
Switzerland scrambles after Trump makes it Europe's biggest loser
The peace-loving Alpine nation has found itself at the forefront of Trump's erratic trade war, with exports such as Swiss chocolate and watches now subject to US tariffs of 39pc.
'Basically, we are all shocked,' says Jan Atteslander from Economiesuisse, a business lobby organisation representing 100,000 businesses in the country. 'We are one of the most open economic partners of the US. We have no tariff and non-tariff barriers for US goods or services. We are number six for foreign direct [investment] in the US.
'In this context, to find early on Friday, at 3am, that you are among the four countries that have – by way out now – the highest import tariffs in the US across the board, it's really a shock.'
The outcome could hardly be worse: Only Syria, Laos and Myanmar face steeper rates than Switzerland of up to 41pc. Even Taliban-run Afghanistan was handed a more favourable deal of 15pc.
To add insult to injury, the announcement came on Switzerland's National Day.
'There are two days in the year – one is Christmas, and the other one is Aug 1 – where normal people are on holiday,' shrugs Atteslander.
The tariff shock has left Bern scrambling. Karin Keller-Sutter, the Swiss president, and Guy Parmelin, the economy minister, are flying to the US on Tuesday for crisis talks. It comes after a disastrous last-ditch call between the Swiss leader and Trump late on Thursday.
The unexpected tariff blow has unleashed anger and soul-searching in Switzerland, with the tabloid Blick declaring it the country's greatest defeat since a battle against France in 1515, which ushered in its policy of international neutrality.
'We're joining the Canadians in protest against the US,' says Nikolay Markov, an economist at Pictet Asset Management in Geneva.
He argues that the Swiss shouldn't have been caught flat-footed.
'It shouldn't be surprising because Switzerland has a significant trade surplus with the US. That's one of the reasons why Switzerland is on the monitoring watch list of the US treasury,' he says.
Switzerland sold £28.8bn more goods to the US last year than it bought, with £47.6bn-worth of items heading to America. Exports range from luxury watches to precision instruments such as pneumatic screwdrivers and micrometres to medicines and Nespresso pods.
Its trade surplus with the world's largest economy grew by 56.1pc from 2023. Trump initially subjected Switzerland to import duties of 31pc on 'liberation day' on April 2.
Most goods exports, apart from pharmaceuticals and gold, will be subject to the new tariff from Thursday unless Keller-Sutter can strike a better deal. The US president has demanded that Swiss drugmakers lower their prices, an issue that may well come up in negotiations.
Swiss business leaders and politicians are, for now trying to keep cool heads, hoping that this will be another example of the phenomenon that traders refer to as 'Taco': Trump always chickens out. While the president likes to announce large headline rates, he tends to use them as a bludgeon to negotiate better deals rather than following through.
The stakes are high. Markov says he initially expected tariffs to shave 0.2pc of the Swiss economy's growth. 'Now it's 1.8pc, so it implies no growth for Switzerland in the coming year. It really changes the economic outlook – potentially materially,' he says.
Such a knock to growth would plunge Switzerland into a technical recession and leave many workers unemployed.
Chocolatiers are among those bracing for the impact. 'It's quite a shock because with tariffs at that level, it will be hard to serve the US market,' says Roger Wehrli. He is the Bern-based chief executive of Chocosuisse and Biscosuisse, trade bodies representing chocolatiers and confectionery makers.
'Combined with the exchange rate changes, this leads to an increase of costs in certain US markets by around 55pc compared to the beginning of the year,' he says.
He warns that Switzerland being singled out leaves it particularly vulnerable.
'The UK has only a tariff of 10pc, the European Union 15pc. So our companies will have a comparative disadvantage. This leads to the conclusion that if this tariff remains, a lot of companies will pull out of the US market,' Wehrli says.
The 39pc rate is beyond even the worst-case scenarios companies had planned for, Wehrli says. He also fears the wider damage to the Swiss economy.
'When we look at this economy in general, we export around 15pc to the United States. I'm very much concerned. It will pose severe challenges to the labour market.'
Atteslander at trade body Economiesuisse says: 'There are thousands of jobs at risk, but I can't really tell if it is really going to happen or not.'
For now, companies like Swatch are temporarily able to rely on all of the stock they rushed into the US in the first half of the year. The watchmaker has enough sitting in US warehouses to last it for at least three to six months, according to its chief executive.
Knife maker Victorinox, another Swiss brand, meanwhile, said it was looking to make its operations more efficient through automation and 'collaborative solutions with our distribution partners'.
'This is not the first big challenge these export companies have faced over the last 15 to 20 years,' says Atteslander.
