Protests staged seeking implementation of internal reservation
Members of Madiga Internal Reservation Struggle Committee staged the protest before the statue of B.R. Ambedkar and accused the State government of neglecting social justice and following anti-Madiga policy.
As part of the protest few among the protesters tonsured their heads and intended to send the hair to the Chief Minister as mark of protest. However, police intervened and stopped more joining the protest, which consequently led to heated argument between the protesters and the police. When the tension escalated, the police took several of them into preventive custody, who were released later in the day.
The protesters alleged that while internal reservation in the States like Haryana, Telangana and Andhra Pradesh had been implemented as per the direction of the apex court, the Karnataka government had failed to do so, resulting in members of Madiga community and its 29 sub-castes being left out from the sphere of employment.
They also alleged that the State government was not cooperating with the Nagamohan Das Commission by not providing the requisite data sought by the Commission from various departments. They said that the Socio-economic and Educational Survey Report by the Kantharaj Commission had been discarded by the Chief Minister and now confusion was being created around Justice Nagamohan Das' report also. The protesters led by Chandrashekhar Naduvinemani, Manju Hosamani, S. Hegde, Manju Kondapalli, Ningappa Hanchinal, Pundalik Madar, Rakesh Dodmani, Parashuram Dodmani, and others urged the government to announce its decision before the start of legislature session on August 11.
In another protest led by Dharwad Dsitrict SC/ST Pourakarmika and Employees Association and Jai Bhim Yuva Shakti Sena, a motorcycle rally was held from Ambedkar's statue in Hubballi to Kalabhavan in Dharwad. Subsequently a semi-naked protest was taken out, a mock funeral of the State government was held and few also tonsured their heads.
On reaching the Deputy Commissioner's office, they submitted memorandum to Deputy Commissioner Divya Prabhu G.R.J. who assured them of forwarding their appeal to the government. Office bearers of the associations Vijay Guntral, Basavaraj Alapur, Harish Guntral, Vijay Mulimani, Basavaraj Chalageri and others led the protest.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
10 minutes ago
- Hans India
BRS urges ECI to revert to paper ballots in Bihar polls
Hyderabad/New Delhi: The BRS has urged the Election Commission of India to consider reinstating ballot paper in the elections, starting with the upcoming Bihar Assembly Elections in November 2025, to restore public confidence in the democratic process. The BRS leaders on Tuesday formally submitted a detailed representation to the Election Commission, urging the constitutional body to address critical concerns affecting electoral integrity and a level playing field. The BRS delegation, headed by Party Working President KT Rama Rao, met the Election Commission on Tuesday in New Delhi upon the Commission's invitation for an interaction. The representation, submitted to the Chief Election Commissioner, highlights four major issues – the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls underway in Bihar, the party's call for a return to paper ballots, the repeated misuse of identical free symbols that dilute the party's identity, and non-action on past representations regarding violations of the Model Code of Conduct (MCC). The BRS voiced serious apprehensions over the untimely and targeted nature of the ongoing SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar. The party termed the SIR exercise unwarranted, particularly with elections on the horizon, and cautioned that it could lead to large-scale voter deletions, especially among migrant and disadvantaged communities. The disenfranchisement of migrant labourers, who move across states for economic survival, was deeply concerning. Documents like Aadhaar and Voter ID must suffice for voter eligibility. The party demanded withdrawal of SIR in Bihar. The BRS also expressed its concerns over the continued use of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs), citing growing public distrust and international precedents. 'Several media reports to this effect have surfaced over the last few years. Many political parties, activists and voters have also expressed their concerns about the usage of EVMs,' the BRS mentioned in its letter. The BRS party reminded that the world's oldest democracy, the US, and mature democracies like the UK, Japan, and Germany do not use EVMs for national elections. The party once again highlighted the persistent misuse of free symbols that closely resemble its reserved election symbol – the Car. In particular, the party flagged eight free symbols – Camera, Chapati Roller, Dolli, Road Roller, Soap Dish, Television, Sewing Machine, and Ship – which, when displayed in small sizes on EVMs and ballot papers, are indistinguishable from the Car symbol, especially for illiterate and elderly voters. The party demanded the immediate withdrawal of these eight free symbols. The BRS also expressed disappointment over the lack of timely action on its earlier representations during the 2023 Assembly and 2024 Lok Sabha elections. These included abusive and derogatory statements by leaders of rival parties, disparities in the Commission's response to complaints filed by BRS versus those filed against it, and inaction on MCC violations, including misuse of social media, hate speech, and politicization of government events. MPs KR Suresh Reddy, Vaddiraju Ravichandra, former MP B Vinod Kumar, and senior leaders Balka Suman and RS Praveen Kumar were part of the delegation.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Soon, SOPs to curb non-consensual content
