Fired state employees breached the personal data of 33,529 more Texans
The latest announcement comes as the state agency continues to investigate a series of breaches by its own employees of its database for Medicaid, food stamp and other assistance programs.
Three months ago, the state notified 61,104 Texans that their personal information may have been improperly accessed by state employees. At that time, seven state employees tied to the breach had been fired including two who stole from recipients food stamp cards.
In February, the agency notified lawmakers that another two state employees had been fired, bringing to a total of nine state employees who had accessed individuals' accounts without a stated business reason.
HHSC officials said Wednesday that these fired employees are now responsible for breaching the personal information of another 33,529 account holders who had either applied or received assistance between June 2021 and January 2025. It is not known how many of those account holders had their benefits compromised.
The state agency recommends that affected individuals carefully review their accounts and health care provider, insurance company and financial institution statements to make sure their account activity is correct. Any questionable charges should be reported promptly to the provider or company and contact law enforcement.
HHSC advises Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients to check their Lone Star Card transactions for potential fraudulent activity at YourTexasBenefits.com or through the Your Texas Benefits mobile app. Recipients who believe they may have been a victim of SNAP fraud should call 2-1-1, select a language, and choose option 3 to report the fraud to the Texas Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General. They should also contact law enforcement to report the fraud and visit a local HHSC benefits office to have their benefits replaced.
HHSC has determined full names, home addresses, telephone numbers, dates of birth, email addresses, Social Security numbers, Medicaid and Medicare identification numbers, financial, employment, banking, benefits, health, insurance, medical, certificate, license and other personal information may have been inappropriately accessed. Recipients who want to know more can go to this link on the agency's website.
The state agency is offering two years of free credit monitoring and identity theft protection services to those affected by the breach. They can also call 866-362-1773, toll-free and use the engagement number B139792.
Tickets are on sale now for the 15th annual Texas Tribune Festival, Texas' breakout ideas and politics event happening Nov. 13–15 in downtown Austin. Get tickets before May 1 and save big! TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
3 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
Planned Parenthood fills health care gaps after Indiana's Medicaid cuts
Deputy Opinion Editor Jacob Stewart's column, 'Defunding Planned Parenthood won't stop virtual abortions in Indiana,' would be laughable if the Statehouse Republicans he used to work for hadn't already done costly and dangerous damage to reproductive health in this state. Indiana is the third-worst state in the nation when it comes to maternal mortality because the state is too focused on passing laws against abortion instead of funding programs that keep people alive. Stewart calls Planned Parenthood 'an abortion clinic." However, abortions make up only 4% of the services they provide. 24% of services they provide involve contraception. Studies have shown that increasing access to contraception reduces abortion rates. Criminalizing abortion does not. Another 54% of the services provided by Planned Parenthood are STI testing and treatment. Planned Parenthood is an available and reachable option for those who no longer have coverage for these services following state and federal legislation limiting access to Medicaid. While Stewart bemoans the ability of patients to access abortion care via telehealth, which one can only assume comes from his personal opinion of when life begins, he does not mention the demise of accessible and affordable health care for living breathing people.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Mass. shouldn't rely on RFK Jr.'s appointees for vaccine advice
Advertisement Massachusetts has historically used the federal recommendations to determine what shots to include in the state's Vaccine Purchase Trust Fund, which bulk buys all routine childhood vaccines and distributes them to providers. The state is reimbursed by private insurance and by a federal program that pays for vaccines for children who are uninsured or on Medicaid. This system ensures every child receives free vaccines, regardless of insurance. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up But relying on Washington's judgment now seems unwise. In June, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime vaccine skeptic, abruptly fired ACIP's members and appointed a new slate, many of whom lack expertise in vaccines and Kennedy also bypassed the typical scientific review process when he recently eliminated a recommendation that healthy pregnant women and children get the COVID-19 vaccine. Medical organizations, led by the American Academy of Pediatrics, Advertisement That lawsuit is ongoing, but states don't have to wait to protect their residents. This month, in a Massachusetts Public Health Commissioner Robbie Goldstein told the editorial board that under Healey's proposal, state experts would assess the various recommendations that are out there — for example, the American Academy of Pediatrics's childhood vaccine schedule — and adopt those recommendations they believe to be science- and evidence-based. The main practical impact would be in requiring the Vaccine Purchase Trust Fund to rely on state, not federal, guidance. For example, if ACIP stops recommending giving the hepatitis B vaccine at birth (a recommendation that's Looking ahead, state officials could choose to rely on state, rather than federal, recommendations in determining what vaccines are required for school attendance. State recommendations could affect what vaccines insurers cover. Increasingly, a lack of trust in federal health officials is becoming a bipartisan problem. Having guidance from state health officials could also increase public confidence in vaccine recommendations among residents skeptical of federal authorities. Advertisement 'Public confidence in the recommendations of public health officials, whether about vaccines or other health behaviors, is only as good as the public's sense of those recommendations being trustworthy, being expert, and being apolitical,' said Carlene Pavlos, executive director of the Massachusetts Public Health Alliance. State recommendations would also give physicians an authoritative source they could use in their practice and in speaking to patients. 'In the absence of timely ACIP guidance, we need a credible, transparent alternative that pediatricians and institutions can trust,' said Everett Lamm, co-chair of the Massachusetts Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics Immunization Initiative. Lamm said pediatricians today are overwhelmed and are seeking guidance on vaccine-related issues that have become politicized. In an ideal world, vaccine recommendations would continue being made by an independent, unbiased US government committee of experts, allowing for uniformity across states and insurers. A regulatory patchwork can create problems, and there's no guarantee that an individual state's regulatory bodies won't become as politicized as the current federal administration. But even with those risks, if the federal government's vaccine-related apparatus can no longer be trusted, giving more authority to the state makes sense. Editorials represent the views of the Boston Globe Editorial Board. Follow us
