logo
Dems try blaming Trump for Texas flood death toll — but weather-alert timeline and even experts critical of prez debunk claims

Dems try blaming Trump for Texas flood death toll — but weather-alert timeline and even experts critical of prez debunk claims

New York Post7 hours ago
The finger-pointing has already begun after the Texas floods, with some Dems blaming Trump budget cuts aimed at the National Weather Service for the catastrophic death toll — yet even experts who are administration critics saying they weren't a factor.
Foes of President Trump are claiming budget cuts by the White House hampered the federal weather agency's ability to issue life-saving warnings in time.
But reviews by experts, the NWS' own timeline of the steadily escalating warnings the federal agency issued before the flooding disaster hit — and the fact that the budget cuts aren't supposed to take effect till Oct. 1 — have debunked the assertion.
3 Kerrville, Texas, which saw some of the worst of last week's flash flooding, was the subject of National Weather Service warnings of 'considerable' flooding risks at 6:22 p.m. on July 3 — nearly 10 hours before the Guadalupe River breached its banks.
LP Media
At least 89 people have been officially confirmed to have died in the flash flooding in Texas Hill Country, which saw the Guadalupe River rise more than 26 feet in just 45 minutes after a freak summer rainstorm.
That grim figure includes dozens of children, many from Camp Mystic, a Christian girls' summer camp near the banks of the river. Approximately 850 flood survivors have been rescued so far, but scores more remain unaccounted for.
3 Some Democrats have pointed the finger at President Trump's planned budget cuts at federal agencies, including the NWS and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) — but the reductions any don't take effect until Oct. 1.
Pool/ABACA/Shutterstock
Texas Democratic Rep. Julian Castro seized on the opportunity of the disaster to score political points at the GOP president's expense, insisting 'Trump's cuts to the National Weather service should be investigated.'
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) echoed his colleague's sentiment, demanding an investigation into whether 'staffing shortages' at the agency resulted in a higher death toll in a letter to Acting Inspector General Roderick Anderson.
The White House shot back that any such claims that agency cuts initiated by the Department of Government Efficiency — which aren't slated to take effect until Oct. 1 — were 'disgusting.'
On the morning of July 3, NWS Austin/San Antonio held briefings with emergency management officials during which discussions were had about imminent flash flooding risks. That same morning, the National Water Center issued a Flood Hazard Outlook, flagging Kerrville and surrounding areas as potentially under threat for flash flooding.
3 At least 89 people have been confirmed dead in the catastrophic flooding, including 28 children.
The first flood watch was issued by NWS Austin/San Antonio at 1:18 p.m. CT on Thursday, July 3, to remain in effect in Kerr County through Friday morning.
At 6:10 p.m. that evening, the Weather Prediction Center also issued three Mesoscale Precipitation Discussions — a forecast in which experts believe flash flooding conditions are possible over the next six hours — warning of excessive rainfall and flash flood potential.
A few minutes later, at 6:22 p.m., the National Water Center warned of 'considerable' flooding risks to the north and west of San Antonio, including Kerrville, which later became one of epicenters of the flooding.
At 11:41 p.m. CDT on Thursday, the first flash flood warning was issued for Bandera County, about 55 miles southeast of Kerr County.
On Friday, July 4, the day the floods began, NWS issued a flash flood warning at 1:14 a.m. with a 'considerable' flag, a type of warning that denotes high-damage threats and automatically triggers Wireless Emergency Alerts on mobile devices, as well as through NOAA Weather Radios.
The agency noted that the first reports from the Kerr County Sheriffs Office of flooding at low water crossings, which were put out at 4:35 a.m. that day, had 201 minutes of lead time.
The flash flood warning was upgraded to a flash flood emergency in south-central Kerr County, including Hunt — where Camp Mystic is located — as early as 4:03 a.m. Friday.
'The National Weather Service is heartbroken by the tragic loss of life in Kerr County,' the agency said in a statement.
'Flash Flood Warnings were issued on the night of July 3 and in the early morning of July 4, giving preliminary lead times of more than three hours before warning criteria were met.'
Even as the warnings piled up, local officials said they had difficulty knowing whether to give the evacuation order.
'Why didn't we evacuate? Well, evacuation is a delicate balance, because if you evacuate too late, you then risk putting buses, or cars, or vehicles or campers on roads, into low water areas, trying to get them out, which then can make it even more challenging,' Kerrville City Manager Dalton Rice told CNN's Pamela Brown on Monday.
'It's very tough to make those calls, because what we also don't want to do is cry wolf,' he said.
County officials had weighed installing a warning system along the banks of the Guadalupe River in 2017 but decided against it due to costs, the New York Times reported. The county had lost out on a $1 million grant at the time that was supposed to at least help fund the project.
Other experts came to the defense of the NWS and shut down those who blamed the administration's impending budget cuts for making a bad situation worse.
'In this particular case, we have seen absolutely nothing to suggest that current staffing or budget issues within NOAA and the NWS played any role at all in this event,' Houston-based meteorologist Matt Lanza — a critic of the Trump weather agency cuts — wrote in a Substack post.
'Anyone using this event to claim that is being dishonest,' he added.
CBS Austin Meterologist Avery Tomasco wrote on X, 'All I'll say is this.
'The National Weather Service issued a flood watch for Kerr County more than 12 hours ahead of the catastrophic flood. A flash flood warning was issued for Hunt & Ingram 3 HOURS before the Guadalupe started to climb. They did their job and they did it well.'
As for claims running rampant online that staffing cuts impacted NWS' ability to put out timely warnings, Tom Fahy, legislative director for the National Weather Service, told NBC News that wasn't the case.
'The WFOs [weather forecasting offices] had adequate staffing and resources as they issued timely forecasts and warnings leading up to the storm,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bill O'Reilly: Trump Wouldn't Approve Paramount Sale ‘Unless CBS Capitulated,' Thinks Network Would Win in Court
Bill O'Reilly: Trump Wouldn't Approve Paramount Sale ‘Unless CBS Capitulated,' Thinks Network Would Win in Court

