logo
Arrest after man barricades himself inside address in Handsworth

Arrest after man barricades himself inside address in Handsworth

BBC News13-06-2025
A man has been arrested after six people were injured amid a siege in Birmingham.West Midlands Police was called to Aston Lane in Handsworth at about 15:40 BST on Thursday when several parked cars and windows of properties were damaged.Three members of the public and three police officers sustained injuries, which were not life-changing or threatening, and a man barricaded himself inside an address.After forcing entry, officers detained a 24-year-old man on suspicion of aggravated burglary, possession of an offensive weapon, assault, criminal damage and assault of emergency workers.
The force said a number of houses were evacuated and road closures were in place while it brought the incident to a safe conclusion.
Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Drug dealer texted police accidentally
Drug dealer texted police accidentally

The Independent

time6 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Drug dealer texted police accidentally

Jack Johannesen, 23, from Sandy, Bedfordshire, has been sentenced to two years and 10 months in prison for drug dealing and breaching bail conditions. He was caught after mistakenly sending a group text message advertising his new drug line to the phone of a police officer who had previously been involved in his arrest. Johannesen was part of an organised crime group operating across Biggleswade and Sandy, dealing in cannabis, crack cocaine, and heroin. Police initially arrested him in October, recovering multiple phones, including one he had smashed, which revealed he had contacted over 400 numbers for drug deals. Following his re-arrest in November due to the mistaken text, officers seized more cannabis, nearly £2,000 in cash, and high-value designer goods.

Farage defends protesters outside Essex asylum hotel as ‘concerned families'
Farage defends protesters outside Essex asylum hotel as ‘concerned families'

The Independent

time6 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Farage defends protesters outside Essex asylum hotel as ‘concerned families'

Nigel Farage has defended people protesting outside an asylum hotel in Essex, claiming most were 'genuinely concerned families'. The Reform UK leader insisted violent scenes outside the hotel were caused by 'some bad eggs', alleging clashes were between the 'usual far-right thugs' and far-left anti-fascist activists, known as Antifa. Some of the demonstrators have been seen wearing black face coverings, similar to those often worn by members of Antifa, but it has not been verified whether the group has attended the protests. Mr Farage also claimed 'civil disobedience on a vast scale' will break out unless migrants stop arriving to the UK on small boats. Six people were arrested on Sunday evening after a string of protests outside the Bell Hotel in Epping, which is believed to house asylum seekers. Eight police officers were injured following clashes at what had started as a peaceful demonstration on Thursday evening, while the latest rally on Sunday saw more than 100 protesters assemble, with some chanting 'save our kids'. The events were organised in response to the arrest of an asylum seeker, who was later charged with sexual offences against a teenager and adult in the town, eight days after arriving to the UK via boat. Hadush Kebatu, 38, from Ethiopia, who denies the allegations and remains in custody, is charged with three counts of sexual assault, alongside inciting a girl to engage in sexual activity and harassment without violence. Mr Farage did not condone violence seen outside the hotel – however, he did say it should 'serve as a stark warning to this government that the British people will not put up with this betrayal for the next four years'. When asked whether the scenes were understandable, he told The Times: 'I don't think anybody in London even understands just how close we are to civil disobedience on a vast scale in this country. 'Of course, there were some bad eggs that turned up at Epping. There were the usual far-right thugs, but equally, what about Antifa? Why? Why are Antifa allowed to go to these demonstrations, to wear balaclavas, to not be identified, to do gestures, last night, of them shooting at members of the public. Why are they there? So it isn't all far-right thuggery, as you might sometimes hear from our prime minister. 'But do I understand how people in Epping feel? You bet your life I do.' He continued: 'Don't underestimate the simmering anger and disgust that there is in this country that we are letting in every week, in fact, some days, many hundreds of undocumented young males, many of whom come from cultures in which women and young girls are not even treated as second-class citizens. 'So the answer is, yes, I do understand the genuine upset and anger, and I'll bet you that most of the people outside that hotel at Epping weren't far-right or far-left or anything like that. They were just genuinely concerned families.' Hope Not Hate, an anti-fascism campaign group, said the series of gatherings outside the hotel began with largely peaceful intent, but were co-opted by actors intent on causing violence. Footage and photography from Thursday and Sunday's events show people with links to groups such as the British National Party (BNP), Britain First, Patriotic Alternative and neo-nazi group Blood & Honour were all in attendance. The Bell Hotel has regularly attracted anti-migrant protests organised by groups such as these since 2020, according to Hope Not Hate. Downing Street described the scenes at Epping as 'clearly unacceptable'. The prime minister's official spokesman said: 'Peaceful protest is a cornerstone of our democracy, but it's clearly unacceptable to see police coming under attack as they ensure that peaceful protest is able to take place. 'And I think Essex Police put out the statement making very clear: people who protest peacefully, lawfully and responsibly cause us and the wider public no concern. However, we can never and will never tolerate criminal violence, and I think the Prime Minister will obviously echo that.'

