WW3 fears grow as ALL phones to blast out 'emergency alarm' in system test
As fears mount over the potential of WW3, the UK will test its emergency alarm system for the first time in two years.
All UK devices will blast out an alarm tone later this year in a new test of the 'Emergency Alert System'.
First launched in 2023, this system is designed to warn the public if there is a danger to life nearby.
This latest test comes as the government's security strategy warns that the UK homeland could come under 'direct threat' in a 'wartime scenario'.
The renewed testing of the emergency system also comes at a time when escalating conflict in the Middle East has sparked concerns of a wider war between nuclear powers.
When it was first tested, the emergency system sent a message to phones which read: 'Severe Alert. This is a test of Emergency Alerts, a new UK government service that will warn you if there's a life-threatening emergency nearby.
'In a real emergency, follow the instructions in the alert to keep yourself and others safe.
'Visit gov.uk/alerts for more information. This is a test. You do not need to take any action.'
The Emergency Alert System was designed to quickly inform the public of an impending threat.
According to the Government, this could include severe flooding, wildfires, or extreme weather events.
Once the alert is sent, all phones in the affected area will make a loud siren-like sound, vibrate, and read out the warning.
The sound and vibration will trigger even if your phone is set to silent.
The government does not need to know your phone number in order to send the message, and all phones will automatically trigger the alert.
The next nationwide test of the Emergency Alert System will occur at some point in the coming year.
However, the exact date is yet to be announced.
After this year's test, the Emergency Alert System will continue to be tested once every two years.
Similar systems are already widely used across a number of other countries, primarily for natural disaster preparation.
Japan has one of the world's most sophisticated systems, which combines satellite and cell broadcast technology.
This system forms part of a wider scheme called J-ALERT that informs the public in case of earthquakes, tsunamis, volcanic activity, or missile threats.
South Korea frequently uses its national cell broadcast system to alert citizens about issues ranging from weather alerts and civil emergencies to local missing persons cases.
The US has a similar system to the UK that utilises 'wireless emergency alerts' to send messages that look like texts with a unique sound and vibration pattern.
The announcement of the UK's upcoming emergency alert test comes at a time when more people are growing worried about the threat of war.
The latest version of the government's defence strategy, published earlier this week, lays out a chilling warning that the UK is no longer safe from military threats.
The report states: 'For the first time in many years, we have to actively prepare for the possibility of the UK homeland coming under direct threat, potentially in a wartime scenario.'
In a foreword to the report, Prime Minister Keir Starmer adds: 'The world has changed. Russian aggression menaces our continent. Strategic competition is intensifying. Extremist ideologies are on the rise. Technology is transforming the nature of both war and domestic security.'
At the same time, the world has been carefully watching the escalating conflict between Iran and Israel in the Middle East.
After US forces bombed Iran's primary nuclear weapons development facility, the nation's leadership has vowed to strike back if there are further attacks.
Amid mounting concerns, a number of European countries have taken measures to improve their citizens' readiness.
Earlier this year, the EU issued advice to its nearly 450 million residents to stockpile emergency supplies to last 72 hours.
The warning told people across 27 countries to build up a store of bottled water, energy bars, torches, and waterproof pouches for IDs.
Citizens could also access a handbook to help prepare against 'various crises, from potential conflict to climate disasters, pandemics and cyber threats.'
Likewise, the French government released a 20-page survival manual detailing how to protect yourself during armed conflict, natural disasters, and industrial accidents such as nuclear leaks.
What is the Doomsday clock and what does it mean?
What is the Doomsday Clock?
The Doomsday Clock was created by the Bulletin, an independent non-profit organization run by some of the world's most eminent scientists.
It was founded by concerned US scientists involved in the Manhattan Project, which developed the world's first nuclear weapons during World War II.
In 1947, they established the clock to provide a simple way of demonstrating the danger to the Earth and humanity posed by nuclear war.
The Doomsday Clock not only takes into account the likelihood of nuclear Armageddon but also other emerging threats such as climate change and advances in biotechnology and artificial intelligence.