BENGALURU The Union government has set up an expert committee to create a standard operating procedure for combating the spread of non-consensual intimate images (NCII), following directions from the Madras high court in a case involving a woman lawyer whose private images were leaked and repeatedly resurfaced online. Centre told the court that the committee, composed of six experts and representatives from the Union government, will come up with a framework to deal with all cases involving NCII content. (Getty Images/iStockphoto) Senior counsel Abudu Kumar Rajarathinam, who appeared for the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), told the court that the committee, composed of six experts and representatives from the Union government, will come up with a framework to deal with all cases involving NCII content. The government made the submission before a bench of justice Anand Venkatesh of the Madras high court that was hearing the woman advocate's petition against the continued circulation of her private photos and videos, which her former partner had recorded without her consent and shared online. Despite multiple takedowns, the images kept reappearing, prompting Venkatesh to intervene and demand urgent systemic solutions. The government informed the court that MeitY had constituted a committee with representatives from the ministries of home affairs, women and child development, communications (department of telecommunications), and MeitY itself. The joint secretary of MeitY will head the panel, which also includes cyber law experts and nodal officers from the participating ministries, it said. The committee will draft an SOP (standard operating procedure) that combines 'legal and technical strategies to immediately and effectively' tackle NCII content. It will also propose long-term solutions and outline clear steps that victims themselves can take when their private content is leaked online. The Centre told the court that sensitising government agencies to the issue will form another key part of the committee's mandate. The high court recorded the submissions and said the committee should treat the present case as a 'test case' to find a robust mechanism to block such content and prevent it from resurfacing. 'This is like Ravana's head. Each time you cut it, it grows back. Even when we block the video, it reappears. The real problem is relapse,' justice Venkatesh said, referring to the woman lawyer's videos and photos resurfacing online despite the government and police authorities repeatedly blocking them. The court then suggested that MeitY can take the same steps it took to block over 1,400 URLs, including international links, spreading anti-India propaganda during 'Operation Sindoor'. Justice Venkatesh said the same intensity and technological tools must apply when a 'citizen's dignity' is at stake. 'The nation is nothing but a conglomerate of its citizens. If we can take swift action to protect the country's image, we must do the same when one individual's fundamental right under Article 21, right to dignity, is under attack,' the judge said. The court noted that NCII content remains a pervasive and recurring issue, especially affecting women who face stigma, threats, and long-lasting trauma. 'This isn't just one woman's fight. It reveals systemic gaps that harm thousands of women across the country,' the judge said. The petitioner's counsel pointed out that while MeitY had previously blocked six URLs, the video had now resurfaced across 13 new links. Senior counsel Rajarathinam confirmed that the URLs were inaccessible in Delhi and Mumbai but still active in Tamil Nadu. He said this was probably because of coordination issues with local service providers and said the authorities will fix it. The court reiterated that the committee must take the present case as a blueprint and evolve a method that works, so it can be replicated in future cases. 'This court will not allow this to become just another committee with a report that gathers dust,' justice Venkatesh said. During a previous hearing last month, the court had directed MeitY to detect and remove all private content of the petitioner within 48 hours. The woman had filed a police complaint after discovering that her ex-partner had secretly filmed their private moments and shared the content online. Despite repeated takedown efforts, the videos continued to resurface on pornographic websites, messaging apps, and social media platforms.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Dear Rahul Gandhi and Donald Trump, India's economy isn't dead
