logo
The secret choice Starmer has already made to save the UK from nuclear war

The secret choice Starmer has already made to save the UK from nuclear war

Metro2 days ago

Within hours of becoming Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer was given a job that is literally a matter of life or death.
Tony Blair reportedly 'turned white' when he was told to complete the order, while John Major said it was 'one of the most difficult things I've ever had to do.'
The momentous task bestowed upon any new leader is to write four identical letters of instruction.
Known as the Letters of Last Resort, each detail what the UK should do in the face of nuclear attack if all those in authority have died.
It's something that has been done since 1969 when the UK started using submarines for their deterrent, and the contents of the letters have always been kept top secret.
'When a new Prime Minister walks into office one of the very first things that happens is that they get briefed on the Trident nuclear weapon programme and the mechanisms for their release,' explains Paul Ingram, Research Affiliate at the University of Cambridge Centre for the Study of Existential Risk. 'The letter are a command to the submarines if London has been hit and leadership has been decapitated above ground.'
Once penned, the instructions are put into a safe within a safe, alongside another letter of instructions on the final steps that need to be taken before opening the Letter of Last Resort from the PM.
They are then delivered to the commanding officers of the Vangaurd, a fleet of four submarines that carry nuclear deterrents.
Once a PM steps down, their letters are burnt without ever being opened, so no one will ever know what they chose to do.
While no one knows for sure, according to a Radio 4 documentary The Human Button , there are said to be four options given by the PM: do nothing, find an ally (suggestions are thought to be America or Australia), use their own judgement, or – the most deadly decision of all – retaliate with nuclear weapons.
'With the PM presumed dead, the commander may well opt to use their own judgement given they are alive and able to use brain cells,' adds Paul. 'Yes, these are are trained military people, trained to follow orders but they are also human beings.'
It's little wonder that writing these letters weigh heavy on the shoulders of those in power.
The Royal Navy's Vanguard Class consists of the four nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines – HMS Vanguard, Vengeance, Victorious and Vigilant – which carry a deadly amount of weaponry.
'Each submarine has 12 operational tubes which can deploy between 8-12 missiles and, it's believed, around 50 warheads, explains Paul.
'That's seven or eight times as destructive as the bomb which flattened Hiroshima in 1945, killing over 140,000 civilians.'
Tom Unterrainer, Chair of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, tells Metro: 'Within hours of a Prime Minister entering power they are indoctrinated into a nuclear framework. In their briefing they are taken through a number of scenarios by senior military – which cities do they hit, how many will die, what are the possible repercussions.
'Writing the letter is one of the first acts of an incoming PM, but at no point during the election campaign has anyone really asked the question of what Keir Starmer thinks about unleashing mass death genocidal nuclear war the world… It's a weird one.'
The letters are only to be opened if a nuclear attack has killed or otherwise incapacitated both the Prime Minister and their designated 'second person' – usually a high-ranking member of the Cabinet such as the deputy prime minister or the first secretary of state – and if all contact with Naval command has been lost.
One of the indications that British Government may have been destroyed is, randomly, said to include the BBC Radio 4 Today programme. According to Lord Peter Hennessy, a history professor and Member of The House of Lords, if it isn't heard for three consecutive days it's a sign that something is very seriously wrong.
However, there are of course other triggers, explains Paul.
'When on patrol these submarines have very limited communications with mainland and it only goes one way. If they were to reach out from the depths of the ocean it could potentially give their location away. They essentially have to sit and wait.
'So if those signals from the Admiralty were to stop for a prolonged period, that would be one trigger. They would also listen out for broadcasts such as the World Service – and maybe Radio 4 – and if they were absent, the submarine would then come up to the shallows to see if they could get signal.
