Victoria law students not allowed laptops in exams to prevent AI cheating
Photo:
123RF
A law student at Victoria University of Wellington (VUW) said students had been "left in the lurch" after an announcement on Monday that said next month's exams for two law subjects would have to be handwritten.
The student, who did not wish to be named, also said a timetable had still not been provided.
In an announcement from the Dean, Professor Geoff McLay, he said he had become "increasingly worried that the embedding of artificial intelligence (AI) in many students' laptops makes ensuring that students' work is their own very difficult".
He had hoped the university would have a technical solution, but said it was very unlikely, although he hoped one would be available at the end of the year.
"This means that we will not be able to allow students to use laptops for exams next month," McLay wrote.
"I want to make this announcement as soon as possible so students have time to prepare for handwritten examinations."
McLay added that there would be an exception for students with a disability that required them to use a keyboard.
The situation affected the LAWS 312 Equity and LAWS 334 Ethics exams.
The student said the announcement was stressful during an already stressful time.
In a Facebook post, a representative of the Victoria University of Wellington Law Students' Society (VUWLSS) said the Council of Legal Education had to be certain that everyone who passed the exams in Equity and Ethics deserved a pass (and did not cheat).
"Previously in person invigilation has been sufficient to manage these concerns. However, due to the increasing ability and sophistication of AI the faculty were concerned about the reliability of the exams, leading to their decision to make the Equity and Ethics exams handwritten."
The representative said VUWLSS had expressed that students' preference was for typed exams - "reflecting how our professional lives will look".
"However, once it became clear that the faculty felt they needed to proceed with handwritten exams we emphasised that students should be informed as early as possible, accessibility options should be made clear, and exam content and timing should reflect the fact that many students have not done handwritten exams since high school and are not used to writing for extended periods of time."
The representative added it was separate from the delay to the exam timetable, which was due to short-staffing.
In a statement, VUW Provost Professor Bryony James said students' handwriting their exams meant the university could be confident that the results truly reflected the students' own knowledge and effort - free of any suggestion of the influence of AI.
James said she would ensure that no student was disadvantaged, and was committed to working with students - including those with disabilities - who might need further support to participate in exams and final assessments as a result.
"As part of this undertaking the Faculty of Law will review this Trimester's exam results to ensure this cohort's performance is in line with previous years and confirm that students are not significantly impacted by this decision."
President of VUW's Students' Association Liban Ali told
Morning Report
he was aware that this could happen as early as last year.
"It has been on the card as of last year, so ... I feel like there was something that was going to happen."
Ali said the announcement had come at the wrong time, and that the Students' Association were very concerned for students.
He said the Students' Association had engaged the Law Society and the faculty to determine the best way to support students.
He added that he would make sure that any changes were communicated early in the future.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
16 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Teen Sarah Patrick charged with parents' murder after sister's discovery
'I can't help but hate myself because I didn't wake up to find them before my five-year-old sister had to find her parents like that,' the teen said in a post to her now-deactivated TikTok social media account. 'It hits me when I see my five-year-old sister screaming for her mommy and daddy,' she added. Sarah, now 17, was arrested early in July by Carroll County, Georgia, police and charged with two counts of murder and two of aggravated assault. Carroll County officials say she turned herself in when presented with 'mountains of physical and digital evidence'. Her biological father, Doniel, accompanied her. He's convinced she's innocent. 'I'll always be in your corner,' he wrote on Facebook. 