I've been ordered to tear down my £180k bungalow – I could go to jail if the council don't listen to me
Defiant Mark Jones said he would live in a caravan and take it down "brick-by-brick" if he ultimately had to comply with Birmingham City Council's demand.
5
5
He is picketing the council house in a last-ditch plea to keep the property, despite having twice been denied planning permission and losing an appeal.
The 55-year-old said: "This is £180,000 trashed in the bin. I can't win this unless the council speaks to me.
'My dogs will need rehoming and I could go to prison. I know we have made mistakes.
"I want the council to talk to me and make me see reason.'
Mark was given until the end of June to demolish the bungalow, built in the back garden of his ex-wife's home in Walmley Ash Road, Sutton Coldfield, in 2019.
With that deadline now missed, the former IT worker is now protesting outside Birmingham's Council House in a desperate bid to secure a change of heart.
He started building it for his dad Tony, who had cancer, believing the size was within the limit for permitted development, which can be done without planning permission.
A month later he was told he needed planning consent but continued building anticipating he would get permission.
But the application was rejected in October 2019, the month his dad died.
Mark said he initially continued building despite his planning problems because his dad was gravelly ill and he was convinced he would eventually secure consent.
I'm fuming after a massive five-storey apartment block is built just yards from my home - I can't sit in my own garden
A second application in November 2019 was also rejected along with a later appeal, which said the bungalow was "backland" development" and "very obvious from surrounding private gardens".
Mark's daughter and her boyfriend moved in during the covid pandemic and now he lives there himself.
He claimed the council had been unwilling to speak with him and come up with a solution that did not involve demolishing the bungalow.
He takes his dogs, springer spaniels Max and Paddy, to his regular protest in Victoria Square and said they would also be will be homeless if the council forced through the bungalow demolition.
If the bungalow is not demolished he could be fined £200 a day.
He said: 'The building size is fine. If I take all the rooms out and put say a swimming pool in it would be OK.
'I am now appealing the permitted development decision and waiting for the enforcement action letter.
'The council said it won't talk to me now. It's waiting for the court case.
'They will say take it down or we will fine you and then we will put you in prison.
'My ex-wife is starting to split the land off so it is separate.
'If I am going to lose I will knock it down. I will live in a caravan for three months and take it down brick by brick."
Asked why he carried on building without planning permission, he said: 'What sane person wouldn't think they would get permission for this?"
Mark claims the bungalow is "100 per cent within permitted development certificate limits" and pointed to the fact it doesn't have separate water or internet.
He said previously: "We don't pay separate council tax. We can't have all three utilities until we have planning permission.
'Every single thing has been refused by Birmingham City Council.
'I don't want to knock it down. It's a waste of time and money. If I get the permitted development certificate, we are going to sell the house with an annex.
'The council should have put an enforcement on me to stop me building it. If I lose, I am moving to Spain and I will take the house down.
'Ultimately, I acknowledge I am at fault. However, I believe the council also bears significant responsibility due to the initial misguidance, followed by a severe lack of communication, support, and adherence to its own procedures.'
A spokeswoman for Birmingham City Council earlier said 'Mr Jones is currently in breach of the Enforcement Notice that was served to him in 2021, and we have given him ample time to comply with the notice by the end of June 2025.'
5
5
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
17 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Sycamore Gap: why would anyone cut down a tree that brought joy to so many?
'It's one of the most asked questions that I get,' says the detective who helped bring to justice the two men who cut down the Sycamore Gap tree in the middle of a stormy September night two years ago. 'As soon as anybody knows I'm involved in the investigation, the first question is: 'Why?'' Why would anyone cut down a tree that brought only joy and happiness to people? Did Daniel Graham and Adam Carruthers see it as a lark? Or a challenge? Was it a cry for help? A yell of anger? Was it no more than an act of 'drunken stupidity', as suggested by Carruthers' barrister Andrew Gurney? Both men were sober, the prosecution argued. DI Calum Meikle, of Northumbria police, genuinely does not know, he says, and thinks we might never know. 'That is potentially the biggest frustration that people hold. Because if there was an obvious reason, if there was an obvious grudge, then people could understand it.' What the detective, the son of a forester, does believe is that Graham and Carruthers had no idea of the ramifications of what was described in court as a 'moronic mission' to cut down the famous tree. 'I don't think they fully understood the enormity of their actions.' Graham and Carruthers have been sentenced after being found guilty by a jury in May at one of the highest-profile criminal damage trials held in the UK. It is a measure of how seriously the state viewed the crime that one of the north's leading KCs, Richard Wright, led the prosecution in court one of Newcastle's huge postmodern quayside crown court building, and a high court judge oversaw the case – Mrs Justice Lambert, who was, until 1 January, the presiding judge of the north-eastern circuit. 'It was just a tree,' Carruthers told a jury, while also swearing blind that he had nothing to do with its felling. The huge public and media reaction mystified him. 