Wesgroup proposes significantly more density at Coronation Park site to offset new Metro Vancouver fees, affordable housing
Spanning 15 acres, the development was set to include six residential towers between 26 and 31 storeys and 100,000 square feet of commercial space following council approval in 2023. Of the 2,587 units, 101 were set to offered as rentals.
The May 10 delegation from Wesgroup follows a 2023 letter of intent the developer submitted to explore affordable housing options in exchange for increased density after concerns were raised about the complete absence of below-market units in the project.
The proposal will require another OCP amendment and rezoning to allow for another tower to be built on site, as well increasing the height of three other towers.
Dean Johnson, Wesgroup's senior vice president of development, said the amount of density is needed to offset costs related to recent increases to Metro Vancouver developer cost charges (DCCs) hurting the project's bottom line, and building market rentals under the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation's (CMHC) Apartment Construction Loan Program (ACLP).
'The CMHC's ACLP is the only viable path forward in today's financial environment,' Johnson said. 'We have two options in front of us: additional density to offset the cost, or decrease the amenity package we previously agreed to with the community. We do not want to go down that path.'
Wesgroup's proposal would add an additional 35-storey tower, as well as 13 storeys on three other towers. In exchange, Wesgroup would convert one of the 26-storey towers fronting Ioco Road to 100 percent rental housing. Of its 288 units, 72 would be secured at below-market rates for 25 years.
CMHC's $55-billion ACLP provides low-cost financing to developers in exchange for rental and affordable housing commitments. But the 2025 funds have already been claimed, and the 2026 intake window is nearly full. In order to qualify, Wesgroup needed municipal confirmation that Port Moody supports the project's alignment with CMHC affordability goals.
While council only received the proposal for information, it unanimously approved the issuance of a 'comfort letter' needed to advance Wesgroup's application to the CMHC.
Offsetting costs
Shortly after Port Moody council
approved Coronation Park in October 2023
, Metro Vancouver's Mayor's Council approved steep increases to regional DCCs, resulting in a $30 million in unplanned fees, according to Johnson.
He said the DCC spike is a significant cost burden on the project, and without the added density, Wesgroup may have to scale back the amenity package approved for the development.
'There was a substantial increase – once in a lifetime, really, for many of us – and this cost is going to be something that we have to deal with on this project,' Johnson said.
Additional density is also needed due to the value difference between market condominiums and market rental.
Most of the additional square footage, however, is being used to offset Metro Vancouver's DCC increases, which account for approximately 77 percent of the increase in density.
Johnson noted that one of the benefits of using the CMHC program is that both towers facing Ioco Road would be built simultaneously, while much of the density would be added in later phases of the project.
Surety bonds
Wesgroup's final request was for the city to consider accepting surety bonds as an alternative to letters of credit when developers post financial securities tied to development permits.
A surety bond offers municipalities a secure financial guarantee that a developer will complete their obligations, while giving the developer more financial flexibility compared to traditional bank-issued letters of credit.
'Letters of credit tie up millions of dollars in equity,' Johnson said. 'Surety bonds are insured, regulated, and already accepted in municipalities like Burnaby, Surrey, and Vancouver.'
He noted Wesgroup currently faces a $15.8 million letter of credit due in July, which it is seeking to defer until building permits are issued in March 2026.
The company is still in the pre-sale phase and has not yet secured final project financing, making the immediate issuance of such a large letter of credit 'challenging,' Johnson said.
Council response
Coun. Haven Lurbiecki was sharply critical of the amount of density being proposed, and questioned whether the CMHC proposal was even related.
She accused Wesgroup of 'shifting the goalposts' by asking the public to essentially subsidize an already massive project.
Lurbiecki noted the original plan includes mostly studios and one-bedroom units at a time when the city needs affordable family-sized housing, townhomes, co-ops, four-plexes, and seniors housing.
'Anything but more condos,' she said. 'To even consider this request for more density, I just find it irresponsible and inexplicable.'
Other councillors took a more supportive approach. Coun. Kyla Knowles welcomed the affordable housing plan and said the financial pressures facing developers must be understood if homes are to be delivered.
