logo
'Can you hit Moscow, St. Petersburg?' Trump privately asked Zelenskyy if Ukraine could strike deep inside Russia

'Can you hit Moscow, St. Petersburg?' Trump privately asked Zelenskyy if Ukraine could strike deep inside Russia

First Posta day ago
Trump privately encouraged Zelenskyy to intensify attacks within Russian territory, asking whether Ukraine could target cities like Moscow and St. Petersburg if provided with the appropriate weapons, according to a report, citing sources read more
Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and US President Donald Trump appear at a meeting, while they attend the funeral of Pope Francis, at the Vatican, April 26, 2025. (Photo: Reuters)
US President Donald Trump privately encouraged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to intensify attacks within Russian territory, asking whether Ukraine could target cities like Moscow and St. Petersburg if provided with the appropriate weapons, according to a report, citing two people briefed on the conversation.
'Volodymyr, can you hit Moscow? . . . Can you hit St Petersburg too?' Financial Times quoted Trump as saying during a July 4 call with Zelensky.
Zelenskyy reportedly replied, 'Absolutely. We can if you give us the weapons.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The provocative remarks made by Trump to Zelenskyy reportedly came just a day after a tense phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin, which Trump later described as 'bad,' according to Financial Times, citing sources.
Trump's conversation with Zelenskyy is being viewed as a direct response to Putin's refusal to engage in US-backed ceasefire negotiations. The behind-the-scenes exchange reflects growing frustration within the Trump administration over Moscow's unwillingness to compromise and signals a sharp shift from Trump's earlier campaign pledge to avoid deeper US involvement in foreign conflicts.
It also contrasts with his traditionally cautious stance toward confronting Russia.
Trump signalled support for Ukraine launching long-range strikes, describing the approach as a way to 'make them (Russians) feel the pain' and force the Kremlin to negotiate, reported FT, citing two individuals familiar with the call.
While it is still uncertain whether the US will supply long-range weapons to Ukraine, a Western official familiar with the discussions told FT that Trump's remarks reflect a growing sentiment among Ukraine's Western allies, one that supports more aggressive strikes inside Russian territory to 'bring the war to Muscovites.'
This view, the official added, is quietly gaining momentum among American policymakers as frustration with Moscow's stance continues to build.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Meanwhile, neither the White House nor the Ukrainian president's office has responded to requests for comment on the report.
On Monday, in major policy shift, President Trump announced new weapons for Ukraine and threatened sanctions on countries that continue buying Russian exports unless Moscow agrees to a peace deal within 50 days.
Sitting alongside Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte in the Oval Office, Trump expressed frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
'My conversations with him are very pleasant, and then the missiles go off at night,' Trump told reporters, adding that Putin had repeatedly broken promises to end the war. 'He's fooled a lot of people,' Trump said, calling Putin a 'tough guy.'
'He fooled Clinton, Bush, Obama, Biden — he didn't fool me,' he added.
Trump said billions of dollars in advanced weapons would be sent to Ukraine, including urgently requested Patriot air defence systems.
'We're going to make top-of-the-line weapons, and they'll be sent to Nato,' he said, clarifying that Nato allies would cover the costs.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'It's a full complement with the batteries,' he noted. 'We're going to have some come very soon, within days… a couple of the countries that have Patriots are going to swap over and will replace the Patriots with the ones they have.'
Up to 17 Patriot batteries ordered by other countries could be diverted to Ukraine 'very quickly,' he said.
Trump's threat to impose secondary sanctions—targeting nations that continue to buy Russian oil—would mark a significant escalation in Western sanctions policy.
Currently, while Western nations have largely cut direct financial ties with Moscow, they have stopped short of penalising other countries such as China and India for continuing to import Russian oil, allowing the Kremlin to earn hundreds of billions in revenues since the war began.
Bipartisan support is growing in Congress for legislation that would authorise such measures.
With inputs from agencies
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump expected to fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell soon after lawmakers' support
Trump expected to fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell soon after lawmakers' support

First Post

time23 minutes ago

  • First Post

Trump expected to fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell soon after lawmakers' support