'Those who speak without knowledge are like the blind describing the sun.' — Mahabharata, Shanti Parva In their misplaced zeal for attention, Donald Trump and Rahul Gandhi have found common cause — declaring the Indian economy 'dead'. If only the facts were as loyal to them as their soundbites are to their need for self-aggrandisation. Trump's utterance, given the way he has behaved post his election victory, was expected. But Rahul Gandhi's reflexive concurrence, parroting anti-India narratives for short-term political gains, raises deeper questions. Is he now India's most committed amplifier of foreign mockery? There are two clear ways to answer this 'dead economy' trope: One with data, and another with diplomacy's hard logic. First, let's follow the numbers. Between 2015 and 2025, India has emerged as the fastest-growing major economy, clocking average real GDP growth of 6.5 per cent compared to 4.1 per cent for emerging economies and 1.8 per cent for OECD countries. In contrast to India's 2004-14 boom, powered by global tailwinds and credit splurge (and even then, India grew slower than the world, slower than emerging economies and much slower than China), this decade's growth under the Modi government came despite disruptive reforms like demonetisation and GST and a pandemic. India is set to become the fourth-largest economy in the world, surpassing the UK and Japan. It accounted for a disproportionately large share of global growth, outpacing all G7 economies in both nominal and real terms. Its 105 per cent nominal GDP expansion between 2015 and 2025 dwarfed the US (66 per cent), Germany (44 per cent), and the UK (28 per cent). While Japan and parts of the Eurozone have almost stagnated, India's growth has been three times faster. It has also significantly narrowed the income gap in per capita terms with OECD nations. Notably, India is projected to overtake Germany soon to become the world's third-largest economy. India led global IPO charts in 2024 with 327 offerings, and the National Stock Exchange now ranks among the top 5 globally. Foreign portfolio flows have surged. Indian equity markets have delivered 16 per cent average annual returns, outshining nearly every peer. During the UPA decade, India's growth lagged behind China, Brazil, and Russia. India outgrew all BRICS economies in 2015-25, outpacing even China in percentage growth over the last five years. Even in per capita income growth, India's rise has been steeper, moving from 30 per cent of average of emerging market economies in 2014 to 42 per cent in 2024. Under the Modi government, exports surged from $468 billion to $825 billion. Defence exports rose twelvefold. Digital India created world-beating platforms like UPI, now processing 49 per cent of all real-time digital payments globally. Inflation, which averaged 8.2 per cent in the UPA era, has been brought down to around 4.5 per cent. Forex reserves have more than doubled. Poverty has fallen at a historic pace, with 25 crore people being lifted out of multidimensional poverty, according to the NITI Aayog. The World Bank has reported that extreme poverty dropped from 16.2 per cent to 2.3 per cent. The contrast between the UPA era and the Modi era is stark. From policy paralysis to policy propulsion. From scams to startups. From a lagging BRICS economy to its leader. India under Modi has not only grown faster but in a cleaner and more inclusive way, and is globally more respected. Over 55 crore Jan Dhan accounts, Rs 34 lakh crore Mudra loans and the world's largest vaccination drive are signals of a state that knows how to implement projects. India today doesn't just aim to be included, it wants to lead the table — that alone marks the death of the 'dead economy' narrative. If India's economy were dead, why is the UK calling its FTA with India the most ambitious in its history? Why are EFTA countries committing $100 billion in investments? Why indeed is the USA chasing trade deals? Why is it that now most iPhones sold in the USA are manufactured in India? Why is it that Canada, a country hostile to India for over a decade, could still not do without India in the G7 it hosted? One could even ask President Trump if the Indian economy is indeed dead, then why is he talking about India in every second press conference he does? India's economy is dynamic, data-backed, and destined for leadership. That this needs to be said in 2025 is unfortunate. That Rahul Gandhi finds himself echoing Trump's casual derision is tragicomic. Perhaps Gandhi thinks aligning with every outsider who insults India will somehow reanimate his politics. But India has moved on from dependency to self-belief, from slogans to substance. The only thing lifeless here isn't the Indian economy. It's the political instinct that cheers when India is jeered. The writer is CEO, Bluekraft Digital Foundation and was earlier director (content), MyGov
