Ukraine restoring medieval Kyiv cathedral damaged by Russian blast
The blast wave from the missile and drone strike on the night of June 10, which came as part of Russia's continuing and intense summer offensive, damaged the cornice on the 11th century cathedral's main apse.
Museum experts are using chemical and technical analysis, and 3-D scanning data of the cathedral, to assess the damage and expect to restore the cornice by the end of the summer, said Nelia Kukovalska, the general director of the Saint Sophia of Kyiv National Preserve, a historical and cultural state institution.
Built shortly after the Christianization of Kyivan Rus in 988 A.D. by Prince Volodymyr the Great, St. Sophia is considered a symbol of Ukraine's historical and cultural heritage and houses important secular and religious mosaics and frescoes.
Odesa cathedral repairs bring hope as Ukrainians enter third year of Russia's war on their culture
'UNESCO commissioned chemical and technological analyses of the cornice plaster, which enabled it to determine the precise composition of the necessary solution. Now, we can restore the damaged section and reinforce the entire cornice,' said Ms. Kukovalska.
She said she had been concerned about the 1,000-year-old Oranta mosaic of the Virgin Mary with her arms raised in prayer. Standing six metres tall, the mosaic is considered a protective symbol of Kyiv and often referred to as the Indestructible Wall. But an inspection of the mosaic has not revealed any visible cracks.
As Russia's war on Ukraine continues, its cultural heritage remains under threat. UNESCO has stated 501 cultural sites across the country have been damaged since the war began in 2022, including religious buildings, museums and historical buildings. The full extent of damage is not known because nearly all of Crimea and the entire Luhansk region are occupied, as are parts of the Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk, and Kherson regions.
Ukraine's Minister of Culture and Strategic Communications, Mykola Tochytskyi, announced on the ministry's website that damage to cultural heritage sites would be documented and submitted to international bodies. The Ukrainian government considers the attack on St. Sophia Cathedral a violation of the 1972 Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage and the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict.
The summer has been especially difficult as Russia's offensive continues in multiple regions across the country. St. Sophia Cathedral has been on the UNESCO list of World Heritage in Danger due to the risks posed by the war.
Ms. Kukovalska said that as early as 2022 Ukrainian intelligence warned of a possible strike on the cathedral and she credited Ukraine's air defence forces with preventing further destruction.
The cathedral is renowned for housing the world's largest collection of 11th-century secular frescoes, offering a glimpse into daily life of Kyivan Rus. The dynastic portrait of Volodymyr the Great and his family includes his son Yaroslav the Wise and daughters who were princesses connected to various medieval European royal families. They include Agatha of Kyiv, who married Edward the Exile of England and became mother to Edgar Atheling and Saint Margaret of Scotland. Maria Dobroniega, also in the portrait, married Polish King Casimir I.
'Our bloodlines have spread throughout European families, says Ms. Kukovalska. 'Across every European country, there are echoes of our shared history.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
39 minutes ago
- National Post
EU to triple travel permit fee to 20 euros
Brussels (Belgium) (AFP) — The digital travel permit for foreigners to enter the European Union should cost 20 euros ($23), almost triple the original planned fee, under a proposal published Friday. Article content The adjustment to the yet-to-be implemented ETIAS scheme for visa-exempt nationals comes as the European Commission seeks to boost its financial resources to fund an array of priorities from defence to agriculture. Article content Article content The change reflects inflation and additional operational costs, the commission said. Article content Article content 'It will also bring the cost for a travel authorisation to the EU in line with similar travel authorisation programmes,' the EU's top executive body said. Article content Adopted in 2018, the European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) regulation originally envisaged a fee of seven euros. Article content Britain's equivalent, known as ETA, comes with a 16 pound fee ($21), while the United States' ESTA permit costs $21. Article content Obtainable online, the European Union's ETIAS permit will be required for the bloc's 27 countries with the exception of Ireland, as well as for Norway, Iceland, Switzerland and Liechtenstein. Article content The permit, valid for three years, will be required for non-EU nationals from countries whose citizens do not need a visa for short stays in Europe, such as Canada, Britain and the United States. Article content Those aged under 18 or over 70 years will be exempt from the fee. Article content Brussels said the scheme was created to identify security, irregular migration and other risks as well as to facilitate border crossing for regular travellers. Article content But its implementation, which was supposed to go hand-in-hand with a new automated border check system, has suffered from delays. Article content The European Parliament and member states have two months to review the new 20-euro fee, which will enter into effect as soon as ETIAS becomes operational — now expected for the last quarter of 2026. Article content This week the commission proposed a boosted two-trillion-euro long-term budget for 2028-2034, which has already upset some of the EU countries that will have to chip in most of the money. Article content As part of the blueprint, which is subject to negotiation, Brussels said it will seek to raise about 58 billion euros a year collecting money directly through measures like its carbon border tax and a levy on electronic waste.
