Lawmakers advance bills aimed at increasing regulation of hunting on Oklahoma's public lands
OKLAHOMA CITY — Lawmakers advanced two bills this week designed to tighten the state's hunting regulations on Oklahoma public lands by instituting new requirements for guides and nonresidents.
Senate Bill 448 heads to the governor's desk after passing off the House floor with a nearly unanimous vote while Senate Bill 208 heads to the House floor moving through a committee Wednesday.
The first, authored by Rep. Jim Grego, R-Wilburton, would require nonresidents to schedule and obtain written permission before hunting at any refuge or wildlife management area operated by the Oklahoma Wildlife Conservation Commission.
A lottery system would be used, if necessary, to distribute permits to nonresidents to hunt. These permits would come at a cost of $100 and the lottery would be used to help ease overcrowding on public lands, Grego said.
Micah Holmes, a spokesperson for the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, said the agency supports the bill because it offers another tool to deal with overcrowding.
The agency fields complaints of overcrowding on more 'popular' publicly managed lands, he said.
Holmes said 'this is a good problem to have,' and it speaks to the 'excellent' land management done by the department.
The agency is also looking into other options to monitor how many people are utilizing public lands, including electronic check-ins and road counters, he said.
Senate Bill 208, authored by Rep. Ty Burns, R-Pawnee, would require the Wildlife Department to create a licensing and registration system for anyone providing 'guiding services' on public lands. Guides are trained professionals who help hunters locate game, navigate terrain and provide other services.
The bill excludes 'commercial hunting facilities' and landowners that offer those services on private or leased property.
The measure does not outline any fees or guidelines for implementation, but allows the department to create any rules necessary to carry out the legislation.
Rep. Nick Archer, R-Elk City, who voted against it, said he's concerned that the bill's language provided no enforcement authority to require these licenses and registration.
This measure is eligible to be heard on the House floor. If approved and not amended on the full chamber, it will head to Stitt's desk.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Is August recess at risk?
It's Monday. We have officially surpassed the six-month mark of President Trump's second term. How does everyone feel about his first six months? That's a loaded question, but I would to know your thoughts. Let me know here. In today's issue: Trump urges Thune to cancel August recess Lawmakers confront Epstein scandal Trump vs. Harvard in court today Trump denies more WSJ reporting Coldplay 'kiss cam' becomes a viral meme 🌻️ ON CAPITOL HILL ' Salt air, and the rust on your door, I never needed anything more' 🎵: The House and Senate are both in session this week before the House breaks away for August recess. The Senate is a week behind the lower chamber — senators still have another Washington work week before *leaving for their annual break. *But there's always an asterisk: Trump wants senators to work through August. He is urging Senate GOP Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) to cancel the Senate's August recess to confirm his 'incredible nominees.' But remember, August recess is the time for Republicans to tout the 'big, beautiful bill' to constituents and claim victory. What is hanging over Congress's sprint to recess: The Jeffrey Epstein saga. The Hill's Mychael Schnell reports that the controversy surrounding the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein case is poised to dominate the conversation on Capitol Hill this week. On one hand, MAGA World wants the files to be released. But on the other hand, President Trump wants the saga to be dropped. There could be a vote this week on a resolution to call for the release of the Epstein files, though that resolution would be nonbinding. What else is happening on Capitol Hill this week, via Schnell. ➤ FUN TIDBIT: One year ago today, CNN anchor Wolf Blitzer was enjoying a 'Wolf Spritzer' cocktail in D.C. when the news broke that then- President Biden would drop out of the presidential race. TBH, I can't imagine a fall without a government shutdown threat: 🍂 Fall — the season of pumpkin spice lattes, apple crisp, chilly mornings, feisty negotiations over government funding and cozy nights. 