'Never doubt your place in this world. You were sent here with purpose, wrapped in grace and born to shine in ways only your soul knows how.' Chaotic childhood 'They don't know it, but a year from now me and my 5-year-old sister would find them wrongfully shot dead in our home – and they won't get to watch me graduate high school, see me walk down the aisle, or even say goodbye,' Sarah posted to TikTok alongside an image of her dead parents in March. Carroll County police cited "mountains of physical and digital evidence" in their case against Patrick. Photo / TikTok 'I miss you guys, save a seat for me in heaven.' But the series of tearful TikTok posts did not address the bitter custody battle waged between her biological parents. Doniel Patrick filed for divorce from his wife in 2018 after 10 years of marriage. They had two children, Sarah and her younger brother, Donnie. Doniel had sought 'primary physical custody of the parties' minor child' and that all visits be supervised until she proved to be 'clean' of drug and alcohol abuse. Ultimately, the divorce settlement gave primary custody to the mother, with the father only seeing them every second weekend and during holidays. This settlement was soon appealed, however. Doniel filed an emergency custody application in November 2019, alleging that Kristen and her new boyfriend – James Brock – had exposed the children to methamphetamine and marijuana use. According to court documents, Sarah, then just 11, told police she was aware of the presence of drugs, that drugs were being used, and that she felt 'unsafe'. Brock was serving probation for drug offences involving ice and marijuana. 'I, Sarah Grace Patrick, am 11 years old and love both of my parents very much,' she recorded in appeal documentation. 'I really want to live with my father. On December 12, 2019, my mother said I could finally live with my father after I told her.' The custody appeal was initially granted. But it was overturned just five days later. Kristin then accused Doniel of breaching the divorce custody agreement by 'wilfully abusing alcohol during his parenting time' and seeking to demean her reputation with her children. A March 2020 court order gave the parents equal custody, adding that the mother must 'ensure that the oldest child, Sarah Patrick, is placed in counselling immediately'. Tumultuous times By October 2020, Sara Grace was allowed to stay with her father during the week and return to her mother on weekends. But, two years later, things took a disturbing turn. Her stepfather, James Brock, accused Kristin of deliberately driving the family car into the side of a barn in which he was standing. James Brock, 45, and Kristin Brock, 41. Photo / Facebook 'Respondent tried to run over the petitioner while he was inside the barn, with the minor child in the backseat of the vehicle,' a police report reads. 'The other minor child witnessed the whole incident. Respondent is abusing prescription medication.' The 'other minor' inside the car was Jaley, then aged 6. Her older brother, Donnie, also witnessed the incident. James went on to accuse Kristin of assault, deliberate property damage and threatening to kill him. But he later dropped all allegations. Instead, they got married in December 2023. 'I don't know if she ever realised … that the person I most wanted to be was her,' Sarah Grace posted to TikTok in April. Another clip shows her in tears, with mascara running down her face. Superimposed are the words: 'Life's hard but at least I have my mom'. The post then cuts to two cremation urns with a photo of Kristin with James. The caption reads: 'Mom?' Sarah Grace's grandfather, Dennis Nolan, is not convinced of her guilt. 'It's all speculative stuff,' he told FOX 5 Atlanta. 'Nothing puts the gun in her hand. They don't have the gun.' He said he had received a call from Sarah after she was detained: 'What are they doing to me?' she reportedly asked. 'Why are they doing this to me? I didn't do anything.' Building a case 'I know, 100% of my heart, that Sarah's innocent,' Sarah's father, Doniel, told US media. 'She's a typical 17-year-old that lived like a teenager, and she would never do this.' Her father, Doniel Patrick (left), insists on her innocence, criticising police procedures during her interrogation. Photo / Facebook He complained that police had not followed correct procedures when interviewing his daughter. Police had prompted him to take a break, he explained. 'By the time I came back in, they had her in the room, interrogating her without my permission. By the way, she was 16 years old at the time,' he said. Doniel says Sarah had named several people she believed may have been involved in the killing. 'She had told us about, you know, other friends of the family and stuff, and she suspected they could have done it,' he said. But Carroll County police are resolute. 'While the case has not remained in the public spotlight in recent months, this investigation has never gone silent,' the Sheriff's Office said in a recent statement. 'Real justice takes time, time to ensure that no detail is overlooked, no stone unturned.' County Sheriff's Office spokeswoman Ashley Hulsey said there were no signs of forced entry at the house, though one door was slightly ajar. And nothing appeared to have been stolen. 'Our team has sifted through mountains of physical and digital evidence and collaborated with the FBI and GBI (Georgia Bureau of Investigation) crime lab,' she added. Hulsey explained that a livestreamed recording of Sarah giving a eulogy at her mother's funeral was among the key pieces of evidence they had collected. Investigators believe the performance was an attempt to divert attention. Although they admit they do not have a motive for the killings. 'She's 17. She's kind of been out on her own. She's lived with different family members and moved all over the place,' Hulsey said. 'We don't know what goes through the mind of a child who wants to harm their parents.' Sarah has been charged as a full adult. The next court hearing is scheduled for August 11.