CTV News
4 hours ago
- CTV News
The EU targets Russia's energy revenue and shadow fleet with new sanctions over Ukraine war
BRUSSELS — The European Union approved on Friday a new raft of sanctions against Russia over its war on Ukraine, including a lower oil price cap, a ban on transactions with Nord Stream gas pipelines, and the targeting of more shadow fleet ships, the EU foreign policy chief said. 'The message is clear: Europe will not back down in its support for Ukraine. The EU will keep raising the pressure until Russia ends its war,' Kaja Kallas said in a statement. Kallas said the measures amount to 'one of its strongest sanctions packages against Russia to date' linked to the war, now in its fourth year. It comes as European countries start to buy U.S. weapons for Ukraine to help the country better defend itself. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy welcomed the new measures, describing them as a 'timely and necessary' step amid intensified Russian attacks. 'All infrastructure of Russia's war must be blocked,' Zelenskyy said, adding that Ukraine will synchronize its sanctions with the EU and introduce its own additional measures soon. The European Commission, the EU's executive branch, had proposed to lower the oil price cap from $60 to $45, which is lower than the market price to target Russia's vast energy revenues. The 27 member countries decided to set the price per barrel at just under $48. The EU had hoped to get major international powers in the Group of Seven countries involved in the price cap to broaden the impact, but conflict in the Middle East pushed up oil prices and the Trump administration could not be brought onboard. In 2023, Ukraine's Western allies limited sales of Russian oil to $60 per barrel but the price cap was largely symbolic as most of Moscow's crude — its main moneymaker — cost less than that. Still, the cap was there in case oil prices rose. Oil income is the linchpin of Russia's economy, allowing President Vladimir Putin to pour money into the armed forces without worsening inflation for everyday people and avoiding a currency collapse. A new import ban was also imposed in an attempt to close a loophole allowing Russia to indirectly export crude oil via a number of non-EU countries. The EU also targeted the Nord Stream pipelines between Russia and Germany to prevent Putin from generating any revenue from them in future, notably by discouraging would-be investors. Russian energy giant Rosneft's refinery in India was hit as well. The pipelines were built to carry Russian natural gas to Germany but are not in operation. They were targeted by sabotage in 2022, but the source of the underwater explosions has remained a major international mystery. On top of that, the new EU sanctions targeted Russia's banking sector, with the aim of limiting the Kremlin's ability to raise funds or carry out financial transactions. Two Chinese banks were added to the list. The EU has slapped several rounds of sanctions on Russia since Putin ordered his troops into Ukraine in February 24, 2022. More than 2,400 officials and 'entities' — often government agencies, banks, companies or organizations — have been hit with asset freezes and travel bans. But each round of sanctions is getting harder to agree, as measures targeting Russia bite the economies of the 27 member nations. Slovakia held up the latest package over concerns about proposals to stop Russian gas supplies, which it relies on. The last raft of EU sanctions, imposed on May 20, targeted almost 200 ships in Russia's sanction-busting shadow fleet of tankers. On Friday, 105 more ships were blocked from European ports, locks and from ship-to-ship transfers, bringing the total number of vessels now sanctioned to more than 400. ___ Lorne Cook, The Associated Press Illia Novikov in Kyiv contributed to this report.
