logo
Soldiers, Strykers and 100-degree temps: Inside Trump's border military zone, World News

Soldiers, Strykers and 100-degree temps: Inside Trump's border military zone, World News

AsiaOne19-06-2025

SANTA TERESA, NM — The weapons system atop a drab green US Army Stryker swivels, its camera shifting downward toward a white Ford F-150 driving slowly along the US-Mexico border.
Under the watchful eye of the 26-ton armoured vehicle perched on a sand dune above them, humanitarian volunteers are driving the dirt road next to the border wall to see if they can continue to search for migrant remains inside one of two military zones established along the border by the Trump administration in April and May.
Soon, they get their answer.
It's not long before an unmarked gray pickup appears, makes a U-turn in the sand, and puts on its siren, here in the desert 5.6 miles (9km) west of the Santa Teresa, New Mexico border crossing.
The driver pulls alongside, introduces himself as a US Border Patrol agent, and tells the volunteers they can no longer be there.
James Holman, founder of the Battalion Search and Rescue group, whose volunteers also hand water to migrants through the bars of the barrier, acquiesces.
Then he vents his frustration.
"We're ramping up all this military and taking this public land away, it doesn't make sense, and it's theatre, it's deadly, deadly theatre," says Holman, 59, a former Marine, who is concerned the military zone will push migrants west into even more dangerous desert crossings.
They are in one of two so-called "National Defence Areas" set up along 260 miles (418 km) of the US southern border in New Mexico and Texas as part of the Trump administration's military buildup on the border.
US President Donald Trump has long shown interest in using the military for civilian law enforcement, sending Marines to Los Angeles this week in their first domestic deployment in over 30 years.
The border military zones are one of his most audacious attempts yet to use troops trained for overseas combat in roles normally carried out by Border Patrol or local police.
The Army has not made public the zones' boundaries. The New Mexico area may run over three miles into the United States, in places, based on "restricted area" warning signs in English and Spanish posted along State Road 9 parallel to the border.
The zones are classified as US Army installations, giving troops the right to temporarily detain and question migrants and other civilian trespassers caught in the areas.
Their primary mission is to detect and track illegal border crossers as part of the Trump administration's quest for "100 per cent operational control" of the border at a time when migrant arrests are near an historic low.
Along the international boundary, Reuters saw warning signs posted inside the United States around 45 feet north of the border barrier around every 100 metres, facing south. That meant if you had crossed the border and could read them, you were already in the zone.
Migrants caught illegally crossing the border into the zones face new trespassing charges on top of unlawful entry to the country, with combined penalties of up to 10 years imprisonment. Attempts to prosecute them for trespassing have floundered.
Starting in May, federal judges in Texas and New Mexico have dismissed trespassing charges against migrants caught within the area and acquitted a Peruvian woman brought to trial, ruling there was no evidence they saw signs before entering the zone.
Illegal border crossings fell to a record low in March after the Biden administration shut down asylum claims in 2024 and Mexico tightened immigration controls.
Trump, who banned people from claiming asylum on the southern border shortly after starting his second term in January, nonetheless says the military areas are needed to repel an "invasion" of human traffickers and drug smugglers. Border buildup
In the past four months Trump raised the number of active-duty troops on the border to 8,000 from 2,500 at the end of the Biden administration, according to the US Army.
Presidents since Richard Nixon have used regular troops and reservists for support roles on the border. Trump has taken it a step further.
The Bureau of Land Management in April transferred 110,000 acres of land in New Mexico, an area seven times the size of Manhattan, to the US Army for three years to establish a first zone. A second was created in May with a transfer of International Boundary and Water Commission land in Texas.
The areas are satellites of the Fort Huachuca and Fort Bliss Army bases in Arizona and Texas, respectively.
