22% of Singles Are ‘Scared' to Retire Alone — How to Plan for a Solo Retirement
Find Out:
Read Next:
Now, facing solo retirement, single investors need to be extra proactive to ensure they can retire comfortably, even without the help of a spouse's or partner's income.
These four strategies can help single investors plan for retirement.
Having a bigger emergency cushion set aside can help ease some of the stress that may come with solo retirement. Living on a fixed income can be a challenge, but having an emergency fund set aside can give you some breathing room if there are months with higher expenses.
According to the study, compared to 62% of partnered investors, 49% of single investors have a strategy to protect their assets against market fluctuations and risk are focusing on diversification of their assets. Those headed for solo retirement should focus on diversifying their assets and setting up 'income streams that don't depend on the market cooperating every year,' said Aaron Cirksena, founder and CEO of MDRN Capital.
Social security benefits can start as early as 62 but drawing on social security before your full retirement age will result in a reduced monthly benefit. Cirksena cautioned that 'if you're single, the timing of Social Security matters even more because you don't have a spousal benefit to lean on.'
As a result, maximizing your payout can go a long way towards additional security in retirement. He added that 'if you can hold off past full retirement age, that extra 8% per year in delayed credits really adds up.'
Cirksena recommended withdrawing funds from taxable accounts first and moving to tax-deferred accounts later.
'It's about managing taxes over decades, not just year-to-year,' he said.
'When you're planning solo, everything falls on your shoulders,' said Cirksena. This makes it even more important for 'the plan to be dialed in.' Focusing on a solo retirement strategy that includes building a larger emergency cushion, diversifying investments and income streams, maximizing social security, and drawing from taxable accounts first can help ease the financial strain of solo retirement.
But regardless of what strategies you use, Cirksena recommended 'structuring your plan so you don't have to guess your way through retirement — it's best to maintain flexibility, automate smart decisions, and be proactive, not reactive.'
More From GOBankingRates
What $1 Million in Retirement Savings Looks Like in Monthly Spending
Here's the Minimum Salary Required To Be Considered Upper Class in 2025
5 Little-Known Ways to Make Summer Travel More Affordable
12 SUVs With the Most Reliable Engines
Sources:
Nationwide, 'Single in Retirement: Looking for Love and Financial Security'
Aaron Cirksena, founder and CEO of MDRN Capital.
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: 22% of Singles Are 'Scared' to Retire Alone — How to Plan for a Solo Retirement
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Michigan joins over 20 states in suing USDA over access to SNAP food stamp recipient records
Michigan is among nearly two dozen states that are suing the federal government over a pending rule that seeks extensive access to the personal records of food stamp recipients. A total of 22 states have signed onto the suit, which was filed Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the U.S. Department of Agriculture. "USDA's actions are unprecedented, threaten the privacy of millions of families, and ignore long-standing restrictions on the use and redisclosure of SNAP data," said the statement from Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel's office. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP, is the modern version of what was once called food stamps. The program is meant for lower-income people who complete an application and meet a series of eligibility requirements. While the SNAP program is federally funded, it has long been administered by the states, and the records of recipients are generally handled at that level. Michigan currently directs about $254 million in SNAP benefits a month through the Michigan Bridge Card network. Eligible recipients can use their individual or household allocations via the electronic benefits card toward purchasing food at most supermarkets and other participating retailers. Fruits, vegetables, meat and dairy products can be purchased with SNAP benefits. Paper products and cleaning supplies are among the ineligible grocery items. In May, the USDA issued a notice that it will require states and territories to share records of SNAP benefits and allotments with the federal government. While those instructions are on hold, according to the USDA, they do ask for personally identifiable information such as names, addresses, Social Security numbers and other records about applicants and recipients. The USA is also seeking information "sufficient to calculate the total dollar value" of SNAP benefits that participants received on and after Jan. 1, 2020. "For years, this program has been on autopilot, with no USDA insight into real-time data. The Department is focused on appropriate and lawful participation in SNAP, and today's request is one of many steps to ensure SNAP is preserved for only those eligible," USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins said in her announcement. The lawsuit said the federal government has never previously asked for such detailed records on SNAP recipients. Quality control checks normally ask for sample data, and both inspections and audits would seek a limited range of information specifically allowed by law. "SNAP applicants provide their private information on the understanding, backed by long-standing state and federal laws, that their information will not be used for unrelated purposes," Nessel's office said. "USDA's actions are unprecedented, threaten the privacy of millions of families, and ignore long-standing restrictions on the use and redisclosure of SNAP data."