🍂 Republican lawmakers are already worried they may be headed for a government shutdown later this year due to the bad blood caused by the bruising 'big, beautiful bill' and rescissions package negotiations. To pile on — the White House may have more demands on the way: White House budget director Russell Vought said the White House is planning to send more spending cuts to Capitol Hill for Republicans to pass. But that may be too big of an ask after several months of controversial demands. Keep in mind — Republicans *need* Democrats here: Republicans can't pass a government funding package on their own. And there isn't much goodwill from Democrats. '[A GOP] senator acknowledged that Democrats are furious after getting steamrolled on the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act and the rescissions package.' If this feels early to be speculating: After this week, the House and Senate won't be in session at the same time until September (!) Read Bolton's explainer of the Senate dynamics right now: 'Republicans fear Washington headed for shutdown after bruising spending fights' Later: The Hill's Jonathan Easley will explore how midterm politics are taking shape as Congress prepares for their scheduled recess in today's Evening Report. Click here to sign-up and get it in your inbox ➤ THE 5 SENATE SEATS MOST LIKELY TO FLIP IN 2026: North Carolina, Georgia, Maine, Texas and Michigan, per Al Weaver 's latest assessment in The Hill. Read Weaver's reasoning ➤ TOMORROW: In The Movement, The Hill's Emily Brooks will explore three major fights on the right to keep your eye on through the end of the year. Click here to sign-up and get it in your inbox ⚖️ IN THE WHITE HOUSE The Wall Street Journal has more tea: The Wall Street Journal reported over the weekend that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent talked President Trump out of firing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. Trump is unsurprisingly not happy with this story. He fired off a Truth Social post bashing the reporting. 'Nobody had to explain that to me. I know better than anybody what's good for the Market, and what's good for the U.S.A,' Trump wrote. 'If it weren't for me, the Market wouldn't be at Record Highs right now, it probably would have CRASHED! So, get your information CORRECT. People don't explain to me, I explain to them!' Bessent then bashed the 'leakers' who spoke with the Journal. He told CNBC the 'leakers … only have partial information. More of Bessent's reaction Keep in mind: Trump is already on the warpath against the Wall Street Journal. He sued the newspaper on Friday after it published a story detailing an alleged letter Trump sent to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein for his 50th birthday. 🔎 Read the lawsuit A judge ruled against Trump: 'A federal judge ruled the Trump administration violated federal law by taking down a public website that showed how funding is apportioned to federal agencies, ordering its reinstatement,' reports The Hill's Zach Schonfeld and Aris Folley. The ruling: 'U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan ruled Monday that removal of the online database overseen by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) violated legislation passed by Congress, which requires OMB to make apportionment decisions publicly available within two business days.' Trump vs. Harvard: Harvard University is battling the Trump administration in court today over the federal government's pause of billions of dollars in funding for the school. The Trump administration's argument: 'The Trump administration has argued it has the authority to pull the funds after determining the university has violated the civil rights of its Jewish students by failing to properly act against antisemitism on campus. The government also argues this court is not the proper venue for this dispute.' Harvard's argument: The university argues the government is violating the university's First Amendment rights. What's unclear: Whether there will be a ruling on the case today. But even if there is, we should expect any ruling to be appealed by the other side. ➤ FASCINATING STAT ABOUT THE WHITE HOUSE'S NONCOMPLIANCE: The Washington Post calculated that Trump officials have been accused of defying a third of judges' rulings against the administration. The gist: 'A comprehensive analysis of hundreds of lawsuits against Trump policies shows dozens of examples of defiance, delay and dishonesty, which experts say pose an unprecedented threat to the U.S. legal system.' Should ICE agents be allowed to wear masks?: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has been under increasing scrutiny due to its agents wearing masks to conceal their identities. Well, ICE acting Director Todd Lyons told CBS's 'Face the Nation' on Sunday that his agents may continue wearing masks. From Lyons: 'I've said it publicly before, I'm not a proponent of the masks. However, if that's a tool that the men and women of ICE to keep themselves and their family safe, then I will allow it,' he said. COMING UP The House and Senate are in. President Trump and Vice President Vance are in Washington. (All times EST) 12:30 p.m.: Trump and Vance have lunch together. 5:30 p.m.: A Senate vote to end debate on a nomination. 📆 Today's agenda 6:30 p.m.: First and last House votes. 📆 Today's agenda Tonight: Stephen Colbert 's first episode of 'The Late Show' since his cancellation was announced. Read CNN's Brian Stelter 's primer: ' What will Colbert say? ' 🐝 INTERNET BUZZ 🍩 Celebrate: Today is National Junk Food Day. 💋 Don't pull a 'Coldplay kiss cam': The CEO of Astronomer has resigned over the awkward kiss cam moment during Coldplay's Boston concert. The whole saga has become quite the internet meme. My personal favorite reenactment is from the Phillies' mascots. 📹 Watch the clip 📦 Amazon has been quietly raising prices: A Wall Street Journal analysis found that Amazon has quietly raised prices on low-cost products after pledging to keep them low during the president's trade war. Meanwhile, Walmart has cut prices. 📊 Check out these graphics showing the price hikes
