logo
Cycling plans in Wales at risk, warn campaigners

Cycling plans in Wales at risk, warn campaigners

BBC News29-03-2025
Campaigners have warned that changes to the Welsh government's cycling policies are putting efforts to get people on their bikes at "risk".The Welsh government has spent millions on encouraging people to walk and cycle, with councils bidding for cash to build new infrastructure.But Transport Secretary Ken Skates said his priority was now inclusive travel - including fixing pavements to ensure they are suitable for people with disabilities and implying less of a focus on bike routes.The Labour minister said: "If our streets are safe for our most vulnerable, they'll be safe for all of us."
Proposed cuts to funding triggered a spat among Labour Senedd members, with Skates' predecessor in the job Lee Waters accusing him of being "deeply disingenuous".Lobbying behind-the-scenes, by campaigners and others - including, sources say, by Waters during the recent Welsh government budget process - appears to have triggered a re-think on cuts to funding for the next financial year.From 2026 funding will be devolved to regional transport bodies, with the Welsh government no longer ring-fencing the cash to be spent.
As part of its action on climate change, the Welsh government has tried for years to encourage more people to get around by bike or to walk more under the umbrella of its active travel policy.According to Audit Wales, Welsh councils spent £218m from the active travel fund or its equivalent between 2018 and 2024.But reports have suggested the Welsh government has struggled to encourage more people to walk and cycle.In recent months Skates has told Senedd members his priorities on active travel have shifted. In January, he said: "We are placing an emphasis in 2025-26 on fixing streets, improving pavements, a focus on walking to and from school."
Cycling UK's Gwenda Owen said there had been "consistent investment in active travel" over the last few years, with councils able to build capacity and "really plan for the future".She told the BBC's Politics Wales programme: "Without that investment in separate cycling infrastructure we risk missing the opportunity to enable more people to choose to cycle."She warned if funding was not ring-fenced "there will be other demands on the money"."We know that very often politically, walking and cycling does not come on top of the agenda," she said.
Customers and staff at the Workhorse bike repair café in west Cardiff gave mixed views about the cycle network in the capital.Head mechanic Jake Curran, 30, said more cycle paths would make him feel safer: "It's nice in Penarth because there's not a lot of road to cycle on but the closer you start getting to Cardiff the more traffic there is. You don't feel as safe when you're riding around Cardiff as I'd like to be."Jen Allan said she cycled in Cardiff. "For the most part it's OK, I can always find a route that gets me where I need to go in a pretty safe way," she said."There's a few where the route will just stop all of a sudden, or will change direction."Rich Morgan said the cycle network had improved since he began living in the city, but said: "There are definite gaps, disconnections, and cycleways ending."
Skates told a committee in January that concerns from cycle campaigners were "unfounded, not least because we've recently implemented the biggest road safety initiative in 25 years with 20mph".The comment triggered a strongly-worded social media post from backbencher and cycling advocate Lee Waters."Using the drop in casualties on 20mph roads to justify cutting back on active travel infrastructure is deeply disingenuous," the Llanelli Labour MS said."Not least because the latest stats show an increase in casualties on roads where the speed limit is over 40mph".In January, John Griffiths, MS for Newport East, wrote to Skates on behalf of the cross-party group in the Senedd on active travel, expressing "considerable concern".In particular, it complained about mooted changes in the Welsh government's budget which they said meant the amount of active travel funding that could be applied for has been "effectively reduced by around 50%", because the number of schemes that could be financed had been reduced.Griffiths told BBC Wales the government's position had now shifted: "We are very pleased that case seemed to have been listened to by Welsh government, because local authorities will be able to take forward more than one project".
One source said they thought the Welsh government's strategy of outlining its "priorities" meant something that was potentially unpopular but the right thing to do was not at the top of their list.The source - someone who works in the sector- said there was also concern active travel could get squeezed out when the funding is devolved to regional bodies - and not ring fenced - from 2026-27.
Some groups have been pushing more inclusive design when it comes to active travel.Kirsty James, of the Royal National Institute for the Blind People (RNIB), said the RNIB was not "anti-cycling", but welcomed the new emphasis on inclusivity.She said: "There has been a lack of consistency in inclusive designs in infrastructure and we want it to work for everybody."The policy and campaigners officer explained that some designs - such as floating bus stops, have been "dangerous for blind and partially sighted people". "You go into the cycle track and you have conflict," she said.
'We've listened to people across Wales'
The Welsh government said it had assumed initially the funding for local government grants would be "significant reduced due to the need to continue investing in rail upgrades".After additional funding was secured, it was able to restore the fund to a similar level from the year before - from £45m to £50m. It said it did not have to invite more than one scheme application, but additional funding meant more could be brought forward.Cabinet Secretary for Transport and North Wales, Ken Skates, said: "Better transport is a priority for this government, and we've listened to people across Wales and their concerns. We are maintaining the level of funding in 2025-26 to local authorities for transport schemes and I will provide more detail on these next week."It was always my intention to protect budgets across the portfolio if funding allowed and given the additional investment made available to me, we can maintain the core funding for active travel at £15m and keep the overall funding to almost the same level as last year."He said that "60 per cent" of core funding must be spent on "actual change on the ground"."Rather than spend tax payers' money on administration and consultancy fees, councils will be able to invest in fixing pavements, dropping kerbs, installing seats, improving bus shelters and making streets safer for all, he added.
Watch Politics Wales on BBC One Wales on Sunday at 10:00 BST, or catch it later on BBC iPlayer.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

