Asia: Most markets rise as Trump sends tariff letters, delays deadline
Days before the three-month pause on his 'Liberation Day' tariffs was set to expire, the US president said he would give governments an extra three weeks to hammer out deals to avoid paying sky-high levies for exports to the world's biggest economy.
That came as he sent out letters to over a dozen countries - including top trading partners Japan and South Korea - setting out what he had decided to charge if they did not reach agreements by the new August 1 target date.
Investors tentatively welcomed the delay amid hopes officials will be able to reach deals with Washington, with some observers seeing the latest move by the president as a negotiation tactic.
The letters said Tokyo and Seoul would be hit with 25 per cent tariffs, while Indonesia, Bangladesh, Thailand, South Africa and Malaysia faced duties ranging from 25 per cent to 40 per cent.
When asked if the new deadline was set in stone, the president said: 'I would say firm, but not 100 per cent firm.'
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business
Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies.
Sign Up
Sign Up
And asked whether the letters were his final offer, he replied: 'I would say final - but if they call with a different offer, and I like it, then we'll do it.'
While Wall Street's three main indexes ended down - with the S&P 500 and Nasdaq back from record highs - Asian markets mostly rose.
Tokyo and Seoul advanced, while there were also gains in Hong Kong, Shanghai and Singapore. Sydney, Wellington and Taipei fell. Manila and Jakarta were flat.
The White House has for weeks said that numerous deals were in the pipeline, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent claiming Monday that 'we are going to have several announcements in the next 48 hours'.
But so far only two have been finalised, with Vietnam and Britain, while China reached a framework to slash eye-watering tit-for-tat levies.
Asia Society Policy Institute Vice President Wendy Cutler said the levies on Japan and South Korea 'will send a chilling message to others'.
'Both have been close partners on economic security matters,' she said, adding that companies from both countries had made 'significant manufacturing investments in the US in recent years'.
For his part, Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said Sunday that he 'won't easily compromise'.
National Australia Bank's Tapas Strickland said there remained a lot of uncertainty among investors.
'If the agreement with Vietnam is anything to go by, then countries... the US has a trade deficit with look destined to have a 20 per cent tariff, and those... the US has a trade surplus with a 10 per cent tariff,' he wrote in a commentary.
'That could mean eventual tariff rates settle higher than what the current consensus is, which is broadly for a 10 per cent across the board tariff with a higher tariff on China.
'Without further clarity, though, markets will have trouble pricing these different scenarios, especially given Trump's quick reversal following the market reaction in response to the initial Liberation Day tariffs.' AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
De-dollarisation and shifting safe havens
[SINGAPORE] Donald Trump's second term as US president has reasserted America's economic might with a mix of bombast, brinkmanship, and a brand of economic nationalism that is as familiar as it is destabilising. The recent passage of expansive tax reform has raised serious questions about US debt sustainability; the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects a deficit of US$1.9 trillion for this fiscal year alone, with federal debt forecast to climb to 118 per cent of GDP by 2035. Moody's downgrade of the US credit rating to Aa1 is not just a symbolic fall from grace, it marks the twilight of the era of 'risk-free' US Treasuries. Elevated yields at the long end of the yield curve reflect investor anxiety over the sheer scale of US refinancing needs. Trump's tariff war aims to fire on two fronts – checking Chinese expansion and plugging a widening US fiscal gap. But here, too, the math is sobering. Even under the most aggressive assumptions – universal tariffs at 20 per cent – the projected revenue gain is a modest US$185.2 billion, barely sufficient to cover annual debt interest payments. Divergence, de-dollarisation and defensive shifts As we enter the third quarter of 2025, three themes dominate the investment landscape: pragmatic de-escalation in tariff tensions, divergent equity performance, and fiscal headwinds which are negative for government bonds and the dollar – but positive for gold. The abrupt de-escalation of US-China tensions has caught markets off guard. After months of hawkish rhetoric, a US-China trade truce is finally underway. With Republican rifts in his backyard, waning poll numbers, and the need to refinance US$7.8 trillion in debt, Trump's embrace of progressive policies underlines efforts to reframe Republicans as the working-class party ahead of 2026 midterms. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Nevertheless, the damage has been done. Despite rising Treasury yields, the dollar tumbled 10.8 per cent in the first six months of 2025, underscoring the growing scepticism about the greenback's long-term viability as the global reserve currency. Post Liberation Day, gold, long considered a hedge against inflation and uncertainty, has decoupled from its traditional inverse correlation with bond yields. Central bank demand for gold reached 1,045 tonnes in 2024 – 121 per cent above the 2010 to 2021 historical average – signalling a broader de-dollarisation trend that extends beyond geopolitics into fundamental shifts in reserve management. Our strategic positioning reflects these tectonic shifts. US equities remain slightly underweight, primarily due to overstated earnings expectations (11 per cent versus 7 per cent in other developed markets, or DMs) and the dollar's structural weakness. Still, pockets of strength remain. Technology, bolstered by resilient AI demand and Nvidia's recent strong guidance, offers a compelling case for selective exposure. Europe, by contrast, benefits from relative fiscal sustainability and resurgent defence spending. Asia ex-Japan remains a deep-value play, with valuations at a 33 per cent discount to DMs and earnings growth forecast at 12.4 per cent. In fixed income, stagflation risks and long-end volatility have risen. Spikes in long-duration