Techday NZ
a day ago
- Techday NZ
Sensitive data exposure rises with employee use of GenAI tools
Harmonic Security has released its quarterly analysis finding that a significant proportion of data shared with Generative AI (GenAI) tools and AI-enabled SaaS applications by employees contains sensitive information. The analysis was conducted on a dataset comprising 1 million prompts and 20,000 files submitted to 300 GenAI tools and AI-enabled SaaS applications between April and June. According to the findings, 22% of files (total 4,400) and 4.37% of prompts (total 43,700) included sensitive data. The categories of sensitive data encompassed source code, access credentials, proprietary algorithms, merger and acquisition (M&A) documents, customer or employee records, and internal financial information. Use of new GenAI tools The data highlights that in the second quarter alone, organisations on average saw employees begin using 23 previously unreported GenAI tools. This expanding variety of tools increases the administrative load on security teams, who are required to vet each tool to ensure it meets security standards. A notable proportion of AI tool use occurs through personal accounts, which may be unsanctioned or lack sufficient safeguards. Almost half (47.42%) of sensitive uploads to Perplexity were made via standard, non-enterprise accounts. The numbers were lower for other platforms, with 26.3% of sensitive data entering ChatGPT through personal accounts, and just 15% for Google Gemini. Data exposure by platform Analysis of sensitive prompts identified ChatGPT as the most common origin point in Q2, accounting for 72.6%, followed by Microsoft Copilot with 13.7%, Google Gemini at 5.0%, Claude at 2.5%, Poe at 2.1%, and Perplexity at 1.8%. Code leakage represented the most prevalent form of sensitive data exposure, particularly within ChatGPT, Claude, DeepSeek, and Baidu Chat. File uploads and risks The report found that, on average, organisations uploaded 1.32GB of files in the second quarter, with PDFs making up approximately half of all uploads. Of these files, 21.86% contained sensitive data. The concentration of sensitive information was higher in files compared to prompts. For example, files accounted for 79.7% of all stored credit card exposure incidents, 75.3% of customer profile leaks, and 68.8% of employee personally identifiable information (PII) incidents. Files accounted for 52.6% of exposure volume related to financial projections. Less visible sources of risk GenAI risk does not only arise from well-known chatbots. Increasingly, regular SaaS tools that integrate large language models (LLMs) - often without clear labelling as GenAI - are becoming sources of risk as they access and process sensitive information. Canva was reportedly used for documents containing legal strategy, M&A planning, and client data. Replit and were involved with proprietary code and access keys, while Grammarly and Quillbot edited contracts, client emails, and internal legal content. International exposure Use of Chinese GenAI applications was cited as a concern. The study found that 7.95% of employees in the average enterprise engaged with a Chinese GenAI tool, leading to 535 distinct sensitive exposure incidents. Within these, 32.8% were related to source code, access credentials, or proprietary algorithms, 18.2% involved M&A documents and investment models, 17.8% exposed customer or employee PII, and 14.4% contained internal financial data. Preventative measures "The good news for Harmonic Security customers is that this sensitive customer data, personally identifiable information (PII), and proprietary file contents never actually left any customer tenant, it was prevented from doing so. But had organizations not had browser based protection in place, sensitive information could have ended up training a model, or worse, in the hands of a foreign state. AI is now embedded in the very tools employees rely on every day and in many cases, employees have little knowledge they are exposing business data." Harmonic Security Chief Executive Officer and Co-founder Alastair Paterson made this statement, referencing the protections offered to their customers and the wider risks posed by the pervasive nature of embedded AI within workplace tools. Harmonic Security advises enterprises to seek visibility into all tool usage – including tools available on free tiers and those with embedded AI – to monitor the types of data being entered into GenAI systems and to enforce context-aware controls at the data level. The recent analysis utilised the Harmonic Security Browser Extension, which records usage across SaaS and GenAI platforms and sanitises the information for aggregate study. Only anonymised and aggregated data from customer environments was used in the analysis.