It's hard to see new left party cutting through in Scotland
It's hard to see new left party cutting through in Scotland

The National

time44 minutes ago

  • The National

It's hard to see new left party cutting through in Scotland

The first thing to say is that if it is able to break out of the factions and abbreviations which abound in the terrain to the left of Labour – and with 300,000 claimed sign-ups and a poll rating of 10% it just might – then it marks a very big change in socialist thinking. For more than a century, socialists who wanted to change capitalism have rubbed along in the Labour Party with those who just wanted a bit more from it. Now large sections of the Labour left look set to give up the ghost. For me, that ship sailed long ago. It's more than two decades since I became convinced that using the powers that Scotland would get with political independence offered a much better prospect of changing the world than trying to reform a British state run by people still steeped in the mindset of empire. READ MORE: Man arrested for 'carrying a placard calling Donald Trump an offensive word' Nonetheless it's an important debate. The political character of England should matter greatly to Scotland and this new party might even play a role here. In one sense the Labour left has nowhere to go. Those now in control of the party have made it perfectly clear radical views are no longer welcome within it. They have been demonised and purged. Labour is manifesting every bit as much intolerance and authoritarianism in its internal structures as it does in government. But how did it come to this? A short time ago the Labour left had more power than at any point in the party's history. Corbyn was leader and commanded the considerable resources provided to the parliamentary opposition by the state. The left controlled the conference and the NEC. And the mobilisation of the grassroots through Momentum was impressive in its day. Yet within a few short years it had all evaporated. Corbyn and others left or were expelled, policy was abandoned wholesale, and the Labour conference would sing the national anthem with no visible dissent. It has been a remarkable transition both in speed and scale. In part this is because the Corbyn project failed abjectly (Image: Getty) in its own terms. Jeremy became leader by accident. And he wasn't very good at it. I watched for years in the House of Commons the breathtaking disloyalty of the right-wing Labour parliamentarians towards the Corbyn front bench. It was embarrassing. Never have I seen such hostility and hate between political parties, never mind within one. But no-one got suspended, or expelled or deselected. They were ignored, left alone to operate as a party within a party. Despite his strength in the wider party organisation, Corbyn never moved against his enemy within. Too naïve, or too nice. Either way, a fatal mistake. Corbyn also never got out of his silo, unwilling or incapable of moving beyond his natural support. He should have developed a narrative about Brexit or constitutional reform that would have galvanised a wider alliance which the left could lead. He didn't. Once defeated, his opponents lost no time in eradicating any possible legacy. These right-wing parliamentarians had been busy making plans. There were organised by a ruthless and clever Irishman called Morgan McSweeney under the banner Labour Together. McSweeney built a strategy for power inspired by Odysseus. Seeing the popularity of left policies in the party, and among the electorate, he argued for 'Corbynism without Corbyn'. But he needed someone to front it who couldn't immediately be outed as a right-wing hack. Step forward the hapless Keir Starmer. You'll cringe to look now at the ten-point platform McSweeney drew up for Starmer's leadership bid. Common ownership, higher income tax on top earners, improving welfare, and more. It worked at the time. Those Labour members who hadn't left after their leader fell lapped it up. Once in position, McSweeney and his acolytes didn't show any hesitation that might have come from wanting to be nice or fair. At breakneck speed and with ruthless efficiency they brushed aside anyone in their way, including many on the soft left, which they saw as a gateway for extremists. They won through deceit, but at the price of the party itself. Which is why we've got a new one. So, what does this mean for us? We've just got used to Scotland being a plurality in which six parties compete. Are we now to have seven? It's hard to see. Certainly, there's plenty of discontent within Labour ranks, but not nearly as much as in places like London. Besides, there's already plenty of options where the disenchanted could escape to. And across it all lies the independence question. Not really something you can avoid. Is it plausible, or possible, for a new party to say we're really radical and want a complete overhaul of the system, but we are agnostic on whether Scotland should be an independent country or remain in the UK? Especially when they would, by definition, be living proof of the failure of the latter option.