Treasuries and Japanese government bond yields reflect sticky inflation unlikely to subside given tariff uncertainties, labour market constraints, and money supply growth. On both a three-month and 12-month basis, we downgrade DM government bonds to Neutral as higher long-term yields and curve steepening are expected. In credit, stay with quality in the A/BBB bucket and adopt a duration barbell approach with two to three-year and seven to 10-year investment-grade exposure. We like US Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS), capital securities, and short-duration quality credit. Our two to three-year CIO Liquid+ strategy remains well-positioned for stagflationary conditions. We remain less convinced on high yield given spread-widening risks. In private assets, seek opportunities in middle-market buyouts and growth private equity. Middle-market companies possess lower purchase multiples, providing room for larger future value expansion. Besides, the requirement for lower leverage in middle-market deals augers well for their outlook in a high interest rate environment. Nuclear energy: Igniting Prometheus' atomic flame If the first half of the 21st century has taught investors anything, it is that the future often looks unthinkable – until it happens. Nowhere is this more evident than in nuclear energy. Once a byword for risk and controversy, nuclear power is quietly re-emerging as a compelling investment thematic, driven by a perfect storm of geopolitical, environmental, and technological tailwinds. First, let us consider the state of energy security. With ongoing conflict in the Middle East, tensions in Europe, and the weaponisation of trade routes, dependence on fossil fuels has become a strategic liability. Supply chains built on the whims of energy cartels or vulnerable chokepoints are no longer tenable. While the nuclear supply chain remains imperfect, it offers a viable avenue for energy diversification. Second, climate imperatives are accelerating policy momentum. Carbon taxation will eventually hit the bottom lines of companies, shifting energy demand towards more sustainable forms of power generation. Nuclear power is uniquely placed to deliver consistent, zero-emission energy at scale. For policymakers seeking to hit net-zero targets without sacrificing industrial productivity, nuclear is becoming not just acceptable, but essential. Third, AI and the growing need for processing power will accelerate energy demand at an exponential scale. With commodity trade increasingly encumbered by protectionism, one way to mitigate the inflationary consequence of such demand would be to introduce feasible substitutes such as nuclear power. Fourth, technological innovation is breaking down old barriers. Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) represent a leap forward, offering lower startup costs and the option to be developed in locations previously deemed unsuitable for larger nuclear power plants. For investors, the implications are clear. The nuclear theme is no longer niche – it is investable. Opportunities span the full value chain: physical uranium as a commodity play; miners who supply it; utilities with substantial nuclear in their energy mix; and manufacturers of next-generation reactor technologies such as SMRs. Much like gold, nuclear represents a long-term hedge – not against inflation, but against energy insecurity, climate inaction, and geopolitical unpredictability. In a world beset by volatility, the atom may yet prove to be a surprisingly stable investment opportunity. Trump's economic strategy has made waves – some intentional, many collateral. While markets are beginning to price in a world of persistent policy risk, stretched fiscal metrics and shifting trade dynamics, this moment also invites a rethink of long-term portfolio construction and the discipline to heed the timeless adage: Time in the market beats timing the market. The writer is chief investment officer, DBS Bank
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Trump says 'no extensions' to Aug 1 tariff deadline
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump said on Tuesday (Jul 8) that he would not extend an Aug 1 deadline for higher US tariffs to take effect on dozens of economies, a day after he appeared to signal flexibility on the date. While Trump imposed a sweeping 10 per cent tariff on goods from almost all trading partners in April, higher rates customised to dozens of economies were unveiled, then halted until Jul 9. But the president this week again delayed their reimposition, pushing it back to Aug 1. Trump insisted that there would be no further delay in the tariffs. "There will be no change," he posted on Truth Social. He added that levies would start being paid on Aug 1, in line with letters now being sent out to trading partners. "No extensions will be granted," Trump said. On Monday night, Trump had told reporters at a dinner that the Aug 1 deadline was "firm, but not 100 per cent firm." Pressed on whether the letters were his final offer, Trump replied: "I would say final - but if they call with a different offer, and I like it, then we'll do it." In a push for further trade deals, Trump sent letters to more than a dozen partners on Monday, including key US allies Japan and South Korea. Products from both countries would be hit with 25 per cent duties, Trump wrote in near-identical letters to leaders in Tokyo and Seoul. Indonesia, Bangladesh, Thailand, South Africa and Malaysia were among other countries facing duties ranging from 25 per cent to 40 per cent. In his messages to foreign leaders, Trump warned of further escalation if there was retaliation against his levies. Most countries receiving the letters so far saw US tariffs at similar or unchanged rates from those threatened in April, although some like Laos and Cambodia saw notably lower levels. The Trump administration is under pressure to show results after promising a flurry of deals following the US president's tariff threats. So far Washington has only struck two pacts, with Britain and Vietnam, besides an agreement to dial back staggeringly high tit-for-tat levies with China. In threatening tariff hikes on various economies, Trump cited in his letters a lack of reciprocity in trading ties. He also warned that goods transshipped to avoid higher duties would be subjected to steeper levels. But he added that if countries were willing to adjust their trade policies, Washington "will, perhaps, consider an adjustment to this letter".
