Does 'decriminalising' cannabis mean people can legally buy it?
The report, published by the independent London Drugs Commission (LDC), includes 42 recommendations, including removing natural cannabis from the Misuse of Drugs Act (MDA).
The mayor said there was 'a compelling, evidence-based case' for decriminalisation and urged government to consider the report's findings, which argue that the current laws are "disproportionate to the harms" cannabis can pose compared to other drugs.
The commission, set up in 2022, does not call for full decriminalisation and instead says "natural" cannabis should be downgraded to classification under the Psychoactive Substances Act.
The report also recommends improved addiction services and better education on the dangers of on problematic use and addiction of cannabis is needed.
Khan aded: 'The current sentencing for those caught in possession of natural cannabis cannot be justified given its relative harm and people's experience of the justice system.'
The UK has several classifications for substances: Class A (which is deemed to be the most dangerous) Class B, Class C, and psychoactive substances.
Class A drugs include heroin and cocaine, an example of Class B drugs are amphetamines and ketamine, and the Class C classification includes steroids and nitrous oxide (laughing gas).
The UK government describes psychoactive substances as drugs that cause hallucinations, drowsiness or changes in perception of time and space, such as bath salts (synthetic cathinones) or dimethocaine.
Cannabis is currently a Class B drug and people found in possession can face a fine or imprisonment.
The report argues that: 'The possibility of a custodial prison sentence of any length…for possession of cannabis for personal use feels excessive'.
This would effectively remove criminal prosecution the possession of small amounts of cannabis for personal use, while continuing to prohibit the importing, manufacturing and distribution of the drug.
A key distinction in drug legislation is the difference between legalisation and decriminalisation, which are two very different terms and should not be confused.
When drug use and possession are decriminalised, criminal charges are not applied to anyone carrying the drug, usually for personal use.
While this may sound like the drug is now 'legal', in practice this is not the case and it would remain illegal to possess and use the drug.
However, it would no longer lead to a criminal record, but may still carry a civil penalty - e.g. civil fines, warnings or treatment or education referrals.
Many critics of the current system say that the criminal justice approach perpetuates stigma and marginalises people with problem drug use.
The report "makes a compelling, evidenced-based case for the decriminalisation of possession of small quantities of natural cannabis," Khan said.
Under decriminalisation, it's important to note that selling, manufacturing and giving away cannabis would still carry criminal penalties.
Even if cannabis does become decriminalised it would still be illegal to possess and therefore illegal to buy the drug.
The key difference, if cannabis was reclassified under psychoactive substances legislation, would be that those in possession for personal use would not face a prison sentence or any fines.
Despite arguments from the report that there could be possible gains from legalisation, including tax revenues and reductions in criminalisation, the drug would still remain essentially illegal to possess.
Offenders caught selling, dealing or sharing psychoactive substances, for any reason, are likely to still face severe penalties including fines and prison sentences.
Under current UK law, drugs that fall under the Psychoactive Substances Act and anabolic steroids are effectively decriminalised as possession will not carry any punishment or fine.
Currently, at the lowest end, police can issue a warning or an on-the-spot fine of up to £90 if you're found with cannabis, it may also be possible to pay a penalty without getting a formal warning or caution.
If someone is repeatedly found with cannabis, the penalty may vary from treatment for addiction to a maximum penalty for possession, which could mean up to five years in prison, an unlimited fine or both.
The maximum penalty for cannabis, supply (selling, dealing or sharing) and cultivation is up to 14 years in prison, an unlimited fine or both.
Citizens can often be confused by UK laws on cannabis possession, with many cannabis-based products available to buy online and the NHS proscribing medical cannabis in rare cases.
In practice the punishment you will receive for carrying cannabis for personal use can be a lottery, with no set sentencing rules for how much you are allowed to possess, before you are issued with a custodial sentence.
The Sentencing Council of England and Wales say that a warning for carrying cannabis can be issued for carrying a 'small amount… consistent with personal use' although there is no maximum legally stated.
The LDC report said that several of the participants in their research thought being found in possession of up to one ounce (around 25 grams) of cannabis would be 'unlikely to attract sanction beyond a fine and/or a formal warning'.
There are several charges relating to the supply of drugs including conspiracy to supply a controlled drug, supplying or offering to supply a controlled drug and production of a controlled drug / cultivation of cannabis plant, which carry different tariffs.
