Lots more fleshing out of the ‘how and when' for indy will be required
Independence is not for me but for the people of Scotland, and that dream must be realised within a feasible timescale as part of a clear and defined plan.
My take from Tuesday's National, particularly the sentiment from the letters pages, is that of disappointment. Disappointment we do not have that clarity and the plan; disappointment we are still not shouting out the benefits of independence and the many downsides of today's Union; disappointment with the lack of vision; disappointment with lack of inspired campaigning; disappointment that the constitutional convention is not in place; disappointment that independence – the raison d'etre of the SNP – has not been promoted as we continue to persuade the undecided, primarily through good governance. After 18 years, how many more years do we need? Do we really believe this will translate into a few more percentage points for independence no matter what the Unionists throw at us?
READ MORE: SNP's losing strategy for by-election took the electorate for fools
Voting SNP1 and SNP2 is seen as a folly. Perhaps one for James Kelly – how many independence-supporting MSPs do we get by voting SNP1 and SNP2 compared with SNP1 and Green or Alba or other as vote 2? That clarity might help me and other voters.
James Dornan MSP advocates keeping John Swinney, recognising the SNP and John's achievements.
I see no advantage in change at this point. However, James says that we must put indy left, right and centre. He implies good governance over the years. He does not properly explain why indy has not been to the fore and kept to the fore of late.
James says a referendum will follow a pro-indy majority. I suggest a lot more fleshing out of 'exactly how and when' is needed, together with a detailed plan to counter the many obstacles that lie ahead, courtesy of the overwhelming pro-Union media, the other political parties and the establishment.
I will remain optimistic that independence will be achieved. It would be good to see a new citizens' convention or constitutional convention in place and positive contributors such as Believe in Scotland and Common Weal help drive independence.
Ken Howells
Longniddry
IN his letter 'Will the SNP once again seek 'both votes'?' (June 10), James Duncan refers to the 'stupid call for 'Both votes SNP'' and ... and the possibility of 'list voters being encouraged to vote for other independence-supporting candidates on the list'.
There was a letter published in The National on Tuesday, December 10, 2024 which explained why this is not possible.
READ MORE: The SNP can't suggest we use our second votes for a different party
James may be thinking of what is called 'apparentement' in mainland Europe, in which electoral law permits political parties to form alliances for an election campaign. Such an arrangement is not permissible by current electoral law here.
If such an arrangement was possible, the result of the Scottish Parliament elections in 2021 could have been more than 75% of the seats with almost 49% of the vote – not very democratic.
If a political party has the highest quotient at any time during the calculations for allocation of list seats, it MUST be allocated that seat even if it has all of the constituency seats in a region.
Michael Follon
Glenrothes
MORE smoke and mirrors from the Labour Party and the UK Government.
From my recollection, this is the third time the UK Government has proclaimed financial backing for the Acorn carbon capture and storage project (proposed 20 years ago) but there is still no money on the table. While tens of billions of pounds continue to flow into projects south of the Border, Scotland is supposed to be grateful for the UK Government now declaring financial support for the Edinburgh exascale supercomputer a year after it cancelled funding. Increased public spending commitments have been cynically hailed by Labour Party politicians without reference to projected inflation increases or different spending choices made north and south of the Border.
READ MORE: Fraser of Allander calls out Labour's Spending Review claim
To cap it all, Governor Murray now hypocritically says that the Scottish Government did not spend last year's budget increase 'wisely' when much of it was spent on increased public-sector wages while the Scottish Government also continued to mitigate the effects of Westminster-imposed austerity. Or has the 'Governor' (also referred to by some as the 'Viceroy') now abandoned the last vestiges of socialist principles he presumably once held?
If that is the case, why are Scottish trade unions still supporting a Labour Party that in government continues to betray the poor and disadvantaged in Scotland while also being complicit in the continuing slaughter and devastation in Gaza?
Stan Grodynski
Longniddry, East Lothian
THE words of the UK Chancellor 'we are renewing Britain' were heard in the House of Commons on Wednesday, yet what followed left questions unanswered. The Chancellor announced a 0.8% increase to Scotland's block grant, yet most UK Government departments were allocated more than 2%, prompting the question 'where is Scotland's 2%'?
