Constituents critical of York MP's suspension
It came after she was a key figure in organising a rebellion against her party's welfare reform bill, which she said would introduce "Dickensian cuts belonging to a different era and a different party".
Maskell defended her decision as standing up for disabled people but the prime minister argued the MPs were "elected on a Labour manifesto" and so should back the government's agenda.
But what do Maskell's York constituents think? People in Acomb have spoken to the BBC about their reaction to the news.
'Absolutely disgusting'
Richard Lowe, from the Huntington Road area of York, is visiting shops on Front Street with his wife.
When quizzed about Maskell's suspension, he says this is a topic the couple has discussed in depth, due to their careers in healthcare.
"Rachael Maskell, for me, embodies what the Labour movement should be," the former mental health nurse says.
"My thoughts are that the suspension is absolutely disgusting.
"As she says, she's been a Labour member for 34 years, she's stood up for disability rights, she's a disability campaigner."
As an ex-nurse, Richard says he has always had a duty of care to his patients - and that Maskell has a duty of care to her constituents.
"I won't be voting Labour at the next general election," he says.
"If Rachael Maskell is still an independent MP, I'll vote for her but I'm not voting Labour.
"I hope she's retaken into the Labour Party very shortly. I can't see it happening myself, but there you go."
'Where are the lines?'
Sat on a bench alongside their dog are Angela and her mother-in-law, Carole, who both live locally.
They explain they do not share the same political views as Maskell but were on the fence about Sir Keir Starmer's decision to suspend her.
"It's difficult, isn't it? Everybody's entitled to their own opinion but where are the lines?" Angela asks.
"I think Labour has made a lot of terrible choices in the past year or so.
"They're not doing themselves any favours."
However, they both thought the welfare system needed an overhaul.
"If you're a disabled person, you should be entitled to a benefit if that benefit is appropriate for your disability," Angela says.
"But I think possibly there's been a bit of a trend of people claiming disability benefits and I don't think there's been enough checks into the background of what's actually needed for some people."
Carole believes more "double checks" should be made to see what benefit is fair for each claimant.
'Over the top'
Further down the street, Carolina Ficco, 62, also stops to chat.
She believes that no matter the political party, MPs should not be punished for representing their constituents.
"I think it was extremely harsh and over the top that she's been suspended," Carolina says.
"Everybody is entitled to an opinion and if she's representing people, why should she be dismissed for that?
"That's what politicians are supposed to be about, they're a voice for us. It's bang out of order."
She says Maskell's suspension is "absolutely, totally wrong".
The prime minister defended his decision to suspend Maskell, along with Neil Duncan-Jordan, Brian Leishman and Chris Hinchliff.
He said: "I am determined we will change this country for the better for millions of working people – and I'm not going to be deflected from that.
"Therefore, we have to deal with people who repeatedly break the whip.
"Everyone was elected as a Labour MP on a Labour manifesto of change and everybody needs to deliver as a Labour government."
In a statement, the York Central MP said she wanted this Labour government to be the "very best ever" and said she had "used every opportunity" to reach into government to be an advocate for disabled people.
"I am, of course, sad of the decision to suspend me for simply seeking the very best for others," Maskell said.
"As someone of deep conviction and faith, I bring these values with me in all I do in representing my constituents and ensuring that I advocate for them, keep them safe and ensure that their voices are taken into the very heart of politics."
Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Starmer says he had to 'deal with' rebel Labour MPs
Labour suspends four MPs after welfare cuts rebellion
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Farage slams secret Afghan refugee resettlement to UK, claims sex offenders among arrivals
Nigel Farage, the leader of the right-wing Reform UK party, slammed the Conservative and Labour parties after it was revealed this week thousands of Afghan refugees were secretly resettled into the country without the public's knowledge. Farage claimed some of those Afghans are sex offenders, sparking a row with the ruling Labour Party, which denied the claims. Around 4,500 Afghans have been relocated to the U.K. so far with around 6,900 expected to be relocated overall. European Nations Demand Power To Deport Immigrants Who Commit Crimes Meanwhile, waves of migrants continue arriving by boat, further inflaming public frustration over unchecked immigration. "Amongst the number that have come are convicted sex offenders – I am not, I promise you, making any of this up, and the total cost of this operation has been a staggering £7 billion [$9 billion]," Farage said in a post on X. Read On The Fox News App "The numbers are off the charts, the cost is beyond comprehension and the threat to women walking the streets of this country, frankly, is incalculable." Relocating the 6,900 Afghans is expected to cost £850 million [$1.1 billion]. The £7 billion Farage referenced is likely the total cost of all Afghan resettlement programs since 2021 of about 36,000 Afghans through multiple schemes. The British government earlier this week revealed it secretly resettled thousands of Afghan nationals in the U.K. after a catastrophic data breach exposed nearly 19,000 applicants who had worked with U.K. forces, an operation kept under wraps by a rare "super injunction" that barred even the mention of its existence. The injunction was lifted Tuesday in conjunction with a decision by Britain's current Labour Party government to make the program public. 