
8 Potentially Expensive Investing Mistakes & How To Avoid Them
One report concludes the average equity investor under-performs the stock market by more than 840 ... More basis points.
A recent report from financial services consultant DALBAR concluded that the average equity investor earned a 16.54% return in 2024. That may sound like a win, but the S&P 500 grew 25.02% in the same period. The S&P 500 is widely viewed as a benchmark for the overall stock market—which means the average investor under-performed the market by over 840 basis points.
The lag is surprising, given that investors can buy an S&P 500 ETF to keep pace with the market before fees. The DALBAR analysis said "investors continued to under-perform due to their own behavior," citing withdrawals from equity funds just before market surges.
If you have $10,000 invested, an 840-basis-point miss costs you $840. Repeat the same mistakes a few years in a row and your net worth is thousands below where it could be. Let's sidestep that outcome by learning about eight potentially expensive investing mistakes and how to avoid them.
1. Not Investing
The average savings yield in December, 2024 was 0.42% according to the FDIC. You may have earned higher cash rates last year if you kept your money in CDs or high-yield savings accounts. But a 4% APR on a cash deposit doesn't come close to last year's 25% gain in the stock market.
Cash is important to have on hand. You need it to cover unexpected expenses or income changes. Unfortunately, bank deposits don't offer the same wealth opportunities as stocks. If you want to grow your net worth, stock investing is one of the simplest ways to do it.
How to avoid this investing mistake: Open a low-cost brokerage account and invest monthly in an S&P 500 ETF. Your monthly budget can be small to start, but plan on increasing it as you get more comfortable.
2. Timing The Market
Timing the market is an investing strategy that attempts to predict stock price trends and profit from them. Imagine knowing ahead of time that stocks would fall dramatically on Monday and then surge back on Tuesday. You'd invest on Monday when prices are low and sell on Tuesday for a quick profit.
The problem is that making these predictions accurately is difficult. Even professional investors have spotty records in this area. Studies comparing the performance of actively and passively managed funds prove it. Active funds rely on human research and decision-making to time trades. Passive funds follow an index like the S&P 500 and don't bother with opportunistic portfolio changes.
An analysis by financial services firm Yodelar found that 57% of active fund under-performed their sector average over five years, while only 40% of passive funds under-performed. The takeaway is that accepting market volatility can be more profitable than trying to profit from it.
How to avoid this investing mistake: Invest consistently every month, whether the market is strong or weak. And the next time stock prices fall, challenge yourself to wait it out. Hold your portfolio the same and see what happens on the other side.
3. Following The Crowd
When investors are optimistic, stock prices rise. When investors are discouraged, stock prices fall. Getting caught up in these sentiments encourages you to buy high and sell low. You can't make a profit that way.
This is why famous, billionaire investor Warren Buffett once advised investors to "be fearful when others are greedy and greedy only when others are fearful." This contrarian approach makes it easier to buy low and sell high, which is what you want.
How to avoid this investing mistake: Don't buy or sell because everyone else is doing it. If you feel the need to take action in a down market, increase your holdings in high-quality stocks when their prices are down. You'll be well-positioned for gains when the market recovers.
4. Going All In
Going all in refers to spending your entire investing budget on one stock or one industry. This strategy can expose you to extreme volatility and high loss potential. It can also prompt you to make other investing mistakes, such as timing the market, following the crowd and emotional decision-making.
How to avoid this investing mistake: Diversification is the solution. Spread your wealth across at least 20 individual stocks plus some Treasury securities if you can. Or, invest in ETFs with well-diversified portfolios.
5. Paying High Fees
Account fees, fund fees and trading fees pull money away from your investments and lower your returns. You can't avoid all investing fees, but you can make sure you're not paying more than you need to.
How to avoid this investing mistake: Dive into your brokerage account and funds to list the fees you're currently paying. Then look for lower-fee alternatives for the account itself or your investments. Say you are invested in SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), which has an expense ratio of 0.0945%. Unless you have a reason for investing in SPY specifically, you could shift new investments to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPLG). It tracks the same index, but has a lower expense ratio of 0.02%.
