logo
Can all of Laos rise from poverty like its Prabang City? – DW – 06/03/2025

Can all of Laos rise from poverty like its Prabang City? – DW – 06/03/2025

DW03-06-2025

Luang Prabang in northern Laos used tourism to become virtually free of poverty. But Laos is still one of the poorest countries in Southeast Asia.
Luang Prabang, in the north of Laos, is experiencing something of an economic boom. When the author of this article last visited in 2012, the city's central street and roadway, Sisavangvong Road, did not have many foreign tourists, and most of Westerners were backpackers just passing through to either Thailand or Vietnam. The hospitality scene felt limited.
But things are different today. Handicraft markets have popped up at the south end of the now-bustling road, near tight alleys leading from the Wat Pa Phai Buddhist temple. Further down Sisavangvong, many international travelers and tourists can be seen dining and drinking in quirky bars and restaurants. Even the adjacent streets have improved, with fancy eateries, cocktail bars, and travel agents ready to serve its international clientele.
The city and the surrounding province attracted over 2 million visitors last year Image: Tommy Walker/DW
Official figures show a 162% increase in visitors year over year as of April 2025. Luang Prabang has also been named by Lonely Planet as Asia's top place to visit for 2025.
Thousands of families escape poverty in Luang Prabang
The Laotian province aimed for 900,000 visitors last year — it got over 2 million, generating some $560 million (€491 million) in revenue. Thanks to the money flowing into the city, officials say that over 16,000 families have moved out of poverty, which is 98.3% of the city's total population.
In March this year, Mayor Viengthong Hatsachan said improvements to the infrastructure, including roads, transport and utilities, have made Luang Prabang poverty free .
Nearly all of Luang Prabang's population are no longer considered poor Image: Tommy Walker/DW
In Laos, the criteria for being free from poverty include stable employment, a permanent home, secondary-level education and access to basic health care, clean water and energy.
Laos pressured by inflation, public debt
But Laos, with its 7.8 million inhabitants living mostly in rural environments across a territory that is bigger than the UK, still struggles to raise living standards. As of 2023, official data shows that nearly 17% of its families were living in poverty, but assessments by international organizations suggest the actual rate could be higher when considering factors like access to education and health care, among others. The Southeast Asian country is ruled by a single party, the Lao People's Revolutionary Party, and UN benchmarks classify it as one of the world's 44 Least Developed Countries (LCDs).
Laos economy struggles amid inflation and falling investment
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
And last year it was reported Laos had a total public debt of $13.8 billion, which was 108% of the country's GDP. It's currency, Lao Kip, also depreciated to record lows against the US dollar and Thai Baht, making it harder to pay back any debt.
The country is heavily reliant on agriculture, with a large proportion of the population working the fields or engaged at other points of the food production chain.
Laos has also invested heavily in hydropower, aiming to become the "battery" of supplying electricity to countries in Southeast Asia. However, these investments have been costly, with Laos deep in debt with Chinese energy firms. On the other hand, thanks to Chinese investment, Laos now boasts a high-speed train line connecting its capital Vientiane to the Chinese border, and there are also discussions of linking Vientiane with Cambodia.
Can Laos use tourism to get rich?
The rise of Laos' ancient capital Luang Prabang brings hope that the entire country could follow in its footsteps and boost tourism earnings to alleviate poverty. But analysts warn that not all visitors bring new business to the local population.
For example, over a million Chinese tourists visited Laos in 2024. However, many of those are so-called "zero-dollar" tour groups that pay low rates and only spend money in Chinese-associated businesses, almost entirely bypassing the local economy.
"While the new high-speed railway connecting China to Laos has increased arrivals, it has not translated into meaningful economic benefits for the local Lao population," says Professor Worrawoot Jumlongnark from Thailand's Mahasarakham University.
Laos: A country in the grip of the Chinese?
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
For others, like Inthy Danesavanh, chairman at the Inthira Group and an eco-tourism specialist in Laos, boosting tourism is a key piece of the puzzle, in addition to improving agriculture.
"Luang Prabang province is along the line of the Laos-Chinese railway, and we can focus more on agriculture, and exports, and the railway can export to the huge Chinese market and this can bring benefit to the local people," he said.
"And I strongly believe in tourism because Laos is surrounded by five countries with bigger populations. It's more than 200 million tourists a year traveling around Laos, next to Laos. I think tourism, agriculture, and logistics, focusing on good roads and access, I think the three sectors have a future for Laos to get rid of this poverty," he told DW.
Edited by: Darko Janjevic

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Has Israel-Iran conflict changed the Middle East?  – DW – 06/27/2025
Has Israel-Iran conflict changed the Middle East?  – DW – 06/27/2025

