logo
Earth's orbit is filling up with junk. Greenhouse gases are making the problem worse.

Earth's orbit is filling up with junk. Greenhouse gases are making the problem worse.

Yahoo08-05-2025

At any given moment, more than 10,000 satellites are whizzing around the planet at roughly 17,000 miles per hour. This constellation of machinery is the technological backbone of modern life, making GPS, weather forecasts, and live television broadcasts possible. But space is getting crowded. Ever since the Space Age dawned in the late 1950s, humans have been filling the skies with trash. The accumulation of dead satellites, chunks of old rockets, and other litter numbers in the tens of millions and hurdles along at speeds so fast that even tiny bits can deliver lethal damage to a spacecraft. Dodging this minefield is already a headache for satellite operators, and it's poised to get a lot worse—and not just because humans are now launching thousands of new crafts each year.
All the excess carbon dioxide generated by people burning fossil fuels is shrinking the upper atmosphere, exacerbating the problem with space junk, Grist explains. New research, published in Nature Sustainability on March 10, found that if emissions don't fall, as few as 25 million satellites—about half the current capacity—would be able to safely operate in orbit by the end of the century. That leaves room for just 148,000 in the orbital range that most satellites use, which isn't as plentiful as it sounds: A report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office in 2022 estimated that as many as 60,000 new satellites will crowd our skies by 2030. According to reports, Elon Musk's SpaceX alone wants to deploy 42,000 of its Starlink satellites.
"The environment is very cluttered already. Satellites are constantly dodging right and left," said William Parker, a Ph.D. researcher in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics and the lead author of the study. In a recent six-month period, SpaceX's Starlink satellites had to steer around obstacles 50,000 times. "As long as we are emitting greenhouse gases, we are increasing the probability that we see more collision events between objects in space," Parker said.
Until recently, the effects of greenhouse gas emissions on the upper atmosphere were so understudied that scientists dubbed it the "ignorosphere." But research using modern satellite data has revealed that, paradoxically, the carbon dioxide that warms the lower atmosphere is dramatically cooling the upper atmosphere, causing it to shrink like a balloon that's been left in the cold. That leaves thinner air at the edge of space.
The problem is that atmospheric density is the only thing that naturally pulls space junk out of orbit. Earth's atmosphere doesn't suddenly give way to the vacuum of space but gets dramatically thinner at a point known as the Kármán line, roughly 100 kilometers up. Objects that orbit the planet are dragged down by the lingering air density, spiraling closer to the planet until eventually reentering the atmosphere, often burning up as they do.
According to the nonprofit Aerospace Corporation, the lowest orbiting debris takes only a few months to get dragged down. But most satellites operate in a zone called "low Earth orbit," between 200 and 2,000 kilometers up, and can take hundreds to thousands of years to fall. The higher outermost reaches of Earth's influence are referred to as a "graveyard" orbit that can hold objects for millions of years.
"We rely on the atmosphere to clean out everything that we have in space, and it does a worse job at that as it contracts and cools," Parker said. "There's no other way for it to come down. If there were no atmosphere, it would stay up there indefinitely."
Parker's study found that in a future where emissions remain high, the atmosphere would lose so much density that half as many satellites could feasibly fit around all the debris stuck in space. Nearly all of them would need to squeeze into the bottom of low Earth orbit, where they would regularly need to use their thrusters to avoid getting dragged down. Between 400 kilometers and 1,000 kilometers, where most satellites operate, as few as 148,000 would be safe. More than that, and the risk of satellites crashing into debris or each other poses a threat to the space industry.
"The debris from any collision could go on to destroy more satellites," said Jonathan McDowell, an astronomer at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Massachusetts who was not involved with the Nature study. "And so you can get a chain reaction where all the satellites are hitting each other, breaking up, and creating more and more debris." This domino effect, commonly known as Kessler syndrome, could fill the orbit around Earth with so much destructive clutter that launching or operating satellites becomes impossible. It's the runaway scenario, the paper cautions, which will make greenhouse gas emissions more likely. "But the chain reaction doesn't happen overnight," McDowell said. "You just slowly choke more and more on your own filth."
According to the European Space Agency, at least 650 breakups, explosions, or collisions have flung their wreckage into space since space exploration started. Space surveillance networks, like the U.S. Space Force, are currently tracking nearly 40,000 pieces of debris, some as large as a car. At least 130 million objects smaller than 10 centimeters are also estimated to be orbiting Earth but are too tiny to be monitored.
Scientists have recently been researching ways to remove this debris by, as McDowell metaphorically put it, "sending garbage trucks into space." In 2022, a Chinese satellite successfully grabbed hold of a defunct one by matching its speed before towing it into graveyard orbit. In 2024, a Japanese company, Astroscale, managed to maneuver a retrieval device within 15 meters of a discarded rocket—close enough to magnetically capture it—before backing away.
"In general, it's an environmental problem being stored up for future generations," McDowell said. "Are we going to hit our capacity? I think we're going to find out the hard way."
This story was produced by Grist and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nexstar set to stream NASA Live
Nexstar set to stream NASA Live