'We need homes. So let's build the homes,' Knowles said. 'If there's an extra $30 million in DCCs, you could say, 'Great, the developer makes less.' But that cost falls on end users.'
She also supported Wesgroup's request to explore surety bonds as an alternative to letters of credit for financial security deposits.
'Financing has changed. It's gotten more challenging,' Knowles said. 'To not have any understanding of that means you are worsening the crisis.'
Coun. Callan Morrison said he supported the comfort letter but wanted more information before weighing in on the broader density and financial deferral requests. 'I appreciate this is going to need a bigger discussion,' he said.
Mayor Meghan Lahti emphasized the comfort letter was only to allow Wesgroup to begin its CMHC application – not an endorsement of all its future asks.
'We may support them sending in the application, but we may not support it at the end of the day,' she said. 'This is helping them get to the next step.'
In principle, however, the mayor supported the rental housing proposal.
'If all things were equal, would we be supportive of a CMHC project happening on that site in the second tower? My answer is a resounding yes,' Lahti said. 'But obviously, there are multi-faceted levels of conversation that need to take place.'
Staff will return with a report on the broader proposal – including the OCP amendment, rezoning, and requests related to financial securities and density.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Digby affordable housing project on hold as federal funding dries up
A plan by a Digby, N.S., non-profit to build affordable housing on the site of a former downtown motel is at a standstill as the group awaits word on federal funding. The Digby & Area Housing Coalition Society purchased the former Siesta Motel in 2022 with an aim to turn the existing building into affordable housing, coalition chair Nancy Robinson said. Subsequently, it was decided that it would be more cost efficient to demolish the motel and build 34 units on the site. The units would serve seniors and other vulnerable people facing Digby's severe housing shortage. Robinson said the units would be genuinely affordable, with tenants spending no more than 30 per cent of their income on rent, including utilities. She said they already have many applicants for the units. After securing $300,000 in funding including provincial grants for design work and municipal approvals, the $11.2-million project was construction-ready this spring and awaiting the release of federal funds. After waiting for the outcome of the federal election, Robinson said the group was told the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation's affordable housing fund, their expected funding source, had been depleted. 'That's a lot of money' CMHC said in an email to CBC that it's affordable housing fund "has attracted significant interest and success, resulting in numerous high-quality applications," but did not indicate if and when it will be replenished. Robinson said the devastating news has left the project in limbo. "That's a lot of money and it's very difficult to make that up," she said. "It's nerve-racking, not just because of the number of people that are waiting for housing, desperately waiting for housing, and Digby where there's really basically nothing available and certainly nothing affordable." Robinson said the delay leaves the volunteer organization having to cover significant costs, including the $2,600-monthly mortgage payment on the vacant property. The delay couldn't come at worse time for Digby, she said. The community's housing shortage has reached emergency levels. She said the funding issue appears linked to broader changes in federal housing policy. While Ottawa works to implement its new housing plan, she said existing programs like the affordable housing fund have been allowed to lapse. Robinson said she understands the need for systemic reform, but immediate action is needed to help people in desperate need of appropriate housing. The coalition has launched a local fundraising campaign and is exploring alternative financing options. Chris D'Entremont, the Conservative MP for Acadie-Annapolis, which includes Digby, said it was strange the program was still taking applications even though it said its funds have been depleted. He said billions of dollars have gone into the fund, which has existed since 2018. "We're hoping that as the fall rolls around, of course, there's going to be a budget coming," he told CBC Radio's Information Morning Nova Scotia. Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne "has said that there will be a program coming, that there should be funding. So we're hoping it will be topping this off." With demolition delayed from its planned May 2025 start, Robinson said completion could now slip to late 2026. Meanwhile, for the applicants the wait continues with no clear resolution in sight. "They are desperate. It's palpable. It's tragic, really," Robinson said. MORE TOP STORIES
Business Insider
2 days ago
- Business Insider
How Johnson & Johnson Stock (JNJ) Discovered a New Lease of Life