It is symbolic and represents a countdown to possible global catastrophe.
The decision to move, or leave the clock alone, is made by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, in consultation with the bulletin's Board of Sponsors, which includes 16 Nobel laureates.
The clock has become a universally recognised indicator of the world's vulnerability to catastrophe from nuclear weapons, climate change, and emerging technologies in life sciences.
In 2020, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, an expert group formed in 1945, adjusted the Doomsday Clock 100 seconds to midnight, the closest we've ever come to total destruction - and it remained there in 2021.
That sent a message that the Earth was closer to oblivion than any time since the early days of hydrogen bomb testing and 1984, when US-Soviet relations reached 'their iciest point in decades.'
The Bulletin also considered world leaders response to the coronavirus pandemic, feeling it was so poor that the clock needed to remain in its perilously close to midnight position.
The closer to midnight the clock moves the closer to annihilation humanity is.
How has the clock changed since 1947?
1947 - 48: 7 minutes
1949 - 52: 3 minutes
1953 - 59: 2 minutes
1960 - 62: 7 minutes
1963 - 67: 12 minutes
1968: 7 minutes
1969 - 71: 10 minutes
1972 - 73: 12 minutes
1974 - 79: 9 minutes
1980: 7 minutes
1981 - 83: 4 minutes
1984 - 87: 3 minutes
1988 - 89: 6 minutes
1990: 10 minutes
1991 - 94: 17 minutes
1995 - 97: 14 minutes
1998 - 2001: 9 minutes
2002 - 06: 7 minutes
2007 - 09: 5 minutes
2010 - 11: 6 minutes
2012 - 14: 5 minutes
2015 - 16: 3 minutes
2017 - 2.5 minutes
2018 - 2 minutes
2019 - 2 minutes
2020 - 100 seconds
2021 - 100 seconds
2022 - 100 seconds
2023 - 90 seconds
2024 - 90 seconds
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
What it takes to write like Agatha Christie
Agatha Christie, the world's best selling fiction writer died nearly 50 years ago. Now, BBC Maestro, an online learning platform, have turned to AI technology to bring Agatha's stories to life. This video is from Tech Now, the BBC's flagship technology programme.
The Sun
6 hours ago
- The Sun
Major Wimbledon change as iconic feature of tournament will be MISSING for first time in its 148 year history
LINE judges will be absent from Wimbledon today for the first time in the tournament's 148-year history — after being booted out by AI. Around 300 of the blazer-wearing officials who call 'out' and 'fault' have been axed in favour of an electronic gizmo. 1 Replacing them is the Hawk-Eye Challenge System which uses high-speed cameras and algorithms to track ball trajectory with pinpoint accuracy. Voices used by the tech are from people working behind-the-scenes at Wimbledon, including tour guides. The decision to adopt AI was made after a pilot at last year's tournament. It is understood the All England Club was reluctant, but the tech has been used in other events for years. Chair umpires will remain. Sally Bolton, chief executive of the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club, said AI will ensure 'maximum accuracy' in officiating. British No 4 Billy Harris, 30, said: 'I'm sure the umpires will be missed. 'It feels like a quieter court when they're not there, and they are all dressed up nice in the suits. 'But if the line calls are more accurate I guess most of the players are not going to be complaining.' Former line judges had to compete for 80 new match assistant roles, which can involve measuring the net, opening tubes of new balls and escorting players to the toilet. Veteran linesman Charles Falconer, 77, who would have been awarded a trophy and certificate to mark his 50th year this summer, reportedly missed out. One judge said: 'Charlie even asked if he could do stewarding to make the milestone, but the tournament told him there was nothing available. 'I thought Wimbledon were better than that.' A total of 23 Brits are in the singles events at this year's tournament — the most since 1984. QUEUE CANNOT BE SERIOUS TENNIS-mad fans pitched tents and sofas overnight to be the first through the gates of Wimbledon this morning. Some 1,400 eager supporters braved searing heat and crammed into nearby Wimbledon Park. Tournament bosses have even issued a dossier on how to queue correctly. The guide warns against smoking, cooking on barbecues and toilet breaks of more than half an hour. Among those queuing last night was Quin Latimore, 29, who said: 'It's filling up fast. 'I have been doing this for quite a few years and have never seen it this busy.'
