IAEA refutes Indian media reports of radiation leak in Pakistan
Listen to article
As Pakistan and India trade accusations over nuclear weapons mismanagement, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has confirmed that 'no radiation leakage or incident has been detected at any nuclear site in Pakistan,' BBC Urdu reported on Thursday.
The issue came up after unverified reports emerged in Indian media, alleging that Indian airstrikes targeted Pakistan's Kerana Hills, where a stockpile of nuclear missiles is reportedly located.
Amid the media speculation, the IAEA confirmed to the British broadcaster that 'based on available data, no radiation leakage or incident has been detected at any nuclear site in Pakistan.' The Indian Air Force also denied striking any nuclear facility.
Earlier, Indian Air Marshal AK Bharti was asked at a press briefing whether reports of a strike on the Kirana Hills nuclear site were accurate. 'Thank you for informing us that there is a nuclear facility there—we didn't know,' he said sarcastically, adding, 'we did not target Kirana Hills, regardless of what is or isn't there.'
India and Pakistan traded accusations of nuclear weapons mismanagement on Thursday, days after reaching a ceasefire agreement following days of escalation.
India's Defence Minister Rajnath Singh said that the IAEA should take control of Pakistan's nuclear weapons—just days after the two nuclear-armed neighbours concluded one of their worst military escalations in nearly three decades.
'Are nuclear weapons safe in the hands of such an irresponsible and rogue nation?' Singh asked while addressing soldiers in Srinagar, the capital of Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK). 'I believe that Pakistan's nuclear weapons should be taken under the supervision of the IAEA.'
Pakistan responded firmly, calling the remarks 'provocative' and aimed at undermining the credibility of its nuclear deterrent. The Foreign Office strongly condemned the Indian Defence Minister's comments, labelling them 'irresponsible' and reflective of India's 'frustration and insecurity.'
'These remarks are not only misleading but also reflect a lack of understanding of the IAEA's mandate,' said the FO spokesperson, adding that Pakistan does not rely on nuclear blackmail to maintain deterrence—unlike India.
The statement further noted that India's remarks expose 'growing insecurity over Pakistan's robust conventional and nuclear deterrence,' while also citing past instances of nuclear material mishandling in India to question New Delhi's own safety protocols.
The Indian minister's statement comes at a sensitive time, as both countries attempt to maintain the 2021 ceasefire agreement along the Line of Control (LoC).
Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar announced that the militaries of India and Pakistan have agreed to extend last week's ceasefire until Sunday, May 18. Addressing the Senate on Thursday, he said the extension paves the way for renewed political dialogue.
Meanwhile, the Pakistani military's chief spokesperson has cautioned that any serious escalation between the two nuclear-armed neighbours could have catastrophic consequences.
'The world now recognises the extent of the nuclear threat [in the region]. Any sane player, like the USA, understands this absurdity and what the Indians are trying to do here,' DG ISPR Lt Gen Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry told Sky News in an interview on Thursday.
'If India thinks that it can carve out a space for war between India and Pakistan, it is actually a recipe for carving out mutual destruction,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
34 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
US must rule out more strikes before talks can resume: Iran
LONDON: Diplomatic talks between Washington and Tehran cannot resume unless the US rules out further strikes on Iran, its deputy foreign minister told the BBC late Sunday. Majid Takht-Ravanchi told the British broadcaster that the US had signalled it wants to return to the negotiating table, a week after it struck three Iranian nuclear facilities. 'We have not agreed to any date, we have not agreed to the modality,' said Takht-Ravanchi. 'Right now we are seeking an answer to this question. Are we going to see a repetition of an act of aggression while we are engaging in dialogue?' The US needed to be 'quite clear on this very important question', he said. The two countries were in talks over Tehran's nuclear programme when Israel hit Iranian nuclear sites and military infrastructure earlier this month, with the US joining by bombing three nuclear sites – Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan – on June 21. The deputy minister revealed to the BBC that the US had signalled it did 'not want to engage in regime change' by targeting Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Takht-Ravanchi also said Iran should still be allowed to enrich uranium. 'The level of that can be discussed, the capacity can be discussed, but to say that you should not have enrichment, you should have zero enrichment, and if you do not agree, we will bomb you, that is the law of the jungle,' he said. Israel claims that Iran's nuclear programme is close to producing a bomb, whereas Tehran says it is for peaceful purposes. It is not clear yet how much damage the strikes inflicted on Iran's nuclear facilities, which US President Donald Trump had said were 'totally obliterated'. UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi said Iran would probably be able to begin to produce enriched uranium 'in a matter of months'. Iran-Israel war opens 'new road' for Mideast: US envoy to Turkiye Takht-Ravanchi said he did not know how long it would take. Under a 2015 deal, Iran was allowed to enrich uranium below 3.67 percent purity for fuel for commercial nuclear power plants. Trump abandoned the agreement in 2018 and Iran responded by producing uranium enriched to 60 percent – above levels for civilian usage but still below weapons grade. That material, if further refined, would theoretically be sufficient to produce more than nine nuclear bombs.