Catriona C Clark
Falkirk
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
44 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Donald Trump plans to ‘visit his three Scottish golf courses next month'
DON HIS WAY Donald Trump plans to 'visit his three Scottish golf courses next month' DONALD Trump is reportedly planning to visit his three Scottish golf courses next month. The US President is set to head to Scotland for the first time since his election victory last year. Advertisement 4 Donald Trump is reportedly planning on visiting Scotland next month Credit: AFP 4 He is likely to visit his three golf courses including Turnberry which was vandalised earlier this year Credit: Alamy The MailOnline reports that, in the final two weeks in July, security services are preparing for Air Force One to land at Prestwick Airport. A ring of steel is expected to be thrown around the President amid fears of major protests following the US military's attack on Iran's nuclear stockpile. During his first stint in office, thousands of Scots took to the streets in Glasgow, Edinburgh and Aberdeen in 2018 to protest against his visit. It comes after Mr Trump previously revealed he plans to visit Scotland during his second state visit to the UK. Advertisement The US President was given the historic invitation to officially come to Britain. It is the first time an American leader has been offered as second state visit. He was handed the invitation by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer in the White House. Mr Trump was hoping to informally meet King Charles this summer at one of his Scottish residences - Balmoral or Dumfries House - ahead of the second state visit likely to take place in September. Advertisement But it is understood that their diaries do not align. The President is likely to visit his Turnberry golf course in Ayrshire - which was vandalised by pro-Palestinian protesters in March. 'Daddy' Trump stopped Israel and Iran war, Nato chief tells 'strong' Don He will also visit his controversial Trump International course in Aberdeen. And Mr Trump may also take time to check in on his brand new 18-hole course, which is set to open at the Aberdeenshire property, named the MacLeod course after the President's mum. Advertisement A Trump visit to Scotland has proved controversial both politicians and the public. First Minister John Swinney called for his second visit to be axed after Trump's explosive bust-up with Ukrainian president Zelensky in the Oval Office. But the SNP leader was branded a hypocrite after he met with Eric Trump over tea and biscuits at Bute House. And several people have been charged over alleged vandalism at the President's Turnberry golf course. Advertisement 4 He will also visit his controversial Trump International course in Aberdeen Credit: AFP
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Ian Blackford calls on SNP to support defence industry
At this week's NATO summit, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer committed to raising defence spending to 5% of GDP by 2035. READ MORE Mr Blackford said this was a "seismic shift" and would have "massive implications for the budgets of every government department over the next decade." "Though in these islands we have excellence in many aspects of our armed forces, to a large extent our military capability has been hollowed out," he wrote. "The need to enhance defence capability and at pace is stark. "There is now a race to invest and if we take last year's defence spending of £53.9 billion as our base, we are going to have to find by 2035 an extra £60 billion plus a year to invest in defence. "Where is this to come from?" The former MP said 'difficult choices' would need to be made. He argued that defence funding should not be seen as a moral compromise, but as an economic lever. "Austerity will be a price to be paid as a consequence of having to invest in our national security. "Investment in defence, though, can be a lever and transformative in itself in generating economic growth." He noted that the industry already supports 33,500 workers in Scotland and contributes £3.2 billion in gross value. "We all want a high-growth, high-wage, high-productivity Scotland—a society that drives investment in skills and innovation." The SNP has long opposed public money being spent on munitions. The Scottish National Investment Bank's ethical investment policy currently bars organisations 'primarily engaged in the manufacture of munitions or weapons' from receiving support. Ian Blackford calling on the SNP to embrace the defence sector (Image: PA) Recently, a new welding centre—backed by Rolls-Royce and intended to support Royal Navy submarine construction—was denied funding by Scottish Enterprise. The UK Government has since stepped in to fund the initiative. The SNP has faced accusations of hypocrisy, as the Scottish Government funds Ferguson Marine, which is subcontracted by BAE to work on Royal Navy frigates. Mr Blackford's intervention comes as John Swinney faces mounting internal and external pressure to reconsider his government's position. Recently, the First Minister suggested the policy could be "reconsidered" given the growing threat from Russia. Speaking on the Holyrood Sources podcast, he said: "I'm conscious we are living in a very different context today. I do think the Russian threat is very real. We have to consider these questions." He added he had no objections if a company wished to set up a munitions factory in Scotland. The First Minister added: "We do not use public money to support the manufacture of munitions but will support skills and defence companies." Speaking to Scotland on Sunday, Stewart McDonald, the SNP's former defence spokesperson at Westminster, said it was time for the party to look again at the policy. "It hasn't had a proper defence debate since 2012, when we changed the policy on NATO," he said. "All of this is moving at such pace. The entire international picture is moving at a rapid pace and if we are a party that seeks to be an independent state—and an independent state in NATO and the EU—then we should have stuff to say on this." Mr McDonald warned: "There is a risk the party falls behind in that debate." He said: "That's a debate going on in capitals across Europe. And although Edinburgh is not a state capital, the Scottish Government has a role to play as a domestic partner. "We have an industry in Scotland worth many billions