump guzzles Diet Coke, his Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert Kennedy has denounced high fructose corn syrup and sugar as poison and wants to prevent low-income Americans from buying soda with their food assistance money. These clashes over Coke's recipe mainly serve to accentuate distasteful U.S. economic formulas. Follow Jennifer Saba on Bluesky, opens new tab and LinkedIn, opens new tab. Coca-Cola said on July 22 that it plans to roll out a version of its signature soda sweetened with U.S. cane sugar instead of high-fructose corn syrup after President Donald Trump issued a statement on July 16 saying he had been discussing the idea with the company.