Family backs bill to prosecute prisons for custody deaths
Family backs bill to prosecute prisons for custody deaths

BBC News

time7 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Family backs bill to prosecute prisons for custody deaths

The family of a woman who took her own life in a Scottish jail have backed an MP's bill which would allow prisons to be prosecuted for the deaths of MP Blair McDougall will present a ten minute rule bill to Westminster on Wednesday calling for Crown immunity in UK prison estates to be current laws, the Crown, which includes the Scottish Prison Service (SPS), cannot be held criminally responsible for deaths in represents the constituency of Linda and Stuart Allan whose daughter Katie, 21, died in Polmont Young Offenders Institution in 2018. Last year a fatal accident inquiry (FAI) into the deaths of Katie and William Brown,16, found that a breach of the Health and Safety Act at the prison "materially contributed" to their Allan was jailed for 16 months in March 2018 for causing serious injury by dangerous driving and driving over the alcohol - also known as William Lindsay - had been remanded in custody after walking into Saracen Street police station in Glasgow while carrying a Scottish government accepted the findings of the FAI and said it had pursued a change in the law to scrap Crown immunity, but that it would require UK government Medhurst, head of the Scottish Prison Service, has also said it should face the possibility of prosecution over deaths in Immunity has previously been scrapped for the NHS and said the move would introduce accountability into the prison East Renfrewshire MP told BBC Scotland News: "I want to see Crown immunity lifted so that when there are failings in health and safety duties by prisons they are held to account for it."At the moment they are untouchable, they can fail again and again."People, particularly young prisoners, can lose their lives and there is no consequence for that."If his private members' bill passes it will proceed to the next stage in the legislative process. Katie Allan's mother, Linda, has been lobbying for change in the Scottish Prison Service since her daughter's approached McDougall, who is her local MP, at his first surgery after the general election last year to raise the issue and said he had been supportive ever Allan said: "We've always said justice for us would be the removal of Crown immunity. There's no meaning in losing a child but it would be a legacy for us."It means that in death Katie has done something good. That her death hasn't been meaningless. "It means that perhaps her death might save the lives of other people in the future."Ms Allan said it "sticks with her" that NHS Forth Valley could also not be prosecuted for any role they played in Katie's death - despite not having Crown immunity - as health care services were provided on the prison Forth Valley have been approached for she said if Katie had been in a private prison at the time of her death, a prosecution would have been be Allan said the introduction of the bill was an important day for families who had lost loved ones to "preventable deaths" in prisons across the UK and would play a part in improving safety in added: "If you look for example at the police service, when it lost Crown immunity, safety standards started to increase in terms of cell custody and police stations."So you would hope the same would happen across the prison estate." What is Crown immunity? Crown immunity is a legal principle which means that legislation does not normally apply to the it means the state, including government and official bodies such as the prison service - and sometimes its employees or agents - can be protected from being charged with criminal offences created by example, if a person dies while in custody at a jail, the Crown could not be held criminally responsible for their does not shield them from civil liability, such as the case brought by the family of Allan Marshall, who died after being restrained by up to 17 prison officers at HMP Edinburgh in immunity was removed from the NHS over 30 years ago as part of the National Health Service and Community Care Act was introduced after a series of scandals, including a salmonella food poisoning outbreak in 1984 that contributed to the death of 19 Scotland, Crown immunity may not always protect prison officers or example, if they are caught using, possessing or giving a "personal communication device," such as a mobile phone, to a prisoner.A provision of the Health and Safety at Work Act also states that, regardless of whether Crown immunity applies, an individual can be prosecuted if they cause a also doesn't apply to privately managed jails, like HMP Addiewell which is the only prison in Scotland which is privately have long challenged the law, arguing that the public and private sectors do not operate on a level playing field.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store