of pounds, employing somewhere between 33,000 and 35,000 people, and it has a very awkward relationship with the Scottish Government—it has done so for a long time." He suggested Mr Swinney should gather major and smaller defence employers in Scotland, invite the defence procurement minister from London, and ask: "How do I marshal the resources of the government—spending, policy, legislative—to better support this?" "I understand there's a bit of political balancing to be done here, but I think that can be over-thought and over-egged," he added. "We do live in much more dangerous times and there's a risk we are just saying the same stuff we've been saying for a long time—and that just would not be credible to stand still politically as the entire world changes around you." Mr McDonald branded the Scottish Enterprise ban on munitions-related investment "a stupid policy" and criticised restrictions at the Scottish National Investment Bank. Meanwhile, in the Sunday Mail, Labour's Scottish Secretary, Ian Murray, called on the SNP to reverse its opposition to nuclear weapons entirely. "Any responsible government has to make sure they put their national security and the safety of their own people first. "Scots only have to turn on their TVs and pick up their newspapers to read about the fact that there is a changing global instability. "I do think the Scottish Government should readdress it." Previously, Mr Murray described himself as a 'lifelong unilateralist' and was one of 2000 parliamentarians to have signed the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) pledge, which obliges signatories to work for their respective nations to sign up to a worldwide ban on nuclear weapons through the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). He added: "My views on nuclear weapons changed some time ago but they have been underlined and emphasised by the fact that the issue of nuclear weapons and deterrence has become a huge global stability issue. "For the Scottish Government to tell Rolls-Royce, one of the most respected British institutions, that they will not contribute to them investing in a highly skilled welding academy in Glasgow tells the public that they do not care about jobs, growth and opportunities for the future. "That is a huge part of the defence dividend we should be trying to capture. Places like Babcock and BAE Systems are hiring foreign welders from the Philippines and South Africa to do the work local people should be doing." READ MORE However, SNP defence spokesperson Dave Doogan told the paper that the party remained 'resolute' in its opposition to nuclear weapons. "We believe we're firmly in step with the vast majority of civil society in Scotland on that point. "Ian Murray, consistent with many other issues, is not in step with the majority of civil society in Scotland. "I've spoken to armed forces professionals who deal with the nuclear deterrent and nobody talks about it in the triumphant way in which Westminster politicians of the two main parties do." Any change in the Scottish Government's policy would likely be met with opposition from the Scottish Greens.
Edinburgh Live
2 hours ago
- Edinburgh Live
Edinburgh Book Festival awarded £300k in taxpayer cash after Nicola Sturgeon ex-aide hired
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info The Edinburgh International Book Festival received £300,000 of taxpayer cash weeks after Nicola Sturgeon's ex-chief of staff was appointed as director. The former first minister, who is among the headliners for the event, will be promoting her new memoir - Frankly. Her former top adviser, Liz Lloyd, was hired as director of the festival in May, reports the Daily Record. A 'one-off' lifeline for the festival of £300,000 was announced by the Scottish Government in June. The event lost its chief sponsor Baillie Gifford last year, after campaigning from eco activists over fossil fuel ties. Lothian Tory MSP Sue Webber said: 'Taxpayers will be asking questions about how the SNP suddenly found this money a matter of weeks after Nicola Sturgeon's most senior former adviser was appointed a director of the festival. 'While the book festival is ultimately crucial for Scotland's culture and Edinburgh's economy, many will be thinking this is not a mere coincidence. The SNP was only scrambling to find this funding because Baillie Gifford was hounded out from its long-held sponsorship by climate activists. Sign up for Edinburgh Live newsletters for more headlines straight to your inbox "SNP ministers should come clean on how this funding was awarded and if there was any lobbying from former colleagues who were once at the heart of the nationalist government." Lloyd worked for the Scottish Government for nearly a decade as Sturgeon's top aide, working closely with current FM Swinney who was then deputy FM. Lloyd was Sturgeon's chief of staff from 2014 until 2021 then a strategic adviser until the ex-FM quit in 2023, when Lloyd also left her post. The book festival said it would be 'spurious' and 'misleading' to suggest any link between Lloyd's appointment and the announcement of the cash, which it said had been planned for months. The event's government funding has more than doubled in the past year to a record £820,000. Announcing the £300,000 grant on Wednesday, SNP Business Minister Richard Lochhead said it would help schoolkids continue to access free literary events. Join Edinburgh Live's Whatsapp Community here and get the latest news sent straight to your messages. The book festival had previously warned its ability to deliver a successful event had been 'severely compromised' by the ending of its relationship with finance firm Baillie Gifford. The deal was cancelled after activists with the Fossil Free Books campaign targeted book festivals across Britain. The Scottish Government said: 'The Edinburgh International Book Festival is one the country's most significant cultural institutions. Its schools programme has been crucial in fostering literacy and cultural engagement among young people. 'Supported by the increase in funding for festivals announced in the 2025-26 Scottish Budget, this funding secures those benefits for young readers across Edinburgh, helping schools that might otherwise struggle with travel costs' Glasgow's Aye Write literary festival had to cancel last year's event after its bid for funding from government quango Creative Scotland was turned down. It is set to be revived.