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Can US President Donald Trump win the Nobel Peace Prize?
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during an Invest America Roundtable in the State Dining room, at the White House, in Washington, U.S., June 9, 2025. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/File Photo The Nobel Peace Prize is one of the most prestigious honours that can be awarded to individuals and organisations internationally. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has nominated U.S. President Donald Trump for the prize. If Trump wins, he will be the fifth U.S. president on the list after Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Jimmy Carter, and Barack Obama. Here is a look at how the award works: WHO CAN WIN? According to the will of Swedish industrialist Alfred Nobel, the inventor of dynamite, the prize should go to the person "who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses." In an introduction on the Nobel website, Chair of the Peace Prize Committee Jorgen Watne Frydnes says "in practice anyone can be the recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize. The history of the prize shows clearly it's given to people from all layers of society from all over the world." WHO CAN NOMINATE? Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore NDP celebrations to be held at 5 heartland sites, including Bishan and Punggol, on Aug 10 Singapore Keep citizens at the centre of public service, Chan Chun Sing tells civil servants Singapore Man arrested for allegedly throwing bottle at SMRT bus, injuring passenger Asia As Trump plays tariffs hard ball, Asean has little choice but to play on Asia PM Anwar called out by his own lawmakers as Malaysia's judicial crisis heats up Singapore SIA flight from Brisbane to Singapore diverted to Perth due to technical issue Sport Speeding likely cause of Diogo Jota car crash: Police Business Great Eastern could resume trading after delisting vote fails to pass; OCBC's exit offer lapses Thousands of people can propose names: members of governments and parliaments; current heads of state; university professors of history, social sciences, law, and philosophy; and former Nobel Peace Prize laureates, among others. You cannot nominate yourself. Nominee lists are kept secret for 50 years, though there is nothing to stop those who make nominations from disclosing their choices. WHO DECIDES? The Norwegian Nobel Committee, which consists of five individuals appointed by the Norwegian parliament, is the arbiter. Members are often retired politicians, but not always. The current committee is led by the head of the Norwegian branch of PEN International, a group defending freedom of expression. They are all put forward by Norwegian political parties and their appointments reflect the balance of power in Norway's parliament. HOW DO THEY DECIDE? Nominations close on January 31, meaning Netanyahu's nomination of Trump would not be considered this year. Members of the committee can make their own nominations no later than the first meeting of the committee in February. They make a shortlist, and each nominee is then assessed by a group of permanent advisers and other experts. The committee aims for unanimity but can decide by majority vote. A final decision is often only made a few days before the prize is announced. CONTROVERSIES The Nobel Peace Prize has often been seen as having a political message. The Nobel website says some recipients have been "highly controversial political actors," while the prize has also increased public focus on international or national conflicts. Obama won the award just a few months after taking office. Two members of the committee stepped down over the decision in 1973 to award the Peace Prize to U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Vietnamese politician Le Duc Tho for negotiating an end to the Vietnam War. One member quit in 1994 when Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat shared the prize with Israel's Shimon Peres and Yitzhak Rabin. WHAT DOES THE LAUREATE GET? A medal, a diploma, 11 million Swedish crowns ($1.15 million), and immediate global attention, if they are not already famous. WHEN ARE THE ANNOUNCEMENT AND THE CEREMONY? The announcement of this year's prize will be made on October 10 at the Norwegian Nobel Institute in Oslo. The ceremony will take place at the Oslo City Hall on December 10, the anniversary of Alfred Nobel's death. REUTERS