That gives troops the right to hold and question civilian trespassers without the need for Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act. The law lets a president deploy federal forces domestically during events like civil unrest.
Some 105 Stryker combat vehicles and around 2,400 troops from the 4th Infantry Division deployed from Colorado Springs in March. They rove in armoured personnel carriers across New Mexico, Texas and Arizona.
Reuters saw Strykers concentrated in a roughly 20-mile ribbon from El Paso west to Santa Teresa, one of the 2,000-mile border's busiest and most deadly areas for migrant crossings.
The 8-wheeled vehicles, used by Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan, and now by Ukraine in its war with Russia, can be seen parked under a bridge to Mexico, atop a landfill and on a ridge above a gap in the border wall.
Their engines run 24/7 to cool crews in the 100 °F (38 °C) plus heat. Vehicles are unarmed but soldiers have personal weapons. Crews take shifts operating the joystick-controlled camera systems that can see for two miles (3.2 km) and have night vision, according to the Army.
A person familiar with Strykers, who asked not to be named, said the work was "monotonous" but said it gave soldiers "a sense of purpose."
Troops have alerted Border Patrol to 390 illegal crossings in the nearly two months since the first zone was established. They made their first detentions on June 3, holding 3 "illegal aliens" in New Mexico before handing them over to Border Patrol, according to Army spokesperson Geoffrey Carmichael.
Border Patrol arrested 39,677 migrants in the El Paso sector in the fiscal year to April, down 78 per cent from the year-earlier period. 'Covered by desert sand'
Sitting outside his juice bar in Sunland Park, Harold Gregory says he has seen a sharp drop in migrants entering his store or asking customers for a ride since Strykers arrived.
"We feel safer," said Gregory, 38. "They do kind of like intimidate so there's not so many people come this way."
In neighbouring Santa Teresa, trade consultant Jerry Pacheco says the optics of combat vehicles are not good as he tries to draw international firms to the town's industrial park.
"It's like killing an ant with a sledgehammer," says Pacheco, executive director of the International Business Accelerator, a nonprofit trade counselling programme. "I think having the military down here is more of a political splash."
About 90 miles (143 km) west, New Mexico rancher Russell Johnson said he saw five Strykers briefly positioned in a gap in the border barrier on his ranch.
[[nid:719122]]
He welcomes the zone as an extra layer of security and has testified to the US Congress on illegal border crossers destroying barbed wire fences, cattle thieves driving livestock into Mexico and a pickup stolen at gunpoint by drug smugglers.
He is unsure if his home, or over half his ranch, is inside the area but has been assured by US Border Patrol he can continue to work land ranched by his family since 1918.
"I don't know, I don't think anyone knows," says Johnson, 37, a former Border Patrol agent, of the zone's boundaries.
He says the Army has not communicated rules for hunters with permits to shoot quail and mule deer this fall in the military area, or hikers who start or end the 3,000-mile (4,800km) Continental Divide Trail within it.
The Army has been seeking memoranda of understanding with local communities and agencies to continue activities in the New Mexico zone, said Nicole Wieman, a US Army spokesperson.
"The MOU process for commercial and recreational activities, such as hunting, mining and ranching, is complex," Wieman said.
Jenifer Jones, Republican state representative for Johnson's area, said Americans can keep doing what they did before in the zone.
"They can carry their firearms as they would have prior," said Jones, who welcomed the troops to her "neglected" area where only a barbed-wire fence separates the two countries in places.
To the east in Las Cruces, the state's second largest city, State Representative Sarah Silva, a Democrat, said the zones have created fear and apprehension
"I see this as an occupation of the US Army on our lands," said Silva.
Back in desert west of Santa Teresa, Battalion Search and Rescue leader Abbey Carpenter, 67, stands among dunes where the group has discovered the remains of 24 migrants in 18 months, mostly women. She is concerned the area could be absorbed into the military zone.
"Who's going to look for these remains if we're not allowed out here," she said, showing the jaw and other uncollected bones of a woman her group reported to local authorities in September. "Will they just be covered up by the desert sands?"
[[nid:719147]]