DW

timea day ago

  • DW

Has Israel-Iran conflict changed the Middle East? – DW – 06/27/2025

The ceasefire between Israel and Iran seems to be holding. Other countries in the region maintain ambiguous attitudes towards the 12-day war and would prefer stability to regime change, or even picking sides. It seems that the most dangerous phase of the current Israeli-Iranian conflict has passed. The ceasefire agreed to on Monday, under US President Donald Trump, has so far remained stable despite some ruptures. With this, Middle Eastern states are utilizing the pause to consider the conflict and its consequences. It seems that many of the countries in the region had one objective in common with regard to the fighting between Israel and Iran: Maintaining ambiguity. For example, Jordan expressed its condemnation of Israeli attacks on Iran along with 20 other Arab and Muslim-majority countries in a public statement. But at the same time, its air force prevented Iranian rockets and drones from flying over Jordanian airspace towards Israel. The Jordanians say they did this to protect their own citizens. Saudi Arabia also signed this statement, but is thought to have allowed Israeli planes into its airspace to shoot down Iranian projectiles. Stefan Lukas, founder of the Germany-based consultancy, Middle East Minds, previously told DW he believes that the Saudis also shot down Iranian missiles themselves, over their country, although there have been no verified reports about this. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Both Jordan and Saudi Arabia have a complex relationship with Israel, involving public criticism but behind-the-scenes cooperation. Both also rely on military cooperation with the US for their defense and Jordan also receives financial aid from the US, to the tune of $1.45 billion (€1.25 billion) in annual bilateral foreign assistance. This makes Jordan one of the countries receiving the most in US foreign aid in the world. Ukraine, Israel and Ethiopia are other major recipients of US aid money. At the same time, though, both countries are interested in maintaining stability in their own region — and that means maintaining a balanced relationship with Iran. That balancing act will continue to shape regional foreign policy, especially in the Gulf states, says Simon Wolfgang Fuchs, an associate professor of Islam at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. The Gulf states have seen how Iran has lost its potential to threaten them as much, Fuchs told DW, as they've seen how Iranian proxies — including Hezbollah in Lebanon and Syria, and pro-Iranian militias in Iraq — have been weakened. The Syrian state under dictator Bashar Assad, which formerly supported Iran, is under new leadership and also no longer an Iranian ally. "Against this background, naturally it seems sensible from the Gulf states' perspective to make an approach to this weakened — but still very important actor — in the region," Fuchs argues. "They have no interest in the regime there being weakened, let alone its overthrow and the chaos that would result. Jordan takes a similar position to that," he explained. In fact, some of Iran's neighbors seem more interested in preventing the fall of the current Iranian regime. "The question remains: Who would rule the Islamic Republic of Iran next?" Marcus Schneider, who's based in Lebanon and heads the Friedrich Ebert Foundation's regional project for peace and security in the Middle East, wrote for Berlin-based political magazine, International Politics and Society. "In the country, there isn't really any organized opposition, for understandable reasons — neither political nor armed [opposition]. In exile, there are two groups who are ready — the monarchists and the People's Mujahedin of Iran." But for both groups, their effectiveness and potential popularity with the Iranian public would be questionable, Schneider said. Egypt's position is just as ambiguous. Egypt's government welcomed the ceasefire between Iran and Israel and announced it would continue to make diplomatic efforts with the goal of finding a long-term, lasting solution to regional crises. Egypt must also find a careful balance, Fuchs explains, because it too is so dependent on US military aid. This balancing act came out into the open again due to recent events. Cairo has regularly rejected any plans that mean accepting expelled Palestinains. "On the other hand, the Egyptian government has also done everything possible not to anger the Israelis and the US," Fuchs noted. "For example, by thoroughly halting the Gaza solidarity march that came from Tunisia on June 14, including attacking international activists, and not allowing them anywhere near Sinai." Egypt's Sinai region borders Gaza, and on June 10, a land convoy of around 1,500 pro-Palestinian activists and more than 100 vehicles crossed into Libya from Tunisia on their way to Gaza. Other marchers in Egypt, who planned to join the procession, were attacked by Egyptian security forces on June 14 near a checkpoint in the north-eastern city of Ismailia. Many were then deported. Egypt obviously wants to avoid any complications in its relationship with the US. The two nations have agreed to cooperate on fighting terrorism and to securing Egypt's borders against unrest in Libya, Sudan or the Gaza Strip. Egypt also gets a huge amount of military aid and receives around $1.3 billion annually from the US. That seems unlikely to change as the US, under President Donald Trump, has yet to comment on Egypt's disastrous human rights situation under autocratic leader, President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi. All the countries in Iran's neighborhood are aware of the importance of maintaining a balance between their partners. "A weakened Iran could be contained and tamed," Schneider wrote. "On the other hand, a country that's cornered, severely battered and fighting for survival is unpredictable." Fuchs adds that another thing has also become clear: The current US administration's course is irritating large parts of the Middle East. "President Trump, with his foreign policy and the use of social media, is throwing all certainties out the window," Fuchs argued. "I really doubt the US will focus attention on the Middle East in coming years. Israel and Iran are exceptions. There's very little interest in further interventions and the US' focus will inevitably shift to east Asia."

