Vedanta has so many red flags, it will take people some time to digest: Viceroy's Perring
Vedanta has denied the allegations.
Also read | Vedanta under fire: Allegations of financial misconduct ring alarm ahead of AGM
Perring and Viceroy Research have earned a reputation for being taken seriously in the financial world, largely due to their role in exposing Wirecard, the German payment processor and financial services provider that was embroiled in one of the biggest financial scandals in post-war Germany.
Edited Excerpts:
We've taken a short position personally here (Vedanta Resources Ltd or VRL). We opened short positions on the bonds of VRL about three to four months back. I can't remember exactly.
We never disclose the size of our short, but it's a high-conviction short.
It's through prime brokers. I don't know where the counterparty is.
Not necessarily, we share the reports, but when we have a high-conviction idea that we may or may not publish, and we take a position that we've been short here on the bonds.
Three key co-founders are generally idea-driven, and then we contract in or work with people who have a better skill set in certain areas, because it would be misleading to say that we all know everything.
We conduct extensive on-the-ground research, examining what Vedanta has said over the last few months. So, timing-wise, the conception or thought process behind Vedanta was about nine months, give or take, from memory. It was September or October of last year. Yeah. What drew our attention was that key events were reported in local newspapers.
Also read | Vedanta share price tanks 8%. Is Viceroy Research report behind the fall?
Still, the company didn't acknowledge this, as evidenced by court cases or by increasing the value of assets, even though they were either not operational or poorly performing. It prompted us to examine some of the assertions Vedanta had made about its projects and its commitment to them. We found that many of Vedanta's promises were never actually fulfilled, such as its announcements about entering the semiconductor and nuclear industries. All of this never materialised. All it's doing is refinancing debt or enabling the payment of dividends. It's crazy.
Well, for Vedanta itself, it's to raise cash, promote the share price and enrich the majority shareholders at the expense of the minority shareholders. The question really should be, how is it allowed to go on where real investors are having their investment jeopardised by a financial management system that's going to, if they continue in this way, jeopardise all the shareholders.
In double-digits. Maybe 15 or 20 people. We focus on people with skill sets to almost try and disprove our thesis, because from a research perspective, it's better to try and prove yourself wrong as a short seller, because your piece will be more solid. But you are also testing the facts more, rather than assuming you're right.
Also read | Vedanta expects demerger to complete by Sept-end: CFO
No journalists. Predominantly forensic accountants, people in the commodities or infrastructure sector, things like that, getting their views … testing out whether what we believe is happening is correct or whether we are wrong.
We wouldn't expect a strong initial reaction. In reality, it will take people some time to digest this. There are so many red flags in this report that I don't think it'd be appreciated until people get to the bottom of it, if I may.
It's a combination of all three, as you'll see in our follow-up, depending on how transparent Vedanta wants to be. Obviously, we don't give everything at once. There's more to come.
We will be sharing some anecdotes, but we don't want to spoil this surprise. We've spent a considerable amount of time on this report, making it one of the few we intend to produce, which offers in-depth coverage of the company, requiring transparency. Obviously, the company needs to be allowed to respond fully, rather than with a childish response. And if that changes, then we will publish more details.
There will be a series of reports.
I am yet to find where the last regulator made things challenging. It happened during the Wirecard episode in Germany, with which we were also heavily involved. There are enough short sellers out there and where they still do damn good work, and our experience of regulators, particularly over the two and a half years, has been, if I'm being really honest, quite positive … we have assisted with investigations into fraudulent companies on three continents. Yes, they don't appreciate the work that we do to the level they should, but they have also been very respectful. They have quite clearly embraced reports, and you can see that out of the charges that were brought by the work.
According to the statement today, all the information that we published is known. That's poppycock. That's what companies rely on as a defence, because they don't want to have to explain how bad it is. We have seen that, all over the world, there is a complete denial. It's malicious. That we profit from being short.
Also read | Anil Agarwal on success: 'It begins in quite years, no praise, just work…'
But in reality, they've been profiting for years, completely underrepresenting risks and misstating the performance of assets, appreciating the value of assets, falsely capitalising projects, and that's even down to amortising a large fine, which is in complete contradiction to accounting rules. There are no coercive or malicious events surrounding the time of our report. It's just that it was ready when it was, and the company, irrespective of our timing. So let's ignore the timing. There's nothing to see there. Why don't they respond fully point by point?
