logo
BIO chair: U.S. has a ‘crisis' on drug costs

BIO chair: U.S. has a ‘crisis' on drug costs

Politico17-06-2025
Driving The Day
NEW BIO CHAIR'S POLICY TAKE — The biotech industry faces a mix of longstanding and novel political challenges amid President Donald Trump's second term. One of its chief lobbying arms is gearing up to take them on.
Ahead of the Biotechnology Innovation Organization's annual convention this week in Boston, Genentech's Fritz Bittenbender — who was elected Monday as the group's board chair — chatted with Lauren about BIO's priority issues, distrust in science and medical institutions and its approach to geopolitical engagement. Pros can read the full Q&A, but here are some highlights and outtakes:
An 'existential policy crisis': Bittenbender used the term to refer to debates around 'intellectual property, how do you pay for medicines, what kind of investments are we going to make at early-stage research' — all of which bring to mind Trump administration priorities like the most-favored-nation approach to bringing down drug prices and limiting National Institutes of Health spending on indirect costs in university research.
'We have a lot of sound-bite policy happening right now, and [most-favored-nation is] a great example of that,' he said, adding that the U.S. health system works much differently from those in allied European countries, often held up as examples of cheaper markets.
How industry can combat distrust in science: Biotechs need to do a better job of communicating the benefits they bring to patients, and they need policymakers' help, Bittenbender said.
'Working with policymakers, and … bringing as much transparency to our industry as we possibly can — using real-world data and digital analytics more effectively to understand postmarketing studies of products on the market and being transparent about that,' he said.
Federal job cuts: Regulatory uncertainty is an 'existential threat' to the industry amid the massive downsizing and restructuring of the Department of Health and Human Services, Bittenbender said.
'If it's going to take 10 or 15 years to bring a product to the market and $1 [billion] to $2 billion to do that, that's a significant investment over a long-term period. And for investors to want to do that, they have to know that there's a certain regulatory environment,' he said. 'They have to know that regulatory timelines are going to be met or exceeded.'
The tariff threat: 'Our industry is a national security imperative for the country, and that means having essential medicines that patients really need manufactured here,' Bittenbender said.
'Hopefully, we won't see tariffs on the pharmaceutical industry, and we work in other ways to get manufacturing into the United States and to ensure that essential medicines that we need in times of emergency or pandemic are sourced from a place that we trust and that we know we can get them,' he added.
IT'S TUESDAY. WELCOME BACK TO PRESCRIPTION PULSE. NPR reports on how music therapy can help cancer patients manage their stress and symptoms.
Send your tips to David Lim (dlim@politico.com, @davidalim or davidalim.49 on Signal) and Lauren Gardner (lgardner@politico.com, @Gardner_LM or gardnerlm.01 on Signal).
Eye on the FDA
SECOND DMD DRUG DEATH — A second patient with Duchenne muscular dystrophy has died after taking Sarepta Therapeutics' Elevidys gene therapy, the company said, prompting a reevaluation of the drug's treatment protocol.
The death occurred in a 15-year-old nonambulatory individual enrolled in the company's randomized, placebo-controlled trial intended to confirm the drug's benefit in patients who can't walk under the FDA's accelerated approval pathway.
A company official said the latest death shares 'some similarities to the previous' death of a teenage boy earlier this year; both fatalities were due to acute liver failure, a known side effect of the viral vector gene therapy used in Elevidys. Sarepta said the signal has emerged only in patients who can't walk, which they consider a surrogate for disease progression.
Sarepta President and CEO Douglas Ingram said the company wants to meet with the FDA 'as rapidly as possible' to establish a new immunosuppressive regimen for nonambulatory patients. Until that's implemented, the company has paused drug shipments for that population, as well as dosing for its clinical trial, it said.
Response: HHS spokesperson Emily Hilliard said the FDA is treating the death 'with the highest level of concern' and 'will take all appropriate regulatory actions to protect patients during our review of gene therapy products.'
