logo
Co-organiser of independent book fair rebuts ‘soft resistance' accusation from Beijing-backed paper Wen Wei Po

Co-organiser of independent book fair rebuts ‘soft resistance' accusation from Beijing-backed paper Wen Wei Po

HKFP5 days ago
A co-organiser of an independent book fair in Hong Kong has rebutted accusations made by Beijing-backed newspaper Wen Wei Po, which alleged that the event and participating bookstores carried out 'soft resistance.'
In a front-page report on Monday, the paper said that 'Reading Everywhere – Hong Kong Independent Book Fair and Bookstore Festival' was full of 'an atmosphere of soft resistance.'
The report also carried the tag, 'Cracking down on soft resistance.'
The independent book fair was co-organised by and held at Hunter Bookstore, an indie bookshop in Sham Shui Po, from Thursday to Monday.
As part of the event, a series of talks on new books also took place at different independent bookshops, such as Book Punch and Have a Nice Stay.
Wen Wei Po alleged that 'Reading Everywhere' sold books with messages that 'oppose China and disturb Hong Kong.' The paper cited as examples: a biography of the jailed pro-democracy media tycoon Jimmy Lai, a memoir of former Democratic Party lawmaker Emily Lau, and a new novel written by pro-democracy political commentator Johnny Lau.
According to the report, an undercover Wen Wei Po reporter went to the book fair and asked a staff member at Hunter Bookstore whether the store was selling a biography of Lai. The shop attendant said the book would be on sale after the book fair.
'This indicated the staff member was well aware of the 'soft resistance' nature of the book,' the report read.
In response to HKFP's enquiry, Leticia Wong, director of Hunter Bookstore, said Lai's biography was published by a Taiwanese publisher and copies of the book had just arrived a few days ago.
She said she did not display the new book at the book fair because the event focused more on local publishing.
'It's not because we're hiding the title,' Wong said in Cantonese. 'If the government said we can't sell this book, we immediately wouldn't sell it. But right now the government has said nothing.'
Wen Wei Po also accused the independent book fair of placing a donation box for the Hong Kong Journalists Association (HKJA). The paper previously labelled the press union an 'anti-government political organisation.'
Wong rejected the accusation, saying that the book fair did not place any donation box for the HKJA nor sell any merchandise of the organisation. 'It's ridiculous. They even got the facts wrong,' she said.
Wen Wei Po also alleged that Book Punch ordered Lai's biography for readers and sold HKJA merchandise.
Pong Yat-ming, owner of Book Punch, told HKFP on Monday that they sold HKJA keyrings and they had no further response to Wen Wei Po's report.
'Surprised'
A journalist-turned-politician, Lau is a member of the city's largest pro-democracy party, the Democratic Party, and served as a lawmaker from 1991 to 2016. She published her memoir, Stay Here, in July.
The pro-Beijing paper referred to her new book as an example of 'soft resistance' and called Lau a 'lawmaker of the Mutual Destruction Camp.' It also alleged that she criticised the 'enhanced' election systems as a 'regression of democracy' in the book.
'Mutual destruction' is a phrase arising from the 2019 protests and unrest, which expresses a willingness by protesters to exhaust all means, even at the cost of sacrifice, to bring about justice or damage the government.
'I am surprised. I never knew that I would be categorised as the Mutual Destruction Camp,' Emily told HKFP in Cantonese. 'In fact, this was the first time I was called this way.'
Many people have criticised the current election system as a 'regression of democracy,' Lau said. 'It's just my personal opinion. Of course, there are people praising it as 'progress of democracy.' I hope there is still freedom of speech in Hong Kong.'
In March 2021, Beijing passed legislation to ensure 'patriots' govern Hong Kong. The move reduced democratic representation in the legislature, tightened control of elections and introduced a pro-Beijing vetting panel to select candidates. The Hong Kong government said the overhaul would ensure the city's stability and prosperity. But the changes also prompted international condemnation, as it makes it near-impossible for pro-democracy candidates to stand.
'Soft resistance'
Since 2021, Chinese and Hong Kong officials have mentioned the phrase as a threat to national security but have not been specific about what it means.
In late June, Secretary for Justice Paul Lam gave an explanation of 'soft resistance' for the first time.
He said there were three main elements of soft resistance: making false or misleading statements, expressing them irrationally and with emotional bias, and with the intention of creating a misunderstanding about the Chinese and Hong Kong governments and their policies.
Lam said on Commercial Radio on Saturday that some forms of 'soft resistance' actually do not violate the law, and the authorities should utilise 'soft power' to handle 'soft resistance.'
'[We] should make sure [the public] understand what the government is doing and what is happening in our country… and to enhance people's understanding and belonging to the country,' Lam said in Cantonese.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Failure' for Taiwan's William Lai as all 24 opposition KMT lawmakers survive mass recall vote
‘Failure' for Taiwan's William Lai as all 24 opposition KMT lawmakers survive mass recall vote

South China Morning Post

time6 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

‘Failure' for Taiwan's William Lai as all 24 opposition KMT lawmakers survive mass recall vote