Globe and Mail
5 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Canada must sanction the Chinese tech companies fuelling the horrors in Ukraine
Marcus Kolga is the founder of DisinfoWatch and a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute. Almost every night since May, Russian missiles and drones – powered by Iranian designs and packed with Chinese components – have torn through Ukrainian schools, hospitals and homes, killing or maiming thousands in a ruthless campaign of terror. Those drones are now reaching further into Ukraine, striking apartment buildings in Lviv over the weekend. In June alone, 5,429 Russian drones and ballistic missiles struck Ukrainian targets. According to the UN, they have caused more than 3,000 civilian casualties since the start of the war, with 232 civilians killed in June. Analysts warn that Russia could soon develop the capacity to launch up to 1,000 drones in a single night against Ukrainian civilian targets. Analysis: Trump tariff threat piles pressure on Canada to expand trade with Asia Russia's weapon of choice in its war of terror is the Iranian-designed Shahed drone – now mass-produced in Russia and rebranded as the 'Geran.' Day after day, waves of these drones hover over Ukrainian cities, with their operators safe inside Russia, actively targeting civilian infrastructure and hunting civilians. Just last week, a one-year-old child was reportedly tracked and killed by a Russian drone operator. The purpose of these drones is clear: to terrorize and demoralize Ukrainian society, destroy critical infrastructure and deprive millions of electricity, water, heat and hope. What is less known, but deeply disturbing, is the extent to which China is supplying components and technology to enable Russia's growing ability to build these drones. The collaboration of Chinese companies and the Chinese regime in building these weapons makes them directly complicit in facilitating and enabling the war crimes being committed against the Ukrainian people. The evidence of Chinese involvement is clear. Ukrainian security services have identified Chinese-origin components in Russian drones recovered after attacks on Kyiv. A recent Bloomberg investigation revealed a direct partnership between Russian firm Aero-HIT and Chinese suppliers and engineers to help Russia mass-produce drones. A growing list of Chinese companies have been exposed for supplying critical components: engines, carbon fibre airframes, electronics, navigation systems and antennas – all essential parts integrated into drones now rolling off Russian assembly lines. Earlier this month, Ukraine's National Security and Defence Council formally sanctioned five Chinese companies for supplying components used in Russia's terror drones. The United States has sanctioned more than 200 Chinese and Hong Kong entities for enabling Russia's war machine, while the European Union has listed over 50. In comparison, Canada has fallen behind. While Canada was among the first to sanction Iranian drone manufacturers in 2022, Ottawa added just 20 Chinese entities to our sanctions list last February, far fewer than our allies and nowhere near sufficient given the growing scale of China's support for Russia's drone program. Even here in Canada, there is disturbing evidence of complicity. In June, the RCMP charged Anton Trofimov – a Russian national living in Canada – for allegedly exporting restricted technologies to Russia via Hong Kong for the purpose of manufacturing weapons, underscoring how Canada itself has been exploited as a platform for Russian sanctions evasion. Opinion: Ukraine showed that drones are the new bullets. Why doesn't Canada get this? Recent reports indicate that Russia's drone production has tripled in 2025, underscoring the urgent need to disrupt the Kremlin's supply chains and expand and rigorously enforce sanctions against the Chinese entities fuelling it. Canada's sanctions are meant to deny aggressor states like Russia the means to wage war and to hold their enablers, such as Iran and China, to account. Canada has clear legal authority to sanction those who enable war crimes. All of the Chinese firms sanctioned by Ukraine this month – and earlier by our allies – meet that standard and should be added to Canada's sanctions list, along with any others contributing to Russia's arsenal. Beyond this, Canada should amend its sanctions legislation to allow for the rapid imposition of secondary sanctions on any entity doing business with sanctioned Chinese firms. This would make it significantly harder for any company to collaborate with Chinese suppliers. Finally, Canada should designate Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism under the State Immunity Act – an action that would allow victims to pursue civil cases in Canadian courts, including against Chinese entities that enable Russia's war. The need to act is dire and undeniable: thousands of lives are at stake. As innocent Ukrainian civilians endure relentless nightly bombardments from Russian drones powered by Chinese-made components, we cannot afford to hesitate. Disrupting the supply lines that fuel Russia's campaign of terror and holding the Chinese private and government entities enabling this deadly collaboration to account will help save innocent Ukrainian lives.