If 39pc tariffs do remain in place, companies could explore workarounds. One unlikely benefactor of Trump's trade offensive could be Slovenia, according to Markov, the economist in Geneva.
'Slovenia is a major trading partner and is part of the European Union and the eurozone, so they're subject to 15pc tariffs. Switzerland could, to some extent, bypass the 39pc tariffs by exporting to Slovenia for re-exports to the US.'
Swiss pharmaceuticals have already invested billions into production facilities in the small central European nation. Other industries could follow.
Ultimately, though, Swiss leaders will be hoping to avoid all that. The federal council – the country's governing cabinet – on Monday said Switzerland was prepared to make a 'more attractive offer' to Trump in an effort to negotiate lower tariffs.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Small boat migrants who lodge human rights claims will DODGE removal to France under Labour's new scheme
Small boat migrants who lodge human rights claims in Britain will evade being returned to France under a massive loophole in Labour's new deal. They will be ruled out of new deportation measures if legal claims are outstanding or if they claim to be under 18, it emerged. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said the human rights loophole would be 'ruthlessly exploited' by lawyers. A new treaty with President Emmanuel Macron 's government, published today, also disclosed the British taxpayer will foot the bill for both sides of the deal, which will see migrants who came here illegally across the Channel exchanged 'one for one' with others still in France. Migrants in France will be flown to Britain by the Home Office and handed a visa to live here for up to three months after successfully applying, while their final application is considered. Officials insisted there will be 'rigorous' security checks even though the French will not hand over any personal details on migrants coming here – including any criminal records they may hold on them. The first small boat arrivals could be detained as early as tomorrow for possible removal to France. However, the details of the treaty open up the prospect of human rights lawyers encouraging migrants to lodge spurious claims simply to avoid being earmarked for removal. Under the terms of the agreement the Home Office will confirm after selecting a migrant that 'at the time of their transfer that person will not have an outstanding human rights claim'. It also sets out how removals will be blocked if a migrant has outstanding legal challenges or has obtained an injunction from a court which bars their removal. There was confusion over a further clause referring to human rights claims which have been ruled by Home Office caseworkers to be 'clearly unfounded'. Mr Philp said the drafting of the clause showed even 'clearly unfounded' claims would successfully block deportation – but the Home Office disputed his reading of the text. A migrant attempts to board a dinghy off Gravelines beach, near Dunkirk, last week As it was unveiled for the first time less than a month ago, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer hailed the deal as 'groundbreaking' and promised small boats migrants would be 'detained and returned to France in short order'. Mr Philp said: 'This deal is likely to be completely unworkable and will be ruthlessly exploited by human rights lawyers to prevent people being returned to France. 'Even a 'clearly unfounded' human rights claim will stop a return to France while it goes through a lengthy court process.' He added: 'This deal has no numbers in it - presumably because they are so small. 'And the deal says that France will not provide any information at all about those they are sending to the UK - so they could be criminals or terrorists and we wouldn't know. 'This is a bad deal, which won't work.' The treaty confirmed any migrant who claims to be an 'unaccompanied minor' will not be deported. There has been a series of cases in recent years which have seen asylum seekers falsely claim to be under 18. The UK will fund flights from France for migrants selected to come here under the scheme, the treaty went on, as well as paying for migrants to be removed. Home Office officials who accompany migrants on removals flights will not be allowed to use physical force in France, prompting questions about their safety aboard the aircraft. Both France and the UK will be able to suspend the deal with just one week's notice – and fully terminate it with one month's notice. Separate documents revealed migrants brought to the UK as part of the deal will be barred from working or accessing benefits during the initial three month period, while the Home Office considers whether it will grant a longer visa. It is unclear where the migrants will be housed, however, opening the prospect of them being placed in taxpayer-funded hotels. The number of people accepted from France will have a 'cap' equal to the number of small boat migrants who are sent back under the deal, the documents showed. But the Home Office was unable to confirm the level of the cap. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper repeatedly refused to say how many migrants will be returned under the deal because it 'could help the smuggling gangs'. Last month it was suggested the scheme would see 50 migrants a week sent back to France. At that rate, just 2,200 would be returned before the agreement expires on June 11 next year By comparison, a record 25,436 migrants have reached Britain by small boat since the start of the year, up 49 per cent on the same period last year. Meanwhile, pro-migrant groups have already indicated they are prepared to bring legal challenges against the new policy – just as they did against the previous Conservative government's Rwanda asylum deal. Steve Valdez-Symonds of Amnesty International UK said: 'We anticipate that this deal is likely to face legal challenges from people who quite reasonably will resist being swapped around like mere fodder rather than addressing the claim for asylum they have made.'


