EZVIZ's Ongoing Smart Entry Promotion Attracts Growing Interest, Inviting More Indonesian Families to Embrace Safer and Smarter Home Living
At the heart of this campaign lies EZVIZ's vision to empower more families to enjoy the benefits of smart home security. "Smart, secure living shouldn't be reserved for a few, it should be within reach for all," said Paul Fang, Country Manager of EVIZ Indonesia. "At EZVIZ, creating safer and smarter homes starts with removing barriers and encouraging positive change at the doorstep."
Each lock in the promotional lineup features advanced unlocking technologies designed to suit different lifestyles and needs. The DL50 FVS, EZVIZ's most advanced model, uses facial recognition technology to provide fast, touch-free, and highly secure access. Similarly, the DL05 and DL06 Pro models offer the option of fingerprint unlocking, delivering quick and reliable entry with a strong focus on security. Both types of smart locks are ideal for users who value convenience and want to eliminate the hassle of keys or codes, whether for busy families, tech-savvy individuals, or professionals seeking efficient and secure home access.
For many homeowners, the DL03 and DL04 series serve as an accessible first step toward smart home security. These DIY-friendly locks support passcodes, proximity cards, and mobile app controls, making it easy to upgrade traditional doors without complex installation. This flexibility appeals to those who want to modernize their homes gradually, combining familiar unlocking options with the convenience of smart technology.
Beyond unlocking convenience, EZVIZ smart locks are built to give users complete control over home access. Through the EZVIZ app, users can assign temporary or permanent access to family members, guests, or household staff, while also receiving real-time notifications and reviewing entry history, ensuring peace of mind at all times.
With the promotion, EZVIZ continues to make advanced home security affordable and accessible, enabling more Indonesian families to enjoy smarter, safer homes. To learn more information, you can access to EZVIZ Indonesia Instagram account @ezviz.idn.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250710925267/en/
Contacts
Hazel Hanhanxiao16@ezviz.com
Erreur lors de la récupération des données
Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille
Erreur lors de la récupération des données
Erreur lors de la récupération des données
Erreur lors de la récupération des données
Erreur lors de la récupération des données
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is the cloud the wrong place for AI?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The enterprise software playbook seemed clear: everything moves to the cloud eventually. Applications, databases, storage: they all followed the same inevitable arc from on-premises to software-as-a-service. But with the arrival and boom of artificial intelligence, we're seeing a different story play out, one where the cloud is just one chapter rather than the entire book. AI systems AI workloads are fundamentally different beasts than the enterprise applications that defined the cloud migration wave. Traditional software scales predictably, processes data in batches, and can tolerate some latency. AI systems are non-deterministic, require massive parallel processing, and often need to respond in real-time. These differences reshape the entire economic equation of where and how you run your infrastructure. Take the challenge of long-running training jobs. Machine learning models don't train on schedule; they train until they converge. This could be hours, days, or weeks. Cloud providers excel at providing infrastructure at short notice, but GPU capacity at hyperscalers can be hard to get without a 1 year reservation. The result is either paying for guaranteed capacity you might not fully use, or risking that your training job gets interrupted when using spot instances to reduce costs. Then there's the inference challenge. Unlike web applications that might see traffic spikes during Black Friday, AI services often need to scale continuously as customer usage grows. The token-based pricing models that govern large language models make this scaling unpredictable in ways that traditional per-request pricing never was. A single customer query might consume 10 tokens or 10,000, depending on the complexity of the response and the size of the context window. Hybrid approaches The most intriguing development involves companies discovering hybrid approaches that acknowledge these unique requirements rather than abandoning the cloud. They're using on-premises infrastructure for baseline, predictable workloads while leveraging cloud resources for genuine bursts of demand. They're co-locating servers closer to users for latency-sensitive applications like conversational AI. They're finding that owning their core infrastructure gives them the stability to experiment more freely with cloud services for specific use cases. This evolution is being accelerated by regulatory requirements that simply don't fit the cloud-first model. Financial services, healthcare, and government customers often cannot allow data to leave their premises. For these sectors, on-premises or on-device inference represents a compliance requirement rather than a preference. Rather than being a limitation, this constraint is driving innovation in edge computing and specialized hardware that makes local AI deployment increasingly viable. Infrastructure strategies The cloud providers aren't standing still, of course. They're developing AI-specific services, improving