Voters in Taiwan on Saturday resoundingly rejected a mass recall campaign targeting opposition lawmakers, dealing a major setback to Taiwanese leader William Lai Ching-te and his ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) while handing the Kuomintang (KMT) a surprise reprieve. All 24 lawmakers from the Beijing-friendly KMT who faced recall votes survived, in what analysts described as a serious political miscalculation by the DPP and its affiliated civil society groups. The backfiring of the DPP's high octane campaign, which was championed as a way to root out 'pro-China forces' and safeguard Taiwan's democracy, exposes growing public fatigue with 'anti-China' rhetoric as a blanket strategy. Beijing, which regards Taiwan as a part of China to be reunited by force if necessary, has intensified military pressure on the island since Lai took office in May last year and provoked Beijing with what it calls 'separatist' and pro-independence remarks. 01:40 Tens of thousands rally in Taiwan against William Lai as recall turmoil engulfs legislature Tens of thousands rally in Taiwan against William Lai as recall turmoil engulfs legislature The United States, like most countries, does not recognise self-governed Taiwan as independent. However, it is opposed to any unilateral change to the status quo and is committed to supplying Taiwan with weapons for defence.

China's PLA Daily outlines image redemption checklist for political officers
China's PLA Daily outlines image redemption checklist for political officers

South China Morning Post

time12 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

China's PLA Daily outlines image redemption checklist for political officers

China's official military newspaper has urged the force's political officers to rebuild their image by showing more loyalty to the top leadership, honesty in their work, and integrity in how they promote soldiers. Advertisement The series of commentaries in the PLA Daily follows Beijing's new disciplinary guidelines released on Monday to 'eliminate toxic influences' in the work of political officers, after a string of high-profile military crackdowns. The latest events include the removal last month of top general Miao Hua from the Central Military Commission (CMC), China's highest military command. Observers remarked that the guidelines and commentaries on improving the image and reputation of political cadres contained subtle clues about the misdeeds of the fallen generals, as well as Beijing's expectations for political officials in the People's Liberation Army (PLA) to address and repair the damage. The three-part series, titled 'How to firmly establish the image and reputation of political cadres', ran from Tuesday to Thursday on the front pages of the PLA Daily as well as its social media platforms. The first commentary stressed the importance of maintaining political loyalty to the Communist Party leadership. Advertisement 'Once loyalty is watered down or falsified, personal interest will overwhelm the collective good in the face of complex struggles and tests of interests, and [they] may even slide into the abyss, betraying both the original intention of joining the army and the party oath,' Tuesday's edition said.

Taiwan votes in high-stakes recall election targeting ‘pro-China' lawmakers
Taiwan votes in high-stakes recall election targeting ‘pro-China' lawmakers

HKFP

time13 hours ago

  • HKFP

Taiwan votes in high-stakes recall election targeting ‘pro-China' lawmakers

Taiwanese voters turned out at schools, temples and community centres on Saturday to cast their ballots in a high-stakes recall election that could give President Lai Ching-te's party control of the parliament. Civic groups backed by Lai's Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) are seeking to unseat 31 lawmakers belonging to the main opposition Kuomintang party, who they accuse of being pro-China and a threat to the democratic island's security. The KMT, which wants closer ties with Beijing, controls parliament with the help of the Taiwan People's Party (TPP) and has slammed the unprecedented recall effort as a DPP power grab. Polling stations opened around Taiwan at 8:00 am (0000 GMT) with 24 KMT lawmakers facing potential recall. Elections for another seven KMT lawmakers will be held on August 23. In the capital Taipei, people queued in school hallways and temples. AFP saw an elderly man arrive at a primary school in an ambulance, which had brought him from hospital so he could vote in favour of the recall. A 71-year-old woman surnamed Tseng told AFP she was voting against the recall, arguing the process was 'costly' and the government should instead 'focus on improving the economy and social welfare'. Both major parties held rain-soaked rallies in recent days to urge supporters to take part in the critical election, which could upend the balance of power in parliament. While Lai won the presidential election in 2024, his DPP party lost its majority in the legislature. Since then, the KMT and TPP have joined forces to stymie Lai's agenda, and slashed or frozen parts of the government's budget. Contentious opposition bills, including an attempt to expand parliament's powers, sparked brawls in the legislature and massive street protests. The DPP needs a minimum of 12 KMT lawmakers recalled to gain temporary control of the parliament, with risk analysis firm Eurasia Group giving that outcome 'a 60 percent probability'. Lai's party would then need to flip six seats in by-elections later this year to cement its dominance in the parliament — which analysts say would be a formidable challenge. Recall results will be released Saturday night. Analysts said if the DPP gets control of the purse strings, even if only for a few months, it is likely to reverse the budget cuts and increase defence spending. Whatever the outcome, though, analyst Lev Nachman said political divisions in Taiwan were certain to deepen. 'The way that the recalls have played out have been perhaps some of the most divisive language used towards both camps that I think I've ever seen,' Nachman, a political scientist and longtime observer of Taiwan, told AFP. China looms large In recent months, KMT chairman Eric Chu has compared Lai's government to Hitler's Nazi regime, while Lai has spoken of 'removing impurities' to defend Taiwan's sovereignty. Beijing has loomed large over the recall vote, with Taipei warning of 'visible evidence' that China was trying to interfere in the process. The KMT's ties with Beijing and frequent visits by its lawmakers to China have raised concerns among critics over Chinese influence on the party. But the KMT rejects accusations it is beholden to Beijing. Communist China has never ruled Taiwan, but Beijing claims the island is part of its territory and has threatened to use force to bring it under its control. For a KMT lawmaker to lose their seat, the number of votes in favour of recalling them must exceed those against and also be more than 25 percent of the total number of registered voters in the electorate.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store