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘A stubborn mule': Trump encourages Powell to resign in latest attack on the Fed chair
‘A stubborn mule': Trump encourages Powell to resign in latest attack on the Fed chair

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

‘A stubborn mule': Trump encourages Powell to resign in latest attack on the Fed chair

US President Donald Trump continued his assault on the chair of the Federal Reserve on June 27, saying he would like Jerome Powell to resign. The president, who has berated Mr Powell for weeks, called the chair a 'stubborn mule' who has 'Trump derangement syndrome' for his refusal to immediately lower borrowing costs. 'I'd love for him to resign if he wanted to,' the president told reporters in the Oval Office. Such attacks have become a mainstay in Mr Trump's second term in the White House. The president, who elevated Mr Powell to Fed chair during his first term, has spent the past few weeks castigating him for not moving quickly enough to cut interest rates. Mr Trump has long been a fan of low interest rates, which make it cheaper for businesses and consumers to borrow and in turn fuel growth. He cajoled Mr Powell during his first term when he thought the Fed chair was taking too long to lower rates. But Mr Trump's interest in lower borrowing costs has taken on more significance this time around. He is pushing Republican lawmakers to approve an expensive tax cut package that would require the United States to sell large sums of debt to finance it. That goal has become harder – and more expensive – given that interest rates remain elevated in a range of 4.25 per cent to 4.5 per cent. Mr Trump has argued that the government would save 'billions' if the Fed lowered interest rates, calling for as much as an immediate 2.5-percentage-point decline. 'We have a guy that's just a stubborn mule and a stupid person that is making a big mistake,' the president said on June 27. The country is paying more to service its debts 'because we have a guy who's suffering from Trump derangement syndrome, if you want to know the truth,' he added. 'He's not good for our country.' The Fed has stuck to a 'wait and see' approach for months, with officials arguing that they can be patient before acting on further rate cuts because the labour market is still solid and inflation is at risk of flaring up again because of Mr Trump's policies. The central bank last lowered borrowing costs in December, after a series of reductions in the latter half of last year. Divisions between Fed officials have started to emerge however, with two Trump appointees recently making the case for interest rate cuts as early as July. Ms Michelle Bowman was recently elevated from her role as governor to head of regulatory issues at the central bank, while another governor, Mr Christopher Waller, is seen as a potential pick to be the next chair. Mr Trump recently said that he was choosing among three or four people to replace Mr Powell, whose term ends in May, and that an announcement would be coming soon. Other contenders include Mr Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor who was almost picked to be chair during Mr Trump's first term; Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent; and Mr Kevin Hassett, a top economic adviser to the president. Asked on June 27 about his interest in the job, Mr Bessent said he would 'do what the president wants, but I think I have the best job in Washington'. The Fed is supposed to operate independently of the White House in order to ensure that officials can make tough choices on interest rates to keep inflation stable and the labor market healthy. Speaking with lawmakers this week, Mr Powell repeatedly stressed that politics did not factor into the Fed's thinking on interest rates. Those decisions are guided by the economic data, he said. Mr Trump has long sought to have a greater say over the direction of interest rates and has repeatedly toyed with removing Mr Powell as chair before his term expires. The Supreme Court recently signalled that the president was not authorised to do that, however. Mr Powell's term as a governor does not expire until 2032, meaning he could technically stay on even after stepping down as chair. Mr Bessent acknowledged that on June 28, saying: 'Chair Powell doesn't have to leave.' The next vacancy is set to open up at the end of January, when Ms Adriana Kugler's term as governor ends. If the administration chose to fill that spot with the next designated chair, Mr Bessent told CNBC, the nomination process could be completed in October or November. That timing is more in line with how it has been done historically. Selecting a replacement as early as the summer would risk muddying the Fed's communications and disrupting financial markets. Mr Trump said on June 27 that he expected whomever he picked to lower interest rates. 'If I think somebody's going to keep the rates where they are, or whatever, I'm not going to put them in,' he said. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

University of Virginia president resigns under pressure from Trump on DEI policies
University of Virginia president resigns under pressure from Trump on DEI policies

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

University of Virginia president resigns under pressure from Trump on DEI policies