Newsweek
5 hours ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Accused of 'Exaggerated Claims' Over Social Security
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Trump administration has "been peddling false and exaggerated claims" about taxation on Social Security benefits, according to a think tank in Washington, D.C. Newsweek has contacted the White House for comment via email outside regular working hours. Why It Matters Earlier this month, President Donald Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act into law. The legislation creates a new expanded standard deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and up, and it follows Trump's long-standing promise to nix federal taxes levied on Social Security income. Trump, the White House and the Social Security Administration (SSA) have promoted the expanded deduction as eliminating taxes on Social Security benefits for almost all seniors. In a June appearance on Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures, Trump said the bill meant "no tax on tips, no tax on Social Security, no tax on overtime." However, experts have said the legislation's touted benefits for seniors are overstated and may hasten the insolvency of Social Security and Medicare trust funds. President Donald Trump speaks with the media at Trump Turnberry golf club in Scotland on July 28. President Donald Trump speaks with the media at Trump Turnberry golf club in Scotland on July 28. Christopher Furlong/GETTY What To Know The One Big Beautiful Bill Act raises the standard deduction for seniors aged 65 and older by up to $6,000 between 2025 and 2028. While it does not directly alter how Social Security benefits are taxed, it could indirectly reduce the amount of those benefits subject to federal taxation. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), almost half of seniors already didn't owe taxes on their Social Security benefits under previous law. "Since the substantial majority of low- and middle-income seniors didn't pay income taxes, the new deduction will provide no benefit to these households—doing nothing to help them afford their health care, housing, and other critical living expenses," the think tank wrote in a report published on Monday. Though the deduction begins to phase out for individuals with incomes over $75,000 and for married couples earning more than $150,000, the Tax Policy Center found that seniors with incomes between $80,000 and $270,000—representing a quarter of people over 65—receive almost two-thirds of the deduction's benefits. While higher-income seniors are the primary beneficiaries of the tax break, most won't see a complete elimination of taxes on Social Security income under the new law, according to the CBPP. "For the vast majority of these higher-income taxpayers, the tax on their Social Security benefits would be reduced but not eliminated," the think tank reported. The deduction also excludes beneficiaries under age 65. Social Security beneficiaries can begin collecting at 62, while those collecting survivor benefits can claim even earlier. Both the SSA and the White House have touted the benefits of the legislation. Citing analysis from the Council of Economic Advisers, the White House said 88 percent of all seniors who received Social Security would pay "NO TAX on their Social Security benefits," adding that the Senate proposal's $6,000 senior deduction was "estimated to benefit 33.9 million seniors, including seniors not claiming Social Security." Prior to the bill being signed by the president, the SSA sent an email celebrating the legislation's passage through Congress. The email said 90 percent of Social Security beneficiaries would "no longer pay federal income taxes on their benefits" and that the bill would provide "meaningful and immediate relief to seniors who have spent a lifetime contributing to our nation's economy." The CBPP report also warned that the new law could worsen the financial outlook of Social Security and Medicare. The think tank said the tax cuts would reduce the revenue generated from Social Security benefit taxation by about $30 billion annually, accelerating insolvency of both trust funds to 2032—a year earlier than previously projected. According to the latest Social Security Trustees report, the program's two trust funds—the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Disability Insurance funds—when combined are projected to reach insolvency by 2034. At that point, benefits would rely entirely on incoming payroll taxes, resulting in an automatic cut of about 21 percent unless Congress intervened. What People Are Saying The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities: "The Trump Administration has been peddling false and exaggerated claims about the harmful Republican megabill's effects on the taxation of Social Security benefits, including in a blast email from the Social Security Administration. The new law doesn't help most low- and middle-income seniors, and it depletes the Social Security trust funds faster. Moreover, the Administration's misleading claims shouldn't distract from how the law's deep cuts to health care and food assistance will leave millions of seniors with low incomes worse off." The White House said in news release on July 21: "The largest tax cut in history for working- and middle-class Americans—including No Tax on Tips, No Tax on Overtime, and No Tax on Social Security—is now the law of the land, along with unprecedented tax relief for small businesses, farmers, workers, and families." What Happens Next The expanded deduction for seniors is set to take effect beginning with the 2025 tax year and expire after 2028 unless extended by future legislation.
