
The US immigration system is being militarized. Now is the time to stand up
Perhaps the biggest headline to emerge from this bill is that it tears giant holes into our social safety net to ensure our nation's wealthiest could benefit from additional tax breaks. But for those of us on the frontlines of the fight to protect immigrants' rights, it signaled the further entrenchment of an authoritarian regime being created on the backs of immigrants. Irrespective of our immigration status or views on immigration, we should all be concerned because we will all be affected: the sheer quantity of resources set aside for immigration enforcement will turbocharge the militarization of our country.
History has taught us that social justice movements can play a significant role in protecting democracies when they are at risk from authoritarian regimes. This bill should be a wakeup call for us all to step up in defense of our democracy before it is too late. Here is what we should anticipate.
The law hands over a staggering $170bn to the Department of Homeland Security to ramp up this administration's brutal immigration enforcement agenda. Among the direct beneficiaries of this largesse is Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice).
Even without these resources, Ice has already been responsible for outrageous and unconstitutional acts that are hacking away at our democracy. It is Ice agents in masks who are kidnapping our neighbors, snatching them off the streets, at courthouses or their workplaces, shoving them into SUVs, and taking them to detention centers. Many have been deported without even being given the right to go before a judge.
Ice agents are using unimaginably harsh tactics. They are violently smashing car windows, ripping parents away from their kids, and targeting children at school. The audacity of their lawlessness and cruelty – often on public display – is unprecedented.
The Trump administration has shown a willingness to crack down violently on those who speak out against its immigration policies. Even public officials have been caught in this dragnet, including California senator Alex Padilla, New Jersey congresswoman LaMonica McIver, Newark mayor Ras Baraka, and New York City mayoral candidate Brad Lander. Every one of these violent encounters has been caught on film.
With this new and massive infusion of resources now being handed over to the DHS and Ice, we will soon see many more abductions on our streets, more family separations, and more brutal crackdowns on dissenters. We are also likely to see the widespread militarization of our communities, consistent with what has already transpired in parts of California: heavily armed military officers in battle fatigues carrying out violent raids with the use of tear gas and rubber bullets; the storming of public venues such as MacArthur Park in Los Angeles for no reason other than to instill fear and intimidation; and government-sanctioned attempts to silence and intimidate public officials and activists through arrests, violence, criminal sanctions and prosecutions.
As scenes previewed by militarized Los Angeles become commonplace in cities across the country – in blue states, to make an example, and in red states eager to collude – many more Americans will perhaps come to realize the full impact of this bill and recognize that the same system that cages immigrants closes rural hospitals. The same ideology that justifies family separation does not flinch when taking away food from the hungry. A government that disappears immigrants to foreign torture prisons without a day in court cannot be trusted to uphold your rights either. The machine of state violence, once built, expands.
So, what are we to do? How do we move forward?
It is incumbent on all of us to double down and meet the moment with the urgency it demands. That means committing to doing what we can to protect the most vulnerable amongst us and hold public officials accountable. We must be loud in our opposition to the attacks on our democracy and actively exercise our freedoms to protect it. We must contact our members of Congress to demand that they uphold the rule of law and take on those actively working to undermine our system of checks and balances. We must join the protests and the growing movement of people from all walks of life who are actively fighting authoritarianism. We must do everything we can to support our immigrant friends, neighbors and community members whose lives are being torn apart by this administration.
Finally, we must also vigorously reject the paralyzing lure of fatalism – that the future will merely be an extension of our present rather than something we can build together. If our government can pour boundless resources into hurting people, there is nothing radical or unrealistic in insisting that those same resources could be used to better all of our lives.
Sign up to Fighting Back
Big thinkers on what we can do to protect civil liberties and fundamental freedoms in a Trump presidency. From our opinion desk.
after newsletter promotion
At the National Immigration Law Center, we will continue using every tool at our disposal to fight back against Trump's attacks on our communities. We are clear eyed about how we got here and what the stakes are. Just because this moment demands defense, it will not stop us from standing firm in the declaration that a pathway to a better world still exists.
What's giving me hope now is the number of people who are joining a rapidly growing movement fighting back against this administration's authoritarian plans. They include courageous immigrants who refuse to be silenced or dehumanized; retirees who are spending time being of service to impacted immigrants, engaging elected officials and/or attending rallies and town halls; courageous young people who refuse to accept the status quo and are putting their bodies on the line; and entire communities who are speaking out and doing everything possible to protect their neighbors.
All of us have a role in upholding justice and preserving our democracy. I'm heartened to see people from all walks of life determined to do their part and remain optimistic that this movement will get bigger and stronger over time.
