KATINA CURTIS: Thickets of red tape holding back Abundance are in government's sights
Even Liberal frontbencher Andrew Bragg is reading it – more to find out his opponents' thinking than to seek advice – while his erstwhile colleague Jason Falinski wants his party to seize the 'abundance agenda' as it searches for relevancy.
An abundance of ink has been spilled this past week about the book that's shaping Canberra's thinking.
Abundance, the 220-page manifesto from US reporters Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson about progressive politics and red tape, has sold out in the bookshops near Parliament, such is the hold it has taken on government.
Anthony Albanese hasn't read it, but everyone else involved in shaping his economic agenda is on board.
Chalmers is 'obsessed' with the way Klein and Thompson crystallise the thinking Australia's economic ministers have been working on.
Scarcity is a policy choice, the argument goes, where the regulatory burden heaped on by well-meaning legislators ends up putting the country in stasis.
It asks, what do we need more of and how do we get it?
But it's not the sole influence on Labor's second-term agenda.
Chalmers has also been looking to the UK for inspiration, both current leader Keir Starmer and the thinking of veteran Labour figures.
You can hear the echoes of all this in the government's rhetoric.
Starmer declared in a landmark speech in March he wanted to untangle bureaucracy, build houses faster and cut red tape costs.
The British Prime Minister spoke of his sense of urgency about delivering for working people and said he believed in the power of government.
Albanese has said now was a time 'when government has to step up' while Chalmers has spoken of an 'obsession with delivery'..
Already, Chalmers and Gallagher have written to regulators asking them to identify red tape to go – an approach one observer described as straight from the Starmer playbook.
Once you realise the 'abundance agenda' is colouring the ministry's thinking, you can see its hues all over the place.
Everyone is looking for the 'good kind of deregulation' in order to speed things up.
There is a genuine desire in the housing and renewable energy spaces to clear away thickets of regulation.
O'Neil had already started efforts before the election to get housing approvals moving faster, urging State governments to streamline planning requirements and get out of the way.
Murray Watt continues work to get the reforms of environmental laws on track amid widespread acknowledgement the approvals system is broken.
The proof will be in whether the government can succeed in Chalmers' aim to 'get out of our own way'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Please don't leak': New Liberal senator's email missive to party colleagues
The Liberal Party's class of 2025 is ready to take on the Albanese Labor government. But first, they have a bit more fighting among themselves to get through. New NSW senator Jess Collins marked the first day of her term on Tuesday by sending out a lengthy email missive to party delegates containing a few gags, and a few more barely disguised swipes at factional rivals. Bold. In fact, 'Labor' only appeared once. 'I am tired of factional hacks trying to weaponise the Constitution to consolidate or hold on to power,' she said. 'We are not going to find our way out of the wilderness if we can't change the status quo.' Collins entered the upper house after knocking off sitting senator Hollie Hughes in a tough preselection fight last year, thanks in part to support from conservative frontbencher Angus Taylor, whom she thanked in her email missive. The new senator also had intriguing words on the foot-in-mouth comments made last month by party elder Alan Stockdale, who said that Liberal women were so 'sufficiently assertive' that the party might need quotas for men. But not about what he actually said. Loading 'I was disappointed that comments made by Alan Stockdale were leaked to the press,' she said. 'That very afternoon I had just spent two hours with Alan and the Administrative Committee telling them how to improve the outcomes for women. If he suggested women were sufficiently assertive perhaps I am to blame. (Sorry, bad joke – please don't leak it!).'
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Albanese is the conservative who mugged the Liberals. Let's hope he seizes the moment
Anthony Albanese is a man who likes props. In the 2022 election campaign, he regularly brandished a one-dollar coin to emphasise his support for a pay rise for workers on the minimum wage. And in the lead-up to this year's election, he employed his Medicare card as a talisman to ward off Peter Dutton's supposedly evil plans for the nation's healthcare system. Clearly, his approach has worked. Everyone has a Medicare card and Albanese was wise to embed in the public consciousness that Medicare is a Labor Party creation, implemented by Bob Hawke's government in 1984 against the fierce opposition of the Coalition. Because Medicare, for all its shortcomings, is an entrenched and popular feature of everyday Australian life, the Labor Party of today has been able to leverage Hawke's long-ago policy success to its great advantage. There's upside for the ALP in portraying itself as a defender of institutions, as it can make the party look less risky, and Albanese leant into this heavily during the election campaign. At his recent post-election address at the National Press Club, he outlined the reasons Labor had won a second term. Electors, he said, had voted for Australian values and for doing things 'our way' – that is, not like Donald Trump and Trump-wannabe Peter Dutton. He also cited Labor's 'commitment to fair wages and conditions, universal Medicare and universal superannuation' that 'set us apart from the world'. In some respects, it's a conservative formulation for a centre-left party: preserving what's already in place. And that signals some potential downside for the government. Universal super was the joint brainchild of Paul Keating and the ACTU's Bill Kelty as part of the union movement's Accord agreement, which also gave rise to Medicare. The historically transformational nature of universal super has been brought into sharp focus this week, with the attainment of the compulsory 12 per cent super contribution and the wider discussion about super balances in the millions of dollars. Inevitably, talk of that achievement invites comparisons between the current Labor government and the all-conquering five-term government led first by Hawke and then Keating. Hawke and Keating wasted no time in office. The Albanese government is 38 months old. Inside the same timeframe, the Hawke government had held two summits – on the economy and on tax – and introduced Medicare, a new incomes policy, an assets test on pensions, floated the dollar, changed the banking system, begun the march on super and produced a comprehensive new package of tax measures. Loading Somewhere within the Labor Party, people will eventually start to ask what a Labor leader 40 years from now will be fighting to preserve from the Albanese years. The course that the prime minister is pursuing – backed strongly by Labor's national secretary Paul Erickson, who has definitely earned his status as the nation's campaigning guru du jour – is the one that secured the government's second victory. In short, the government's first priority will be about delivering methodically on its promises, namely reducing HECS debts, building 1.2 million homes, continuing the push towards renewables, increasing the number of Medicare urgent clinics, and continuing to keep inflation down. That makes sense, especially since the national political scene is now a bunch of players who have, to an extent, been mugged by reality. Everyone is a smartie after the event, but no one expected a Labor landslide. The government wasn't geared up for it. The Liberals had even less of a clue. None of the polls predicted it. YouGov got closest; its central projection was 84 lower house seats for Labor – a mild increase on its majority but still 10 short of the actual, stratospheric result.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Albanese is the conservative who mugged the Liberals. Let's hope he seizes the moment
Anthony Albanese is a man who likes props. In the 2022 election campaign, he regularly brandished a one-dollar coin to emphasise his support for a pay rise for workers on the minimum wage. And in the lead-up to this year's election, he employed his Medicare card as a talisman to ward off Peter Dutton's supposedly evil plans for the nation's healthcare system. Clearly, his approach has worked. Everyone has a Medicare card and Albanese was wise to embed in the public consciousness that Medicare is a Labor Party creation, implemented by Bob Hawke's government in 1984 against the fierce opposition of the Coalition. Because Medicare, for all its shortcomings, is an entrenched and popular feature of everyday Australian life, the Labor Party of today has been able to leverage Hawke's long-ago policy success to its great advantage. There's upside for the ALP in portraying itself as a defender of institutions, as it can make the party look less risky, and Albanese leant into this heavily during the election campaign. At his recent post-election address at the National Press Club, he outlined the reasons Labor had won a second term. Electors, he said, had voted for Australian values and for doing things 'our way' – that is, not like Donald Trump and Trump-wannabe Peter Dutton. He also cited Labor's 'commitment to fair wages and conditions, universal Medicare and universal superannuation' that 'set us apart from the world'. In some respects, it's a conservative formulation for a centre-left party: preserving what's already in place. And that signals some potential downside for the government. Universal super was the joint brainchild of Paul Keating and the ACTU's Bill Kelty as part of the union movement's Accord agreement, which also gave rise to Medicare. The historically transformational nature of universal super has been brought into sharp focus this week, with the attainment of the compulsory 12 per cent super contribution and the wider discussion about super balances in the millions of dollars. Inevitably, talk of that achievement invites comparisons between the current Labor government and the all-conquering five-term government led first by Hawke and then Keating. Hawke and Keating wasted no time in office. The Albanese government is 38 months old. Inside the same timeframe, the Hawke government had held two summits – on the economy and on tax – and introduced Medicare, a new incomes policy, an assets test on pensions, floated the dollar, changed the banking system, begun the march on super and produced a comprehensive new package of tax measures. Loading Somewhere within the Labor Party, people will eventually start to ask what a Labor leader 40 years from now will be fighting to preserve from the Albanese years. The course that the prime minister is pursuing – backed strongly by Labor's national secretary Paul Erickson, who has definitely earned his status as the nation's campaigning guru du jour – is the one that secured the government's second victory. In short, the government's first priority will be about delivering methodically on its promises, namely reducing HECS debts, building 1.2 million homes, continuing the push towards renewables, increasing the number of Medicare urgent clinics, and continuing to keep inflation down. That makes sense, especially since the national political scene is now a bunch of players who have, to an extent, been mugged by reality. Everyone is a smartie after the event, but no one expected a Labor landslide. The government wasn't geared up for it. The Liberals had even less of a clue. None of the polls predicted it. YouGov got closest; its central projection was 84 lower house seats for Labor – a mild increase on its majority but still 10 short of the actual, stratospheric result.