Mr James Ryan concluded that resisting Trump officials' demands would put the school's students and faculty at risk. PHOTO: KIRSTEN LUCE/NYTIMES University of Virginia president resigns under pressure from Trump on DEI policies The president of the University of Virginia, Mr James Ryan, resigned on June 27 under pressure from President Donald Trump's administration over the school's diversity, equity and inclusion policies. In a letter to the UVA community, Mr Ryan said he had made the 'excruciating decision' to step down after concluding that resisting Trump officials' demands would put the school's students and faculty at risk. 'I cannot make a unilateral decision to fight the federal government in order to save my own job,' he wrote. 'To do so would not only be quixotic but appear selfish and self-centered to the hundreds of employees who would lose their jobs, the researchers who would lose their funding, and the hundreds of students who could lose financial aid or have their visas withheld.' Virginia's Democratic US senators, Tim Kaine and Mark Warner, called the Trump administration's demand 'outrageous' in a joint statement and said Mr Ryan's departure would hurt the university and the state. It was not clear whether Mr Ryan's resignation would take effect immediately. Earlier, the New York Times had reported that the Justice Department had demanded his resignation, and he decided to capitulate. The administration has launched a campaign against diversity, equity and inclusion and targeted colleges and universities that it has claimed are pushing antisemitic, anti-American, Marxist and 'radical left' ideologies. Universities that have been investigated or have had funds frozen have said that Mr Trump's attacks are threats to freedom of speech, freedom of academics and the schools' very existence. In a warning issued to UVA last week, the Justice Department said the government had concluded that the use of race in admissions and other student benefits were 'widespread practices throughout every component and facet of the institution,' according to the Times. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

US Senate rejects bid to curb Trump's Iran war powers
US Senate rejects bid to curb Trump's Iran war powers

Straits Times

time3 hours ago

  • Straits Times

US Senate rejects bid to curb Trump's Iran war powers

A view shows the aftermath of an Israeli strike on a building on Monday, after the ceasefire between Israel and Iran, in Tehran, Iran, June 26, 2025. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS/File Photo WASHINGTON - The Republican-led U.S. Senate rejected a Democratic-led bid on Friday to block President Donald Trump from using further military force against Iran, hours after the president said he would consider more bombing. The Senate vote was 53 to 47 against a war powers resolution that would have required congressional approval for more hostilities against Iran. The vote was along party lines, except Pennsylvania Democrat John Fetterman voted no, with Republicans, and Kentucky Republican Rand Paul voted yes, with Democrats. Senator Tim Kaine, chief sponsor of the resolution, has tried for years to wrest back Congress' authority to declare war from both Republican and Democratic presidents. Kaine said his latest effort underscored that the U.S. Constitution gives Congress, not the president, the sole power to declare war and requires that any hostility with Iran be explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for the use of military force. "If you think the president should have to come to Congress, whether you are for or against a war in Iran, you'll support Senate Joint Resolution 59, you'll support the Constitution that has stood the test of time," Kaine said in a speech before the vote. Lawmakers have been pushing for more information about weekend U.S. strikes on Iran, and the fate of Iran's stockpiles of highly enriched uranium. Earlier on Friday, Trump sharply criticized Iran's Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, dropped plans to lift sanctions on Iran, and said he would consider bombing Iran again if Tehran is enriching uranium to worrisome levels. He was reacting to Khamenei's first remarks after a 12-day conflict with Israel that ended when the United States launched bombing raids against Iranian nuclear sites. 'OBLITERATED' Members of Trump's national security team held classified briefings on the strikes for the Senate and House of Representatives on Thursday and Friday. Many Democratic lawmakers left the briefings saying they had not been convinced that Iran's nuclear facilities had been "obliterated," as Trump announced shortly after the raid. Opponents of the resolution said the strike on Iran was a single, limited operation within Trump's rights as commander-in-chief, not the start of sustained hostilities. Senator Bill Hagerty, a Tennessee Republican who served as ambassador to Japan during Trump's first term, said the measure could prevent any president from acting quickly against a country that has been a long-term adversary. "We must not shackle our president in the middle of a crisis when lives are on the line," Hagerty said before the vote. Trump has rejected any suggestion that damage to Iran's nuclear program was not as profound as he has said. Iran says its nuclear research is for civilian energy production. Under U.S. law, Senate war powers resolutions are privileged, meaning that the chamber had to promptly consider and vote on the measure, which Kaine introduced this month. But to be enacted, the resolution would have had to pass the Senate as well as the House of Representatives, where Speaker Mike Johnson, a close Trump ally, said this week he did not think it was the right time for such an effort. During Trump's first term, in 2020, Kaine introduced a similar resolution to rein in the Republican president's ability to wage war against Iran. That measure passed both the Senate and House of Representatives, with some Republican support, but did not garner enough votes to survive the president's veto. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store