'It was almost as if someone had been murdered,' he said. The sycamore tree in a dip on Hadrian's Wall in Northumberland was most likely planted in the late 19th century at the behest of the landowner John Clayton, Newcastle's town clerk who is recognised as 'the man who saved Hadrian's Wall'. Clayton owned land containing 20 miles of the wall, including five forts, and organised a number of pioneering excavations. He did everything he could to protect the wall and could also surely see where was a good spot to plant a tree. He would never see just how wonderful the spot he chose for the sycamore tree was, but countless generations who followed have. In 1991, the tree featured in the Hollywood film Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves in a scene with Kevin Costner and Morgan Freeman. It looks almost too beautiful. It helped put the tree into the wider public consciousness to the point where, in more recent decades, it became a place for birthday celebrations, marriage proposals and the spreading of ashes. It was one of the most photographed trees in the UK, but also morphed into something much bigger. It had a cultural identity. People said it felt like it was part of the DNA of north-east England. When Danny Boyle filmed 28 Years Later, set in the north-east, he of course featured Sycamore Gap just as he, of course, featured Antony Gormley's Angel of the North. The tree had gone when Boyle filmed, but he reasoned that 'all the things that have happened to us in the last 28 years have not happened'. So he recreated it. Its survival in the rage virus apocalypse was a wonderful tribute to the tree, he said. In reality, the tree has gone. Early suspects in the keenly watched investigation included an elderly former lumberjack – who was evicted from his home near the wall – and a teenager. Both were arrested and cleared of any involvement. Meikle said 'a single strand of intelligence' led police to Graham and Carruthers, who drove from their homes in Cumbria over the border to Northumberland on 27 September 2023 with one thing in mind. It was a night deliberately chosen by the pair, the court heard, because Storm Agnes was raging and, as experienced tree fellers would know, it is easier to fell a tree in a storm. Graham and Carruthers were once the best of friends who talked on the phone to each other every day. They were described as an 'odd couple' who 'stumbled on each other' about four years ago after Carruthers restored the Land Rover of Graham's father who, before it was completed, killed himself. The picture Graham painted of his life was a bleak one. The court heard he rarely socialised with anyone other than his on-off girlfriend. He lived in a caravan on a plot of land four miles from Carlisle with his two dogs for company. He had trouble sleeping and never made plans, he told police. The land was the base for Graham's groundworks business, which included tree-work – work for which he enlisted the help of Carruthers. They were the best of friends but by the time of the trial they could barely look each other in the eye. Since their arrest, Graham had turned against Carruthers. Graham denied being involved but told police he knew who was responsible, although he would not reveal the guilty man's identity because he had young children. That supposed reluctance soon changed. He showed police a photograph of Carruthers holding owls while in the background were chainsaws. Concerned that the police were not making enough progress, Graham made an anonymous call to 101 telling them that 'one of the lads that done it, Adam Carruthers, has got the saws back in his possession'. If they went to the property where Carruthers lived with his partner and children, they would also find a section of the tree, he said. He also warned that there were firearms on the property. Police found nothing to incriminate Carruthers, or firearms. Graham claimed Carruthers had a 'fascination' and 'strange interest' in the tree. He said his mechanic friend even had a length of string in his workshop, which he used to measure the tree's circumference and kept for sentimental reasons. In his interviews and evidence, Carruthers offered no thoughts on who was responsible but insisted it was not him. He was at home in his caravan on an airfield at Kirkbride, Cumbria, at the time, he said. The evidence against Graham and Carruthers was overwhelming, not least that police could prove that it was Graham's phone that was used to film the act of the tree being felled at 12.32am on 28 September 2023. That footage, lasting two minutes and 40 seconds, and enhanced by digital experts, was shown to a packed, silent, stunned courtroom. The terrible revving of the chainsaw in the Northumberland emptiness is followed by the sound of the tree cracking and crashing to the ground. Carruthers and Graham insisted they were not there. Messages between the men, which showed them revelling in the publicity and anger that followed the felling, had been misinterpreted, they said. A jury found the two men guilty, but the question of 'why' remains. The prosecution suggested it was 'a bit of a laugh' for the pair. It emerged after the trial that Graham was embroiled in a planning row and faced eviction – was the crime something to do with the bleakness of his life? Whatever the reasons for what the prosecution called 'mindless thuggery', the tree has gone – but in a way, it will never go. Saplings grown from seeds recovered at the site have been titled 'trees of hope' and have been given to good causes across the UK. At a visitor centre near Sycamore Gap, the Sill, people can see a section of the tree in a permanent art display created by Charlie Whinney. It's regarded as 'the people's tree' and visitors are free to photograph, touch or even hug it. And at the site of the felled tree there are signs of growth from the stump, which have been described as 'astonishing'. Sycamore Gap has gone, but there will be a sequel.
