
Trump says there could be a Gaza deal next week after Hamas gives ‘positive' response
He told reporters aboard Air Force One there could be a deal on a Gaza ceasefire by next week but that he had not been briefed on the current state of negotiations.
Hamas said Friday it has given a 'positive' response to the latest proposal for a ceasefire in Gaza but said further talks were needed on implementation.
It was not clear if Hamas' statement meant it had accepted the proposal from US President Donald Trump for a 60-day ceasefire. Hamas has been seeking guarantees that the initial truce would lead to a total end to the war, now nearly 21 months old. Trump has been pushing hard for a deal to be reached, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is due to visit the White House next week to discuss a deal.
The Hamas statement came as Israeli airstrikes killed 15 Palestinians in Gaza early Friday, while a hospital said another 20 people died in shootings while seeking aid.
The UN human rights office said it has recorded 613 Palestinians killed within the span of a month in Gaza while trying to obtain aid. Most were killed while trying to reach food distribution points run by an Israeli-backed American organization, while others were massed waiting for aid trucks connected to the United Nations or other humanitarian organizations, it said.
Efforts ongoing to halt the war
Trump said Tuesday that Israel had agreed on terms for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, during which the US would 'work with all parties to end the war.' He urged Hamas to accept the deal before conditions worsen.
In its statement late Friday, Hamas said it 'has submitted its positive response' to Egyptian and Qatari mediators.
It said it is 'fully prepared to immediately enter into a round of negotiations regarding the mechanism for implementing this framework.' It did not elaborate on what needed to be worked out in implementation.
A Hamas official said the ceasefire could start as early as next week but he said talks were needed first to work out how many Palestinian prisoners would be released in return for each freed Israeli hostage and to specify the amount of aid that will enter Gaza during the truce. Hamas has said it wants aid to flow in greater quantities through the United Nations and other humanitarian agencies. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to discuss the response with the press.
The official also said that negotiations would start from the first day of the truce on a permanent ceasefire and full withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza in return for the release of remaining hostages. He said that Trump has guaranteed that the truce will be extended beyond 60 days if needed for those negotiations to reach a deal. There has been no confirmation from the United States of such a guarantee.
Previous rounds of negotiations have run aground over Hamas demands of guarantees that further negotiations would lead to the war's end, while Netanyahu has insisted Israel would resume fighting to ensure the destruction of the militant group.
'We'll see what happens. We're going to know over the next 24 hours,' Trump told reporters on Air Force One late Thursday when asked if Hamas had agreed to the latest framework for a ceasefire.
20 killed Friday while seeking aid
Officials at Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis said at least three Palestinians were killed Friday while on the roads heading to food distribution sites run by the Israeli-backed the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation in southern Gaza.
Since GHF began distributions in late May, witnesses have said almost daily that Israeli troops open fire toward crowds of Palestinians on the roads leading to the food centers. To reach the sites, people must walk several kilometers (miles) through an Israeli military zone where troops control the road.
The Israeli military has said previously it fires warning shots to control crowds or at Palestinians who approach its troops. The GHF has denied any serious injuries or deaths on its sites and says shootings outside their immediate vicinity are under the purview of Israel's military.
On Friday, in reaction to the UN rights agency's report, it said in a statement that it was investigating reports of people killed and wounded while seeking aid. It said it was working at 'minimizing possible friction between the population' and Israeli forces, including by installing fences and placing signs on the routes.
Separately, witnesses have said Israeli troops open fire toward crowds of Palestinians who gather in military-controlled zones to wait for aid trucks entering Gaza for the UN or other aid organizations not associated with GHF.
On Friday, 17 people were killed waiting for trucks in eastern Khan Younis in the Tahliya area, officials at Nasser Hospital said.
Three survivors told the AP they had gone to wait for the trucks in a military 'red zone' in Khan Younis and that troops opened fire from a tank and drones.
It was a 'crowd of people, may God help them, who want to eat and live,' said Seddiq Abu Farhana, who was shot in the leg, forcing him to drop a bag of flour he had grabbed. 'There was direct firing.'
Airstrikes also hit the Muwasi area on the southern end of Gaza's Mediterranean coast, where hundreds of thousands of Palestinians driven from their homes are sheltering in tent camps. Of the 15 people killed in the strikes, eight were women and one was a child, according to the hospital.
Israel's military said it was looking into Friday's reported airstrikes. It had no immediate comment on the reported shootings surrounding the aid trucks.