6. Skipping The Research
Making investing decisions based on limited information can be dangerous, particularly if you're picking stocks. Fund-based investing strategies are less research-intensive, but you still should understand what you're buying and how you can expect it to perform.
How to avoid this investing mistake: Spend time educating yourself. You could allocate a short, weekly time time slot on your calendar for this. Use it to research securities or investing strategies. Ask questions and find answers. The more time you put in, the better investor you'll be.
7. Getting Emotional
Emotions can convince you to sell when the market is down, even though logic says stock prices will eventually recover. Emotions can also urge you to buy tech stocks at crazy-high valuations, even though logic says there's a point at which their prices become unsustainably high.
Ryan Kahn, managing director at Dyad Capital, acknowledged this common investing problem in an interview. "It's easy to let emotions drive decisions when the market is down, but that's usually when you need to stay disciplined," Kahn explained.
How to avoid this investing mistake: Kahn recommended focusing on the fundamentals and not letting "short-term noise derail your long-term strategy."
If you don't have a long-term strategy, make one. Document what you're trying to accomplish and how you will do it. Include your methods for making trade decisions, and the criteria that make a security buy-worthy or sell-worthy. The next time you feel like making a rash decision, go to your documentation and follow the methodology you defined in calmer times.
8. Investing What You Can't Afford To Lose
Inevitably, your investments will lose value. Panic can result if the loss pinches your finances. At best, panic can push you into emotionally driven decisions like selling securities to avoid deeper losses. At worst, panic can encourage you to chase gains to recoup lost capital. That can lead to bigger losses and more panic.
If you can afford to leave your capital invested during market downturns, you don't have to panic. You have the option to keep your portfolio intact, at least until stock prices recover and return to growth.
How to avoid this investing mistake: Build a cash emergency fund before you start investing. Use that fund for unexpected expenses, so you won't have to reach into your portfolio. Also, only invest money you won't need for at least five years.
Hartford Funds reports that bear markets last 9.6 months on average. So, the five-year timeline is a buffer to protect against a downturn followed by a slow recovery.
Fewer Investing Mistakes For Higher Returns
The stock market's long-term average annual return is 6% to 7% annually after inflation. You can produce similar returns in your portfolio by investing regularly in a low-fee S&P 500 fund and—this is key—leaving your money invested for decades. Dedicate yourself to this simple approach and you'll avoid market timing, emotional decision-making, crowd-following and other potentially costly investor mistakes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
10 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Warren Buffett announces $6 billion in donations to five foundations
NEW YORK — Famed investor Warren Buffett is donating $6 billion worth of his company's stock to five foundations, bringing the total he has given to them since 2006 to roughly $60 billion, based on their value when received. Buffett said late Friday that the shares of Berkshire Hathaway will be delivered on Monday. Berkshire Hathaway owns Geico, Dairy Queen and a range of other businesses, and Buffett is donating nearly 12.4 million of the Class B shares of its stock. Those shares have a lower and easier-to-digest price tag than the company's original Class A shares, and each of the B shares was worth $485.68 at their most recent close on Friday. The largest tranche is going to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust, which will receive 9.4 million shares. The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation will receive 943,384 shares, and the Sherwood Foundation, Howard G. Buffett Foundation and NoVo Foundation will each receive 660,366 shares. Buffett made waves a year ago when he said he plans to cut off donations to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation after his death and let his three children decide how to distribute the rest of his fortune. Berkshire Hathaway's Class B stock has climbed 19.1% over the last 12 months, topping the broad U.S. stock market's return of 14.1%, including dividends. Buffett is famous on Wall Street for buying companies at good prices and being more conservative when prices look too high. The bargain-hunting approach has helped him amass a fortune worth about $145 billion, with basically all of it in Berkshire Hathaway's stock. 'Nothing extraordinary has occurred at Berkshire; a very long runway, simple and generally sound decisions, the American tailwind and compounding effects produced my current wealth,' Buffett said in a statement. 'My will provides that about 99½% of my estate is destined for philanthropic usage.'