Ultimately, the end goal is for minority shareholders to protect themselves. The stakeholders, other than those implementing this strategy, have been misled and should be in uproar. Because, if this continues, the parasite, as we refer to it, is just a financial extraction.
If we believe that we wouldn't do it. One thing we do is highlight transparency. We published on Wirecard. It's about transparency, which is lacking in the public markets, where companies are too willing to highlight the positives and overlook what's happening, not necessarily behind the scenes, but the things that could impact them. And accountability is key, but more importantly, we're advocating for greater transparency from companies, particularly those that perpetually spin plates of prosperity versus the reality of their underlying performance.
Also read | Vedanta's Anil Agarwal sees BIG opportunity for India amid Harvard-Trump row
In the case of Nate (Nathan Anderson, founder of Hindenburg), he attempted to bring transparency to shareholders (at Adani). I'm sure that the corporate governance is either better managed at Adani now, or at least people believe it is. Suppose it has improved, kudos. The reality is also that the conviction in Adani Enterprises is 30% less than when Hindenburg published the report. It depends on what investors want to believe. We've held on to some shorts for two years.
We'd welcome an invitation if you'd like that as your headline. We'd dial in. Yeah. We are more than willing to have anyone with an invite ask questions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Asian Paints exits Akzo Nobel India; sells 4.42% stake for ₹734 crore
NEW DELHI: Paints major Asian Paints on Wednesday exited Dulux paint-maker Akzo Nobel India by selling its entire 4.42 per cent stake in the company for Rs 734 crore through an open market transaction. In a regulatory filing on Wednesday, Asian Paints said it "has sold its entire holding of 20,10,626 equity shares in Akzo Nobel India Ltd, representing 4.42 per cent of its paid-up share capital". The sale was executed at Rs 3,651 per share through the bulk deal mechanism, it added. Last month, Sajjan Jindal's JSW Paints announced the acquisition of Dutch paint maker Akzo Nobel's India unit in a Rs 12,915-crore deal to become the fourth-largest player in the paint industry in the country. JSW Paints will buy a 74.76 per cent stake in Akzo Nobel India for Rs 8,986 crore and launch an open offer to buy another 25 per cent from the open market for up to Rs 3,929.06 crore. According to the bulk deal data on the NSE, Asian Paints sold 20,10,626 shares, amounting to a 4.42 per cent stake in Gurugram-based Akzo Nobel India. The shares were disposed of at an average price of Rs 3,651 apiece, taking the transaction value to Rs 734.08 crore. Meanwhile, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund and Eastspring Investments India Consumer Equity Open Ltd purchased a total of 9.5 lakh equity shares or 2.1 per cent stake in Akzo Nobel India. These shares were picked up at the same price, taking the deal value to Rs 346.92 crore, as per the data on the National Stock Exchange (NSE). Eastspring Investments is a subsidiary of British multinational insurance and asset management firm Prudential. Details of the other buyers of Akzo Nobel India's shares could not be ascertained on the exchange. Shares of Akzo Nobel India slipped 1.56 per cent to close at Rs 3,627 apiece on the NSE.