UN investigates shootings near aid sites
The spokeswoman for the UN human rights office, Ravina Shamdasani, said the agency was not able to attribute responsibility for the killings. But she said 'it is clear that the Israeli military has shelled and shot at Palestinians trying to reach the distribution points' operated by GHF.
In a message to The Associated Press, Shamdasani said that of the total tallied, 509 killings were 'GHF-related,' meaning at or near its distribution sites.
In a statement Friday, GHF cast doubt on the casualty figures, accusing the UN of taking its casualty figures 'directly from the Hamas-controlled Gaza Health Ministry'and of trying 'to falsely smear our effort.'
Shamdasani, the UN rights office spokesperson, told the AP that the data 'is based on our own information gathering through various reliable sources, including medical, human rights and humanitarian organizations.'
Rik Peeperkorn, representative of the World Health Organization, said Nasser Hospital, the biggest hospital operating in the south, receives dozens or hundreds of casualties every day, most coming from the vicinity of the food distribution sites.
The International Committee of the Red Cross also said in late June that its field hospital near one of the GHF sites has been overwhelmed more than 20 times in the previous months by mass casualties, most suffering gunshot injuries while on their way to the food distribution sites.
Also on Friday, Israel's military said two soldiers were killed in combat in Gaza, one in the north and one in the south. Over 860 Israeli soldiers have been killed since the war began, including more than 400 during the fighting in Gaza.
The Israeli military also issued new evacuation orders Friday in northeast Khan Younis in southern Gaza and urged Palestinians to move west ahead of planned military operations against Hamas in the area. The new evacuation zones pushed Palestinians into increasingly smaller spaces by the coast.
The Health Ministry in Gaza said the number of Palestinians killed in the territory has passed 57,000. The ministry does not differentiate between civilians and combatants in its count, but says more than half of the dead are women and children. The ministry is run by medical professionals employed by the Hamas government, and its numbers are widely cited by the UN and international organizations.
The war began when Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking roughly 250 hostages.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Leaders
8 minutes ago
- Leaders
Iran Conflict will End on Negotiating Table: Col. Dahouk
On June 13, 2025, Israel launched a surprise attack on Iran to eliminate its nuclear program and prevent it from acquiring a nuclear weapon. As a result, both countries exchanged intensified aerial and missile attacks for 12 days. Then on June 22, the US intervened in the conflict by striking three nuclear facilities in Iran, namely Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan, using bunker-buster bombs and Tomahawk missiles. Although the US President, Donald Trump, has insisted that the US strikes had set Tehran's nuclear program back 'decades,' adding that Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been 'completely and totally obliterated,' there are reports suggesting the Israeli and US strikes have not completely destroyed Iran's nuclear program. In this context, the Former Senior Military Advisor to US Department of State, Colonel (Ret.) Abbas Dahouk, said that the US strikes caused massive damage to Iran's nuclear program but has not completely destroyed the program, emphasizing that the Iranian nuclear issue will be settled through negotiations. US Strikes Impact Speaking to Al-Arabiya, Col. Dahouk pointed to the damage inflicted by the US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites. 'It seems like the political messaging from all parties go beyond realty on the battlefield,' he said. 'The US strikes on three nuclear sites, Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan, were highly effective and managed to undermine these sites. The US used the most powerful non-nuclear weapon in the world,' Col. Dahouk noted. 'There is a massive damage, but when we talk about the entire Iranian nuclear program, it has not been completely destroyed. There is no way to destroy knowledge or ideology by military power,' he added. Return to Negotiations Col. Dahouk said that the only way to resolve Iran nuclear issue is through negotiations. 'All this has to come to the negotiating table. Battles do not end on battlefields, they end on the negotiating table,' he noted. 'The US will win if Iran returns to negotiations to reach some sort of a deal. Trump may agree to something like that, but it seems that Israel perhaps may have a veto to this process because it wants to completely destroy Iran's nuclear program. So, we will see the outcomes of the next round of negotiations,' Col. Dahouk said. New Round of Talks Washington is preparing for the first direct meeting with Tehran since the US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, in Oslo next week, Axios reported citing two American officials. The US Special Envoy, Steve Witkoff, will meet with the Iranian Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, to resume talks. Commenting on the choice of Oslo as the location for the talks, Col. Dahouk, said: 'I think, not exactly sure why in Oslo, maybe because it is a neutral location and both parties agreed to it. The most important thing here is war and peace.' He pointed to the importance of building trust between the US and Iran. 