The council say a custodial sentence for cannabis cultivation should start at seven plants or more, with more severe penalties for cultivation of more than 20 plants and producing industrial amounts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
11 hours ago
- New York Times
King Charles III Will Host Trump for U.K. State Visit in September
President Trump will make a two-day state visit to Britain from Sept. 17 to 19, Buckingham Palace confirmed on Sunday, making him a rare head of state to be accorded a second such visit. King Charles III will play host to Mr. Trump and his wife, Melania, at Windsor Castle, the palace said in a statement. The king issued Mr. Trump a formal invitation last February in a letter presented to him by Prime Minister Keir Starmer during a visit to the Oval Office. Mr. Starmer played up the unusual nature of the repeat invitation, saying, 'This has never happened before; this is unprecedented.' Mr. Trump relished his last state visit to Britain, in 2019, when he was hosted by Queen Elizabeth II. The queen threw him a lavish banquet at Buckingham Palace and gave him a royal artillery salute. In a documentary about his political comeback, 'The Art of the Surge,' Mr. Trump showed off a book of photos of himself and the queen, 'who was fantastic, by the way,' he said. But Mr. Trump picked a fight with London's mayor, Sadiq Khan, who is Muslim, just before his arrival, calling him a 'stone cold loser' on social media and accusing him of doing a terrible job of running Britain's capital city. Mr. Khan had described Mr. Trump as 'just one of the most egregious examples of a growing global threat,' likening the president's language to that used by 'fascists of the 20th century.' He remains mayor and there is little indication that their mutual antipathy has softened. The timing of Mr. Trump's visit makes it unlikely he will be accorded the honor of delivering a speech to Parliament, several British papers reported. It is usually not in session in late September because the country's political parties hold their annual policy conferences during that period. That could set up an awkward contrast wit the visit of President Emmanuel Macron of France, who spoke to Parliament during his state visit last week. Like Mr. Macron, Mr. Trump will be hosted at Windsor Castle rather than Buckingham Palace, which is undergoing major renovations.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
IDF targets Hamas, PIJ explosives, observation posts in bid to stop ambushes on troops
On Tuesday, the IDF announced that five soldiers were killed, and 14 were wounded in Beit Hanun by an explosive device Hamas terrorists planted. The IDF has dismantled numerous Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad explosives and observation posts used to ambush troops in the areas of Shejaia and Zeitoun in Gaza City over the past two days, the military said Saturday. The Israeli air force killed dozens of terrorists operating in the same area. In the area of Beit Hanun, soldiers killed numerous terrorists and dismantled terror infrastructure above and below ground, and weapons. On Tuesday, the IDF announced that five soldiers were killed, and 14 were wounded in Beit Hanun by an explosive device, most of them from the Netzah Yehuda Battalion in the Kfir Brigade. Hamas had placed improvised explosive devices just before the soldiers entered the area between Air Force and artillery barrages that were conducted in order to pave a safe path for the infantry, according to the IDF. The Air Force struck a total of about 250 targets throughout Gaza in the past two days, including terrorists, booby-trapped structures, weapons storage facilities, anti-tank missile launch sites, sniper posts, tunnels, and more. There have been several soldiers who were killed throughout Gaza by explosives planted by terrorists, ambushes, snipers, and anti-tank missile fire. The IDF announced on Wednesday that St.-Sgt.-Maj. (res.) Abraham Azulay was killed in Khan Yunis in Gaza after terrorists emerged from a tunnel and tried to abduct him. Last week, the IDF announced the death of Sgt. Asaf Zamir, who was also killed in Khan Yunis when a terrorist fired an anti-tank missile at the tank he was in. In the same incident, four soldiers were wounded.
New York Times
3 days ago
- New York Times
Evidence Supports War Crimes Allegations in Darfur, I.C.C. Prosecutor Says
The International Criminal Court said on Thursday it had 'reasonable grounds' to conclude that war crimes and crimes against humanity were unfolding in Sudan's western Darfur region, where the county's civil war has thrust the region into a deepening catastrophe. 'The humanitarian position has reached an intolerable state,' the court's deputy prosecutor, Nazhat Shameem Khan, told the United Nations Security Council on Thursday. 'People are being deprived of water and food. Rape and sexual violence are being weaponized. Abductions for ransom or to bolster the ranks of armed groups have become common practice.' Among the court's worst findings was 'an inescapable pattern' of women and girls being raped or subjected to other sexual violence because of their gender and ethnicity, Ms. Khan said. While Ms. Khan did not specify who had committed the war crimes in the court's findings, both of the warring parties in the civil war have previously been accused of atrocities by officials from the United States, the United Nations and human rights groups. The determination that war crimes were being committed came after the prosecutor's office collected about 7,000 pieces of evidence, including the testimony of victims, Ms. Khan said. Investigators have made repeated trips to speak with victim groups and to interview witnesses in refugee camps in neighboring Chad, where many people from Darfur have fled. Sudan's civil war erupted in April 2023 and the brutal fighting has killed tens of thousands of people, driven millions more from their homes and caused widespread famine. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