The FDA is reviewing a cell therapy candidate from Capricor Therapeutics to treat DMD. The target date for a decision is Aug. 31.
PDUFA PROBLEMS? KalVista Pharmaceuticals raised some eyebrows late last week after announcing that the FDA had disclosed it would miss its Tuesday PDUFA target for the drug sebetralstat, which is used as therapy for hereditary angioedema, 'due to heavy workload and limited resources.' The rare disorder causes episodes of swelling in various parts of the body and can sometimes be fatal.
FDA Commissioner Marty Makary has repeatedly said medical product reviews would continue apace despite thousands of job cuts at the agency, and reviewers were not among the terminated workers. But employees charged with supporting review staff by booking travel and securing supplies were impacted, and drug companies remain concerned about attrition in the remaining workforce.
HHS did not comment.
In Congress
EXPANDED ORPHAN EXEMPTION OUT — The Senate Finance Committee's reconciliation bill strips an effort by the House to expand a Medicare drug price negotiations exemption for orphan drugs to include medicines that treat multiple rare diseases or conditions.
The Congressional Budget Office estimated the policy in the House bill would cost the federal government nearly $5 billion over 10 years, a figure groups like AARP and Patients For Affordable Drugs Now used to urge senators to keep the measure out of the Senate bill.
But pharmaceutical companies argue the provision would incentivize additional investment in rare-disease drug development as the IRA exemption currently applies to orphan drugs that treat a single rare disease.
SANDERS WANTS ACIP INVESTIGATION — Senate HELP ranking member Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) wants his counterpart to open a bipartisan investigation into the removal of 17 members of the CDC's outside vaccine committee.
In his letter to Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), chair of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, Sanders asked for 'serious oversight' of HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s actions regarding the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices.
'Secretary Kennedy's reckless decision to fire these non-partisan scientific experts and replace them with ideologues with limited expertise and a history of undermining vaccines will not only endanger the lives of Americans of all ages, it directly contradicts a commitment he made to you before he was confirmed that he would not make any significant changes to this important Committee,' Sanders wrote to Cassidy.
A spokesperson for Cassidy did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
In the courts
PURDUE SETTLEMENT 2.0 — All 50 states and several U.S. territories have agreed to sign onto a $7.4 billion settlement with Purdue Pharma and its principal owners, the Sackler family, that will resolve state and local government claims.
'The local government sign-on and voting solicitation process for this settlement moving forward will be contingent on bankruptcy court approval,' California Attorney General Rob Bonta's office said in a news release. 'A hearing is scheduled on that matter in the coming days.'
The settlement ends the Sackler family's control of Purdue and prevents them from selling opioids in the country.
Document Drawer
The FDA's Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee will meet on July 18 to discuss Otsuka Pharmaceutical's supplemental new drug application to approve Rexulti to treat adults with post-traumatic stress disorder in combination with sertraline.
The FDA published final guidance outlining recommendations for generic drugmakers on how to submit a pre-submission facility correspondence that can be used to help the agency begin site assessments in advance of submitting an abbreviated new drug application.
WHAT WE'RE READING
The 17 dismissed members of the CDC's vaccine advisory panel published an op-ed in JAMA, saying their abrupt dismissal last week 'undermines the committee's capacity to operate effectively and efficiently, aside from raising questions about competence.'
HHS awarded an Arizona law firm $150,000 for its expertise on the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, NOTUS' Margaret Manto reports, suggesting it's considering policy changes to the 40-year-old system.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump wants to celebrate 250 years of independence with a UFC fight at the White House
Trump wants to celebrate 250 years of independence with a UFC fight at the White House