In an unprecedented move that is bound to rattle investors and sow fundamental questions about the independence of monetary policymaking, US President Donald Trump is expected to soon fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. read more In an unprecedented decision that will kill the independent monetary policy of the United States, President Donald Trump is expected to soon fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and replace him with a puppet who would cut interest rates to his liking. Multiple media reports said that Trump has asked Republican lawmakers whether he should fire Powell and indicated to them he wanted to fire him. The New York Times reported that Trump showed a group of Republican lawmakers a draft of a letter firing Powell and asked them if he should go ahead with it. Sources said that he indicated in the meeting that he wanted to go ahead with firing Powell. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Separately, Bloomberg reported a White House official as saying that Trump is likely to fire Powell soon and discussed the matter with Republican lawmakers. For months, Trump has been trashing Powell for not cutting interest rates to his liking. On his part, Powell has insisted that the Fed would cut the interest rate at an appropriate time on the basis of economic metrics and would not follow political directives. Any decision to fire Trump will likely disrupt the markets and shake faith in the US economy. In its history of more than a century, no Chair of the Federal Reserve has been fired by any president. The independence of the Federal Reserve in setting the monetary policy of the country irrespective of the prevailing political environment is the bedrock of the central bank. Undoing the independence could disrupt the markets and set the stage for disastrous monetary policy that prioritises the president's whims and fancies and not economic prudence. The Bloomberg reported that Republican lawmakers with whom Trump discussed the matter supported his move to fire Powell. Under the law, the president may only fire the Federal Reserve Chair for 'cause'. While the law does not define what cause means, legal precedent states that cause compromises inefficiency, negligence of duty, and malfeasance in office, and states that policy disagreements is not a cause for firing. Even though Trump's cause is clearly policy disagreement, he could announce the firing of Powell anyway. He would be confident that any legal challenge to the firing would be dismissed by the conservative majority of the Supreme Court that he has in his pocket. Trump himself appointed three of the Supreme Court judges in his first term who have almost always done his bidding on the bench. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

Trump admin calls for calm as Israel strikes Syria amid Druze–Bedouin clashes: ‘We're very concerned about it'
Trump admin calls for calm as Israel strikes Syria amid Druze–Bedouin clashes: ‘We're very concerned about it'

Mint

time23 minutes ago

  • Mint

Trump admin calls for calm as Israel strikes Syria amid Druze–Bedouin clashes: ‘We're very concerned about it'

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio expressed deep concern on Wednesday (July 16) over escalating violence in southern Syria, following a second consecutive day of Israeli airstrikes targeting Syrian government forces near the Israeli frontier. 'We're very concerned about it,' Rubio told reporters in Washington. 'We want it to stop. We're talking to both sides, all relevant sides, on this, and hopefully can bring it to a conclusion.' Tom Barrack, the US special envoy for Syria, said the United States was actively engaging with "all sides to navigate towards calm and integration." The renewed conflict centers around the southwestern Syrian province of Sweida, a predominantly Druze region, where armed clashes erupted earlier this week between Druze militias and government-aligned Bedouin fighters. Israel launched strikes on Syrian tanks and troops, claiming it was acting to prevent harm to the Druze minority and to enforce a demilitarized zone near its border. According to a Reuters journalist on the ground, drones and at least four airstrikes were heard over the predominantly Druze city of Sweida. A damaged tank was seen being towed away, bursts of gunfire echoed through the city, and three bodies were observed lying on the ground. The violence, which erupted on Sunday, has already claimed dozens of lives. Syria's foreign ministry condemned the Israeli strikes, saying it holds Israel "fully responsible" for the attacks and their consequences. The ministry vowed to protect all Syrian citizens, including the Druze. A statement from the Syrian presidency said the country would take legal action against 'anyone proven to have committed violations or abuses, regardless of their rank or position.' Tensions spiked following a video statement from influential Druze religious figure Sheikh Hikmat al-Hajri, who accused Syrian government troops of breaching a ceasefire agreement. 'We are being subject to a total war of extermination,' al-Hajri said. 'I call on all Druze to confront this barbaric campaign with all means available.' Shortly after, Syrian Defense Minister Murhaf Abu Qasra announced a ceasefire and said government troops would only fire in self-defense. He also deployed military police to Sweida to "control military behaviour and hold violators accountable," according to Syria's state news agency SANA. Despite the ceasefire declaration, Reuters reported ongoing shelling and violence in Sweida city, with Syrian army convoys entering neighborhoods and continuing to fire on residential areas. In a joint statement, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz said Israel ordered strikes to defend the Druze and enforce a longstanding demilitarization agreement in southern Syria. 'Israel is committed to preventing harm to the Druze in Syria due to the deep brotherhood alliance with our Druze citizens in Israel,' the statement read. 'We are acting to prevent the Syrian regime from harming them and to ensure the demilitarization of the area adjacent to our border with Syria.' The Israeli military said on Monday it struck several Syrian tanks approaching Sweida to "prevent their arrival to the area" and mitigate potential threats to Israeli territory. The violence marks a major challenge for Syria's interim president Ahmed al-Sharaa, who has struggled to establish control since toppling Bashar al-Assad in December. Sharaa has received backing from the Trump administration but continues to face distrust from minority communities, especially after mass killings of Alawites in March. The latest round of clashes between Druze fighters and government-aligned Bedouin militias has displaced thousands, and competing statements from Druze leaders have complicated efforts to stabilize the region. Earlier Tuesday, Druze spiritual leaders issued a statement calling on militants to surrender and cooperate with incoming Syrian troops. However, al-Hajri later claimed the statement was 'imposed' by Damascus and said Syrian forces violated the agreement by continuing to fire on civilians.