Biopharma giant Johnson & Johnson's (JNJ) stock hit new highs this year after reporting its Q2 results on July 16th, giving the market a clear signal that it's reigniting growth with practically flawless numbers—a potential turning point for the second half of the year. The upwardly revised guidance and expectations for strong margin expansion, despite lingering litigation concerns, have brought fresh optimism to the stock and appeased shareholders clamoring for added value. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. While the stock isn't as discounted as it was earlier this year, valuations still look reasonable. Given JNJ's strong compounding potential and this renewed bullish momentum, I see it as a Buy. How J&J's Strong Quarter Sets the Stage for Growth Johnson & Johnson stock has been rangebound for years, weighed down by a mix of factors, including a massive wave of lawsuits claiming its talc-based baby powder caused cancer due to asbestos contamination, as well as expiring drug patents, such as its blockbuster Stelara losing exclusivity. Last but not least is sluggish growth and an eroded safe-haven reputation, since legacy consumer brands like Tylenol, Listerine, and Band-Aid have low growth and face margin pressure from cheap competition. According to TipRanks data, JNJ has underperformed the S&P quite considerably since 2024. Johnson & Johnson's latest Q2 earnings may mark a true inflection point toward more consistent alpha generation. The company delivered exactly what it needed— beating both earnings and revenue expectations —while issuing a notable upward revision to guidance: an additional $2 billion in forecasted sales and $0.25 more in projected EPS. For a pharma giant like J&J, that's a clear signal of renewed momentum following a prolonged period of litigation-related overhang. Management also reaffirmed its full-year outlook for a 300-basis-point improvement in operating margin, raising it from approximately 25.4% to 28.4%. Notably, the quarter wasn't just about numbers. J&J reported compelling 5-year trial results for its multiple myeloma immunotherapy—an encouraging sign in the fight against a challenging cancer. The company also set an ambitious goal: to become the global leader in oncology by 2030, with a target of over $50 billion in cancer drug sales. With a potential $5 billion peak opportunity in bladder cancer and a strong pipeline aimed at offsetting losses from aging blockbusters, J&J is signaling that real innovation is back at the forefront. Breaking Free from the Margin Squeeze While markets often reward margin expansion, Johnson & Johnson looks especially well-positioned to benefit going forward. In addition to raising full-year earnings guidance, the company also delivered positive updates on cost pressures— halving its expected tariff impact from $400 million to $200 million and projecting a $1.1 billion tailwind from favorable currency shifts as the U.S. dollar weakens. The reduced tariff burden is primarily attributed to the MedTech division, which is more exposed to global supply chains and international manufacturing than the pharmaceutical segment. That's a clear tailwind for margins and future profitability. It's also important to note how strategic portfolio decisions have helped set the stage for this improvement. The 2023 spin-off of Kenvue—essentially the entire Consumer Health business—removed a lower-margin segment from the mix, sharpening J&J's focus on higher-margin areas. This move highlights the company's commitment not only to defending margins but also to actively growing them. In today's market, stability alone isn't enough—investors are looking for real margin expansion, and Johnson & Johnson seems intent on delivering. Analysts have responded by raising their EPS estimates for 2025 and 2026 by about 2% compared to before Q2 earnings. They now expect full-year EPS in 2025 to hit $10.86 —an 8.7% increase from last year—and to reach $11.34 in 2026, representing an annual growth rate of 4.4%. Reasonable Valuation with Growth on the Horizon Johnson & Johnson is a vast, stable, and diversified company, so its valuation tends to reflect relative stability rather than wild growth. Looking at its forward earnings multiple, currently around 15.5x, it's basically in line with the five-year average. This is well above the lows seen earlier this year, when it traded as low as 11x forward earnings in January. To me, this suggests the valuation isn't necessarily cheap, but it's reasonable. Comparing J&J's current earnings multiples over the last twelve months to its main peers, the 17.5x P/E ratio sits close to the sector average. Except for Merck & Co. (MRK), J&J is actually one of the more discounted names in the group. Finally, with a dividend yield of almost 3%, the stock no longer appears exuberant, and the yield isn't particularly compelling—especially when compared to the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield. However, J&J's payout ratio is typically safe, at around 50% of earnings, which helps build shareholder trust. Additionally, the market is now anticipating a more positive growth trajectory following the recent upward revisions to guidance, both last quarter and earlier this year. Is JNJ Stock a Buy, Hold, or Sell? Wall Street sentiment on Johnson & Johnson remains mixed, with more caution than conviction among analysts. Of the 19 analysts who have issued ratings over the past three months, nine are bullish, while the remaining ten are neutral. The average price target stands at $176.35, suggesting a modest upside of approximately 4.3% from the current share price. Johnson & Johnson Positioned for Consistent Alpha Generation Johnson & Johnson has, in my view, successfully restored market confidence in both its innovation pipeline and cost discipline—key pillars that could drive renewed growth and support reliable shareholder returns for decades to come. For long-term investors, initiating a position now is essentially a bet on a proven dividend combined with steady capital appreciation—an attractive formula that has historically outperformed the broader market. While the stock appears fairly valued at current levels, it offers compelling potential for compounding returns and consistent alpha generation in the years ahead.