'Again, this could cause them to be a target, so it is a decision that couldn't be taken lightly. However, if the world appeared dark above ground, that would be another sign something has happened.'
In the event of a doomsday scenario, the Vanguard commander will open the safes containing the letter and carry out the instructions contained within.
'The assumption is that the person who has written them is already a corpse, so the question really is do they follow the instructions of a dead person or not – especially when it could contribute to the destruction of all life,' says Tom.
'I've worked with Commander Robert Forsyth, who was on the Polaris nuclear submarine, and he did something called the perisher course. This trains those on the subs the drill to fire weapons and the choices they have to make. They get a legal briefing and reassurances, but in reality there are still big question marks surrounding the laws of war.'
'If the commander decides to retaliate, they would then consult with two other officers on board,' adds Paul. 'If all three agree they would plot their targets and programme their missiles. Then they would use a dual key system and a trigger to fire the weapons.'
To give an idea of the extent of damage, Tom says, 'If a fully loaded, powered up weapon was launched and hit somewhere London, it would all be gone. There would be firestorms, millions dead in an instant.'
James Callaghan, who was Prime Minister from 1976-1979, is the only former leader to reveal what he would have done.
'If we had got to that point where it was, I felt, necessary to do it – then I would have done it,' he told a BBC documentary in 1988.
'I've had terrible doubts of course about this. And I say to you that if I had lived after having pressed that button, I would never, never have forgiven myself.'
Meanwhile, despite spending a lifetime trying to ban nuclear weapons, when Jeremy Corbyn was standing for election in 2019, he said that if elected PM he would write the letters.
'I will write the appropriate letters to our commanders,' he said, adding that 'any nuclear weapon used anywhere in the world is a disaster.'
In 335 BC, Alexander the Great burned the Greek city of Thebes to the ground, spreading destruction and devastation to send a firm message to the cityfolk who tried to revolt against him.
One of the only buildings he left standing in the middle of the ruins was the home of a poet he admired, whose name was Pindar.
If nuclear war was to break out today, and central London was flattened by several megatons of explosive force, the Prime Minister and top military figures would likely be sheltering in one of the few places left unaffected.
It is also called Pindar.
Our senior political reporter Craig Munro has the full story here.
Disaster films almost always start the same way. A crowded supermarket, ping after ping as shoppers' phones go off, screams.
An asteroid, a tsunami, an earthquake, World War III. Something – or someone – is about to upend the world.
But whatever the impending disaster is, experts tell Metro it won't be mobile phones that people will rely on to survive.
It'll be something a little more old-school.
'Crises can take many forms,' Dr Colin Alexander, a senior lecturer in political communications at Nottingham Trent University, says.
'However, radio remains the go-to medium of communication in these moments.'
You can find our deep dive into what happens when the world is silenced here.
'Starmer has said he's been prepared to use nuclear weapons – all the party leaders have,' says Tom. 'Which is essentially saying you're willing to push a button that can unleash genocidal nuclear war on planet earth. That's the level we're operating on.' More Trending
For Paul, if he was asked to write the Letters, his instructions would be to 'either do nothing or find an ally,' he says.
'The point of the Vangaurd missiles is to act as a deterrent, for other countries to know that even if you destroyed government above ground, there is the risk of an attack from the ocean.
'For me, those missiles aren't for retribution, they are to deter action. So sending warheads off after London had been destroyed would be a war crime and a gratuitous murder of millions of civilians.'
Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Claie.Wilson@metro.co.uk
Share your views in the comments below.
MORE: Six places which could be safe if World War Three erupts – including two in UK
MORE: 'I was 17 when I had my first day of school'
MORE: How close was Iran to making a nuclear bomb and what's really going on with Israel's nuclear program?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rod Stewart comes out in support of Reform UK
Rod Stewart comes out in support of Reform UK