Why more Germans can't afford life on their wages  – DW – 06/27/2025
Why more Germans can't afford life on their wages  – DW – 06/27/2025

DW

timea day ago

  • DW

Why more Germans can't afford life on their wages – DW – 06/27/2025

German politicians are fond of saying, "Work must be worth it." But ever more people who work full-time need state benefits. And the new minimum wage hike is seen as disappointing. Chancellor Friedrich Merz took to the Bundestag lectern this week to deliver — in his characteristically forthright manner — the government's position on what he called of the next major priorities for his government: His plans to reform the unemployment benefit, or Bürgergeld ("citizen's income"). He rang a familiar tune on the subject of work: Work, he argued, needs to be worth it. He wanted "to ensure that people in Germany as a whole can once again see that their efforts are paying off and that the principle of performance-related pay will once again be applied." But his remark was somewhat undercut by a statistic that emerged a few days earlier: In 2024, some 826,000 working people were dependent on benefits, or Bürgergeld ("citizen's income") as it is called in Germany. That represents an increase of around 30,000 since 2023 — the first time that the number of employed people receiving a top-up had increased since 2015. That, perhaps not coincidentally, was also the year that Germany introduced its first basic minimum wage — at the time, over a million workers were still dependent on state benefits, a number that has steadily decreased since. These extra benefits cost the state nearly €7 billion ($8.1 billion) in 2024 — over a billion more than the €5.7 billion the state paid for such cases in 2022. The government revealed the figures in response to a parliamentary question from Bundestag member Cem Ince of the socialist Left Party, who told DW: "It is unacceptable that hundreds of thousands of people are dependent on state aid despite being in work. This means we are supporting low wages and perpetuating the exploitation of labor." Ince believes that these figures show that Germany's minimum wage is simply too low. Though it was raised substantially by the last government — to €12 at the start of 2023 — it has only risen minimally since then, to the current €12,82 per hour. On Friday, the German minimum wage commission — which consists of representatives of employers' associations and trade unions — announced that the minimum wage would increase in two stages: To €13,90 on January 1, 2026, and then €14,60 a year later, falling short of the €15 the center-left Social Democrats (SPD) had been campaigning on. Helena Steinhaus, founder of the campaign group Sanktionsfrei ("Sanction-Free"), which supports people living on benefits, says the small rises in recent years have not kept up with increases in rent and cost of living in the past couple of years. The average rent in Germany, for example, rose by 4.7% last year alone, and by as much as 8.5% in Berlin. "I'd say that's our answer as to why more people have to top up their earnings, because the minimum wage — even if you work full time — doesn't cover what it is supposed to cover." But some economists argue that the minimum wage has little to do with the number of working people who need benefits. "You have to recognize that most of these people don't work full-time — most of them are in training or working part-time," said Holger Schäfer, senior economist for labor market economics at the German Economic Institute in Cologne (IW). "The minimum wage won't be any use there, because the reason that people can't earn a living from their income is not down to the low hourly wage, but the low number of hours." The figures back this up: According to the latest figures from the Federal Employment Agency, of the 826,000 workers who receive benefits, only around 81,000 were working full-time. But that is no excuse for paying low wages, according to Cem Ince: "The fact is: the current minimum wage is a poverty wage! Employers cannot talk their way out of this," he said. "The number of people receiving supplementary benefits depends to a large extent on low wages. One of my recent inquiries revealed that people earning the minimum wage for full-time work cannot afford adequate housing in half of Germany's major cities and are dependent on financial support." In any case, as Steinhaus argued, the reason why many people only work part-time is simple: They have children or other dependents who need care, and many cities in Germany lack childcare infrastructure. The IW calculated last year that 306,000 children in Germany under the age of three don't have a kindergarten place — even though they are legally entitled to one. A 2021 study by the Institute for Employment Research (IAB) found that the more children working people have, the more likely they are to need benefits. If the state invested more in childcare places, Cem Ince argued, "it would enable many people to escape the trap of part-time work." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Nevertheless, Schäfer argues that raising the minimum wage is not the answer, and could be counterproductive: "It could make the situation worse if companies restrict their demand for work because of the higher cost," he told DW. Steinhaus is not convinced: "The employers' associations have made that argument for the last ten years, but in the last ten years that has not been proven true even once," said Steinhaus. "Of course, there are some companies that struggle when the minimum wage is raised, but a lot of companies profit from the fact that they can employ people cheaply." Schäfer also believes that the recent rise in the number of people requiring a top-up is relatively small and that the overall downward trend since 2015 remains intact. Last year's rise, he said, probably had more to do with general economic conditions on the labor market than anything else. Merz, meanwhile, is likely to stick to his plans to reform the unemployment benefit system in an attempt to get more people onto the labor market — even if then some of those workers need state help anyway. "Unfortunately, Merz's arguments about work are the wrong way round," said Steinhaus. "When he says, 'work needs to be worth it,' he means that unemployment benefits should be reduced. But the minimum you need to live on is independent of what poor workers earn. They should earn more, no question. But simply reducing benefits is counterproductive, and it plays the poorest off against each other."While you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.