Donald Trump signals over 10% tariffs in India-US trade deal framework
Donald Trump signals over 10% tariffs in India-US trade deal framework

Business Standard

time23 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Donald Trump signals over 10% tariffs in India-US trade deal framework

United States (US) President Donald Trump has said that a trade deal with India would be on the 'same line' as that with Indonesia, which will face a 19 per cent tariff – thus suggesting that India, too, may have to brace for tariffs exceeding the 10 per cent threshold under the proposed interim agreement. On Tuesday, Trump said the bilateral trade pact with Indonesia would result in tariff- and non-tariff-barrier-free access for US goods to the Indonesian market. In exchange, Indonesia will face a 19 per cent tariff on its exports to the US, down from the 32 per cent initially proposed last week. 'We have a couple of those deals that are going to be announced. India basically is working along that same line (as Indonesia). We're going to have access to India; and you have to understand, we had no access into any of these countries. Our people couldn't go in. Now we're getting access because of what we're doing with the tariffs,' Trump told reporters. Trade economist Biswajit Dhar said the 10 per cent base tariff is likely to remain, and India should prepare for higher duties. 'I don't think the 10 per cent tariff will go away. That's the bottom line, with which Trump is negotiating. The rest is up to the President,' he said. 'We should get a deal which doesn't include our sensitive sectors, such as agriculture and dairy. We need to protect our main cereals and the (US) push for exporting GM (genetically modified) crops.' Ajay Srivastava, a former trade ministry official and founder of the Delhi-based think tank Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), warned against rushed negotiations and emphasised the importance of transparency. India must negotiate transparently, guard against one-sided outcomes, and not succumb to pressure for quick, symbolic agreements that compromise its long-term economic interests, he said. 'India must insist on a jointly issued, written statement before acknowledging any agreement. Verbal assurances or informal understandings --especially those announced on social media -- are no substitute for formal, verified commitments.' A team of officials from New Delhi is currently in Washington to negotiate an interim trade agreement ahead of the August 1 deadline. India has been pressing for an exemption from Washington's proposed 26 per cent reciprocal tariff and the existing additional 10 per cent duty. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said that as part of the deal, Indonesia has committed to buying $15 billion in US energy, $4.5 billion in American agricultural products, and 50 Boeing jets, including several 777s. 'For the first time ever, our ranchers, farmers, and fishermen will have complete and total market access to the Indonesian market of over 280 million people,' Trump wrote. 'If there is any transhipment from a higher tariff country, then that tariff will be added on to the tariff that Indonesia is paying,' he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store