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Nexstar set to stream NASA Live

SAVANNAH, Ga. (WSAV) — NASA's live programming will begin streaming on Netflix this summer. Viewers will be able to watch rocket launches, spacewalks and views of Earth from space on the streaming platform as part of NASA's efforts to reach a global audience. The partnership comes as there has been a surge in commercial rocket launches led by Elon Musk's Spacex, which has had 81 launches in the first half of 2025. Spacex is the only U.S. company with a spacecraft that is certified to bring astronauts to the International Space Station. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Could Mexico sue SpaceX? Debris from Starship rocket explosion prompts investigation
Could Mexico sue SpaceX? Debris from Starship rocket explosion prompts investigation

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Could Mexico sue SpaceX? Debris from Starship rocket explosion prompts investigation

Billionaire Elon Musk's aggressive approach in developing SpaceX's massive Starship rocket from South Texas has led to spectacular fiery explosions time after time after time. Now, it seems the United States' neighbors south of the border are reaching the end of their patience. During a recent news conference, Mexico's president indicated that a lawsuit could be forthcoming if investigators determine that Musk's spaceflight company has contributed to undue pollution and marine life die-off in the country. The announcement comes after SpaceX's Starship, which the company is developing for human spaceflight, exploded in a fiery blaze earlier in June. The mishap occurred as the giant spacecraft was being prepared for an engine test ahead of its next launch. While no one was injured, the explosion did cause debris to fall in the area of SpaceX's test site in South Texas near the U.S.-Mexico border. Here's what to know about SpaceX's Starship, including the recent explosion and Mexico's ensuing legal threats. On June 18, Starship unexpectedly exploded while SpaceX was preparing for an upcoming flight test. No one was hurt in the incident, which occurred as the Starship spacecraft was standing alone on the test stand prior to being mounted on top of the rocket booster. The mishap, which SpaceX later referred to on its website as "a sudden energetic event," completely destroyed the spacecraft and ignited several fires that caused damage in the area surrounding the test stand. While SpaceX is investigating the mishap, Musk said in a post on X that preliminary data suggested that a pressurized tank failed at the top of the rocket. About a week later, Mexico President Claudia Sheinbaum announced she is considering taking legal action against SpaceX. 'We are reviewing everything related to the launching of rockets that are very close to our border,' Sheinbaum said at a news conference on Wednesday, June 25, as reported by multiple outlets, including the New York Times and Al Jazeera. The announcement comes as Mexican officials are conducting a review of potential environmental damage in the Mexican state of Tamaulipa after debris from the exploding spacecraft rained down on its beaches. If SpaceX violated any international laws, 'we will file any necessary claims,' Sheinbaum said. The governor of Tamaulipas, Américo Villarreal Anaya, said authorities were examining whether 'the internationally required distances are being respected in order to have these types of facilities, so that there is no risk to urban centers,' according to reporting from the Times. SpaceX claimed on its website that the Starship explosion posed "no chemical, biological, or toxicological risks" to the surrounding inhabited areas. The assertion is one the company reiterated on social media site X when news broke of Sheinbaum's comments. "As previously stated, there are no hazards to the surrounding area," SpaceX wrote in a June 26 post. "And as is the case before any test, a safety zone was established around the test site and was maintained throughout the operation." SpaceX also blamed trespassers for hindering recovery teams' efforts to retrieve debris. The explosion occurred while SpaceX was prepping Starship for its next launch from the company's Starbase headquarters, located about 23 miles from Brownsville and about 180 miles south of Corpus Christi. Starbase, which Texas voters in Cameron County approved in May to become its own town, has also attracted some of its own controversy. Earlier in June, commissioners with the city of Starbase voted unanimously to close several of the city's public streets to outsiders, angering longtime residents and property owners. The mishap and threats of legal action also come amid growing outcry among environmental activists over how SpaceX's operations are potentially decimating regional ecosystems. The South Texas Environmental Justice Network, which has long opposed Musk and his space program, most recently issued a statement in May condemning the Federal Aviation Administration for approving SpaceX's request to increase its Starship flight tests. SpaceX has long refuted accusations that its rocket launches pose threats to wildlife or the environment. Starship, regarded as the world's largest and most powerful launch vehicle ever developed, towers over SpaceX's famous Falcon 9 rocket – one of the world's most active – which stands at nearly 230 feet. SpaceX is developing Starship to be a fully reusable transportation system, meaning both the rocket and vehicle can return to the ground for additional missions. The Starship, standing nearly 400 feet tall when fully stacked, is due to play a pivotal role in the years ahead in U.S. spaceflight as NASA eyes a return to the moon and Musk has dreams of the first humans reaching Mars. But the next-generation spacecraft has yet to reach orbit on any of its nine uncrewed flight tests, which began in 2023 and are visible to the public from nearby South Padre Island. For three tests between June and November 2024, Starship flew halfway around the world at a lower suborbital trajectory before reentering Earth's atmosphere and splashing down as planned in the Indian Ocean. Those flights have been followed by a series of setbacks after Starship's first three tests of 2025 all failed to repeat the successes of previous demonstrations. Before the latest explosion in June, Starship's most recent demonstration came May 27 when the spacecraft spun out of control roughly halfway through its flight and disintegrated in a fireball. Though Starship was unable to achieve its most important objectives, the distance the vehicle traveled far surpassed the previous 2025 flights in January and March, when Starship exploded within minutes. SpaceX is planning to increase the number of Starship launches after receiving key regulatory approval to conduct 25 flight tests a year. Just four Starship test missions were conducted in 2024. Eric Lagatta is the Space Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach him at elagatta@ This article originally appeared on Corpus Christi Caller Times: Is Mexico threatening to sue SpaceX? Starship explosion prompts review