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bank of England relaxes mortgage lending rules to help boost growth
LONDON: British banks and building societies will be able to issue more potentially risky mortgages, the Bank of England said on Wednesday, as it sought to help the government's push to boost home ownership. Individual lenders will now be able to exempt more mortgage borrowers from loan-to-income limits brought in after the 2008 financial crisis, although the sector as a whole will still be subject to a 15% cap on high loan-to-income lending. Just under 10% of new mortgages exceed 4.5 times a borrower's income and BoE Governor Andrew Bailey said he would be happy to see that percentage rise. "If a good part of this was used, this is quite a change," Bailey said at a press conference to present the central bank's half-yearly assessment of financial stability risks. The change could lead to up to 36,000 new higher loan-to-income mortgages a year, BoE Deputy Governor Sam Woods said. British lenders approved 755,000 mortgages for house purchases last year, according to BoE data. Property sales have slowed slightly since the end in April of a temporary tax break, but a slow pace of new construction and rising wages are expected to keep upward pressure on prices. The BoE said the change in rules should allow more first-time buyers to get a mortgage, although it added that lenders' deposit requirements were a bigger barrier for most borrowers. Lower deposits Britain 's governing Labour Party said in its 2024 election campaign that it intends to make permanent a government insurance scheme that encourages lenders to accept lower deposits, alongside a pledge to build 1.5 million more homes. The loosening of the cap on lending to riskier borrowers comes after a call by the government for regulators to look for ways to encourage economic growth, without risking the stability of the financial system. The loan-to-income limit was introduced in 2014 as part of measures to discourage excessively risky mortgage lending by banks which contributed to the 2008 global financial crisis. Lenders have since become better capitalised and introduced more stringent checks on borrowers. The BoE said individual banks' general unwillingness to risk a breach of the 15% cap on high loan-to-income loans meant that the sector as a whole had stayed well below the threshold. Banks' aggregate share of high loan-to-income lending hit 9.7% in the first quarter, the BoE said. Allowing some individual lenders to go above that threshold would likely only lead to an overall share of such riskier lending hitting 11% by the end of 2025, the central bank forecast. The BoE will also refresh its assessment of banks' overall capital requirements and update the market on that at its next financial stability report in December, it said, the first such review in five years. However, the BoE noted that it currently judged the overall level of capital in the system to be "broadly appropriate". Deputy Governor Sarah Breeden said she would welcome broader international discussion of what aspects of post-2008 capital rules had proved most valuable, in the light of experience in the COVID-19 pandemic. The BoE added that the review would not stop it publishing revised rules for smaller banks in the coming weeks.
Hindustan Times
43 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
How Volkswagen's Electric Bus Went From American Flagship to Flop
As psychedelic rock blared, Thomas Schäfer hopped onto a Huntington Beach, Calif., stage flanked by surfboards two years ago to announce the rebirth of an automotive icon, the Volkswagen bus. The German auto giant was bringing back the bus as an electric vehicle, albeit one with a boxy design and two-tone paint job reminiscent of the original. The reboot was more than two decades in the making, and the company said the vehicle would soon be available in the U.S. 'Finally, finally,' said Schäfer, a top VW executive, as the bus they called the rolled across the stage to wolf whistles from the crowd. The reception since has been considerably less enthusiastic. Volkswagen had hoped to ride a wave of nostalgia for a much-loved symbol of 1960s hippie counterculture as a way to carve out a larger chunk of the lucrative U.S. auto market—a feat that has defied the world's second-largest carmaker for half a century. Instead, the vehicle is shaping up to be yet another American misadventure for the company, reaching dealers years late, over budget and just in time for a trade war. Built in Germany, the model was delivered to its first U.S. customer days after the election of Donald Trump, who would go on to introduce a 25% tariff on imported cars and roll back government support for EVs. With a battery range of less than 250 miles per charge, the doesn't compare favorably with other new EVs. The German-led design also failed to account for some uniquely American tastes: It often needs to be fitted with extra cupholders at U.S. ports. Capping the model's troubles, all the vehicles shipped to the U.S. were recalled in April because the third-row seats were too broad, allowing three passengers to squeeze into a space with only two seat belts. Sales were suspended for two months while Volkswagen fit plastic parts to narrow the row, which meant the company only delivered 564 in the three months before the end of June. Even before the recall, the luxury sticker price of the ID. Buzz, which starts at about $60,000, kept a brake on sales as consumers pivoted to more affordable wheels. In the U.S., where the vehicle became available toward the end of last year, just over 3,000 had been shipped to dealers by the end of March. While a slowdown in EV sales and President Trump's tariffs have caught other automakers off guard, the debacle highlights institutional problems, such as internal divisions and sluggish, Europe-centric product development, that have dogged Volkswagen for years. Senior Volkswagen executive Thomas Schäfer at the launch for the in Huntington Beach, Calif., in June 2023. 