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
China to resume some Japanese seafood imports after Fukushima ban
BEIJING: China has lifted a ban on seafood imports from most regions of Japan, partially mending a years-long dispute over Tokyo's handling of nuclear wastewater. China and Japan are key trading partners, but increased friction over territorial rivalries and military spending has frayed ties in recent years. Japan's brutal occupation of parts of China before and during World War II remains a sore point, with Beijing accusing Tokyo of failing to atone for its past. Japan began gradually releasing treated wastewater from the stricken Fukushima nuclear plant into the Pacific Ocean in 2023. The move was backed by the International Atomic Energy Agency and the plant operator TEPCO says all radioactive elements have been filtered out except for tritium, levels of which are within safe limits. But it drew sharp criticism from Beijing, which banned imports of Japanese seafood as a result. Russia later followed suit. Samples from long-term monitoring of nuclear-contaminated water from Fukushima had 'not shown abnormalities', China's General Administration of Customs said in a statement Sunday. As a result, China 'decided to conditionally resume' seafood imports from Japan, except imports from 10 of the country's 47 prefectures, including Fukushima and Tokyo, which remain banned. The Japanese government received the decision 'positively', Kazuhiko Aoki, deputy chief cabinet secretary, told reporters in Tokyo. China, Japan close to resuming seafood imports after Fukushima ban But Japan 'will strongly demand the Chinese side lift remaining import regulations on seafood from 10 prefectures', he added. Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning confirmed Monday that Beijing was resuming seafood imports from regions 'that meet China's standards'. But she warned that China would take measures to restrict imports 'should any risks be identified'. In 2011, a huge earthquake triggered a deadly tsunami that swamped the Fukushima nuclear facility and pushed three of its six reactors into meltdown. China vociferously opposed the release of the treated wastewater, casting it as environmentally irresponsible. But in September last year, it said it would 'gradually resume' importing the seafood. Production companies that had suspended trade must reapply for registration in China and would be 'strictly' supervised, Beijing's customs administration said Sunday.
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
India must rethink its policies, says Ishaq Dar
FM Ishaq Dar in meeting to review ongoing evacuation of Pakistani nationals/zaireen presently stranded in Iran & Iraq on June 18. Photo: Pakistan's Deputy Prime Minister (DPM) and Foreign Minister, Ishaq Dar, has said that India must review its policies and cannot impose its will on Pakistan. Speaking at the Foundation Day ceremony of the Institute of Strategic Studies in Islamabad, Dar warned New Delhi against unilateral actions and reiterated Pakistan's commitment to regional peace and sovereignty. He strongly criticised India's use of 'false flag operations' to justify aggression against Pakistan, particularly citing the Pulwama incident, which he said was used by India to stage a fabricated narrative. 'India must revisit its strategic choices and end its policy of coercion,' Dar stated. Tensions between Pakistan and India escalated on April 22, when an attack in Pahalgam killed 26 people. India blamed Pakistan for the incident. Pakistan has categorically rejected Indian accusations. India then undertook a series of hostile actions the next day on April 23, suspending the 65-year-old Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), cancelling visas for Pakistani citizens, closing the Wagah-Attari border crossing and ordering the shutdown of the Pakistan High Commission in New Delhi, among others. Read: Pak IWT stance vindicated by arbitration court Both the countries subsequently reduced diplomatic staff at their respective embassies in the other's territory. Referring to water disputes, Dar asserted that India cannot unilaterally suspend the Indus Waters Treaty, accusing it of attempting to weaponise water against Pakistan. He reaffirmed Pakistan's resolve to safeguard its territorial integrity and uphold its sovereign rights. On the Kashmir issue, the DPM said the dispute is internationally recognised and its peaceful resolution is essential for regional stability. He accused India of openly violating international laws, while reiterating Pakistan's adherence to the principle of peaceful coexistence. Commenting on global affairs, Dar welcomed the ceasefire between Iran and Israel and reaffirmed Pakistan's longstanding support for Iran's legitimate stance. He called for dialogue-based resolution of Iran's nuclear issue and expressed concern over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, condemning ongoing atrocities in the region. Separately, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif welcomed the Permanent Court of Arbitration's Supplemental Award on the Indus Waters Treaty, calling it a major vindication of Pakistan's stance. Read more: Bilawal condemns US attack on Iran, warns India over IWT breach The ruling confirmed that India cannot unilaterally suspend the treaty or its dispute resolution mechanisms. In a statement on Sunday, the PM said water is vital for Pakistan and praised Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar and Attorney General Mansoor Awan for their legal efforts. The court stated that the Treaty remains binding unless terminated by mutual consent and does not allow one-sided suspension by either party. Earlier, Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairperson Bilawal Bhutto Zardari had said that Pakistan would consider war if India refused to honour the Indus Waters Treaty. 'India must choose between honouring the treaty or losing control of all six rivers,' Bilawal said, reaffirming Pakistan's commitment to protecting its share of water under the 1960 World Bank-brokered agreement. The comments followed an earlier statement made during a political rally in Sukkur, where Bilawal declared, 'Either the river will flow or their blood will.'