Exploration Mysteries: Lost Cosmonauts
Exploration Mysteries: Lost Cosmonauts

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Exploration Mysteries: Lost Cosmonauts

'Listen! Listen! Talk to me! I am hot!…oxygen…oxygen…am I going to crash?' For several decades, these chilling words, which screeched through a makeshift radio in the 1960s, have refused to fade. A choppy, distorted, and panicked voice of a woman in trouble was one of the many recordings which gave rise to one of the most persistent urban legends of the Space Age: the lost cosmonauts. Believers in the lost cosmonauts reject Yuri Gagarin's title as the first man in space. Their theory insists that the Soviets were secretly launching humans into space before Gagarin made his pioneering flight aboard Vostok I in 1961. The cosmonauts on these supposed earlier flights had all died. It is four years after World War II. Italian brothers Achille and Giovanni Battista Judica-Cordiglia had a vested interest in radio technology. They spent their adolescence saving up to buy parts to make radio antennas. Along with other pieces of radio equipment that they bought from American soldiers, they built an enormous antenna, which they mounted on the roof of their apartment. For fun, they enjoyed tuning into frequencies from around the world. However, one moment changed everything for them. When Russia successfully sent Sputnik I into orbit in 1957, it also launched the space race. In 1958, the United States followed with Explorer I. The brothers managed to capture the frequencies of both missions. Achille and Giovanni wanted in on this space race in their own way, by eavesdropping. In a repurposed World War II German bunker just outside of Turin, where their parents had moved the family, they continued their radio work. Eagerly, they set up an experimental listening station, with their homemade radios tuned into happenings in the night sky. For months, the brothers worked tirelessly to perfect their system to track all Soviet missions. One night, they held their breath as faint beeping started to come through their headphones. Morse code. More accurately, an SOS. They believed it must have been a manned launch that went wrong. However, at this time, only dogs were used on space flights. The next odd occurrence was the sound of a human heartbeat accompanied by heavy breathing, most likely coming from a male in distress. After that, panicked transmissions from a team of three people (two men and one woman) said, 'Conditions growing worse. Why don't you answer?...Remember us to the Motherland! We are lost! We are lost!' Over the years, such dire transmissions continued and further fueled the rumors that the Soviets were regularly losing their cosmonauts. News outlets caught wind of the story, but it wasn't the first of its kind. In 1959, an article from the Continentale in Italy claimed that a Czechoslovakian official gave a list of the names of cosmonauts who died during their missions: Alexei Ledovsky, Andrei Mitkov, Sergei Shiborin, and Maria Gromova. In a Soviet periodical called Ogoniok, Pyotr Dolgov and Ivan Kachur were declared dead, not during a clandestine mission to space, but after conducting a parachute test at high altitude. No one was able to confirm and clarify these details. This begs the question: Were these "cosmonauts" actually high-altitude test pilots or parachutists? Achille and Giovanni's discoveries did not escape notice. Soon enough, there was an ominous knock at their door from none other than the KGB. Writer Micah Hanks at The Debrief wrote that years later, a journalist named Kris Hollington tracked down a KGB visitor in 2008, who admitted: 'Of course, we were interested in the Judica-Cordiglia brothers; they were hacking into our commun­ications. Imagine that today, a pair of amateur kids taking apart the Russian space program like it was a toy…' To their surprise, the man let them off with a warning. Nonetheless, the visit itself was ominous and made them question whether or not the Soviets were trying to cover up or silence any interested parties. The brothers' work earned them a well-received visit to NASA headquarters, where scientists and communications specialists praised them for