Boston Globe
9 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Deadly fire prompts scrutiny of assisted living homes that serve lower income adults
More than 75 percent of Gabriel House residents are enrolled in Medicaid, state officials have said, and it charges significantly less than a typical assisted living facility does for private-paying patients. Built in 1964, Gabriel House had been the subject of several complaints from family members about living conditions. Lipson, secretary of the Executive Office of Aging and Independence, or AGE, raised the possibility that such facilities, because they are so dependent on government housing or Medicaid payments, 'should be regulated or supported in a different way' from those that rely on private payers. Advertisement There are about 20 affordable assisted living homes in Massachusetts, said state Representative Thomas Stanley, the Waltham Democrat who sponsored legislation to improve conditions in assisted living facilities last year. He said lower income adults are particularly ill-served by the current regulatory structure. Advertisement 'What needs to happen is a deep dive into the affordable ALR (Assisted Living Residence) model,' Stanley said. 'That fire probably would have never happened in one of the private pay ALRs because they're modern buildings.' Such facilities primarily rely on public subsidies to operate. That can include housing subsidies and support from Medicaid for some services. Gabriel House accepted payments through Massachusetts' Group Adult Foster Care program, which provides personal care assistance designed to keep people out of nursing homes. 'Unless Massachusetts can get more Medicaid funding for assisted living, there is not a model that works well for low income people,' said Liane Zeitz, a member of the state commission and an elder law attorney, after the meeting. Each year more elders in Massachusetts fall into a growing gap: they don't have enough medical needs to qualify for nursing home care, but can't afford assisted living or home care services, said Michelle Woodbrey, co-owner of 2Sisters Senior Living Advisors, which works with families across New England. 'When someone's care needs increase, they have to leave assisted living and move to a nursing home for help with multiple activities of daily living,' she explained. 'But someone can't just move into a nursing home because they're out of money. There's this group of people who fall between the cracks. Gabriel House served many of those people.' The median monthly cost of assisted living facilities in Massachusetts is $3,655 to $8,036, according to AGE. Gabriel House charges $2,400 a month for assisted living in a studio apartment. The owner of Gabriel House, Dennis Etzkorn, did not return a request for comment. He is listed as the principal for two corporations in state records, Advertisement Yet public subsidies may not be able to keep up with the cost of services, state officials said. Affordable assisted living homes are often in older, repurposed buildings, Stanley said. Such buildings are likely grandfathered through some code enforcement requirements, Stanley said. Fall River officials could not be reached Tuesday evening to clarify whether Gabriel House was exempted from building or fire code requirements. Nancy Jones, 68, a retired social worker, moved her sister, Donna Murphy, 73, into Gabriel house about five years ago. It was the only 'foster group home' they could afford, she said. 'They don't charge you as much,' she said. 'Any other assisted living is thousands of dollars.' She was shocked when, two days later, all of the cereal and perishables in Murphy's apartment had been eaten by mice, she said. She called the Fall River Public Works office, which told her they were aware of 'infestations' from mice and cockroaches and the facilities were being exterminated monthly. The door in the back of the building, which was locked, had a wheelchair accessible ramp and a bell that was supposed to let staff know when a resident wanted to come inside. The bell broke, Jones said, and even when it worked, it was difficult for wheelchair users to access. She contacted a state assisted living ombudsman, Steven Ellsweig, who visited the facility. Within two days the bell was fixed, Jones said. Advertisement Still, the larger problem of access to the door was never fixed, Jones said. The family called the ombudsman three additional times to report the facility's elevator was broken, which seriously limited Murphy's ability to get around. 'You knew something had to happen in this place,' she said. 'It was an accident waiting to happen.' Ellsweig did not respond to requests for comment. Carolyn Fenn, state ombudsman and director of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, declined to comment on the number of complaints from Gabriel House or other homes. Compared to heavily regulated nursing homes, state oversight of assisted living facilities is limited, experts said. Fire safety issues appear to largely be left to municipal code enforcement. Workers have told the Globe there weren't fire drills at Gabriel House, but Fall River Fire Chief Jeffrey Bacon said his department's inspections do require buildings to have an evacuation plan and fire drills. 'And we would hold them to that, and hold them to giving us dates when they were performed,' he said. The group that met Tuesday, the Assisted Living Residence Commission, was created by long term care legislation passed last year. It has primarily focused on affordability and transparency within the larger assisted living industry, and safety issues weren't supposed to be a primary focus. Draft recommendations the commission plans to send to the Legislature next month include providing low income residents more help to access assisted living facilities, more clarity about costs, and greater public access to state records about the homes. Even some of these recommendations, though, received pushback from industry representatives. Staffing requirements for assisted living facilities are virtually nonexistent. But Brian Doherty, president of the industry trade group the Massachusetts Assisted Living Association, resisted suggestions for minimum staffing standards. Advertisement 'Because residences serve different acuity levels, there is no one-size-fits-all staffing ratio,' he posted in comments during the virtual meeting. Zeitz, the elder law attorney, wrote during a virtual meeting of the commission, 'There needs to be a method by which AGE can appropriately monitor and assess whether there is appropriate staffing. The Fall River case is an example. I understand that there were only 2 overnight staff on duty (and I'm not clear if they were required to be awake). Given the size of the building — this appears to have been inadequate.' Jason Laughlin can be reached at