John Swinney hints at rescue package to save Alexander Dennis jobs
John Swinney hints at rescue package to save Alexander Dennis jobs

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

John Swinney hints at rescue package to save Alexander Dennis jobs

The Scottish Government has today confirmed it is looking at a rescue package it thinks could save jobs at Alexander Dennis – but said details were being kept under wraps due to 'commercial sensitivity'. The firm has threatened to end its manufacturing operations in Scotland by closing its sites in Larbert and Falkirk, putting 400 jobs on the line. It is planning to centralise its operations in Scarborough, North Yorkshire. In a statement, Swinney indicated that a package of new work to keep jobs in Scotland was being explored. READ MORE: Protesters to slam SNP's £180,000 cash award to Donald Trump golf course He said: 'Scottish Ministers place the utmost importance on the presence of Alexander Dennis in Scotland and the retention of its highly skilled manufacturing workers. 'The Scottish Government has committed to exploring any and all viable options throughout the consultation period to allow the firm to retain its skilled employees and manufacturing and production facilities. 'While I cannot provide details due to commercial sensitivity at this time, I hope this update provides the workforce and local community with further assurance that the Scottish Government remains wholly committed to supporting the future of bus manufacturing in Scotland. 'We will undertake this work in tandem with every other short, medium and long-term opportunity we continue to explore in close collaboration with the company, Unite, GMB, Scottish Enterprise, Transport Scotland and the UK Government.' Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes is meeting unions GMB and Unite to discuss the proposal while [[Transport]] Secretary Fiona Hyslop attends a meeting of the UK Bus Manufacturing Expert Panel in London focusing on the future pipeline of zero-emission bus orders. READ MORE: Trans toilet rules 'may force Scottish museums to close' It was reported earlier this month that a consultation with the workforce on job losses would be extended for another fortnight to explore ways of keeping jobs in Scotland. There have also been proposals to put staff on a furlough scheme to retain jobs in Scotland before work on new orders came in. Unite's regional secretary for Scotland Derek Thomson previously told a Holyrood committee that the closure of Alexander Dennis's Scottish operations would be "catastrophic" for the local area. The threat of closure has already spilled into the Scottish economy, with Greenfold Systems Ltd, based in Dunfermline, Fife, closing because a major proportion of its operations were involved with the troubled bus firm. A total of 81 jobs were lost after the "loss of a major contract", administrators said. The threatened closure has become a major political issue, with Scottish Labour accusing the SNP of failing to do enough to support the firm. Anas Sarwar has repeatedly criticised John Swinney of having done "nothing" to save jobs, pointing out that the [[SNP]] were ordering "buses from China, instead of from Scotland". But it later emerged that in Labour-run Edinburgh, where the buses are municipally owned by the council, had not bought buses from Alexander Dennis in the last three years.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store