The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump is nearly halfway through Project 2025 agenda in just the first six months of his presidency
Nearly half of the initiatives laid out in Project 2025 — which is considered by many to be a blueprint for the second Trump administration — have already been implemented by the president, a rolling analysis has found. Just over six months into Donald Trump's second term, approximately 115 of the 317 objectives set forth in the far-right playbook, authored in 2023 by the Heritage Foundation, have become a reality. That's about 46 percent, according to the Project 2025 Tracker, an online spreadsheet created by two Reddit users and updated as Trump announces policies. It appears to be one of the only publicly available resources regularly updated with data on Project 2025 objectives and administration action. Some of those objectives have been implemented through executive orders, such as shutting down the Department of Education, eliminating diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) language from the federal government, and restoring implementation of the death penalty for certain crimes. Other objectives have been pushed forward through Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which was passed by Congress in July. Some of those objectives include eliminating electric vehicle incentives and adding work requirements for Medicaid. It's unsurprising that many of Project 2025's 'Mandate for Leadership' objectives have become part of Trump's agenda. Several of his senior staff are authors of or contributors to Project 2025, including Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought, Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr, senior trade adviser Peter Navarro, border czar Tom Homan, Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Paul Atkins, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Chief of Protocol Monica Crowley, and others. Other staffers have ties to the Heritage Foundation, which produced the more than 900-page mandate. Despite the administration's close ties to the Heritage Foundation and enacting some nearly identical policies to those named in Project 2025, Trump had insisted on the campaign trail that he knew 'nothing' about the mandate and acted as though he was very unfamiliar with it. The Project 2025 Tracker says that around 63 policies in Project 2025 are currently 'in progress. One example is the language in Project 2025 that encourages the president to revoke guidance that prohibits adoption or foster agencies from discriminating based on sexual orientation or gender identity. While Trump has not signed an executive order directly doing so, his executive order establishing the White House Faith Office includes language that encourages the team to make recommendations 'promoting foster care and adoption programs in partnership with faith-based entities' while promoting religious freedom. In January, Paul Dans, a conservative lawyer who oversaw Project 2025, told CNN t hat Trump's first few actions were 'exactly' what the Heritage Foundation set out to do. 'This is exactly the work we set out to do,' Dans said at the time. 'It's still in the early first stages of bearing fruit, but we wanted to make sure the president was ready to hit the ground running on day one. The rapidity and the depth of what they've rolled out this quickly is a testament to the work done in Project 2025 and other presidential transition projects.'


Daily Record
10 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Donald Trump's bizarre arm gesture after 'nukes on White House roof' claim
Reporters were shouting questions to the American leader at the time. Donald Trump is said to have claimed he wants to install nuclear missiles on the roof of the White House. And seconds after the alleged claim, The President performed an unusual gesture. Reporters had gathered in the White House grounds and shouted questions up at the President, who had been on a tour of the roof of the building during a walkabout. He's planning extensive renovations to the iconic residence and office building. His first change was to pave over the famous Rose Garden - something that has sparked anger among critics. The Mirror reports the next project he has announced is to tack a huge ballroom on the side of the East Wing - designs of which closely resemble the ballroom in his Mar A Lago club in Florida. Today, he responded to questions about what he wanted to build next by apparently shouting " missiles. Nuclear missiles." He pointed to the roof of the White House beneath his feet, then made a stiff-armed gesture, twice. It seems likely that the President was merely miming the launch of a missile. But after the furore around a similar gesture Elon Musk made at a party to celebrate his inauguration, it's likely his critics will note the gesture's similarity to a Nazi salute. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Trump appeared to be taking stock of several areas including the roof of the press briefing room and the Rose Garden. Wearing a suit with a red tie, Trump walked the area with several other people, as someone with them took photographs. Trump may have been surveying ongoing renovation and construction work at the White House. He returned to the presidency with grand ideas for remaking the building, like paving over the Rose Garden and building a massive ballroom. After making observations from the White House roof, Trump walked over to an area above the briefing room, briefly interacting with reporters gathered below. Asked why he was on the roof, Trump said he was 'taking a little walk' and mentioned the 'ballroom on the other side.' Last month, the White House announced construction on a massive, new $200 million ballroom. It is the first structural change to the Executive Mansion itself since the addition of the Truman balcony in 1948 — and work will begin in September. One of the five men with him appeared to be James McCrery, architect for the project. "Just another way to spend my money for this country,' Trump said. 'Anything I do is financed by me."