'Could have been there earlier? Probably, yes,' Kjell Gruner, president of Volkswagen Group of America, told reporters earlier this year. A spokesman for the in Germany said it was a 'halo' product designed to bring drivers to showrooms rather than sell in great numbers. He said it only arrived in the U.S. last year, following a 2022 launch in Europe, because Volkswagen's American business decided that a three-row extended version that only came later was the best fit for the U.S. market. Many hardcore VW fans have been disappointed by the rollout. In Dallas, Texas, European car enthusiast and parts supplier Autrey McVicker was 'dead set on getting the Buzz' until his dealer told him the pomelo yellow and white version he had his eye on would cost $72,000, far more than he had expected. 'I just couldn't justify such a high expense for an EV that would most likely lose 50% of its value the first year,' he said. McVicker is still waiting for his He hopes to get one 'once they start popping up on the used market for what they are actually worth.' Golden age The original bus sold in the millions, embodying Volkswagen's name, which means 'the people's car' in German. In the 1960s, the bus and the Beetle helped Volkswagen enjoy rapid growth. U.S. sales peaked at almost 570,000 in 1970, more than a third of the brand's global total. At the time, the van was priced at the equivalent of around $20,000, less expensive than most cars. Many of them festooned with peace signs and flowers, and capable of moving large groups around the country cheaply, the bus was a favorite of surfers, young families and hippies. (When Grateful Dead guitarist Jerry Garcia died in 1995, Volkswagen ran an ad with a tear falling from one headlight.) It spawned 'van life' several generations before the term was embraced by social-media influencers. But as the dollar fell against the deutschmark and Japanese auto companies expanded to the U.S., Volkswagen lost its edge. By 1993, Volkswagen sales in the U.S. had declined to a low of less than 50,000. A few years later, the New Beetle helped to revive the brand by channeling its 1960s heritage, and Volkswagen began plotting a similar effort for the bus. A first attempt was shown at the 2001 Detroit auto show. The concept was a hit and was cleared for series production, but following a management change, the new bus was canceled for fear it would be too niche and costly. Instead the company launched a rebadged Chrysler minivan, the VW Routan, that flopped. It took the greatest scandal in Volkswagen's history for the company to get serious about reviving the bus. In January 2016, less than four months after the company admitted to cheating on emissions tests, Volkswagen executive Herbert Diess delivered the keynote address at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas. Diess started with an apology to the millions of customers with affected vehicles, then pledged to create 'a different and better company. A new Volkswagen.' 'Do you remember this iconic machine?' asked Diess, as a photo of a VW bus with a surfboard on the roof appeared on screen behind him. 'Ladies and gentlemen, the Volkswagen Budd-e.' Diess was one of a growing group of auto executives who believed the industry was on the cusp of an electric revolution, and was a fan of Elon Musk. The Tesla CEO was preparing to launch the company's first mass market vehicle, the Model 3 sedan, which he said would cost $35,000. Nearly 200,000 people reserved a Tesla on the first day orders opened, and Diess used the new competition as a motivating tool to push Volkswagen to move faster. Volkswagen had toyed with the idea of bringing out an electric version of the more aerodynamic Beetle, according to former executives. But the company settled on electrifying the bus, partly because Americans were turning away from small cars in ever larger numbers. A Volkswagen bus in Greenwich Village, circa 1965. Diess saw the Volkswagen people carrier as a way to recapture what made the company popular in 1960s America: fun, affordable vehicles. Making them electric would help dispel the stench of its emissions scandal. The Budd-e concept offered a 'journey to the year 2019,' Diess said. By mid-2017, when in Pebble Beach he announced regular production of the he was promising the first deliveries in 2022. It didn't reach America until 2024, after he had left the company. Internal rivalries In his then role as head of the Volkswagen brand, Diess was in charge of the group's pivot to becoming an electric-car maker. Volkswagen owns luxury automakers Audi and Porsche in a structure that encourages competition between rival teams to develop new technologies, such as those feeding into the novel approach to electric vehicles that spawned the The belief was that friendly competition would yield a better product, but it had the effect of slowing down decision-making on the according to a former executive at Volkswagen's North American arm. The competition also drove up costs as the departments duplicated efforts, the person said. Volkswagen, which developed the alongside other EVs such as the ID.4, later vied with the company's separate commercial-vehicle arm for the right to produce it. Elon Musk and Herbert Diess with the Volkswagen Diess had considered making the vehicle in the U.S., where Volkswagen opened a factory in Chattanooga in 2011. As a compromise to get the over the line, Diess gave the vehicle to the commercial-vehicle business, which had produced the original bus and made its successor vehicles for sale across Europe. Chattanooga got to produce the more mainstream ID.4 SUV instead, while the commercial business gave up a project to electrify an existing van. But the commercial-vehicle engineers had less expertise on electric-vehicle technology and building automobiles for sale in the U.S. 