Kica Matos is president of the National Immigration Law Center
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
26 minutes ago
- The Sun
Diddy's ex Gina Huynh makes surprise plea for his release after dropping out of trial despite claim he ‘stomped on her'
SEAN 'Diddy' Combs' ex-girlfriend has bizarrely pleaded with a judge to release him despite once claiming he had 'stomped' on her. Virginia - 'Gina' - Huynh had initially been anonymously referred to as 'Victim-3' in the disgraced music mogul's sex trafficking trial. 6 6 She was supposed to testify against Combs in his criminal case, reported CNN. But, Gina "mysteriously dropped out" days before the rapper's trial began, it added. It has now transpired that she has asked - via Combs' defense team - for Judge Arun Subramanian to show her ex leniency during the star's sentencing. This is despite her once claiming he had stomped on her stomach, and dragged her by the hair. In a surprise letter to the judge, Gina has pleaded for Combs to be set free from jail. She also stated that she does not believe Combs is a danger to the community. It's the first time "Victim-3" has identified herself by name. According to court documents cited by Page Six, Gina described her ex as a committed family man 'who has not been violent in many years.' She claimed, 'To my knowledge, [Combs] has not been violent for many years, and he has been committed to being a father first. 'Our relationship, like many, was not always perfect, we experienced ups and downs, and mistakes were made. Diddy trial witness 'The Punisher' reveals battle against 'storm of negativity' after taking part in freak-offs "But he was willing to acknowledge his mistakes and make better decisions in the future.' Gina's letter also claimed her ex, 'embodied an energy of love, patience and gentleness that was markedly different from his past behavior' by the time their troubled relationship ended. 'I am writing because I do not view Mr. Combs as a danger to me or to the community,' she said, while stressing that it was his "first criminal case." 'He has substantial ties to his family and community, including children who depend on him for emotional and financial support,' she added. 'I want to assure the Court that if released, I believe Mr. Combs will adhere to all conditions imposed and will not jeopardize his freedom or the well-being of his family.' Her plea was included as an exhibit in the defense's latest filing ahead of the singer 's sentencing in his federal criminal case on October 3. VIOLENCE However, her endorsement has come as a surprise as she had previously claimed Combs had punched her in the head during their five-year relationship. Her allegations were aired during a bombshell 2019 interview with controversial celebrity gossip blogger LaTasha Kebe, known as Tasha K - who was once involved in a defamation lawsuit with Cardi B. Gina alleged during her interview with the blogger, "He stomped on my stomach really hard — like, took the wind out of my breath. 'I couldn't breathe. He kept hitting me. I was pleading to him, 'Can you just stop? I can't breathe.'' She also alleged the rapper then grabbed her by the hair and was 'punching' the back of her head. Gina claimed she defended herself by fighting back as she had had 'enough of his s**t.' She alleged, "He was mentally, emotionally and physically abusing me." DROPPED OUT OF TRIAL Diddy's ex was initially part of the prosecution's case against Combs, and was to have been a key witness. She was expected to testify alongside his other ex-girlfriends, Cassie - the R&B singer whose real name is Casandra Ventura - and Jane Doe, who testified under a pseudonym. However, prosecutors had to tell the jury in New York that 'Victim-3 may not show up' after they lost contact with Gina and her attorney. Gina had claimed to Tasha K that Combs, "would always compare me to Cassie and tell me that I'm the bad one, she's a good one." Cassie and Jane told the court during the star's trial that he forced them into drug-fueled sex marathons they called 'freak-offs' and 'hotel nights." The jury deliberating at his sex trafficking trial heard testimony from 34 witnesses over seven weeks at Manhattan's Federal Court. APPLES THROWN This included testimony from Combs' ex-employees, such as his former assistant, George Kaplan, who testified that he witnessed at least three alleged instances of violence. He alleged that his saw his former boss throw apples at a woman named Gina in 2015. Kaplan said it was "the last straw for me." ABC News reported during the trial that Kaplan told the court that in the fall of 2015 he saw a "very angry" Combs. He alleged that he saw the singer "throwing these green apples that lived in a decorative vessel" in the entryway of his Miami home. 6 6 The apples were allegedly aimed "at another girlfriend" of Combs' who, Kaplan told the court, was "trying to shield herself with her arms." In 2016, security cameras captured Combs hitting, kicking and dragging Cassie as she left his room at the Intercontinental Hotel in Los Angeles. The horrific video was shown repeatedly throughout his trial. VERDICT In early July, Combs, 55, was acquitted of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking charges carrying potential life prison terms. But, he was convicted of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution for arranging for girlfriends and male sex workers to travel to engage in sexual encounters that he filmed. Each prostitution-related charge carries a potential maximum 10 years in prison. After hearing the verdict, Combs held his hands up in a prayer motion, looking at the jury and hugging his defense lawyer Teny Geragos. Prosecutors had alleged the Bad Boy Records founder used physical violence, threats, and the resources of his business empire to coerce two former girlfriends to participate in days-long, drug-fueled sexual performances with male sex workers sometimes called "freak-offs." Combs pleaded not guilty, and his lawyers argued his two girlfriends took part willingly in the encounters. SENTENCING The Associated Press reported that prosecutors said they now expect Combs could face a prison sentence 'substantially higher' than the four to five years they once thought he was likely to face. In a submission to the Manhattan federal court last Thursday, they also opposed his request to be released on $50 million bail while he awaits sentencing. Combs' lawyers have said they believe the guidelines, if properly calculated, will call for 21 to 27 months in prison. 6


The Sun
26 minutes ago
- The Sun
UK's immigration hotspots revealed where 1 in 20 residents are migrants who arrived last year… how does YOUR town fare?
