KV Dharwad Students Excel in ‘Mera Amrit Station' Competition
While Roshani of Class III emerged as the star performer in the Drawing Competition, securing the 1st prize for her creative and imaginative artwork, Surabhi V.G. of Class IX secured 2nd position in the essay competition and 3rd position in elocution competition, a release from KV said.
The students received the prizes from Karnataka Governor Thaawarchand Gehlot during the inauguration ceremony of the Amrit Stations held in Dharwad recently. Chairman of Karnataka Legislative Council Basavaraj Horatti and others were present.
Deputy Commissioner of the KVS Regional Office Dharmendra Patle, Assistant Commissioners R. Pramod and Hema K., and principal Rakesh Kumar Goyal have congratulated the students for their excellent performance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
14 hours ago
- India Today
Message in smooth train fare hike: A mature Indian who knows a good ride comes at a price
Nothing good comes for free. That's the message loud and clear in the various moves the Narendra Modi government is making in infrastructure. Be it rising highway tolls, heavy-duty bridges and tunnels, or now the latest addition—a hike in train July 1, Indian Railways has increased passenger fares across most long-distance trains: the first such move in five years. But while the hike may pinch slightly on paper, its implications are broader, reflecting a subtle but decisive shift in both public expectations and political fare increase is marginal but with a purpose: 2 paise more per km in AC classes and 1 paisa more in the sleeper and second-class Mail and Express trains. For slow passenger trains, the hike is 0.5 paisa per km and applies only on trips exceeding 500 services and monthly season tickets remain unaffected. The fare for a 1,000 km distance in multi-class passenger trains will be hiked on an average at Rs 10 for economy class and Rs 15 for second class. Still, it adds up. With over 4.8 trillion passenger km of movement expected in FY2025-26, the fare adjustment is projected to net the railways an additional Rs 1,100 crore over the remaining nine months of the financial year. Had it been implemented from April 1, the amount would have crossed Rs 1,450 boost is no small deal in a system where passenger operations are heavily subsidised. Suburban travel recovers barely 30 per cent of its cost; non-AC long-distance journeys about 39 cent. Only AC segments, thanks to their premium pricing, manage a slender surplus of around 3.5 per just as telling as the numbers is the silence. There's been precious little political outrage. No protests. No widespread condemnation. That silence suggests two things: one, that the BJP now believes it can insulate itself from backlash in the wake of such policy decisions, a courage lacking in many predecessors who either delayed fare increases or cloaked them in opaque the Indian passenger appears to have grown up—prepared, albeit grudgingly, to shell out a little more in return for real enhancements of service. Most importantly, there has been radio silence even from railway minister Ashwini Vaishnaw on this on social of this is a far cry from 2014 when the new Modi government had to roll back a proposed hike in suburban fares following a blowback. In comparison, the latest fare hike comes just months before the crucial Bihar could mean that increases in railway fares may finally no longer be the political silver bullet they once were. Some of this change in perception is a consequence of how far Indian Railways has come in recent years. The widening of Vande Bharat routes, the visible station modernisation projects and the cleaner coaches—all of that adds to the fact that the railways is trying to deliver what is more than just status fare hike becomes a piece of a larger narrative then: of passengers paying for, and demanding, better value. To be sure, for a few years now, the railways has been printing the not-so-subtle message on all its tickets that it recovers only half of its cost from ticket last fare hike was in January 2020. It amounted to an increase of 4 paise per km for AC classes and 2 paise for non-AC and suburban services. The shift was made with relatively little political current fare increase is less steep, but it is tied to a several more important process tweaks: Aadhaar-based OTP verification for Tatkal tickets, advance reservation charts eight hours before departure and revised waiting list caps—up to 60 per cent in AC, 30 per cent in sleeper, thanks to more data it does not outright invalidate the Opposition's query: why are you raising fares now, after a record Rs 2.5 lakh crore allocation has been made for railways in Budget 2025-26? Doesn't the government have more money than before?The answer lies in the calculus of operational cost. Salaries, fuel, maintenance, security and the introduction of new services all carry enormous costs. But the expense that pinches the most is the ballooning pension bill, which is within touching distance of Rs 70,000 crore and rising every revenues can bail the railways out only so much. And with passenger earnings projected to climb from Rs 75,215 crore in FY25 to Rs 92,800 crore in FY26, some of it will also be down to making up the shortfall, filling the gap with yet more class-based also the more profound optics of fairness. This still leaves half of all rail passengers—suburban and short-distance in particular—paying highly-subsidised rates, whereas the higher expectations of better-off passengers for clean, punctual and modern trains cannot be carried through cross-subsidisation this hike is just as much about messaging as money. It's the railways asserting itself as a modern, service-driven utility, not a big old legacy network of some other era dragging along the baggage of populism. That said, for the wheels to turn faster, cleaner and more reliably in the future, passengers will have to chip in, perhaps only a little bit. Most of all, it is a shift in the public transport conversation in India: from entitlement to to India Today Magazine- Ends
Hindustan Times
2 days ago
- Hindustan Times
X complies with takedowns globally but seeks special treatment in India: Govt