Washington Post
11 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Not just Mamdani: Centrist Democrats can win on affordability, too
Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-Nevada) still remembers her best tip ever, when she was a college student waiting tables outside Minneapolis for the local NHL team's holiday party. 'Nobody can party like hockey players,' Rosen said, recalling how they showed off their sport's hard-hitting nature by pulling out their fake teeth. 'They drank and spent so much money.' More than 45 years later, Rosen — who moved to Nevada after graduating from the University of Minnesota — has emerged as the biggest Democratic booster of a signature economic proposal from President Donald Trump. She co-sponsored a bill with Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) to fulfill Trump's 2024 campaign promise for 'no taxes on tips,' the type of issue she experienced firsthand when the Minnesota North Stars left her a nearly $300 tip. A version of that legislation is tucked into the massive tax and immigration bill that Republicans are trying to pass on a party-line vote in the coming days. While every Democrat in Congress, including Rosen, opposes that broad legislation — largely because of its cuts to Medicaid — the Cruz bill won a unanimous vote last month in the Senate. If the massive legislation fails, Rosen will push her allies in the House to move a stand-alone tip bill to the president's desk. Her effort, fresh off a successful reelection bid in 2024, serves as a model for Democrats searching for a moderate approach to winning in swing districts and battleground states. Democrats are deep into internal battles drawn over generational and ideological fault lines and are debating how to use modern communications to get out their message. Many on the left see a model for winning in Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old democratic socialist poised to win the Democratic New York mayoral primary after running an online savvy campaign touting progressive ideas to fight inflation. Some centrist Democrats have pushed back against Mamdani for his far-left proposals, including free bus service and government-owned grocery stores. But similarities in the 33-year-old's mayoral bid and the 67-year-old senator's approach show the path to winning coalitions. Nevada was the only state that had twice voted against Trump but flipped to him last year — from a roughly 2.5 percentage point defeat in 2016 and 2020 to a more than 3 percentage point victory in 2024. But Rosen beat Trump-endorsed Republican Sam Brown by nearly 1.7 percentage points by embracing an aggressive approach to fighting inflation while positioning herself as an authentic voice, someone who didn't run her first political campaign until her late 50s. Rosen has held victory parties at Caesars Palace to remind folks that she was a cocktail waitress there. She gives off the political vibe of an encouraging aunt rather than career politician. 'It was really important to me to be present to people, for people, to listen to their stories,' she said in a recent interview. 'My motto is agree where you can, fight where you must.' In five presidential battleground states that hosted key Senate races, Democrats won four. Rosen was running her second statewide race ever, while Sens. Ruben Gallego (D-Arizona) and Elissa Slotkin (D-Michigan) were running their first and Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisconsin) was running her third. Incumbent Bob Casey, who lost in Pennsylvania, was running his eighth statewide bid in three decades. Two figures from opposite ends of the Democratic ideology spectrum recently noted Mamdani, a state lawmaker since 2021, offered a fresh alternative to former governor Andrew M. Cuomo, 67, with personal scandal baggage. 'The people are clearly asking for generational change,' Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York), a liberal icon, told reporters. 'They are looking for a new generation of leadership,' Slotkin said during a policy address touting her centrist vision. Republicans take a different view of Rosen's and Slotkin's victories, blaming their big-money donors for not believing in the GOP nominees until it was too late. 'Many didn't believe we had a chance to win. And the money was late breaking there. But I think had we had the resources earlier, Sam Brown would have won,' Sen. Steve Daines (Montana), who chaired the National Republican Senatorial Committee last year, said in a brief interview. Rosen raised about $50 million for her campaign, more than twice as much as Brown's, and outside political groups favored Rosen by an edge of about $55 million to $45 million, according to Open Secrets. Rosen received 4,000 fewer votes than Kamala Harris did at the top of the Democratic ticket, while Brown fell about 75,000 votes shy of Trump's tally. Rosen did have better appeal than Harris in what Nevadans call 'the rurals,' lightly populated conservative areas far from the Las Vegas Strip. Humboldt County, in the northernmost stretch of the state, favored Trump by more than 4,400 votes while Brown won by 3,662 votes. Rosen believes that national Democrats face higher hurdles in rural areas where they never campaign and end up branded with 'all that noise' from conservative media outlets. She overcame some of that as an incumbent senator with time to visit those parts of the state. 