'Commercial-vehicle engineers had to learn a lot of things, and the other engineers said, 'We're too busy, you figure it out yourself,'' the former Volkswagen North America executive said. 'That's why it took so damn long.' The commercial-vehicle business is also based at a plant in Hanover that is among the company's most expensive. The labor cost of producing a vehicle in Germany was roughly $3,307 last year, compared with $1,341 in the U.S., according to a recent report by consultants at Oliver Wyman. Hundreds of millions of euros were also spent on upgrading the plant to accommodate production of an EV on an all-new platform. The decision to make the vehicle in Hanover was at least partially due to Volkswagen's complicated political situation. Hanover is the capital of Lower Saxony, the German region that owns 20% of the company's voting shares and has two seats on its board. 'Herbert's plans to take the bus out of Hanover and put it in another country didn't go down well with Lower Saxony,' recalls one executive who was involved in the project. The Volkswagen spokesman said the factories run by the commercial-vehicle business were the only ones with the equipment to build a vehicle with side panels such as the Supply shortages pushed up battery costs during the pandemic, which was especially impactful for the given the large battery required to move a bus. High costs meant the plusher interior features initially envisaged, such as a soft dashboard and door panels, were gradually replaced with cheaper plastics as the project progressed. The rich people's car The styling of the original bus that made it so endearing turned out to translate poorly in the EV age. When Diess showed an prototype in 2017, he promised EVs that would be 'affordable for millions, not just to millionaires.' The company prepared its Hanover factory to produce up to 130,000 units a year, and executives hinted that they could in time manufacture it in the U.S. as well. Only around 30,000 units were sold last year, hurt in Europe by key markets including Germany and Sweden rolling back EV subsidies. The original VW bus had its engine at the rear, giving it an unusually flat front and poor aerodynamics. For an EV, minimizing weight and air drag is key to maximizing range per unit of expensive battery power. An at a Volkswagen plant in Hanover, Germany, in 2022. Volkswagen's designers made the front of the much more sloping than that of the original bus, but they still had to use an outsize battery to report an anemic range of 234 miles at full charge. When the finally hit U.S. dealerships in October, the $60,000 price tag was criticized as being higher than many competitors' vehicles, which could also travel farther on a single battery charge. 'Anyone who has been around VW thinks the price point is high,' said Fred Emich IV, a Volkswagen and Kia dealer. Dazed and confused Designing and building cars in Germany for the U.S. comes with problems beyond just high costs. After less than a year on the U.S. market, the has already been subject to two recall notices, both for glaring design oversights. In April, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration warned that the vehicle showed the international brake-warning sign in amber rather than the word 'brake' in red capital letters, which is the requirement in the U.S. A few weeks later, the body said the third-row seat was too wide because it could accommodate three people even though it only had two seat belts. The company is fitting plastic parts to cover the sides of the seats in the roughly 5,600 vehicles affected. Volkswagen also appeared to miss the biggest appeal of the to American car buyers: its paint job. The top-of-the-line comes in a two-tone paint job with names like Cabana Blue and Pomelo Yellow, reminiscent of the vintage models often found in psychedelic hues. The base model is only offered in pedestrian white, gray or black. To help juice sales of those models, Volkswagen started directing dealers to wrap the cheaper versions with colored vinyl. The snafus are emblematic of Volkswagen's struggles to bring products designed for European tastes or regulatory standards to the U.S. Used to catering to sedan-loving Europeans, the company was slow to introduce SUVs as Americans started to embrace them in the 2000s. The emissions scandal itself was rooted in an effort to adapt a European technology for tighter U.S. nitrogen-oxide emissions standards, at minimal cost. 'The problem with all of the Volkswagen brands has always been that they've just been a bit too Europe-centric,' said Citigroup analyst Harald Hendrikse. The company has made clear it wants to change that. At Volkswagen's annual general meeting in May, Chief Executive Officer Oliver Blume said it was 'formulating a vision for North America,' where it wants to grow 'with products that are consistently geared to the expectations of American customers.' But Blume didn't evoke the Instead he talked about Scout, the heritage SUV brand for which the company is building a $2 billion new factory in South Carolina. Write to Sean McLain at and Stephen Wilmot at How Volkswagen's Electric Bus Went From American Flagship to Flop How Volkswagen's Electric Bus Went From American Flagship to Flop How Volkswagen's Electric Bus Went From American Flagship to Flop