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bill O'Reilly: Trump Wouldn't Approve Paramount Sale ‘Unless CBS Capitulated,' Thinks Network Would Win in Court

Bill O'Reilly said what basically everyone has been thinking since CBS parent company Paramount agreed to a $16 million settlement over the Kamala Harris interview on '60 Minutes' last week: The company would have won in court – but needs Trump to approve its complex sale to Skydance. 'So the settlement, uh, from CBS is interesting,' the 'No Spin News' host said Monday. 'Trump [was] never going to approve that unless CBS capitulated — which they did. … But the bigger picture is what's important.' More from TheWrap Bill O'Reilly: Trump Wouldn't Approve Paramount Sale 'Unless CBS Capitulated,' Thinks Network Would Win in Court | Video ABC Revamps 'GMA3' Lineup as Anchors DeMarco Morgan, Eva Pilgrim Exit CBS News Legend Lowell Bergman Explains Why Paramount's Trump Settlement Is 'A Lot Worse' Than His Big Tobacco Case Trump Media Launches TV Streaming Platform Truth+ in Partnership With Newsmax The July 1 settlement includes 'plaintiffs' fees and costs' as well as a donation to a future presidential library; Trump will not personally receive any money. Paramount also said that 'in the future, 60 Minutes will release transcripts of interviews with eligible U.S. presidential candidates after such interviews have aired.' 'This is all about '60 Minutes,'' the former CBS employee and Fox News host said. '[They] wanted Kamala Harris to win the election. There's no doubt about it. You just go back and look at the transcripts as I have, and it's all about promoting Kamala and diminishing Trump.' Trump claimed CBS interfered with the election and damaged his own companies when it aired a promo that was different from an answer Harris gave to correspondent Bill Whitaker. While O'Reilly believes Trump had a point, he didn't think the president would have won. 'I don't think that CBS would have lost that case in court,' O'Reilly said. 'There is a difference, but is it egregious? So Trump sued them for billions of dollars.' O'Reilly said he knows the corporate media has gone far left – 'I know … I don't think that, it's not an opinion' – and played a clip from the October 8, 2024 interview to prove his point. 'Whitaker should have gone bang — 'Give me one solution you've offered in the first year of the Biden administration.' Give me one' … Because she always falls back on, 'Oh, Trump killed the immigration bill that Charles Schumer ginned up early this year.' … [Whitaker] booted it because he didn't anticipate the boldness of the lie — that what she just said, 'From day one, literally, we have been offering solutions,' is about the biggest falsehood I have heard from any politician in the last decade.' O'Reilly said Trump proved as much when he shut down the border and 'stopped the illegal immigration asylum madness in two months.' 'Whitaker was soft on her,' O'Reilly added. 'This is not an interview. It's not the way it's done. You've been watching me for almost 30 years. You know how an interview on television should be done. This is gibberish.' Paramount Global has agreed to merge with Skydance Media in a complex $8 billion deal. If approved, the deal is expected to close by fall 2025. The post Bill O'Reilly: Trump Wouldn't Approve Paramount Sale 'Unless CBS Capitulated,' Thinks Network Would Win in Court | Video appeared first on TheWrap.

Trump, Netanyahu look to relocate Palestinians voluntarily from Gaza to other countries
Trump, Netanyahu look to relocate Palestinians voluntarily from Gaza to other countries

USA Today

time23 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump, Netanyahu look to relocate Palestinians voluntarily from Gaza to other countries