NEW analysis has revealed that up to one in 20 residents in parts of England and Wales are immigrants who moved here in the last year. Government statistics published last week show the total population change of England and Wales skyrocketed by 700,000 in 2023/24. It marks the second largest surge in population since World War 2. The male population grew faster than the female population with net international migration 18,000 higher for males than for females. The Daily Mail revealed that net international migration, the difference between the number of people arriving and leaving the country, was positive in all but one of 318 local authority areas. Newham, London, saw an influx of more than 17,000 people in the year to mid-2024. A total of 17,224 people came to the borough as international migrants, the local authority area is home to just 374,000 people. The data suggests that migrants arriving from abroad in the last year now make up 4.6 per cent of the London borough's population, roughly one in 20 people. According to the Office of National Statistics (ONS) Luton and Coventry had similarly high figures with 10,200 international migrants coming to Luton and 15,446 coming to Coventry. This marked a 4.3 per cent population increase for Luton and a 4.2 per cent increase for Coventry. Current immigration levels are at an all time high and experts warn that this is pilling pressure on housing, schools and the NHS. Robert Bates, research director at the Centre for Migration Control told the Daily Mail: "Assimilation has been made impossible by the sheer scale of mass migration and our national culture is damaged as a result. The Sun watches as hundreds of illegal migrants arrive at Dover "Stretched public services - from the NHS and GP surgeries to public transport and schools - are being further eroded by a low wage, low-skill immigration system. "Politicians have ignored the concerns of voters due to a misguided belief that open borders benefit the economy. "We fast need a government which rejects this dogma and starts work to scrap a whole raft of failed visa routes, end foreign nationals ' access to the welfare system, and invests in skills for the British workforce." He added that mass migration is changing the fabric of Britain. 4 4 According to the ONS' estimates there were roughly 61.8 million people in England and Wales in mid-2024. This is up from just 61.1 million people in mid-2023. The increase of 706,881 people was overshadowed by the 821,210 population rise in the months to mid-2023. Growth in both years was driven almost entirely by record rises in the number of international migrants. Nearly 1.1 million people are thought to have immigrated in the last 12 months compared to the 450,000 thought to have emigrated. There were only slightly more births than deaths in the year to mid-2024, adding just 29,982 to the population. In raw numbers, the larger local authorities had the most international migrants arriving. The City of London, home to just 15,111 people saw an 11 per cent increase in its population, this was down to net international migration. Only one local authority area, South Holland, Lincolnshire, experienced more international migrants leaving than arriving. The ONS said the area had 557 arrivals from abroad last year but 695 people emigrated. Internal migration - movement within the UK - is recorded separately. The ONS said there may be some overlap in the data but determining how much is difficult because of the difficulties in examining population flow. For example, the same person could be classed as an international immigrant and internal emigrant, they could also die, further confusing the picture. It comes after the Prime Minister announced a crackdown on immigration in May. His package of policies to curb immigration involved a hiking of the skills threshold for immigrants and a toughening of the rules on fluency in English. Under the new rules migrants will also be required to wait 10 years for citizenship rather than the current five and face deportation for even lower-level crimes. Keir Starmer also recently came to a "one in one out" deal with French president Emmanuel Macron in a bid to solve the small boats crisis. It comes as the total number of migrants who arrived in 2025 by small boat so far reaches 25,436, Home Office figures show. Some 898 people made the journey in 13 small boats on Wednesday, the arrivals figure is up 51 per cent on this point last year, and is 73 per cent higher than in 2023. 4 4


Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump: will 'substantially' raise tariffs on goods from India over Russian oil purchases
WASHINGTON, Aug 4 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Monday he will substantially raise tariffs on goods from India over its purchases of Russian oil. "India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine," Trump said in a post on Truth Social. "Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA." He did not elaborate on what the tariff would be. India's trade ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump last week said he would impose a 25% tariff on goods imported from India and added that the world's fifth-largest economy would also face an unspecified penalty but gave no details. Over the weekend, two Indian government sources told Reuters that India will keep purchasing oil from Russia despite Trump's threats. The sources did not wish to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter.