"Will Have Deal For Much Less Tariffs If...": Trump On US-India Trade Talks
US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (local time) reaffirmed that India-US will soon strike a trade deal with "much less tariffs", allowing both countries to compete.
"I think we are going to have a deal with India. And that is going to be a different kind of a deal. It is going to be a deal where we are able to go in and compete. Right now, India does not accept anybody in. I think India is going to do that, and if they do that, we are going to have a deal for much less tariffs," Donald Trump said.
India and the US have been negotiating over a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) before the critical July 9 deadline of the 90-day pause on tariff escalations.
Meanwhile, India has adopted a firmer stance on agricultural matters as high-stakes trade negotiations with the United States reach a pivotal moment, government sources said on Monday.
The Indian delegation, led by Chief Negotiator Rajesh Agrawal, has extended its stay in Washington, as reported by ANI earlier. The two negotiations were scheduled on Thursday and Friday, but have been extended as both nations work urgently to finalise an interim trade agreement before a crucial July 9 deadline.
The extended negotiations come as both countries face the looming return of suspended 26% reciprocal tariffs. These punitive measures, imposed initially during the Trump administration on April 2, were temporarily suspended for 90 days but will automatically resume if no agreement is reached.
"The failure of these trade discussions would trigger the immediate reimplementation of the 26% tariff structure," warned a senior official.
India's hardened position reflects the politically sensitive nature of its agricultural sector. The country's farming landscape is dominated by small-scale subsistence farmers with limited land holdings, making agricultural concessions particularly challenging from both economic and political perspectives.
Notably, India has never opened its dairy sector to foreign competition in any previous free trade agreement -- a precedent it appears reluctant to break even under US pressure.
The United States is pushing for reduced duties on agricultural products, including apples, tree nuts, and genetically modified crops.
Meanwhile, India seeks preferential access for its labour-intensive exports, such as textiles and garments, Gems and jewellery, Leather goods, and agricultural products like shrimp, oilseeds, grapes, and bananas.
Beyond the immediate interim agreement, both nations are working toward a comprehensive bilateral trade agreement (BTA) with the first phase targeted for completion by fall 2024. The ultimate goal is ambitious: more than doubling bilateral trade from the current $191 billion to $500 billion by 2030.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Keep 'secular', drop 'socialist'
Some people, including big leaders, are saying that two words – 'secular' and 'socialist' – should be removed from the beginning (called the Preamble) of India's Constitution. They say these words were added in 1976 by then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi during a time when people's rights were heavily controlled – called the Emergency. But the Supreme Court of India has said these words are important and mean something special in the Indian context. Let's start with 'secular'. This means the government should treat all religions equally. It should not favour one over another. India has many religions, castes, and languages, so this idea is very important. Our Constitution already supports this through rules like: Article 15 , which says no one should be treated unfairly because of religion or caste Article 25 , which says everyone is free to follow any religion So 'secular' truly belongs in the Constitution. Now about 'socialist'. This word is more complicated. It comes from a system where the government owns most businesses and land so that wealth is shared more equally. But today, India is a mix of capitalism (private business) and social justice (helping the poor and giving everyone a fair chance). Our Constitution supports fairness, not full government control. In fact, a strong economy with private businesses and good welfare schemes (like free schools or health care) works better for India than old-style socialism. Also, being secular helps make social justice happen. In a country with many religions and castes, only a fair, religion-neutral government can treat people equally. So here's the simple answer: Keep secular – because it's essential Drop socialist – because it doesn't fit India's needs today Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
India.com
40 minutes ago
- India.com
Explained: What Is Inside Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' And Why It Is Sparking So Much Heat
New Delhi: U.S. President Donald Trump calls it his 'Big Beautiful Bill'. Behind the grand name lies a controversial piece of legislation. It mixes tax cuts, deep spending shifts, new defense boosts and changes to healthcare and social aid. The Senate passed it after a marathon session. Now, it heads to the House, where the debate could get even more intense. Here's a breakdown of what the bill actually does and why it is causing so much uproar. At the centre of the bill lies Trump's push to extend the 2017 tax cuts. Those cuts were due to expire in 2025. This bill makes most of them permanent. High earners stand to benefit the most. Wealthier families would keep their deductions and lower tax rates. A few new benefits are added too such as deductions on tips, car loan interest (if the car is made in the US) and overtime pay. One major change – the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap would rise from $10,000 to $40,000 but only for five years. Estimated cost of all tax breaks – $4.5 trillion over a decade. Without the bill, the current child tax credit – $2,000 per child – would fall to $1,000 by 2026. With the bill, the credit increases to $2,200 per child. It is not a dramatic jump, but a politically safe one. The bill pushes $350 billion toward national security and border enforcement. That