Chicago Tribune
2 days ago
- Chicago Tribune
Mayor Brandon Johnson pledges no push for property tax hike after CFO recently called one ‘likely'
Mayor Brandon Johnson is now ruling out seeking a property tax hike in his upcoming budget proposal, an apparent shift in course for his administration after a top city official said earlier in the week that they probably would do so. On Friday, Johnson said he will instead try again to tax the city's wealthiest residents and corporations. He added that he has 'a number' of ideas for progressive revenue, but did not answer when asked to share them. 'The ultra-rich in this city and this state have an opportunity to do a better job in investing in our infrastructure, investing in community safety,' he said. Johnson told the Tribune that 'nothing has changed' when asked about the apparent abrupt switch-up during a news conference. The mayor's attempts to raise property taxes to balance this year's budget were roundly rejected by aldermen. But he said he isn't turning away from property taxes to close the 2026 budget hole because he's worried he doesn't have the votes. 'We've always made it very clear from the very beginning that we are going to invest in people and use progressive revenue to ensure that we build the safest, most affordable big city in America,' he said. Just Tuesday, Chicago's Chief Financial Officer Jill Jaworski said 'it is likely that that will be part of the package' when asked about the mayor calling for a 2026 property tax increase. But the mayor delivered a clear rejection of the idea Thursday. 'I will not be proposing a property tax increase in my budget. I'm going to continue to work hard to find progressive revenue,' he told ABC-7 Chicago. The mayor similarly did not specify Thursday to ABC-7 what new taxes and other revenue-raisers he hopes to rely on to balance the city's budget. He also said it was too early to discuss potential furloughs and layoffs, adding 'our workforce is what makes our city strong.' The 2026 budget fight will begin in earnest after Labor Day. Johnson, who campaigned promising to not raise property taxes, proposed last year that the city raise them by $300 million to help close a budget gap near $1 billion. Aldermen rejected the plan in an unprecedented 50-0 vote. The mayor's administration then tried to negotiate several smaller property tax hikes with aldermen, but was rejected each time. The City Council's decision, alongside Johnson's opposition to city service and workforce cuts, resulted in a compromise to balance the budget with a fleet of smaller taxes and fees. The largest was a roughly $130 million hike to the personal property lease tax on cloud computing services, a move that affected software services, including many that businesses rely upon. Johnson notably failed in an earlier effort to tax the rich in 2023 when the 'Bring Chicago Home' plan lost in a citywide referendum. The proposal would have hiked taxes on real estate transfers over $1 million to raise money to pay for homelessness services. Many aldermen fear the sort of kitchen-sink approach they used to land the budget last year will be harder to use this year. Several easier-to-tap options have been exhausted, and the city's fiscal challenges have only grown as federal funding cuts threaten the city's already precarious financial position. Johnson's top budget officials have long described property taxes as an effective way to bring in predictable, long-term revenue and stabilize the city's budget. But in ruling out property taxes as part of the package this fall, the mayor may very well have sensed a trial balloon had popped after several aldermen quickly criticized the idea this week.