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
It's true that my fellow students are embracing AI – but this is what the critics aren't seeing
Reading about the role of artificial intelligence in higher education, the landscape looks bleak. Students are cheating en masse in our assessments or open-book, online exams using AI tools, all the while making ourselves stupider. The next generation of graduates, apparently, are going to complete their degrees without ever having so much as approached a critical thought. Given that my course is examined entirely through closed-book exams, and I worry about the vast amounts of water and energy needed to power AI datacentres, I generally avoid using ChatGPT. But in my experience, students see it as a broadly acceptable tool in the learning process. Although debates about AI tend to focus on 'cheating', it is increasingly being used to assist with research, or to help structure essays. There are valid concerns about the abuse and overuse of large language models (LLMs) in education. But if you want to understand why so many students are turning to AI, you need to understand what brought us to this point – and the educational context against which this is playing out. In March 2020, I was about to turn 15. When the news broke that schools would be closing as part of the Covid lockdown, I remember cheers erupting in the corridors. As I celebrated what we all thought was just two weeks off school, I could not have envisioned the disruption that would mar the next three years of my education. That year, GCSEs and A-levels were cancelled and replaced with teacher-assessed grades, which notoriously privileged those at already well-performing private schools. After further school closures, and a prolonged period of dithering, the then-education secretary, Gavin Williamson, cancelled them again in 2021. My A-level cohort in 2023 was the first to return to 'normal' examinations – in England, at least – which resulted in a punitive crackdown on grade inflation that left many with far lower grades than expected. At the same time, universities across the country were also grappling with how to assess students who were no longer physically on campus. The solution: open-book, online assessments for papers that were not already examined by coursework. When the students of the lockdown years graduated, the university system did not immediately return to its pre-Covid arrangements. Five years on, 70% of universities still use some form of online assessment. This is not because, as some will have you believe, university has become too easy. These changes are a response to the fact that the large majority of current home students did not have the typical experience of national exams. Given the extensive periods of time we spent away from school during our GCSE and A-level years, there were inevitably parts of the curriculum that we were never able to cover. But beyond missed content, the government's repeated backtracking and U-turning on the format of our exams from 2020 onwards bred uncertainty that continued to shape how we were assessed – even as we progressed on to higher education. In my first year of university, half of my exams were online. This year, they all returned to handwritten, closed-book assessments. In both cases, I did not get confirmation about the format of my exams until well into the academic year. And, in one instance, third-year students sitting the exact same paper as me were examined online and in a longer timeframe, to recognise that they had not sat a handwritten exam at any point during their degree. And so when ChatGPT was released in 2022, it landed in a university system in transition, characterised by yet more uncertainty. University exams had already become inconsistent and widely variable, between universities and within faculties themselves – only serving to increase the allure of AI for students who felt on the back foot, and make it harder to detect and monitor its use. Even if it were not for our botched exams, being a student is more expensive than ever: 68% of students have part-time jobs, the highest rate in a decade. The student loan system, too, leaves those from the poorest backgrounds with the largest amounts of debt. I am already part of the first year to have to pay back our loans over 40, rather than 30, years. And that is before tuition fees rise again. Students have less time than ever to actually be students. AI is a time-saving tool; if students don't have the time or resources to fully engage with their studies, it is because something has gone badly wrong with the university system itself. The use of AI is mushrooming because it's convenient and fast, yes, but also because of the uncertainty that prevails around post-Covid exams, as well as the increasing financial precarity of students. Universities need to pick an exam format and stick to it. If this involves coursework or open-book exams, there needs to be clarity about what 'proportionate' usage of AI looks like. For better or for worse, AI is here to stay. Not because students are lazy, but because what it means to be a student is changing just as rapidly as technology. Elsie McDowell is a student. She was the 2023 winner of the Hugo Young award, 16-18 age category Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