'The most important thing is trust, which must be established between the US and Iran in the diplomatic process. We have to wait and see what Iran will agree to after the 12-day war, which has not ended in any form. There is a ceasefire, which means a temporary pause in the war and each party may be regrouping and assessing its position. We have to wait and see what Iran will agree to from the US' terms,' he said. Iran's Calculations Asked about Iran's insistence on not compromising and coming to the negotiating table, Col. Dahouk said that it depends on Iran's calculations. 'It is up to Iran. They are the only ones who can provide the reasons behind all this, and their calculations and ideologies,' he said. 'But the Iranian regime knows what happened to other countries when they gave up their nuclear capabilities, such as Libya, Ukraine, Iraq and Syria. It also knows what happened to countries which kept their nuclear programs, such as Pakistan and North Korea,' he added. 'Therefore, they consider the nuclear program the last line of defense and once they lose it, they will lose a lot of political and deterrence capabilities. This could end the Iranian regime. If the regime wants to protect itself, it must protect the nuclear capabilities. This is what they are fighting for,' Col. Dahouk said. Resumption of War Regarding the possibility of the resumption of war between Iran on one side and the Israel and the US on the other side, the Former Senior Military Advisor to US Department of State expected this could happen if negotiations failed. 'We are in a ceasefire. And during ceasefires, warring parties regroup and rearrange their political and economic capabilities. If the talks are not held, there might be another strike or more attacks,' Col. Dahouk noted. Short link : Post Views: 9


Leaders
an hour ago
- Leaders
Hamas Responds Positively to Ceasefire Proposal as Israelis Clash over Gaza Plans
The Palestinian movement Hamas said on Friday it had delivered a 'positive' response to the latest proposal for a ceasefire in Gaza. Meanwhile, Israeli leaders clashed over plans for Gaza, as the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, ordered an evacuation plan to the south of the Strip, while the Israeli military chief of staff warned of the plan's consequences. Positive Response In a statement, Hamas said it had completed internal consultations regarding the latest ceasefire proposal, offered by the mediators Egypt and Qatar to stop the ongoing aggression against the people of Gaza. In the light of this, the Palestinian movement said it had responded positively to the proposal, stressing that it was fully prepared to immediately enter into a round of negotiations regarding the mechanism for implementing this framework. An Egyptian security official told Reuters that Hamas' response included 'positive signs' that an agreement is near. However, Hamas has some demands that need to be worked on, he added. Discussing Gaza Ceasefire Details Despite Hamas' positive response, the Palestinian movement suggested that further talks were needed on the implementation mechanisms. The US President, Donald Trump, had proposed a 60-day ceasefire, during which the US would work with all parties to end the war. Trump said on Tuesday that Israel had agreed to his proposal and urged Hamas to do the same. Speaking to the Associated Press (AP), a Hamas official said that negotiations are necessary before the ceasefire begins to determine the number of Palestinian prisoners who will be released in exchange for each freed Israeli hostage, as well as the amount of aid that will enter Gaza during the truce. Furthermore, negotiations will begin on the truce's first day on a permanent ceasefire and full withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza in return for the release of remaining hostages, the official said. Trump's Optimism Trump expressed optimism regarding the ceasefire in Gaza following Hamas' response. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One late on Friday, Trump said: 'They said they gave me a positive response? Well, that's good.' The US President added that he had not been briefed on the current state of negotiations, however, 'There could be a Gaza deal next week,' he said. Trump also said that he would be 'very firm' with Netanyahu on the urgency for a quick ceasefire in Gaza. On Wednesday, Trump said that Israel had agreed to the conditions required to finalize a 60-day ceasefire, following a 'long and productive' meeting between his representatives and Israeli officials on Gaza. He urged Hamas to accept the ceasefire deal. 'I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE,' he wrote on Truth Social. A Saudi Priority Saudi Arabia has stressed its position regarding the urgency of a ceasefire in Gaza, according to Reuters. In the light of this, the Saudi Foreign Minister, Prince Faisal bin Farhan, said that the Kingdom's top priority is a permanent ceasefire in the Strip. 'What we are seeing is the Israelis are crushing Gaza, the civilian population of Gaza. This is completely unnecessary, completely unacceptable and has to stop,' Prince Faisal said during a joint press conference with his Russian counterpart, Sergey Lavrov, in Moscow. Israel's Position on Gaza Ceasefire Netanyahu has yet to comment on Trump's announcement and Hamas' response. The Israeli Prime Minister is set to meet with Trump in Washington on Monday. But so far, their public statements have shown a wide gap, as Netanyahu has insisted on disarming Hamas – a demand that the Palestinian group has firmly rejected to discuss. 