Pakistan court suspends order seeking ban on 27 YouTubers ‘critical' of govt
Alphabet-owned YouTube this week told 27 content creators that it could block their channels – including those of journalists and Khan and his opposition party Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf – if they failed to comply with a judicial magistrate court order seeking to ban them.
Islamabad: A Pakistani court on Friday suspended an order seeking to ban the YouTube channels of more than two dozen critics of the government including former Prime Minister Imran Khan, a defence lawyer said.
The judicial magistrate court in Islamabad had said it was seeking the ban after the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency criticised the channels in a June 2 report for 'sharing highly intimidating, provocative and derogatory contents against state institutions and officials of the state of Pakistan.'
The decision to suspend the order was taken by an additional sessions judge, said Imaan Mazari, the lawyer for two of the YouTube content creators.
In Pakistan, an additional sessions judge is a judicial officer who presides over a sessions court, handling both civil and criminal cases.
'Our submission is that the order has no legal basis. It was a one-sided decision without giving defence a chance to be heard,' Mazari said.
She also said the magistrate court had no jurisdiction over the matter.
The next hearing in the sessions court is on July 21.
In Pakistan's judicial system, cases start at civil and judicial magistrate courts and appeals are heard in high courts and the Supreme Court.
Digital rights campaigners say that any ban would further undermine free speech in Pakistan, where the authorities are accused of stifling newspapers and television, and social media is seen as one of the few outlets for dissent.
Disclaimer: This report is auto generated from the Reuters news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Also Read: 'My only crime is reporting truth'—Pakistan bans 27 YouTube channels over 'anti-state content'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
17 minutes ago
- First Post
What is the controversy over BBC's Gaza documentary?
The BBC is facing backlash after it aired — then removed — a Gaza documentary narrated by a 13-year-old boy whose father is a Hamas official. The broadcaster admitted a serious editorial lapse in not disclosing this connection. Now, amid political pressure, the controversy has many questioning the BBC's impartiality read more People sit outside the BBC Broadcasting House offices and recording studios in London, UK, January 17, 2022. File Image/Reuters The BBC is facing controversy surrounding one of its recent documentaries on Gaza, after it emerged that the child narrator of the programme is the son of a senior Hamas official. The public broadcaster has been accused of breaching its own editorial standards on accuracy. The film in question, titled Gaza: How to Survive a War Zone, focused on the experiences of children living through the ongoing war in Gaza. Narrated by a 13-year-old Palestinian boy named Abdullah, the documentary was produced by the independent company Hoyo Films and initially broadcast on BBC platforms in February. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, the programme was taken down just five days later after it was discovered that the narrator's father, Ayman Alyazouri, holds the position of Deputy Minister of Agriculture in Gaza's Hamas-run government — a fact not disclosed to BBC editorial teams before the broadcast. Internal BBC review reveals serious editorial failings The BBC's Director of Editorial Complaints and Reviews, Peter Johnston, led a comprehensive internal investigation into how the programme was commissioned, reviewed, and aired. The inquiry, which examined 5,000 documents and more than 150 hours of footage from the film's 10-month production period, concluded that the documentary violated the corporation's accuracy guidelines by failing to disclose relevant information that could materially affect audience perception. Johnston's report stated that the background of the narrator's father constituted 'critical information' that should have been disclosed prior to transmission. 'Regardless of how the significance or otherwise of the Narrator's father's position was judged, the audience should have been informed about this,' the report stated. The review made clear that although the BBC's guidelines on impartiality were not breached, the failure to accurately represent the narrator's background amounted to misleading the public. It also noted that there was no indication that the boy's father or family had influenced the film's content in any way. BBC Director-General Tim Davie acknowledged the gravity of the findings, saying the investigation had 'identified a significant failing in relation to accuracy.' BBC Director-General Tim Davie is pictured at BBC World Service offices in London, UK, April 28, 2022. File Image/Reuters In response, Davie pledged that the BBC would now act 'on two fronts — fair, clear and appropriate actions to ensure proper accountability and the immediate implementation of steps to prevent such errors being repeated.