Forbes
5 hours ago
- Forbes
Stretch Your Social Security Check In These Affordable, Sunny Cities
Living on a fixed income can feel limiting, especially in larger cities where housing and healthcare costs continue to rise. The average Social Security check is now just a little over $2,000 per month, up from about $1,918 last year and close to $1,514 five years ago, per the Social Security Administration. While that's an improvement, it's still not nearly enough to comfortably cover living expenses in high-cost metros areas. That said, there are a handful of smaller, budget-friendly U.S. cities where $2,000 can still go surprisingly far, covering housing costs and some essentials. Sure, there are overseas destinations where your dollars may stretch even further, but those come with their own logistical challenges, healthcare uncertainties, and cultural adjustments. For many, there's still no place like home, especially if home comes with sunshine and a milder winter. Here are three warm-weather U.S. cities where retirees can enjoy a comfortable lifestyle on a fixed income, without giving up on quality of life or climate. PHILADELPHIA - FEBRUARY 11: Blank Social Security checks are run through a printer at the U.S. ... More Treasury printing facility February 11, 2005 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. As U.S. President George W. Bush travels the country to stump for his plan to change the Social Security system, opposition continues from some members of Congress and senior citizen groups concerned that the proposal would erode guarantees to the federal retirement program. (Photo by William) Decatur, Alabama If you're looking for a pretty low cost of living, Alabama deserves a closer look. Decatur offers a warm climate and a lower median home value than the national average. Alabama is also tax-friendly for retirees, as it doesn't tax Social Security benefits or most pension income. In fact, homeowners aged 65 and older are exempt from state property taxes, and in many cases, local property taxes too. Decatur enjoys a moderate Southern climate, with average annual low temperatures of around 51 degrees Fahrenheit. Its location on the Tennessee River adds natural beauty and provides for several outdoor recreation options. Median home prices in Decatur typically range from $210,000 to $230,000, reflecting the state's generally lower housing costs. Hot Springs, Arkansas The city is well known for its namesake hot springs and national park. Hot Springs combines natural beauty with small-town affordability and a warm climate. Arkansas also ranks among the more tax-friendly states for retirees, with relatively low housing and healthcare costs. Hot Springs National Park, located at the city's north end, is home to 47 thermal springs, offering lots of wellness options. Average annual low temperatures hover around 50°F, making it appealing for those who want to avoid harsh winters. Housing costs are also well below the national average. Median home values in Hot Springs range from $155,000 to $170,000. Sebring, Florida A smaller town located in central Florida, Sebring offers the appeal of Florida's sunshine without the high price tag of the state's more famous coastal cities. The population in Sebring is older, making it a good fit for retirees. Sebring offers relatively low local taxes, and while it doesn't sit directly on the ocean, it features several freshwater 'lake beaches.' The overall cost of living is considerably lower than in places like Miami or Tampa, making it a solid choice for retirees living on Social Security. Median home prices in Sebring remain more affordable compared to other parts of the state, estimated at between $185,000 to $220,000. Average annual low temperatures come in at a mild 63°F. While Florida's weather is a draw, it's worth noting that hurricane risk is a factor to consider. Learn more about Trefis RV strategy that has outperformed its all-cap stocks benchmark (combination of all 3, the S&P 500, S&P mid-cap, and Russell 2000), to produce strong returns for investors.