X (formerly Twitter) complies with takedown laws globally but seeks special treatment in India, the Union government told the Karnataka high court on Tuesday while opposing the social media giant's petition against joining the Sahyog portal for automated notices. The Karnataka high court will hear the matter next on July 8. (Shutterstock) Solicitor general Tushar Mehta, appearing for the government, said X must join the platform and comply with all takedown notices issued by designated authorities. 'In every other country, they follow the law. Only in India, they expect these luxuries,' Mehta said. X has challenged the government's direction, asking it to join the portal, arguing that Sahyog opens the door for 'indiscriminate censorship.' Senior advocate KG Raghavan, who appeared for the company, cited the case of the Indian Railways asking X to remove a viral video of a woman driving on railway tracks in Telangana. Raghavan questioned how such content was unlawful. He claimed 'every Tom, Dick, and Harry' could issue takedown notices under Sahyog. Mehta objected to Raghavan's choice of words and said the officers sending such notices were the competent authority, and the government would not tolerate anyone calling them names. Justice M Nagaprasanna, hearing the matter, said the senior counsel must exercise restraint for these were officers of the 'government of India' and had 'statutory powers.' The government reiterated that X has no legal right to challenge takedown orders. It previously told the court in an affidavit that social media intermediaries did not have the locus to fight for their users in court. The government also cautioned that if X resisted, it might lose safe harbour. Under Section 79 of the Information Technology (IT) Act, platforms like X are protected from liability for user content, provided they comply with takedown requests within 36 hours of receiving official notice. X has argued that this provision has been misused to create a parallel blocking mechanism that violates the Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Shreya Singhal vs Union of India, which provides for orders for content removal only under a defined process established under the IT Act. The high court will hear the matter next on July 8.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 days ago
- Business Standard
Best of BS Opinion: Trump's citizenship rules may upend world order
Hello and welcome to BS Views, our newsletter that sums up today's opinion page. Our editorial as well as lead columnist weigh in on President Trump's proposed ban on birthright citizenship and its wider consequences. Our second columnist looks at what plagues India's manufacturing sector and how it might be fixed. The first major shock of the Trump presidency was an executive order banning 'birthright citizenship' in the US. As our first editorial points out, birthright citizenship is the norm in most countries that have inherited British common-law, including the US. President Trump's order faced legal pushback but the US Supreme Court has said that lower courts' decisions cannot amount to a nationwide overturning of the order. In short, the White House might be soon be able to start restricting birthright citizenship. The birthright citizenship law has held good since 1898, and has allowed the US to become a successful multi-ethnic society. That is what enrages some of Trump's followers who oppose the idea that that anyone can be American. If birthright citizenship is indeed rolled back, then it will be an epochal shift in American identity and in its role in the world. The Indian Railways is set to increase fares starting July, a move that is expected to pull in revenue of roughly Rs 700 crore this fiscal year. However, as our second editorial argues, this bump is unlikely to change the dynamics of the railways' revenue - given passenger fares account for less than a third of the total revenue - or help it fund infrastructure upgrades. Instead, losses are covered through cross-subsidies from freight operations and higher fares for premium travel, such as air-conditioned rakes. This, too, may be a losing proposition considering freight traffic has been losing out to road transport, while AC services account for a mere 5 per cent of passengers, forcing it to look to government grants and extrabudgetary support for capital expenditure. The real issue is the lack of clarity on its commercial and social objectives. Without rationalising these contrasting goals, the railways will struggle to become world-class. Our lead columnist Mihir S. Sharma wonders if the West's experiment with open borders is coming to an end, given President's Trump ban on birthright citizenship and European nations' realisation that their openness might have had unintended consequences. Some of his advisors' and party colleagues' are even willing to seek to void citizenship rights of naturalised Americans. What is worrying is that these ideas are finding echoes across the Atlantic. Germany's decision to open borders to asylum-seekers from West Asia have had a ripple effect in the continent's politics. In the UK, Brexiteers oversaw migration grow manifold from non-European nations, including India. As a result of populist backlash against what is seen as unbridled immigration, mainstream politicians across Europe are slowly closing the continent off, following hesitantly in Trump's footsteps about foreigners among their midst. India's manufacturing sector and it's role as a solution to persistent issues of employment and economic growth have long been the subject of debate. While the need of the hour is more local manufacturing, points out our second columnist Debashis Basu, it's share in GDP has actually slipped further. The much-touted Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme hasn't quite taken off. A genuine manufacturing ecosystem takes years of reform which, in India's case, has been sporadic. Had it taken off, he says, it could have addressed both joblessness and poverty. Instead, the government has focused on cash transfers and welfare schemes, killing any incentive to work. India's demographic dividend, Basu warns, is fast turning into a demographic liability.
