logo
Ayotte vetoes partisan elections for school offices

Ayotte vetoes partisan elections for school offices

Yahoo08-07-2025
Calling it a 'system that is not broken,' Gov. Kelly Ayotte vetoed legislation to allow any city or town to hold partisan school district elections.
House chair urged lawmakers to let school races be partisan
House Election Laws Chairman Ross Berry, R-Weare, had been a big supporter of the bill to allow any city or town to decide their school district elections would be partisan. Gov. Kelly Ayotte vetoed the bill Monday.
The Republican-led Legislature had approved the bill (HB 356) largely along party lines, after its supporters maintained that it would help voters know the political affiliations of candidates on the ballot.
'This attempts to solve the low voter turnout in smaller towns. High voter turnout is good for democracy,' House Election Laws Committee Chairman Ross Berry, R-Weare, told a Senate panel in May.
'Non-partisan elections often enable candidates to disguise their true intentions. This bill would assist voters in understanding what or who they are voting for.'
Ayotte said the change could be counter-productive.
'Local school board elections are run properly and in a nonpartisan manner, and there is no need to fix a system that is not broken. Making these local elections into partisan fights will create unnecessary division between Granite Staters,' Ayotte wrote in her veto message. 'For the reason stated above, I have vetoed House Bill 356.'
Two-term Rep. Robert Wherry, R-Hudson, authored the bill.
The solid opposition from House and Senate Democrats will ensure Ayotte would win this veto override fight since it would need two-thirds to override her decision.
The House passed the bill on an unrecorded vote of 200-173, which just about mirrored the Republican vs. Democratic attendance in the House on March 27.
In May, the Senate Election Laws and Municipal Affairs Committee surprisingly recommended the bill be killed by a 3-2 count.
School board lobby stayed neutral
When it reached the full Senate days later, however, a move to kill it failed, 13-10, with all GOP senators present voting to keep the bill alive and all Senate Democrats wanting to turn it down.
Sen. Kevin Avard, R-Nashua, was absent for that vote.
Barrett Christina, executive director of the New Hampshire School Boards Association, said the group took no position on the matter.
A partisan election provision for town elections has been a law since 1970, though it has rarely been used, he said.
'Less politics in school is a good thing' Christina said. 'The availability of certain political parties to caucus behind closed doors raises significant concerns for NHSBA.'
Senate's top Democrat warned partisan elections could sow more division
Senate Democratic Leader Rebecca Perkins Kwoka of Perkins said a bill to allow cities and towns to make their school races partisan could lead to more division in the community.
Senate Democratic Leader Rebecca Perkins Kwoka of Portsmouth had raised the argument that partisan elections could lead to more division in the community.
Berry said partisanship already exists in most school elections and the bill would provide more transparency for voters.
Before Berry's House committee, 10 signed up in favor of the bill and 444 against.
There were even fewer signed up to take a stand on the bill before the Senate panel.
What's Next: The House and Senate are likely to return to session this fall for a single day to take up Ayotte vetoes; because this is a House bill, the first test will come in that chamber.
Prospects: Barring abysmal attendance by House Democrats on that day, Ayotte is highly likely to have the veto sustained.
klandrigan@unionleader.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

OPEC Plus Will Increase Oil Output
OPEC Plus Will Increase Oil Output

New York Times

time23 minutes ago

  • New York Times

OPEC Plus Will Increase Oil Output

Eight countries that belong to the oil cartel known as OPEC Plus said Sunday that they would boost oil production by 547,000 barrels a day beginning in September, the latest in a series of monthly increases that began in April. The move, in effect, reverses a program of 2.2 million barrels a day in output cuts that was put in place in 2023 to tighten supply and prop up the markets. The announcement from OPEC Plus was expected and so may have little impact on prices. 'We expect a limited negative market reaction,' analysts at the investment bank Jefferies said in a note to clients after the announcement. After years of pursuing production restraints, the group, led by Saudi Arabia, is taking advantage of what analysts view as a relatively short-term window in the oil market to boost output. The United Arab Emirates and other countries have chafed at restraints on production that have opened the way for the United States and other producers outside OPEC Plus to pump more oil. In addition, Saudi Arabia and other oil-producing countries appear to have an interest in pleasing President Trump, who wants lower gasoline prices for American drivers. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store