There is still time for amendments to be made to the assisted dying bill – but it deserves to pass
In particular, we agreed with those who said that the safeguards against coercion needed to be strengthened, and that the requirement for a High Court judge to sign off on a decision to die was unworkable.
To her credit, Kim Leadbeater, the Labour backbencher who is the sponsor of this private member's bill, has taken those concerns seriously and sought to allay them. Since November, the bill has been improved, as was confirmed in the Commons on Friday.
The safeguards have been strengthened and the role of the High Court judge has been replaced by a panel including a lawyer, a social worker and a psychiatrist. This is a better and more workable arrangement, drawing on a range of relevant expertise, rather than a narrowly legal authority.
No doubt the bill could still be improved further. We are worried, for example, that the Royal College of Psychiatrists said earlier this week that it could not support the draft law in its current form because, among other things, 'there are not enough consultant psychiatrists to do what the bill asks'.
But this raises questions that are beyond the scope of the bill itself, and it would be wrong to block the bill on the grounds that it may not be possible for everyone who wants to use its provisions to do so. If assisted dying is right in principle, it is better that it is available to some rather than none.
Among the amendments Ms Leadbeater accepted on Friday was one to exclude anorexia explicitly from the definition of a terminal illness. This is another welcome change.
MPs also agreed amendments to ensure that there is no obligation on anyone, such as medical staff, to take part in a patient's decision to seek an assisted death; to prevent doctors from discussing the option of an assisted death with under 18s, unless the patient has raised it first: and to require the government to publish an assessment of the availability and quality of palliative and end-of-life care.
These are all further improvements to the bill. That is not to say that it has now achieved a state of legislative perfection. We remain concerned, in particular, about whether the protections for people with mental illness are sufficient. The Royal College of Psychiatrists says that 'mental health services simply do not have the resource required to meet a new range of demands'.
Ms Leadbeater should continue to try to meet the concerns expressed in good faith by the bill's critics. There is still time for further amendments to be made before MPs are asked to give their yes or no verdict on the bill next month – and it can then be amended further in the House of Lords.
However, one of the striking contributions to the debate on Friday was made by Marie Tidball, the Labour MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge. As an MP with a disability – she was born with shortened limbs and a single digit on each hand – she said she had voted for the bill in November on the understanding that it would be strengthened and improved, and that she was now satisfied that it had been.
Of course, the bill is not perfect, and never could be, because the subject is so difficult and the circumstances in each case will be different. Ms Leadbeater must continue to make it the best it can be, but those MPs who gave the bill a conditional vote of confidence in November can now safely send it on to its next stage in the upper house.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
DAN HODGES: This is why I think Farage and Rayner are right - Britain is now a nation on the brink
Becky lives about ten minutes from The Bell Hotel in Epping. She used to pass by it when she went for a stroll with her daughter on nearby Bell Common. But that stopped when the asylum seekers arrived. 'I drive her past here now,' she tells me. 'It doesn't feel safe.' It's why she's joined the small group of protesters standing by steel railings, and surrounded by a polite, but large, group of police officers.
Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Leading figures back Telegraph's campaign for prostate cancer screening
Leading figures have thrown their weight behind the Telegraph's campaign for targeted screening for prostate cancer. Men are not offered tests even if they have a family history of the disease, but the UK National Screening Committee is considering whether to recommend the rollout of testing. Launching the campaign, The Telegraph revealed thousands of men are only receiving a diagnosis with prostate cancer after being dismissed by their GP multiple times. Every year about 55,000 men are diagnosed with prostate cancer, the most common cancer in men. Of those, around 10,000 only receive the diagnosis after at least three visits to their GP seeking help, NHS data suggests. Rishi Sunak, the former prime minister, on Saturday backed the call for targeted screening, joining several figures from the world of television and sport who have been treated. Experts believe there is a growing case for targeted screening, meaning that prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests would be offered to those at heightened risk. The plight of men with prostate cancer has been highlighted by Sir Chris Hoy, a six-time Olympic cycling gold medallist, who was diagnosed with terminal cancer that originated in his prostate in 2023. Despite prostate cancer affecting his father and grandfather he was never offered PSA tests. Targeted screening could mean offering checks to men with a family history of the disease, higher genetic risks or those whose ethnic background increases the chance of disease. Men over the age of 50 can request a PSA test but GPs are told not to offer them proactively, and to use their clinical judgment about younger men. Under the current rules, those with symptoms should be offered tests. Wes Streeting, Health Secretary, has said that Sir Chris 'makes a powerful argument' about the case for prostate screening, especially where there is a family history of disease. Every year in the UK around 12,000 men die from it with around half of men only diagnosed when the disease, which can be symptomless, is at a late stage. Mr Sunak, who recently became an ambassador for the charity Prostate Cancer Research, said: 'Too many men are leaving it too late to get checked. They get lulled into a false sense of security by the absence of symptoms. 'In too many cases, by the time there are symptoms that are impacting your lifestyle, it's probably too late. By the time men do seek help, the cancer can be advanced and much harder to treat. 'In some cases people don't realise they are in high-risk groups because of family history or ethnic background. Ignorance kills and that's why we need a targeted national screening programme. It will ensure men are seen and checked before it's too late.' Government advisers have previously been reluctant to recommend the programme because of concerns about PSA tests. However, in recent years the back-up diagnostics used to make a diagnosis have significantly improved. Actor Stephen Fry, 67, was diagnosed in 2018 and underwent surgery to remove his prostate and some lymph nodes. He was diagnosed after a routine PSA blood test and MRI scan following a suggestion from his doctor. He too backed the Telegraph campaign, saying: 'Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men in the UK yet it remains one we speak about too little, test for too late and act on too slowly. Thousands of men are dying needlessly from a disease which, when caught early, is eminently survivable. The status quo must change and it must change now.' He urged the Government and the National Screening Committee to introduce a targeted screening programme, beginning with the men most at risk. Fry said: 'We know early detection of prostate cancer saves lives. It really is that simple. No man should die from a cancer that could have been treated if found in time. We have a moral obligation – as a society and as a health system – to act. The opportunity is before us; the cost of inaction is measured not just in numbers but in fathers, brothers, partners and friends lost and families left shattered.' Dermot Murnaghan, 67, the former Sky News presenter, revealed in June that he has Stage 4 prostate cancer, meaning it has spread to other areas of the body. He said he 'fell through the gaps' in the system, never asking his GP for tests because he assumed that regular private health checks included PSA tests. He told The Telegraph: 'I know first hand the difference early diagnosis can make. We now have the tools to target those most at risk and save thousands of lives each year. It's time we rolled out screening for high-risk groups.' TV presenter Nick Owen, 77, was diagnosed with aggressive prostate cancer in 2023, for which he received treatment. He said: 'Being diagnosed was one of the worst days of my life. It triggered some turbulent times, not just for me but my family too. Life is better now but it's not the same as it was. The groundswell for change in how this awful disease is diagnosed and treated is growing. 'Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in the UK without a screening programme, but the evidence is there to change this. 'Early diagnosis is key and changing that senseless situation where its still incumbent on men to be aware of their risk and proactively talk about it with their GP. Black men and those with a family history are at increased risk, so its so important that they are armed with the full facts. 'I am a dad to three boys all in their late 30s and early 40s. I know about inherited risk. I am really concerned about them. I am very anxious about it. 'We all want a world when there are regular, reliable tests to find prostate cancer in its early stages, when it's easier to treat. Hopefully this campaign can set us on the right path to get there.' Kenny Logan, 53, the former Scotland international and husband of BBC presenter Gabby, underwent treatment for prostate cancer earlier in 2022. He said: 'I was asymptomatic when I was diagnosed in 2022, if I hadn't taken a blood test it might have been too late. I'm grateful to be here, this is why I'm backing The Telegraph's campaign urging the Government to act with urgency.' Bill Turnbull, a TV presenter and journalist, died of the disease in 2022 aged 66. His daughter Flora said: 'A targeted screening programme for men who are most vulnerable of developing prostate cancer will be a step in the right direction. Those at highest risk of this disease deserve better. 'My family and I know how cruel prostate cancer is after watching my dad gradually decline after his diagnosis in 2017. 'I know how decisively and swiftly the illness can act if left unchecked. I really hope this campaign results in better outcomes and a better future for all men and those who love them.' Nick Jones, 61, the founder of Soho House, an international chain of private members' clubs, was diagnosed with a large and aggressive tumour on his prostate which was urgently removed. He said: 'I consider myself one of the lucky ones, my prostate cancer was caught just in time. But luck shouldn't decide who lives and who dies. It's time for the Government to act. Too many lives are on the line.' Journalist Paul Henderson was diagnosed with stage two prostate cancer in June and will be writing a regular column for The Telegraph about going through the process of diagnosis and treatment. He said: 'Prostate cancer awareness shouldn't start with a diagnosis. As the most common cancer in the UK, we all need to be talking about it. We need to understand the risk factors and we need to catch it as early as possible. 'Like almost all men, I never thought it would happen to me. But in all honesty, I never really thought about prostate cancer, full stop. That has to change. And bringing in a national screening programme shouldn't really be a discussion because it's simply a matter of life or death.'
Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Police fail to arrest supporters of banned group Palestine Action in sign demos - despite more than 100 arrests last week
Police have failed to arrest supporters of the banned group Palestine Action as 11 activists sat holding signs for 60 minutes without being detained. Protests were held in both Totnes and Edinburgh today as part of a campaign opposing the proscription of the direct action organisation. But despite more than 100 arrests last week and 200 total arrests since the ban came into force on July 5, protesters today were allowed to hold their signs. It marked a stark contrast to last week when rallies were held in London, Manchester, Bristol, Edinburgh and Truro where activists were physically carried away and detained by police amid shouts of 'fascist' and 'Starmer's project of fear has failed'. The ban on Palestine Action means membership of or support for the direct action group is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000. Due to the ban, inviting or expressing support for the organisation - through chanting, clothing or displaying articles like flags, signs or logos - is a criminal offence. Organisers behind today's protests, Defend Our Juries, have argued police's decision to 'exercise discretion to leave peaceful protestors be' has suggested the ban on the group is unworkable as activists (in Totnes) 'defend our ancient liberties in a small, rural town'. It comes as yesterday UN Human Rights Chief Volker Türk argued the proscription of Palestine Action was a violation of international law. The group was proscribed by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper after its members caused an estimated seven million pounds worth of damage to RAF Brize Norton planes on June 20. Ms Cooper also claimed '[the group's] activity has increased in frequency and severity since the start of 2024 and its methods have become more aggressive, with its members demonstrating a willingness to use violence'. Defend Our Juries says around 500 people are expected to take part in a 'mass sign-holding' on August 9 after today's protesters held signs saying 'I Oppose Genocide. I Support Palestine Action'. In Totnes protesters were joined by dozens more holding signs with their own wording, as well as people holding trade union flags and hundreds of supporters singing 'Lift the ban, now, for Gaza' and applauding speeches calling for the Home Secretary to Lift The Ban. Attending the protest was journalist George Monbiot who argued 'Palestine Action are protesters not terrorists'. He said: 'The proscription of Palestine Action is the most illiberal thing any Home Secretary has done for at least 30 years. 'The result is an Orwellian situation, in which people gently calling for peace are arrested under the Terrorism Act, while the government actively assists Israeli state terror, as it perpetrates genocide in Gaza. This is an assault on free speech, on logic and on human decency.' In a letter to police ahead of the demo, the Totnes residents claimed: 'In continuing to support the Israeli government in its genocide, including through the ongoing export of parts for F-35 fighter jets, the British government is committing crimes under the Genocide Act 1969, which is binding in UK law.' Rallies were also held in Edinburgh and Truro last week to protest the proscription of the campaign group as a terrorist organisation earlier this month. Pictured: Protesters hold up signs in support of Palestine Action at the demonstration in London Similar sign-holding protests are scheduled to take place today in Derry for a third week where, so far, the local police have made no arrests. On Wednesday Derry City & Strabane District Council became the first elected politicians to openly defy the ban and call for it to be lifted. Activists have been protesting against the UK's supplying of arms in Gaza, which has killed more than 57,000 Palestinians since October 7 - when 1,200 Israelis were killed by a Hamas incursion into the country amid the continued occupation of Palestinian territories. Although seemingly absent from today's protest, Devon and Cornwall Police said in a statement on demonstrations last week: 'A number of placards which were contrary to the law remained on display despite police advice. 'Eight people, two men and six women, were arrested on suspicion of offences under Section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000. They remain in police custody.' The force has been contacted for further comment as has Police Scotland.