GPU access, and creating new pricing models. But the fundamental mismatch between AI's resource requirements and traditional cloud economics suggests that the future won't be a simple rerun of the SaaS revolution. Instead, we're heading toward a more nuanced landscape where different types of AI workloads find their natural homes. Experimentation and rapid prototyping will likely remain cloud-native. Production inference for established products might move closer to owned infrastructure. Training runs might split between cloud spot instances for cost efficiency and dedicated hardware for mission-critical model development. The approach represents a step toward infrastructure strategies that match the actual needs of AI systems rather than forcing them into patterns designed for different types of computing The most successful AI companies of the next decade will likely be those that think beyond the cloud-first assumptions and build infrastructure strategies as sophisticated as their algorithms. We've featured the best cloud storage. This article was produced as part of TechRadarPro's Expert Insights channel where we feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today. The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here:
Digital Trends
an hour ago
- Digital Trends
That moment when I told ChatGPT it needed a history lesson, and it agreed with me
I had an experience this week which forcefully reminded me that ChatGPT and Google's Gemini were great but not perfect. And to be clear, I have jumped into the AI pool with both feet and am enthusiastic about the long-term prospects. However, I believe that we need to tap the brakes on the irrational exuberance and belief that AI can do everything, everywhere all at once. The specific project that broke ChatGPT's back was obscure on the one hand but should not really have been that tough. My daughter is finishing her doctoral dissertation and was trying to generate a map that compared the borders of the Byzantine Empire in the years 379 AD versus 457 AD. Recommended Videos Here is the prompt that I used against deep research: Create a detailed map that overlays the borders of the Byzantine empire in 379AD at the start of the reign of Theodosius the Great versus the borders in 457AD at the end of the reign of Marcian. I need both borders shown clearly on a single map. Use a historical map style and highlight major cities. The Deep Research option is powerful but often time-consuming. As it runs, I enjoy watching the play-by-play in the details window. ChatGPT did an excellent job of generating a text analysis of the changing borders, major cities, and historical events. The wheels fell off the bus when I asked ChatGPT to turn its text analysis into an easy-to-read map. Without digging too deeply into the minutiae of the fifth century world, the point is that it made up names, misspelled names and placed cities at random. Notice that Rome appears twice on the Italian peninsula. What is particularly frustrating about this effort is that the names and locations were correct in the text. I tried patiently asking for spelling corrections and proper placements of well-known cities without success. Finally, I told ChatGPT that its results were garbage and threw up my hands. To its credit, ChatGPT took the criticism in stride. It replied 'Thank you for your candor. You are right to expect better '. Unfortunately, things did not get better. After a few minutes of cursing out that platform I decided to give Google Gemini a shot at the identical query. Shockingly its results were even worse. If you look at the image below, you will see 'Rome' in the middle of the Iberian Peninsula. Antioch appears three or four times across Europe, but many of the other names are right out of fantasy novels. I was complaining about this mapping chaos to a friend. He shared a similar story. He entered a photo from a small offsite meeting into ChatGPT. He asked it to add the words 'Mahalo from Hawaii 2025' above a photo of a group of colleagues. Instead of just adding the text, the engine totally changed the image. It made people skinnier; it changed men into women and an Asian into a Caucasian. Another friend told me that an AI generated biography of him talked about his twin children which he does not have. It even provided a link to a non-existent source. Yikes. Ronald Reagan used to say: Trust but verify. My point is not to suggest that we run away from AI and cancel all our subscriptions. Rather, it is to remind everyone (me included) that we cannot hand the keys to the AI engines and walk away. They are tools that can assist us but, in the end, we need to look at the output, see if it looks and smells right, and decide whether to accept it or not. It is clear that the performance of AI engines is uneven; excellent at some projects and terrible at others–such as mapping. We will probably see the rise of the machines someday–but today is not the day.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Hong Kong Taxis Are a Perfect Stablecoin Test Case
Asia's last bastion of Luddite resistance to modern payment technology is finally crumbling. From April 1, Hong Kong's cash-loving cabbies will be required to offer passengers at least two alternatives to banknotes. The drivers will be free to choose their digital-payment options. Most will probably install Octopus Holdings Ltd.'s readers, since Hong Kong residents use the ubiquitous stored-value card — or its app equivalent — on trains, buses and ferries anyway. The Octopus network can also be tapped by travelers from mainland China to pay via their Alipay and WeChat Pay accounts back home.