Women's Euro 2025: Five things to know  – DW – 06/27/2025
Women's Euro 2025: Five things to know  – DW – 06/27/2025

DW

time2 days ago

  • DW

Women's Euro 2025: Five things to know – DW – 06/27/2025

Sixteen of Europe's premier women's national teams are set to compete for continental supremacy. DW has you covered on the key facts as the tournament opens in Switzerland. Euro 2025 is being hosted by Switzerland from July 2 to July 27 and the matches will be played at eight stadiums: in Basel, Bern, Geneva, Zurich, St. Gallen, Lucerne, Thun and Sion. Iceland and Finland open the tournament in Thun on July 2, while hosts Switzerland kick off their campaign three hours later in Basel's St. Jakob-Park stadium – where the final is to be played on July 27. Germany open their campaign against Poland in St. Gallen on July 4. By today's standards this is a relatively small tournament, with just 16 teams, divided into four groups. Each team plays the other three in their group once, with the top two from each advancing to the quarterfinals. Should matches in the knockout stage remain drawn after 90 minutes, two 15-minute periods of extra time are played. If necessary, matches will be decided in penalty shootouts. World Cup champions Spain disappointed by finishing out of the medals at last summer's Paris Olympics, still they top this list as the continent's highest FIFA-ranked women's team (No. 2). By now they should have put the controversy over the unwanted kiss by former FA President Luis Rubiales after the 2023 World Cup final behind them. Normally one of the first teams you would name would be the defending champions, however England have had a list of absences and injuries to deal with in recent months. Key central defender Millie Bright ruled herself our, saying she was at her "mental and physical limit" while fellow Euro 2022 winners Fran Kirby and goalkeeper Mary Earps retired on the eve of the squad announcement. Bayern Munich star Georgia Stanway as well as Lauren Hemp and Alex Greenwood of Manchester City, each missed the bulk of the season after undergoing knee surgery but all make the squad, as does the mercurial Chelsea forward Lauren James, who is nursing a hamstring injury. Germany, finalists in 2022, are just behind Spain in the FIFA rankings but are a lesser-known quantity than they were three years ago. They've gone through a coaching change after the disappointing 2023 World Cup and captain Alexandra Popp retired. New coach Christian Wück is optimistic about his squad, which he hopes will play with a mixture of "joy, enthusiasm, will and conviction." France have established themselves as regular quarterfinalists in recent Euros, making it to the semifinals in 2022 – and the Nations League Final in 2024. They had recently fallen off a bit but climbed back into the top 10 in FIFA's latest women's rankings. Following the retirement of Alexandra Popp, Giulia Gwinn has big boots to fill as Germany's new captain, but is a proven winner with Bayern Munich. She was also a member of the that fell at the last hurdle in England three years ago. Spain boast two recent Ballon d'Or winners in midfielders Aitana Bonmati (2023, 2024) and Alexia Putellas (2021, 2022) – two good reasons for making Spain one of the favorites. Both were members of Spain's World Cup-winning side in 2023 and semifinalists at the Paris Olympics. A teammate of Putellas and Bonmati at Barcelona, Ewa Pajor is making her debut at a major tournament with her national team, as this is the first time that Poland have managed to qualify for either the World Cup or the Euros. They will need the striker to be at the top of her game if they are to come out of a group with Germany, Denmark and Sweden. One of her opponents will be Pernille Harder, a veteran of more than 160 matches for Denmark at 32, she is still going strong for Bayern Munich in the Bundesliga. For the defending champions, Alessia Russo has graduated from Euro 2022 supersub to England's first choice striker. The Arsenal forward was joint top scorer in the domestic Women's Super League (WSL) and won the Champions League with her club. She will be the focal point for a side who have plenty of attacking midfield threats. UEFA announced late last year that it had earmarked a total of €41 million ($47 million) in prize money for the 2025 Women's Euros, representing a 156% increase on the figure from the previous tournament in 2022. In a statement, European football's governing body said the increase in funds reflected "UEFA's on-going commitment to growing women's football across Europe." Still, the women continue to trail far behind the men in this department, with the total prize money for Euro 2024 coming in at €331 million – or about eight times what the women are playing for this summer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store