'There will not be a Hamas. There will not be a Hamastan. We're not going back to that. It's over,' Netanyahu said on Wednesday. Meanwhile, an Israeli official was quoted by Israeli media as saying that Tel Aviv had received and was considering Hamas' response to the ceasefire proposal. Israeli Dispute over Gaza Plans The Israeli media reported a clash between Netanyahu and the Israeli military chief of staff, Eyal Zamir, during a cabinet meeting late on Thursday. According to the Times of Israel, Ynet and Channel 12, Netanyahu asked Zamir to 'work on a wide-scale evacuation plan of the population to the south of the Strip' and lay siege to the north. Zamir responded by asking: 'Do you want a military government [in Gaza]? Who will govern 2 million people?' Netanyahu said that the alternative to the evacuation plan was to capture the entire Strip and risk harming the hostages. The Israeli military chief rejected the evacuation plan. 'We have not agreed to this. To control these people who are hungry and angry could lead to a loss of control and as a result of that loss of control they could turn on the (Israeli military),' he warned. But Netanyahu insisted on his position, ordering Zamir to 'Prepare an evacuation plan — I want to see it when I return from Washington.' Short link : Post Views: 22


Leaders
an hour ago
- Leaders
Big Beautiful Bill: Trump Signs Controversial Bill into Law
The US President, Donald Trump, signed into law his landmark tax and spending cuts bill, known as the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill.' The signing ceremony coincided with the US Independence Day on July 4 and featured a lavish outdoor celebration at the White House. Celebratory Signing Ceremony On July 4, 2025, a day after the US Congress narrowly passed the bill, Trump signed the legislation in a splashy Independence Day ceremony at the White House, with stealth bombers and fighter jets flying over the White House and hundreds of his supporters in attendance, according to Reuters. 'This is a triumph of democracy on the birthday of democracy, and I have to say that the people are happy,' the US President addressed his supporters from the balcony of the South Lawn alongside first lady, Melania Trump. 'I've never seen people so happy in our country because of that, because so many different groups of people are being taken care of: the military, civilians of all types, jobs of all types. So you have the biggest tax cut, the biggest spending cut, the largest border security investment in American history,' Trump said. Controversial Bill The signing of the bill came after days of tense negotiations as several Republican Party members opposed the bill, fearing it would raise the US debt, and Democrats accused it of rewarding the wealthy and punishing the poor. However, the bill ended with only two House Republicans voting against it, joining the 212 Democrats opposed to it. Finally, the bill narrowly passed by 218 votes to 214. The House Democratic Leader, Hakeem Jeffries, delivered a lengthy speech, which lasted for nearly nine hours, slamming the bill as a giveaway to the wealthy that would strip low-income Americans of federally-backed health insurance and food aid benefits. Moreover, the Democratic National Committee Chair, Ken Martin, blasted the Republicans for backing the law. 'Today, Donald Trump sealed the fate of the Republican Party, cementing them as the party for billionaires and special interests – not working families,' he said in a statement. 'This legislation will hang around the necks of the GOP for years to come. This was a full betrayal of the American people. Today, we are putting Republicans on notice: you will lose your majority,' Martin added. Big Beautiful Bill Key Takeaways The One Big, Beautiful Bill, which Trump calls 'the biggest bill of its type in history,' includes extending the 2017 tax cuts approved during Trump's first term and major cuts to Medicaid spending. It also includes new tax breaks on tipped income, overtime and Social Security; increasing defense budget by $150 billion; phasing out Biden-era clean energy tax credits; and boosting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) with $100 billion. Although Trump and his Republican allies have argued that the legislation will boost economic growth, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that the overall package will increase budget deficits by $3.4 trillion through 2034. Musk's New Party Trump's Big Beautiful Bill has reignited the clash between the US President and his former billionaire ally, Elon Musk. The CEO of SpaceX and Tesla slammed the bill, threatening to unseat Republican lawmakers who support it and to form a new political party if the bill passes in the Senate. Hours before Trump signed the new legislation, Musk doubled down on his threat to form a new party, asking his followers whether he should move forward with creating the America Party. In a poll on X, Musk said: 'Independence Day is the perfect time to ask if you want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system! Should we create the America Party?' Trump-Musk Clash Over the past month, Musk attacked Trump's bill in a series of posts on X. 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame! And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth,' he wrote. The tech billionaire also refloated the idea of forming a new political party. 'If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day. Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE,' he said. In response, Trump accused Musk of opposing the bill because he would lose electric vehicle (EV) and solar energy subsidies granted under the federal electric vehicle tax credits. 'Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa. No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE. Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!' Trump posted on Truth Social. Short link : Post Views: 7