'Afghans For Trump' Group Feels Abandoned After Administration Revokes Refugee Protections A spreadsheet containing the personal information of the nearly 19,000 people who had applied to relocate to the U.K. after the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan was accidentally released in 2022 because of a defense official's email error. The government only became aware of the leak when some of the data was published on Facebook 18 months later. "I can't think of a better example of the total incompetence, dishonesty and genuine lack of understanding of what the priorities of a British government are than this Afghan scandal," Farage added. But U.K. Defense Secretary John Healey denied any known sex offenders had been allowed into the U.K. under the program and insisted everyone had been checked "carefully" for any criminal records He said if Farage had any "hard evidence," he should report it to the police. "Anyone who has come into this country under any of the government schemes that was under the previous government and now from Afghanistan is checked carefully for security, checked carefully for any of those sort of criminal records that would preclude and prevent them coming to this country," Healey told Times Radio, according to The Sun. British soldiers were sent to Afghanistan as part of an international deployment against al Qaeda and Taliban forces in the war on terror after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. At the peak of the operation, there were almost 10,000 U.K. troops in the country, mostly in Helmand province in the south. The Associated Press contributed to this article source: Farage slams secret Afghan refugee resettlement to UK, claims sex offenders among arrivals Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Old enough to pay tax, old enough to vote': Inverclyde's MSYPs on voting age change
INVERCLYDE'S representatives at the Scottish Youth Parliament have welcomed the decision to lower the voting age for general elections to 16. The UK Government has announced plans to lower the voting age across the country to let 16 and 17-year-olds vote, meaning these born in 2013 will be able to cast a ballot in the 2029 general election. In Scotland, those as young as 16 have been voting since 2016 when they were granted the right by Holyrood to vote in Scottish Parliamentary elections and local elections. Matthew Quinn MSYP (Image: Contributed) Members of the Scottish Youth Parliament (MSYP) for Inverclyde, Matthew Quinn and Maya McCrae, have both praised the Westminster decision and have offered some advice for first time voters. Matthew said lowering the voting age is a 'major victory' for young people. He said: 'One of the main Scottish critiques of the Westminster system is that it is not always representative of the people. I feel this decision is an important step towards changing that. 'I would say to younger voters who will be voting [for the first time], do your own research and try to become as informed as possible. 'It is easier to make a choice in an election if you have a good idea of all the parties, candidates and what they stand for.' Despite his praise for the plans, Matthew also says that this policy change 'merely gives young people what they deserve'. Maya McCrae (Image: George Munro) Maya has also welcomed the decision, saying it is a change the electoral system 'really needed'. She told the Tele: 'I think this is fantastic news and proves that if young people stick to our guns and campaign for what we want, we will see results. 'Young people working alongside the SYP have put in so much time and energy to create the impact that was needed to see this policy pushed through and I'm just delighted to see our hard work pay off. 'With voter turnout consistently decreasing and with the change in the political atmosphere, young people deserve to have their say. 'If you're old enough to pay taxes, you're old enough to vote on how that money should be spent.' Other News Calls for a new Port Glasgow health centre as building is 'past its due date' Concern raised over £6m Greenock street works after road surface is torn up Athletes of all abilities encouraged to join Inverclyde's triathlon next month Maya's advice to young voters is to become involved in politics early on and to be wary of using social media as a primary source of information when it comes to election time. She added: 'With the rise in social media becoming the primary source for news, I think it's really important that governments focus on decreasing the levels of propaganda and misinformation that's spread across the internet, and that there's a real drive to encourage young people to get involved in politics from as early as possible.' Alongside this change, voters will now be able to use UK-issued bank cards as a form of voter ID, providing the card displays the elector's name.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Home Secretary says ‘gap in law' on violent attackers will be closed
Police and courts will be given powers to deal with suspects believed to be planning mass killings, according to the Home Secretary. Yvette Cooper said the new tools will enable the criminal justice system to 'close the gap' between terror suspects, who can be jailed for life for planning attacks, and individuals not driven by a particular ideology. Police would be given powers to apprehend them before they carry out attacks. Ms Cooper told BBC Radio 4's State of Terror series: 'There is a gap in the law around the planning of mass attacks that can be just as serious (as terrorism) in their implications for communities, their impact, the devastation that they can cause and the seriousness of the crime. 'We will tighten legislation so that that is taken as seriously as terrorism.' She said legislation would be similar to that which allows police to arrest terror suspects for steps taken to prepare for an attack, such as research, which is not currently available without links to an ideological cause. 'We've seen cases of growing numbers of teenagers potentially radicalising themselves online and seeing all kinds of extremist material online in their bedrooms,' she said. 'We have to make sure that the systems can respond while not taking our eye off the ball of the more long-standing ideological threats.' Southport attacker Axel Rudakubana, who killed three girls at a dance class, is among the individuals who could have been covered by the legislation.