The Independent

time17 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Rod Stewart comes out in support of Reform UK

Rocker Rod Stewart has publicly endorsed Nigel Farage and the Reform UK party, urging his fans to give Farage a chance. Stewart expressed dissatisfaction with the current government and criticised Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer 's new Brexit deal, stating he is also 'fed up with the Tories'. He said Farage is coming across well as a political option for the UK. Stewart's current support for Farage contrasts with his 2024 criticism of the politician for blaming the West for the war in Ukraine. Stewart has been a vocal supporter of Ukraine since the conflict began, even renting out a home for a refugee family.

I think Keir Starmer's ineptitude here takes some beating
I think Keir Starmer's ineptitude here takes some beating

The Herald Scotland

time2 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

I think Keir Starmer's ineptitude here takes some beating

Sir Keir Starmer pays for that first challenge through reputational damage. We will all pay for the second challenge through other spending curbs and possible tax hikes. I have covered politics for the odd decade. I have witnessed missteps aplenty by leaders from each and every political party. However, the ineptitude displayed here takes some beating. Read More: Consider the PM's demeanour. There he was at the NATO summit, promising a substantial increase in defence spending. Which, in itself, leaves some Labour MPs disquieted. Asked about the growing insurrection over cuts to disability payments, he dismissed the complaints as 'noises off'. Cue yet more anger from discontented backbenchers, furious that their genuine concerns for the disadvantaged were downplayed in such a fashion. Then, inevitably changing tack, he conceded on Thursday that there would be talks with the dissidents, aimed at achieving a settlement in line with 'Labour values of fairness.' The rebels duly entered those talks. But many were privately asking themselves what happened to those 'Labour values' when Ministers proposed a package of reforms which their own official advisers said would push a quarter of a million people into poverty, including 50,000 children. For pity's sake, what did Sir Keir and his Cabinet think the reaction would be to such a forecast? Meek acquiescence? In viewing this spectacle, I could not help thinking of Neil Kinnock's 1985 conference speech, condemning Militant, when he summoned up 'the grotesque chaos of a Labour council – a Labour council – hiring taxis to scuttle round a city handing out redundancy notices to its own workers.' Change the accent, excise the oratory and you have Keir Starmer heading a Labour government – a Labour government – driving people into poverty with cuts in disability support. Sir Keir has now performed a hat-trick of U-turns. On winter fuel payments, on a statutory inquiry into grooming gangs – and on welfare. This is by far the most substantive. Can he come back from this? He can – although there is a much shorter electoral timetable in Scotland. But, still, it makes us revisit basic questions about his leadership. Firstly, last July's big Labour win is not solely or even chiefly down to him. He entered Downing Street because folk were heartily sick of the Tories – and sought a conduit to kick them out. As things stand, Reform seem to be offering an alternative for those who have broadened their disgust – and are utterly sick of established politics, full stop. Secondly, with some exceptions, the team around him have failed to shine. Including the Chancellor. Was there really nobody to suggest gently that the emperor was somewhat short of bodily cover on the benefits issue? Were they, perhaps understandably to some degree, so engrossed in global crisis that they failed to notice – or, rather, sufficiently address – the concerns of their backbenchers over the most distressed and disadvantaged of our citizens? Thirdly, and ironically, the very weakness of the Conservatives adds to Sir Keir's problems. To be blunt, he has nothing to beat. Relatively little is required of him in the Commons or in public discourse. Finally, those Labour values. When you contemplate Sir Keir, do you really summon up principles such as egalitarianism and fairness? Yes, you will know of his upbringing, His mum, the nurse. His father, the toolmaker. He told us often enough. But do values of commonality and collective endeavour shine through from him? I get the concept. He took over from Jeremy Corbyn and felt obliged to stress that Labour had moved from the Left, had changed – and would, consequently, change the country. On assuming office, Rachel Reeves felt the need to assuage the markets with a balanced budget. Hence the stress she placed upon curbing winter fuel payments. For a Labour Chancellor, it was deliberately counter-intuitive. Again, I get it. In due course, they backed down on winter fuel. And the cuts to disability benefits went too far for their party. Way too far. And for the voters. By chance, I chaired a conference on the issue in Glasgow this month. Two things stood out. Deep, genuine apprehension over the benefit cuts. And entrenched distrust over the package of support for getting jobs. Labour know they got this badly wrong. The emphasis on job creation needed to come first. The cuts needed to be moderated. Both will now happen. Sir Keir will insist that reform is still on track. However, this has been a fundamentally damaging episode for the PM. I understand the motivation. The desire to be fiscally cautious, to generate funds for spending in other quarters. But this was the wrong target, introduced in the wrong way. No doubt temporarily, Sir Keir seemed to forget which party he was leading – and in which legislature. He is Prime Minister, primus inter pares, completely dependent upon Commons votes. Not a dismissive, stand-alone President. Those were not 'noises off'. They were concerns voiced by his backbenchers, his supporters, the bulwark of his power. Then there is Scotland. Where former Labour Minister Brian Wilson, writing in The Herald, urged a rethink to avoid 'a deep and lasting split'. Where former MSP Neil Findlay questioned the sanity of Labour MPs – while warning that their chances of re-election would be reduced, not enhanced. Where the Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar was left stranded. Backing the principle of reform – while urging 'fairness'. In practice, as his MP colleagues made up their minds, his influence appeared minimal. He was duly lampooned by John Swinney at Holyrood – as the SNP cited figures indicating that child poverty is down in Scotland, by contrast with England and Wales. There is a way back for the PM. There is almost always a way back. But this has been deeply, deeply damaging. For Sir Keir Starmer, never glad confident morning again. Brian Taylor is a former political editor for BBC Scotland and a columnist for The Herald. He cherishes his family, the theatre – and Dundee United FC

Ireland's media watchdog defends €500,000 funding of ‘Kneecap' film as Belfast rappers prepare for Glastonbury gig
Ireland's media watchdog defends €500,000 funding of ‘Kneecap' film as Belfast rappers prepare for Glastonbury gig

Belfast Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Belfast Telegraph

Ireland's media watchdog defends €500,000 funding of ‘Kneecap' film as Belfast rappers prepare for Glastonbury gig

Irish media regulator boss has defended his decision to give nearly half a million euro (£427k) in funding to Kneecap's film. The Belfast rap trio will take to the stage at Glastonbury this afternoon, despite opposition from UK prime minister Keir Starmer who said he did not feel it was 'appropriate' given the current court case against band member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store