The Guardian
17 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Two men behind ‘senseless' felling of Sycamore Gap tree jailed for four years
Two men who carried out a 'moronic mission' to fell one of the most loved and photographed trees in the UK have been jailed. Daniel Graham, 39, and Adam Carruthers, 32, were each given prison sentences of four years and three months for an act of criminal damage that caused the Sycamore Gap tree to crash down on to Hadrian's wall in Northumberland on a stormy September night in 2023. The attack, using a chainsaw in the middle of the night, was met with sadness, disbelief and anger that rippled around the world. The sycamore was probably planted in the late 19th century and in recent decades the site was known as a beauty spot where people went to picnic, celebrate birthdays, propose marriage, spread ashes or just take photos. Graham, from Carlisle, and Carruthers, from Wigton, were found guilty in May of the criminal damage of the tree and the wall beside it, a Unesco world heritage site. They had denied criminal damage even though there was evidence that Graham's car had been used to drive to the beauty spot with a chainsaw in the boot. During an eight-day trial at Newcastle crown court, the jury watched footage from Graham's phone of the tree being felled and heard messages between the pair that the prosecution said showed them revelling in the infamy. The prosecutor, Richard Wright KC, said during the trial that the crime was a 'moronic mission' and the 'arboreal equivalent of mindless thuggery', and that the two men showed a 'basic lack of decency and courage to own up to what they did'. He said: 'Up and down the country and across the world, the reaction of all right-thinking people to the senseless felling of the Sycamore Gap tree has been one of sadness and anger. Who would do such a thing? Why would anyone do such a thing? Take something beautiful and destroy it for no good reason.' Wright said the 'public indignation, anger and downright disgust' at the felling had been palpable. 'Far from being the big men they thought they were, everyone else thought that they were rather pathetic.' More details soon …
The Sun
17 minutes ago
- The Sun
Warning over horrifying swindle carried out by cyber gangs who raid people's bank accounts
BRITS have been warned over a horrifying swindle carried out by gangs of cyber criminals who raid people's bank accounts. The devastating con is usually carried out by Chinese organised crime groups who have been estimated to have stolen billions of dollars from victims worldwide. 2 So-called 'pig butchering' is where scammers established fake romantic and trusting relationships with victims before luring them into fraudulent investments or other financial traps. In 2023, Shan Hanes, a banker from Kansas, US, embezzled £34.6million from his bank to cover his losses, having fallen victim to a pig butchering scam. Hanes was later sentenced to more than 24 years behind bars. Usually, a pig butchering scam works in three stages – hunting, raising and killing. This involves a scammer finding a victim online, chatting to them in order to build up trust and then getting them to invest large amounts of money into fraudulent schemes. The scam works in a similar way to a traditional romance scam, where scammers approach their victims by posing as a possible romantic partner on a dating app, or as a friend via social media. The big difference though is how the scam is executed. With a romance scam, trust is based on the victim's urge to maintain a romantic relationship with the scammer. In this scenario, the scam can often last for years. Pig butchering scams though, in comparison, generally take place over a much shorter time period. Interview with Richard Foster who is a ransomware negotiator The scammer, rather than focusing on trying to extract money through emotional manipulation, leans more on the victim's desire to make money together with the scammer. This can involve just a few months rather than years to take advantage of the victim. Usually, the scammer will present themselves as being financially successful and confident with a broad network and have appealing investment opportunities. Once the victim has made an initial small investment, the scammer will then try to escalate the process and push them into making a much larger financial commitment, reports. In 2024, Jacqueline Crenshaw, from Connecticut, US, met a man on an online dating site. He posed as a widower with two children and regularly chatted to Crenshaw on the phone. In just two months, they started talking about investing in cryptocurrency. She sent him $40,000 (£29,500) at first and received screenshots from him showing supposedly huge profits from the investment. Crenshaw was then encouraged to invest much more and it ultimately led to her losing almost $1 million (£738,000). Highly organised criminal gangs are thought to run these pig butchering scams with them using management teams who provide training to new recruits and even hire people as models who can interact with the victim. The Chinese government has taken a number of measures in order to try to stamp out the fraud. The Anti-Telecom Fraud Act was introduced in 2022 which was aimed at specifically preventing and punishing the use of telecommunications and internet technologies to defraud individuals and organizations. The Chinese Ministry of Public Security has also launched the National Anti-Fraud Centre App. This app allows the public to report scams and access real-time risk alerts relating to fraud. Along with the work of other government departments, it has helped intercept 4.7billion scam calls and 3.4billion fraudulent text messages since the start of 2024. The crackdown by the Chinese authorites has made it more difficult for criminal groups to operate in the country, leading many criminals to relocate abroad with South-East Asian countries – mainly Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar – being their chosen destination. The collapse of the illegal online gambling industry in the region following the Covid pandemic has led criminal gangs to look for new sources of revenue. Estimates of the profits made from online scams amount to around 40 percent of the combined GDP of Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar. The leaders of the criminal gangs often operate from tightly controlled compounds which act as hubs for online scams, with their primary focus on pig butchering. These compounds are usually presented as being 'technology parks' which help recruit workers. However, many people are forced into working for the scammers. While pig butchering can inflict severe financial hardship on the victims, the crime gangs are often also closely tied with violent crime, human trafficking as well as other forms of organised criminal behaviour. 2