includes $46 billion for Trump's Mexico border wall, $45 billion for migrant detention beds and billions more to hire 10,000 new ICE agents. This part of the bill closely mirrors Trump's immigration crackdown promises. To help fund tax breaks and defense spending, the bill slashes safety net programmes. That includes Medicaid and SNAP (food aid). Republicans say the goal is to 'refocus' these programmes on the most vulnerable – children, pregnant women and disabled citizens. But the Congressional Budget Office says around 11.8 million Americans could lose health coverage if the bill becomes law. The bill guts tax credits for solar, wind and electric vehicles. A tax break for electric car buyers would end this year, not 2032, as current law allows. This rollback hits the core of former President Joe Biden's climate policy, especially his Inflation Reduction Act. The U.S. debt already stands at $36.2 trillion. Trump's bill adds another $3.3 trillion over 10 years and raises the debt ceiling by $5 trillion – higher than what the House had approved earlier. According to Yale's Budget Lab, top earners gain 2.2% in income and lowest earners lose 2.5%, mainly from cuts to food and healthcare support. Wealthier Americans keep more money. Low-income families may face new struggles. Senate passed it with 51-50 votes. Every Democrat opposed the bill. Vice President JD Vance cast the deciding vote. Republican support was shaky but held after last-minute amendments. The bill now goes to the House. If the House changes anything, the Senate will have to vote again. Both chambers must agree on a final version before Trump can sign it into law. He is hoping to do that by July 4, but even he admitted, 'It is going to be hard.' Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' is huge in size and impact. It brings major tax relief to some, while pulling back on healthcare and aid for others. It fuels defense and border spending, but balloons national debt. And it could redefine America's budget if it survives the House.
Economic Times
41 minutes ago
- Economic Times
How will the big beautiful bill become a law: number of votes, approval in both chambers and the complete process
The US Senate passed President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' after a long debate. The bill needed a simple majority due to budget rules. Vice President JD Vance cast the tie-breaking vote. The House of Representatives will now vote on the bill. The journey from bill to law in the United States. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads How many votes are needed in the Senate? How many votes are needed in the House? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What is supermajority? How does a bill become a law in the U.S.? Introduction: A member of Congress (either House or Senate) introduces the bill. It's assigned a number and referred to the relevant committee for review. Committee Action: The committee studies the bill, holds hearings, and may revise it. If approved, the bill moves to the full chamber. Floor Debate and Vote: The bill is debated on the chamber floor. Amendments may be proposed. A vote is taken—if it passes by a simple majority, it moves to the other chamber. The Other Chamber: The process repeats in the second chamber (House or Senate). If the second chamber amends the bill, it returns to the first chamber for agreement. Conference Committee (if needed): If the two chambers pass different versions, a conference committee of members from both chambers negotiates a compromise. Both chambers must then approve the final version. Presidential Action: The bill is sent to the President, who can sign it into law or veto it. If vetoed, Congress can override the veto with a two-thirds majority in both chambers. What's next for the bid beautiful bill? President Trump's much-anticipated 'Big Beautiful Bill,' aimed at extending his signature 2017 tax cuts and reshaping federal spending, has just passed the U.S. Senate after a marathon session. But how many votes did it actually require- and what's the journey from bill to law in the United States?For most major bills, the U.S. Senate needs a simple majority- at least 51 out of 100 votes- to pass. But, if senators try to block a bill with a filibuster, it takes 60 votes (three-fifths of the Senate) to end the debate and move the 'Big Beautiful Bill' used special budget reconciliation rules, which let the Senate skip the filibuster and pass the bill with just a simple majority In this case, the final tally was 50-50 after three Republicans (Susan Collins, Thom Tillis, and Rand Paul) joined all Democrats in opposition. Vice President JD Vance, presiding over the Senate, cast the tie-breaking 51st vote to pass the billAfter nearly 48 hours of debate and a ' vote-a-rama ' on amendments, the bill squeaked through- showing just how tight the margins can be for major a bill moves to the House of Representatives , it faces a tight vote. The House is made up of 435 voting members, and passing legislation requires a simple majority- at least 218 votes if all members are present and previous House version of the ' big beautiful bill ' passed by just 215-214, showing how razor-thin the margins are. The Republican's House majority currently stands at just 220-212, leaving little room for defections.A supermajority is when a higher threshold is required than a simple majority for the bill to pass either of the chamber. It is required for certain actions in Congress . For example, overriding a presidential veto needs a two-thirds majority- 290 out of 435 votes in the House and 67 out of 100 in the Senate. Additionally, constitutional amendments and some impeachment proceedings also demand a two-thirds the Senate's approval, the bill now heads to the House Rules Committee, which will set the terms for debate. The House will then vote on the bill. If the House passes the Senate's version, it goes straight to President Trump for his signature. If the House amends the bill, it returns to the Senate for further negotiation or a conference both chambers agree on the final text, President Trump can sign it into law—cementing another major legislative victory for his administration.