their inventions and self-taught knowledge. They also recorded John Glenn's communications during his mission in 1962. Seeing their value, NASA and the brothers exchanged information, with NASA trading American mission frequencies for Russian frequencies. Achille and Giovanni established the Zeus Network, which allowed radio enthusiasts around the world to tap into spaceflights. This lasted until at least the 1969 moon landing. Did the brothers actually overhear dying cosmonauts crying out to the ether for help? The many cryptic and terrifying jumbled cacophonies suggested a failing Soviet space program that could leave America the victor of this highly politicized race. Some believe the brothers lied or exaggerated to gain notoriety. According to writer and science scholar Maria Rosa Menzio, the brothers received two kinds of translations from the mostly indiscernible recordings they intercepted. When they sent them to native Russian speakers, the translations made little sense. However, when they took the recordings to a German teacher who spoke Russian, the teacher only gave them what she thought she heard or was able to make out. Therefore, skeptics find the brothers to be an unreliable source. Space historian James E. Oberg provided his own take on the lost cosmonauts. Digging into some of the names, he claims to have clarified the story of one of the victims mentioned in Ogoniok. He said: Dolgov, an experienced test pilot and stratospheric parachutist, really did disappear under mysterious circumstances about that time. More than two years later the Russians announced that he had just died in a high-altitude jump in November 1962. He also quoted Dr. Charles Sheldon, a Washington expert on the Soviet space program, who said: Those who would believe in these purported Soviet orbital deaths must think there is a second and independent Soviet manned program. In contrast to the open program which always brought the man back until 1967, the secret program always failed. Why the Russians would want to run a secret failure program parallel to their open success program is not clear. It is no secret that the Soviet space program had its share of bad luck. There were many accidents, probably more than we know, which were never made public. But most importantly, one of the main reasons why many people believe in the lost cosmonauts is the highly secretive and authoritarian character of the Soviet Union. Media, higher education, culture, and even thought were under heavy state control and censorship. No one truly knew what was going on. From assassinations and undercover operations to mysterious disappearances, it was always tempting to lean toward the theory of a big cover-up. The behavior of Soviet leaders fomented further suspicion. Sometimes, Nikita Khrushchev teased at upcoming launches that they were ready to send men into space. Then nothing would happen, which made people believe the launches occurred but failed. This brings us to another strange story. In the newspaper The Daily Worker, journalist Dennis Ogden wrote about a cosmonaut named Vladimir Ilyushin who was supposedly the first man in space. He launched two days before Yuri Gagarin's flight, but his flight crashed in China, and he suffered severe brain damage. Officials claim Ilyushin was the victim of a car accident, while others say this was an excuse to explain away Ilyushin's injuries. The Cold War was a battle between the West and the East, but also a fight between what was real and what wasn't. Truth and propaganda came head to head. It's hard to get to the bottom of propaganda. Oberg says: The only safe answer still is that no one outside a small coterie in the USSR can know. We can say, however, that there is no hard evidence available to indicate that any such fatal secret missions ever took place… As we examine the evidence, it is possible that the "lost cosmonauts" could have been a group of ill-fated high-altitude test pilots or parachutists who might have been destined to go into space one day. Unfortunately for them, they didn't make it. In the craze of one of the world's most intense periods, truth was sometimes mixed with fiction.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store