'You can't be everywhere. But in Nevada and some other states, people can really get to know you. So it is absolutely an advantage,' Rosen said. Rosen instantly knew the moment Trump started talking about 'no taxes on tips' that it would resonate in a state where roughly 1 in 4 workers are in the hospitality industry. They probably either receive tips or have close friends and family working for tips. That industry got crushed during the pandemic, and now inflation has prompted another decline in tourist visits to Las Vegas. 'It's such a variable job. You don't know what your tips are going to be day in and day out. One day good, one day not so good,' Rosen said. While Harris also supported eliminating taxes on tips, Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (Nevada) was the only other Democrat to join Rosen in co-sponsoring Cruz's bill. Culinary Workers Union Local 226, Nevada's largest union, also endorsed the proposal. Some Democrats on Capitol Hill have been hesitant to embrace the no-tax-on-tips policy, worried it is unfair to workers who receive a regular hourly wage. Critics of the proposal say the biggest beneficiaries of such a policy are staff at high-end restaurants who are already making high salaries, not the lowest-paid workers in the service industry. It could create a rush on employers shifting their workers into a tipped-wage system, leading to customers facing tip requests in places that rarely used to have them. But Rosen knew that Nevada, with the lowest percentage of college graduates of any battleground state, would embrace a proposal that appealed to its working-class image. 'We're always trying to find ways to put more money back into people's pockets,' the onetime culinary union member said. Without a deeply partisan background, she doesn't hesitate to break from her party's orthodoxy on issues including crime and border security. Rosen used her financial edge to start airing ads at least six months ahead of the election that ref far-left ideas such as defunding the police and open borders. 'I work with both parties on things like helping veterans exposed to burn pits and stood up to my own party to support police officers and get more funding for border security,' she said in one ad. Many of these positions run counter to the ideas embraced by Mamdani, Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont). But some Democrats point to issues Mamdani highlighted as appealing to most voters, allowing swing-district candidates to graft their own policy prescriptions into what fits their voters. 'It's not the left versus the middle — to win, it must be both. Mamdani's focus helps preview many of the issues liberals and moderates can embrace: affordability, quality of life and opposing slashing health care,' Steve Israel, the former New York Democratic congressman who ran the party's House campaign operation for four years, wrote in his Substack after the mayoral primary. For Rosen, that lesson goes all the way back to the time a bunch of professional hockey players got rowdy and left her a massive pile of cash. Rosen, who can't remember if she reported that tip on her taxes, moved away a few years later, and the North Stars became the Dallas Stars. But she always remember that lesson, one that resonates with a huge amount of voters in Nevada. 'Your tips were everything,' she said.

Associated Press
28 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Warren Buffett announces $6 billion in donations to five foundations
NEW YORK (AP) — Famed investor Warren Buffett is donating $6 billion worth of his company's stock to five foundations, bringing the total he has given to them since 2006 to roughly $60 billion, based on their value when received. Buffett said late Friday that the shares of Berkshire Hathaway will be delivered on Monday. Berkshire Hathaway owns Geico, Dairy Queen and a range of other businesses, and Buffett is donating nearly 12.4 million of the Class B shares of its stock. Those shares have a lower and easier-to-digest price tag than the company's original Class A shares, and each of the B shares was worth $485.68 at their most recent close on Friday. The largest tranche is going to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust, which will receive 9.4 million shares. The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation will receive 943,384 shares, and the Sherwood Foundation, Howard G. Buffett Foundation and NoVo Foundation will each receive 660,366 shares. Buffett made waves a year ago when he said he plans to cut off donations to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation after his death and let his three children decide how to distribute the rest of his fortune. Berkshire Hathaway's Class B stock has climbed 19.1% over the last 12 months, topping the broad U.S. stock market's return of 14.1%, including dividends. Buffett is famous on Wall Street for buying companies at good prices and being more conservative when prices look too high. The bargain-hunting approach has helped him amass a fortune worth about $145 billion, with basically all of it in Berkshire Hathaway's stock. 'Nothing extraordinary has occurred at Berkshire; a very long runway, simple and generally sound decisions, the American tailwind and compounding effects produced my current wealth,' Buffett said in a statement. 'My will provides that about 99½% of my estate is destined for philanthropic usage.'