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Republicans press Lutnick on AI chip policy
A group of House Republicans pressed Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Thursday to quickly nail down the administration's policy on artificial intelligence (AI) chip exports after rescinding the Biden administration's framework. Eight GOP lawmakers, led by Rep. Mark Alford (R-Mo.), urged the administration to provide a 'stable exporting structure' to replace former President Biden's AI diffusion rule. 'This rule would have helped China win the AI race, and replacing this rule quickly will provide American innovators a stable environment to compete and win,' they wrote in Thursday's letter, first reported by Semafor. The Trump administration rescinded the AI diffusion rule in May. The rule, unveiled in the final days of Biden's presidency, placed caps on chip sales to most countries around the world. Only 18 U.S. allies and partners were exempted from the restrictions. The diffusion rule faced sharp pushback from the semiconductor industry, with major players like Nvidia slamming it as 'misguided.' The Commerce Department pulled the rule shortly before it was set to go into effect, arguing it would 'have stifled American innovation and saddled companies with burdensome new regulatory requirements.' Alford and his GOP colleagues agreed with the administration's assessment, while pushing for a new framework with know-your-customer and security controls. 'We can only win the AI race with Communist China if we are wisely limiting our foreign adversary's opportunities to develop frontier AI and enabling American companies to compete quickly in the global marketplace,' they added. 'Both prongs are important and the balance between them are crucial.' 'America is winning the AI race, but the competition has been hard fought and will continue to be,' the lawmakers continued. 'Steps must be taken quickly since investments happening now will create the world's tech ecosystem for decades to come.' The letter comes after the Trump administration walked back curbs on some Nvidia chip sales to China last week. Nvidia announced last Monday that it was filing applications to sell its H20 chips after receiving assurances from the U.S. government that its licenses would be granted. The chipmaker revealed earlier this year that the administration was implementing new licensing requirements that would limit its ability to sell the chips in China. The reversal prompted pushback from at least one key Republican lawmaker, Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), chair of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. He raised concerns in a letter to Lutnick on Friday, arguing that the move would boost China's AI capabilities.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
House GOP campaign arm outraises Democrats in second quarter
The National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) outraised its counterpart, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), in the second quarter of 2025. The House GOP campaign arm brought in $32.3 million in the second quarter of the year, while the House Democratic campaign arm raised $29.1 million in the same period. In June alone, the NRCC raised $18.1 million and the DCCC brought in $12.7 million. In 2025 so far, the NRCC has raised a total of $69 million, while the DCCC has raised $66 million. However, the DCCC reported having $39.7 million in the bank, while the NRCC has $37.6 million cash-on-hand. The NRCC's second quarter haul is a milestone for the committee, which is normally outraised by its Democratic counterpart. The last time the NRCC outraised the DCCC in the first six months and second quarter of an election cycle was 2021. 'While House Republicans build a historical war chest to grow the majority, House Democrats are broke, divided, and hijacked by socialists,' said Mike Marinella, spokesman at the NRCC. 'Donors are slamming the brakes because they know this party is pathetic, aimless, and has no chance of taking back the majority.' In their own statement, the DCCC noted they have 'the better message, stronger candidates, and necessary resources' to win back the House next year. 'Republicans are running scared because they know they are poised to be rejected by the American people next year,' said DCCC Chair Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.). 'Their support for the Big, Ugly Law is going to cost them the House Majority. It fails to lower costs for everyday Americans and instead rips health care away from millions, threatens funding for rural hospitals, and will lead to higher energy bills – all to pay for tax breaks for the wealthiest few. It's no surprise that it's the least popular piece of legislation of the 21st century,' The latest numbers from the House committees come as the Republican National Committee (RNC) reported raising $96.4 million during the first six months of the year, while the Democratic National Committee raked in $69.2 million in the same period. The RNC also holds a cash-on-hand advantage of $80.78 million to $15.22 million.