San Francisco Chronicle​

time28 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Trump wants to celebrate 250 years of independence with a UFC fight at the White House

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — President Donald Trump said Thursday that he's thinking of staging a UFC match on the White House grounds with upwards 20,000 spectators to celebrate 250 years of American independence. 'We have a lot of land there,' said Trump, a UFC enthusiast who has attended several of its mixed martial arts matches in recent months and is close friends with Dana White, the league's president. Trump announced his plan in Iowa during the kickoff for a year's worth of festivities to celebrate America's 250th birthday on July 4, 2026. The Republican president also announced a culminating festival on the National Mall in Washington, and a separate athletic competition featuring high school athletes from across the country. 'So every one of our national parks, battlefields and historic sites are going to have special events in honor of America 250. And I even think we're going to have a UFC fight," Trump said. ″Think of this on the grounds of the White House. We have a lot of land there," he said, adding that it would be a 'full fight' with 20,000 to 25,000 people. Trump has recently enjoyed standing ovations and cage-side seats for several UFC fights, including an appearance immediately after his 2024 reelection and another just last month alongside White for two championship fights.

How Traders Capitalized on Oil's Extreme Price Swings
How Traders Capitalized on Oil's Extreme Price Swings

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How Traders Capitalized on Oil's Extreme Price Swings

The oil market didn't disappoint rollercoaster-ride fans in the first half of the year with wild price swings and sudden dips and price hikes. U.S. trade policies, OPEC+ production policies, and the on-and-off war premium have all influenced market movements and traders' behavior and strategies at some point over the past six oil prices traded in a fairly narrow range in the first quarter of the year, in the low to mid $70s per barrel. Hedge funds and other portfolio managers expected a recovery in China's industrial activity and oil consumption amid continued OPEC+ production cuts. Traders bet on stronger global oil demand amid restricted supply, while the Fed signaled inflation is tamed and additional interest rate cuts would follow soon. However, the price of oil collapsed at the start of the second quarter. U.S. President Donald Trump announced sweeping tariffs on all countries, threatened a trade war with Canada, America's top trading partner, and intensified trade pressures on China. The so-called 'retaliatory' tariffs on dozens of countries—now suspended—plunged the equity and oil markets into chaos. Speculators began to fear recessions, including in the United States. Investment banks elevated the risk of a U.S. recession to a base-case scenario. Traders bet on falling oil prices, amassing short positions. To compound the price slump, the OPEC+ group began in April what analysts believe is a strategy to regain market share and punish U.S. shale. The alliance led by Saudi Arabia has been consistently raising collective output by 411,000 barrels per day (bpd) each month, nearly triple the volume originally scheduled. OPEC+ continues to cite 'current healthy oil market fundamentals' to justify its production hikes. In reality, the group has been adding lower volumes than the baseline figure of 411,000 bpd, as some producers appear to now sincerely work to compensate for previous overproduction. Such is the case of Iraq, OPEC's second-biggest producer after Saudi Arabia. But non-OPEC Kazakhstan has been openly defying the group's targets as it continues to raise production from projects involving international majors such as Chevron. Kazakhstan's Energy Minister Yerlan Akkenzhenov confirmed in May that 'the republic has no right to enforce production cuts' on foreign operators. Despite Kazakhstan's production growth, the OPEC+ producers are adding fewer barrels to the market than the headline figure of 411,000 bpd. Compliance and compensation levels have been and will be key for traders and investors to guesstimate how much additional crude OPEC+ is really adding each month. For now, it looks like OPEC+ is going after market share and depressing prices for the U.S. shale producers. In the latest Dallas Fed Energy Survey out this week, 61% of executives expect their firms' oil production would decrease slightly from June 2025 to June 2026 if the WTI price remained at $60 per barrel. At WTI price at $50 per barrel, 46% of executives expect their firms' oil production would decrease significantly from June 2025 to June the slump in April and May, oil prices jumped in June to a four-month high at the beginning of the 12-day war between Israel and Iran. Traders feared a disruption to oil and gas supply from the Middle East, and were speculating that the mother of all disruptions – an Iranian attempt to close the Strait of Hormuz – shouldn't be too easily discarded. With the start of the conflict, traders hiked their bullish bets on oil prices by the most since last October. At the same time, short positions – bearish bets that prices would drop – hit the lowest level in four months. The price spike was short-lived as the U.S. ended the conflict (for now) by bombing three Iranian nuclear sites. The ceasefire added volatility to the market, which saw wild swings in June and traders followed the trends. Related: Brent crude surged by more than 30% in just three weeks, peaking on June 23, before nose-diving in its biggest two-day drop since 2022, erasing most of the gains from summer demand expectations and the Middle East risk premium, Ole Hansen, Head of Commodity Strategy at Saxo Bank, said in a commentary early this week. The latest commitment of traders reporting week to June 24 saw a dramatic unwind across commodities, sparked by the sudden easing of Middle East tensions following a U.S.-brokered ceasefire, Hansen added. 'Crude oil took the biggest hit, with WTI and Brent futures tumbling 12%, while gold and silver also lost their shine as safe-haven demand faded.' Trend-following funds and managed money accounts reacted swiftly to the fading war premium, unloading 95,500 crude oil contracts and wiping out more than half of the previous three weeks' buildup. Brent saw the biggest unwinding in longs, with the net long position – the difference between bullish and bearish bets – slashed by 29%, Saxo Bank's Hansen noted. Going forward, traders will take clues from geopolitics and U.S. trade policies, the OPEC+ moves to add supply to the market, the Fed's dot plot of the pace of expected interest rate cuts, the strength (or weakness) of peak summer oil demand, and the ever-present but currently subdued war risk premium in the Middle East. By Tsvetana Paraskova for More Top Reads From this article on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

White knuckles and ‘massive unknowns' ahead of Trump's July 9th tariff deadline
White knuckles and ‘massive unknowns' ahead of Trump's July 9th tariff deadline