The meeting was the third time Trump has hosted Netanyahu since returning to the White House in January and came as they seek a cease-fire between Israel and Hamas. WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump and Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said they would seek other countries to relocate Palestinians as part of ending Israel's war with Hamas. Asked about a two-state solution that includes recognition of an independent Palestinian state, Netanyahu said Palestinians had already shown through Hamas that they couldn't be trusted with a neighboring government. 'So people aren't likely to say, 'Let's just give them another state and the platform to destroy Israel,'" Netanyahu said. Netanyahu added that Israel will 'work out a peace with our Palestinian neighbors – those who don't want to destroy us.' But he said Israel must retain control over security, and that 'we don't care' if people say 'it's not a complete state.' 'We vowed never again,' he said. Netanyahu said Israel would have to retain control of security over Gaza rather than a complete state. "I think the Palestinians should have all the powers to govern themselves, but none of the powers to threaten us," he said. "That means a certain power, like overall security, will always remain in our hands. Now, that is a fact, and no one in Israel will agree to anything else, because we don't commit suicide." Netanyahu told reporters at the White House that "Trump is bringing a vision" for the region by seeking other countries to locate Palestinians. Trump called in February for the U.S. to take over the Gaza Strip and relocate roughly 2 million Palestinians to neighboring Arab countries. His goal, he said, is to turn the war-ravaged enclave into the "Riviera of the Middle East." "It's called free choice," Netanyahu said. "You know, if people want to stay, they can stay, but if they want to leave, they should be able to leave. It shouldn't be a prison. It should be an open place and give people a free choice." The meeting was the third time Trump has hosted Netanyahu since returning to the White House in January. Netanyahu met earlier with Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy in the Middle East, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio before meeting with the president. The officials aim for a cease-fire in the war between Israel and Hamas, which attacked southern Israel in October 2023. The attack killed about 1,200 people and took 251 hostages. About 50 hostages remain, with 20 believed to be alive. Hamas has demanded an end to the war before it would free remaining hostages. Israel has insisted it would not agree to halt fighting until all hostages are free and Hamas dismantled. 'We need to end this war,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters July 7. 'We need to get all the hostages home. Hamas has to accept this proposal in order to do that.' Asked if there was a holdup with a cease-fire agreement, Trump said: 'I don't think there is a holdup.' 'Something good will happen': Netanyahu Netanyahu said Israel was working with Trump to find other countries "to give the Palestinians a better future." 'We've had great cooperation from countries surrounding Israel,' Trump said. 'Something good will happen.' Israelis cherish life for themselves and their neighbors in "the entire Middle East,' Netanyahu said. But he said Israel can't allow its neighbors to threaten it.

Planned Parenthood sues Trump admin, saying it is targeted by provision in megabill

time29 minutes ago

Planned Parenthood sues Trump admin, saying it is targeted by provision in megabill

A federal judge in Massachusetts granted a temporary restraining order against a provision in President Donald Trump's recently passed tax and policy megabill that would deny Planned Parenthood and its member organizations Medicaid funding for one year for non-abortion health services. Planned Parenthood, the largest reproductive health provider in the United States, and two of its member organizations had filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration earlier Monday over the provision, which the groups said was meant to target Planned Parenthood and its member organizations over abortion access. While the Hyde Amendment already prohibits the use of federal funding for abortions, the provision would prevent providers that offer abortion services and that received over $800,000 or more in federal Medicaid funding in 2023 from receiving Medicaid funding for other kinds of care for one year. Judge Indira Talwani, who was nominated by former President Barack Obama, wrote in the temporary restraining order that "Defendants, their agents, employees, appointees, successors, and anyone acting in concert or participation with Defendants shall take all steps necessary to ensure that Medicaid funding continues to be disbursed in the customary manner and timeframes to Planned Parenthood Federation of America and its members; Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts; and Planned Parenthood Association of Utah." The order is set to remain in effect for 14 days, and a hearing has been set for July 21. Planned Parenthood, in a statement on social media on Monday night, wrote, "We're grateful that the court acted swiftly to block this unconstitutional law attacking Planned Parenthood providers and patients... The fight is just beginning, and we look forward to our day in court!" In its lawsuit, Planned Parenthood wrote that the bill's provision was meant "to categorically prohibit health centers associated with Planned Parenthood from receiving Medicaid reimbursements… in order to punish them for lawful activity, namely advocating for and providing legal abortion access wholly outside the Medicaid program and without using any federal funds." Mentioning that Planned Parenthood branches serve over a million patients using Medicaid each year, the group wrote, "losing the ability to choose a Planned Parenthood Member health center as their Medicaid provider will be devastating for Medicaid patients across the country." The group also said that Planned Parenthood clinics, services, and staff would likely be eliminated if the clinics can no longer get Medicaid reimbursement. The lawsuit names Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) administrator Mehmet Oz, along with their respective agencies, as plaintiffs. ABC News has reached out to HHS and CMS for comment. Multiple groups that oppose abortion access condemned the lawsuit, calling the bill a win for their cause and framing Planned Parenthood as desperate. "Planned Parenthood's desperation is showing as they run to the courts again to fix a crisis of their own making. Time after time they rely on unelected judges to bail them out of trouble, rather than fix deep systemic problems internally... As Planned Parenthood doubles down on lawfare and abortion politics, they prove exactly why the One Big Beautiful Bill is a historic victory for the people, stopping half a billion dollars in forced taxpayer funding of the corrupt abortion industry for the first time," Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America director of legal affairs Katie Daniel said in a statement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store