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Statement On AI In Universities From Aotearoa Communication & Media Scholars Network
We speak as a network of Aotearoa academics working in the inter-disciplines of Communication and Media Studies across our universities. Among us we have shared expertise in the political, social and economic impacts of commercially distributed and circulated generative artificial intelligence ('AI') in our university workplaces. While there is a tendency in our universities to be resigned to AI as an unstoppable and unquestionable technological force, our aim is to level the playing field to promote open critical and democratic debate. With this in mind, we make the following points: For universities… · AI is not an inevitable technological development which must be incorporated into higher education; rather it is the result of particular techno-capitalist ventures, a context which needs to be recognised and considered; · AI, as a corporate product of private companies such as OpenAI, Google, etc., encroaches on the public role of the university and its role as critic and conscience, and marginalises voices which might critique business interests; For researchers… · AI impedes rather than supports productive intellectual work because it erodes important critical thinking skills; instead, it devolves human scholarly work and critical engagement with ideas–elements vital to our cultural and social life–to software that produces 'ready-made', formulaic and backward looking 'results' that do not advance knowledge; · AI promotes an unethical, reckless approach to research which can promote 'hallucinations' and over valorise disruption for its own sake rather than support quality research; · AI normalises industrial scale theft of intellectual property as our written work is fed into AI datasets largely without citation or compensation; · AI limits the productivity of academic staff by requiring them to invent new forms of assessment which subvert AI, police students and their use of AI, or assess lengthy 'chat logs', rather than engage with students in activities and assessments that require deep, critical thinking and sharing, questioning and articulating ideas with peers; For students… · AI tools create anxiety for students; some are falsely-accused of using generative-AI when they haven't, or are very stressed that it could happen to them; · AI tools such as ChatGPT are contributing to mental-health crises and delusions in various ways; promoting the use of generative-AI in academic contexts is thus unethical, particularly when considering students and the role of universities in pastoral care; · AI thus undermines the fundamental relationships between teacher and student, academics and administration, and the university and the community by fostering an environment of distrust; For Aotearoa New Zealand… · AI clashes with Te Tiriti obligations around data sovereignty and threatens the possibility of data colonialism regarding te reo itself; · AI is devastating for the environment in terms of energy and water use and the extraction of natural resources needed for the processors that AI requires. Signed by: Rosemary Overell, Senior Lecturer, Media, Film & Communications Programme, The University of Otago Olivier Jutel, Lecturer, Media, Film & Communications Programme, The University of Otago Emma Tennent, Senior Lecturer, Media & Communication, Te Herenga Waka Victoria University of Wellington Rachel Billington, Lecturer, Media, Film & Communications Programme, The University of Otago Brett Nicholls, Senior Lecturer, Media, Film & Communications Programme, The University of Otago Yuki Watanabe, Lecturer, Media, Film & Communications Programme, The University of Otago Sy Taffel, Senior Lecturer, Media Studies Programme, Massey University Leon Salter, Senior Lecturer, Communications Programme, University of Auckland Angela Feekery, Senior Lecturer, Communications Programme, Massey University Ian Huffer, Senior Lecturer, Media Studies Programme, Massey University Pansy Duncan, Senior Lecturer, Media Studies Programme, Massey University Kevin Veale, Senior Lecturer, Media Studies Programme, Massey University Peter A. Thompson, Associate Professor, Media & Communication Programme, Te Herenga Waka/Victoria University of Wellington Nicholas Holm, Associate Professor, Media Studies Programme, Massey University Sean Phelan, Associate Professor, Massey University Yuan Gong, Senior Lecturer, Media Studies Programme, Massey University Chris McMillan, Teaching Fellow, Sociology Programme, University of Auckland Cherie Lacey, Researcher, Centre for Addiction Research, University of Auckland Thierry Jutel, Associate Professor, Film, Te Herenga Waka, Victoria University of Wellington Max Soar, Teaching Fellow, Political Communication, Te Herenga Waka Victoria University of Wellington Lewis Rarm, Lecturer, Media and Communication, Te Herenga Waka | Victoria University of Wellington Tim Groves, Senior Lecturer, Film. Te Herenga Waka, Victoria University of Wellington Valerie Cooper, Lecturer, Media and Communication, Te Herenga Waka | Victoria University of Wellington Wayne Hope, Professor, Faculty of Design & Creative Technologies, Auckland University of Technology Greg Treadwell, senior lecturer in journalism, School of Communication Studies, Auckland University of Technology Christina Vogels, Senior Lecturer, Critical Media Studies, School of Communication Studies, Auckland University of Technology