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

White knuckles and ‘massive unknowns' ahead of Trump's July 9th tariff deadline

The 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs is set to expire on July 9, and U.S. consumers and investors are left waiting in limbo as President Donald Trump negotiates deals with trade partners. Experts tell Fortune Trump's next moves could put his credibility in question, as he's already walked back on previous tariff hikes after his 'Liberation Day' announcement. The countdown to the 90-day freeze on sweeping Liberation Day tariffs expires next week, and President Donald Trump's administration is a far cry from its '90 deals in 90 days' goal. Trump's self-imposed July 9 deadline follows his sweeping reciprocal tariffs address in April, which sparked global panic and caused the S&P to shed $5 trillion in value in about two days. As next week's deadline approaches, the Trump administration has announced new trade agreements with countries including China, the U.K., Vietnam and Indonesia—but details about these agreements are scant, and no word of further deals being made yet has left U.S. consumers and investors with little clarity. Investors have grown accustomed to the 'TACO,' or Trump Always Chickens Out trade, where markets fall when Trump announces steep tariffs on imports and then jump back up when he pauses them. But experts say this pattern can't last forever. 'Time's ticking to get deal frameworks in place,' Wedbush Securities Senior Equity Research Analyst Dan Ives told Fortune. 'Even though the market has shrugged it off, for businesses that operate every day, there's massive unknowns and a lot of white knuckles. It's a key week and a key few months ahead [for] tariffs.' Economists already expect current tariff rates to increase costs on consumer goods this summer—these prices could increase further after July 9. Pantheon Macroeconomics economists wrote in a note on Thursday that there is an 'imminent risk' of a temporary jump in tariffs rates across the board as the deadline nears. If imposed, reciprocal rates could boost consumer prices from tariffs to 1.5% from 1% under the current tariff rates, they wrote. But experts are skeptical that Trump will maintain any reciprocal rates imposed next week, as he's lowered rates in the past as talks with trade partners have continued. Trump and China formalized a rare earth deal in June, after Trump briefly charged 125% duties on Chinese imports in April. 'In the end, however, we expect any ratcheting-up of the tariffs to be short-lived. Other countries will respond forcefully; they all saw Mr. Trump fold to pressure from China in May,' the Pantheon economists wrote. 'The weaker economic backdrop compared to April and the further decline in the president's approval rating since then also suggest an eventual climbdown is likely.' Some experts even anticipate little change as the deadline approaches, as current pacts with major trade partners still need to be refined. 'So far we have a tiny number of agreements which are themselves not very detailed,' UBS Chief Economist Paul Donovan told Fortune in an email Thursday. 'The Chinese 'agreement' is simply a partial de-escalation of an unsustainable deal. The UK 'agreement' is partially implemented with plenty of disagreement on the outstanding details. The deadline is likely to serve as a point from which further extensions or continuation of negotiations will be announced.' Trump's credibility in question Markets have grown accustomed to Trump walking back on extreme tariffs threats. Now, experts say Trump's next moves will inform whether countries in negotiations with the U.S. have a similar mentality. '[Trump] certainly doesn't want to be accused of chickening out because it would hurt his credibility in any future negotiations,' Thierry Wizman, Macquarie Group financial markets economist, told Fortune. 'The focus is always on showing that he can in fact cut you off.' Wizman does expect some deals to be announced, though, which he says will be touted by the administration. 'Trump can always come out and say, 'We have a deal,' but it will be a deal that's very narrow in scope. So they'll segregate the things that they have agreed on and say that's a deal like with China,' Wizman said. 'There's a whole bunch of ways this can go right, and it's also a whole bunch of ways it can be spun.' Experts say to expect continued talks past July 9 with many major trading partners like the EU. 'The deadline is probably not going to change very much—mostly the status quo will be retained while negotiations continue with more or less vigour depending on the importance of the bilateral relationship,' UBS' Donovan wrote, 'Uncertainty about the ultimate outcome will persist. If there is any attempt to escalate, investors are likely to shrug their shoulders and wait for U.S. President Trump to retreat.' Trade with China China accounts for about 37.6% of U.S. imports this year, according to supply chain intelligence platform project44. This is a 0.1% increase from 2024. Still, Wizman says whatever trade agreements to come in the near future may look to lock out China from moving capital in and out of other countries' supply chains. He says this may be a focus in trade agreements with countries like Japan, South Korea and the EU. 'If you can get these countries to depend on bilateral trade with the U.S. and depend less on China, then you basically bolt these countries into the U.S. orbit permanently,' Wizman said. This story was originally featured on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store