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD BBC News CEO Deborah Turness also admitted fault, stating on BBC Radio 4's The World at One that 'we are owning where we have made mistakes, finding out what went wrong, acting on the findings, and we've said we're sorry.' Hoyo Films accepts partial responsibility, apologises Hoyo Films, the independent production house behind the documentary, also came under the spotlight for failing to inform the BBC of the narrator's family background. According to the BBC's findings, three members of the Hoyo Films team were aware of the narrator's father's government role during production, but this information was not passed on to BBC editorial staff. While the internal review did not find that the production company had acted with intent to deceive, it placed the bulk of the responsibility for the breach on Hoyo Films, stating that the BBC also shared some accountability for insufficient oversight and inadequate follow-up on editorial queries before airing the film. In a statement following the release of the review, Hoyo Films said it accepted the conclusions of the report and 'apologises for the mistake that resulted in a breach of the editorial guidelines.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The company also welcomed the opportunity to explore the re-editing of the documentary for future use, potentially in shorter formats for the BBC's iPlayer archive. The report also revealed that Abdullah had received a payment of £795 for his participation, paid via his adult sister. He was also given a second-hand mobile phone and a gift card for a computer game. Altogether, the compensation amounted to £1,817. A financial audit found the sum to be within a reasonable range for such work. Ofcom opens separate investigation into BBC conduct In light of the BBC's findings, the UK's media regulator Ofcom confirmed that it would launch its own inquiry under its rule that prohibits factual programmes from 'materially misleading the audience.' An Ofcom spokesperson stated, 'Having examined the BBC's findings, we are launching an investigation under our rule which states that factual programmes must not materially mislead the audience.' Dame Melanie Dawes, Chief Executive of Ofcom, later told British newspaper Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme that the BBC had been 'slow to get a grip' on recent issues, including this documentary and other editorial controversies. 'It's very frustrating that the BBC has had some own goals in this area,' she said, warning that continued missteps could lead to a 'loss of confidence' in the broadcaster's independence and integrity. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Calls for reform in the UK 'My job is to make sure that we uphold the highest standards and that the public and parliament can have confidence in the BBC,' UK Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy told reporters. She noted that while the BBC had taken some steps to rebuild public trust, 'there have been a series of catastrophic failures over recent weeks.' In response to the scandal, the BBC outlined several corrective measures, as reported by BBC: A new leadership role will be established for news documentaries and current affairs, providing strategic oversight of long-form output across the news division. Fresh editorial guidance will mandate enhanced scrutiny of narrators, especially in content involving contested or sensitive geopolitical issues. A new 'first gate' commissioning system will ensure that all compliance and editorial considerations are documented and addressed before production approval. Artists & journalists rally behind and against the BBC A collective of more than 500 high-profile figures — including actor Riz Ahmed, filmmakers Ken Loach and Mike Leigh, and broadcaster Gary Lineker — signed a public letter in February defending the original documentary. Organised by Artists for Palestine UK, the letter warned that 'a political campaign to discredit the programme' risked further silencing Palestinian voices in Western media. Conversely, the Campaign Against Antisemitism condemned the BBC's handling of the situation, calling the review's recommendations 'frankly insulting.' The group argued that the report lacked new insight and claimed it appeared designed 'to exonerate the BBC.' Former BBC content chief Danny Cohen and JK Rowling's agent Neil Blair were among more than 40 Jewish television executives who had earlier written to the broadcaster, raising serious questions about its editorial processes and standards. Meanwhile, internal dissent is also growing. Over 100 BBC journalists recently criticised the decision not to air another Gaza-focused documentary, Gaza: Medics Under Fire, which was eventually broadcast by Channel 4. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In a letter to senior leadership, the journalists accused the corporation of failing to report 'without fear or favour when it comes to Israel,' and claimed the editorial judgment appeared driven by 'fear of being perceived as critical of the Israeli government.' The BBC also faced backlash in June for broadcasting a performance at Glastonbury by rap punk duo Bob Vylan, during which they led the crowd in chants of 'death' to the Israeli military — prompting further criticism of the BBC's editorial oversight. On October 7, 2023, Hamas launched a coordinated attack on southern Israel, killing approximately 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli officials. In response, Israel began a large-scale military offensive in Gaza. As of now, Gaza's Health Ministry reports that more than 58,000 people have been killed, with more than half of the fatalities being women and children. The ministry does not differentiate between combatants and civilians, though the United Nations and other international bodies rely on its casualty figures as the most reliable source available. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Also Watch: With inputs from agencies
Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Germany plans AI offensive to catch up on key technologies, document shows
Germany wants to ramp up its use of artificial intelligence by the end of the decade to support Europe's largest economy and compete on the world stage in key technologies, a document seen by Reuters showed on Tuesday. The race to develop AI is intensifying, with China, the United States and India emerging as frontrunners, putting pressure on Germany and the European Union more broadly to catch up. 'With an AI offensive, we want to generate 10% of our economic output based on AI by 2030 and make AI an important tool in central fields of research,' the German research ministry's draft strategy said. The strategy does not say what proportion of the German economy is currently supported by AI. According to an OECD report from 2024 on Germany and AI, the country should leverage AI to meet its most pressing challenges, including the green transition, administrative and industrial efficiency and healthcare quality. Economists have pushed for a rapid roll-out to keep German industry competitive, with the IW institute reporting earlier this year that the country could increase productivity by an average 0.9% annually from the years 2025 until 2030, rising to 1.2% over the course of the 2030s. So far this decade, that figure has stood at 0.4%. The German cabinet is expected to pass the strategy before the end of the month, setting ambitious targets to catch up with the United States and China on AI. The document sets out targets for bids to construct high-capacity processing centres in the European Union to be in operation by 2027. The government wants to coordinate its applications with industry, experts and federal states by the end of the year. The European Commission has allocated 20 billion euros ($23 billion) in EU funding for the construction of AI 'gigafactories'. Under a coalition agreement finalised earlier this year, the German government aims to have at least one of the centres built in Germany, with Deutsche Telekom among the companies interested. The German strategy also sets out goals to ramp up quantum computing technology, with two 'error-corrected quantum computers' to be created by 2030 and made available to users, the document said. It also sets out a plan to put Germany's first research satellite for quantum communication into operation this year. The strategy says that while Germany has seen early success in innovation, it is falling behind in the commercialisation of AI. 'This creates competitive disadvantages and dependencies,' the document said, adding that AI research in Germany must be linked to fields such as robotics, mechanical engineering, car manufacturing and the chemicals industry.'
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Trump team to deny hearings in new bid to keep migrants detained, memo shows
The Trump administration is launching a new effort to keep immigrants who entered the US illegally detained by denying them bond hearings, an internal memo showed, a change that could further swell the numbers of those guidance by the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, a portion of which Reuters reviewed, could be applied to millions of people who crossed the border illegally and are contesting their Donald Trump has vowed mass deportations, which he says are needed after high levels of illegal immigration under his predecessor, Democrat Joe Biden. Congress passed a spending law this month that provides funding to detain at least 100,000 people, a steep increase over the record 58,000 in custody by late Washington Post first reported the new ICE policy limiting bond hearing eligibility, citing a July 8 memo by its acting director, Todd guidance shared with Reuters called for ICE to interpret several immigration law provisions as "prohibitions on release" after an arrest, adding the shift in policy was "likely to be litigated."It encouraged ICE prosecutors "to make alternative arguments in support of continued detention" during immigration court new policy appeared to reverse legal standards governing detention for decades, said Tom Jawetz, a former homeland security official in the Biden administration, calling it "a radical departure that could explode the detention population."The US Department of Homeland Security and ICE did not immediately respond to requests for comment.- EndsTune InMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Donald Trump
